[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 54 (Thursday, April 3, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H2762]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




  LIMITATION ON AMENDMENTS DURING FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 1559, 
        EMERGENCY WARTIME SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2003

  Mr. YOUNG of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that 
during consideration of H.R. 1559 in the Committee of the Whole 
pursuant to House Resolution 172 no further amendments to the bill may 
be offered except:
  Pro forma amendments offered by the chairman or ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Appropriations or their designees for the 
purpose of debate; amendments numbered 2, 7, 8 and 9 in the 
Congressional Record; and amendments specified in the list that I have 
placed at the desk.
  Each such amendment may be offered only by the Member designated in 
this request, or a designee, or the Member who caused it to be printed, 
or a designee, shall be considered as read, shall not be subject to 
amendment, except pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate, and 
shall not be subject to a demand for a division of the question in the 
House or in the Committee of the Whole; any point of order against such 
an amendment shall be considered as reserved pending completion of 
debate thereon; and any such amendment may be withdrawn by its 
proponent after debate thereon.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will read the list.
  The Clerk read as follows:

       Mr. McGovern regarding reducing funding for counter-drug 
     activities; Mr. Obey regarding cuts for Colombia money 
     transferred to port security; Mr. DeFazio reducing funding 
     for Turkey and increasing for National Guard; Mr. DeFazio 
     regarding limitation on military activity not authorized by 
     Congress; Mrs. Tauscher regarding nonproliferation; Mr. 
     Sherman regarding economic support fund; Mr. Reyes regarding 
     money to joint task force for borders; Ms. Jackson-Lee of 
     Texas regarding $50 million for SEVIS; Mr. Nadler regarding 
     port security; Mr. Wu and Mr. Scott regarding airline 
     bailout; Mr. Flake regarding airline bailout; Ms. Millender-
     McDonald regarding transit security; Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas 
     regarding Office for Domestic Preparedness; Ms. Jackson-Lee 
     of Texas regarding Office for Domestic Preparedness; Ms. 
     Jackson-Lee of Texas regarding Office for Domestic 
     Preparedness; Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Substance Abuse/
     Medical Health; Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Department of 
     Health and Human Services; Mr. Allen regarding IDEA and No 
     Child Left Behind Act, no offset; Mr. Crowley regarding $100 
     million for Pakistan limitation; Mr. Crowley regarding Hero 
     bill; Mr. DeFazio regarding unemployment compensation for 
     airline workers; Mr. Edwards, regarding airline 
     discontinuation of service near bases; Mr. Israel regarding 
     Commercial Airline Protection for Surface to Air Missiles; 
     Mr. Kucinich regarding Limitation Amendment that require all 
     contracts acquired for the reconstruction of Iraq to be 
     subject to competitive bidding, as stated in the Federal 
     Acquisition Regulation and the USAID Acquisition Regulation; 
     Mr. Kucinich Regarding Limitation amendment that restricts 
     funds in Title I, Chapter 3 ``Operation Iraqi Freedom 
     Response Fund;'' Mr. Rangel regarding $450 million from Iraq 
     to school improvement; Mr. Rodriguez regarding adding $70 
     million for veterans health care; Mr. Turner regarding 
     homeland security report; Ms. Waters regarding IDB; Ms. 
     Waters regarding conflict of interest; Ms. Waters regarding 
     HUD community development; Mr. Hoeffel regarding strike $68 
     million from Colombia. Transfer peacekeeping to Iraq; Mr. 
     Stupak regarding health care for Iraq; Mr. Wu regarding 
     airline bailout; Mr. Rothman regarding airspace restrictions; 
     Mr. Nethercutt regarding limitation on use of Iraq funds; Mr. 
     Kennedy of Minnesota regarding limitation on the use of Iraq 
     funds; and Mr. Hoekstra regarding AmeriCorps.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Florida?
  Mr. OBEY. Mr. Speaker, reserving the right to object, did the Clerk 
read two or three amendments to be potentially offered by the 
gentlewoman from California (Ms. Waters)?
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Three.
  Mr. OBEY. Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my reservation of objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Florida?
  There was no objection.

                          ____________________