[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 18, 2003)]
[House]
[Pages H1915-H1917]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NICARAGUA PROPERTY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT ACT OF 2003
Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 868) to amend section 527 of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 to require that certain
claims for expropriation by the Government of Nicaragua meet certain
requirements for purposes of the prohibition on foreign assistance to
that government.
The Clerk read as follows:
H.R. 868
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Nicaragua Property Dispute
Settlement Act of 2003''.
SEC. 2. CERTAIN CLAIMS FOR EXPROPRIATION BY THE GOVERNMENT OF
NICARAGUA.
Section 527 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act,
Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995 (22 U.S.C. 2370a) is amended by
adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(i) Certain Claims for Expropriation by Government of
Nicaragua.--(1) Any action of the types set forth in
subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of subsection (a)(1) that was
taken by the Government of Nicaragua during the period
beginning on January 1, 1956, and ending on January 9, 2002,
shall not be considered in implementing the prohibition under
subsection (a) unless the action has been presented in
accordance with the procedure set forth in paragraph (2)
``(2) An action shall be deemed presented for purposes of
paragraph (1) if it is--
``(A) in writing; and
``(B) received by the Department of State on or before 120
days after the date specified in paragraph (3) at--
``(i) the headquarters of the Department of State in
Washington, D.C.; or
``(ii) the Embassy of the United States of America to
Nicaragua.
``(3) The date to which paragraph (2) refers is a date
after the enactment of this subsection that is specified by
the Secretary of State, in the Secretary's discretion, in a
notice published in the Federal Register.''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
North Carolina (Mr. Ballenger) and the gentleman from California (Mr.
Lantos) each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr.
Ballenger).
General Leave
Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their
remarks and include extraneous material on the bill under
consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentleman from North Carolina?
There was no objection.
Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, section 527 of the ``Foreign Relations Authorization
Act, fiscal years 1994 and 1995,'' sanctions or stops certain U.S.
bilateral assistance and U.S. support for assistance from International
Financial Institutions for a government of a country that has
confiscated a U.S. citizen's property. Nicaragua sadly falls amongst
these rules of section 527, but has received Presidential waivers of
the sanctions every year since the legislation was enacted.
American citizens have had nearly 12 years to come forward to file
property claims with the American embassy. This bill amends section 527
to afford American citizens a reasonable opportunity to file a claim
with the American embassy in Managua.
Any American citizen who has not yet filed a property claim with the
American embassy will have 120 days after the notice is published in
the Federal Register to do so. Any claims already on file or that are
filed within the 120-day period can continue to be considered by the
State Department in making its annual determination as to whether to
apply the waiver or the sanctions authorized under section 527.
This bill would not, however, prevent American citizens from filing
property
[[Page H1916]]
claims after the 120-day period and seeking help from the American
embassy in Managua to engage on their behalf with the Government of
Nicaragua regarding their claim.
At the same time, the bill sets a date certain that the Nicaraguan
government can look to as an end date for registering new property
cases for the purpose of the prohibition on assistance currently in
law. This will provide important encouragement for the government of
President Enrique Bolanos, who is an ally of the United States.
Nicaragua is one of the poorest countries in the Western Hemisphere and
continued American assistance to Nicaragua is vitally important.
Mr. Speaker, the Government of Nicaragua has incurred $236 million in
debt to pay these claims. The Bush administration supports the bill. I
also want to thank my friend, the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr.
Delahunt), for cosponsoring this bill with me. I urge my colleagues to
support this resolution.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of this resolution, and I
yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I first would like to applaud the gentleman from
Illinois (Mr. Hyde), the chairman of the Committee on International
Relations, for expediting consideration of this very important bill in
support of President Enrique Bolanos and his administration. I also
want to acknowledge the two cosponsors of this bill, the gentleman from
North Carolina (Mr. Ballenger) and the gentleman from Massachusetts
(Mr. Delahunt), my good friend, who has been one of our leaders on all
Western Hemisphere affairs.
Mr. Speaker, the world last year witnessed the constitutional and
peaceful transfer of power in Nicaragua from one democratically elected
president to another. The inauguration of President Bolanos thus
represented the further consolidation of democracy in Nicaragua after
many decades of authoritarian rule.
Since his inauguration, President Bolanos and his administration have
struggled to reinvigorate the Nicaraguan economy, create jobs, reduce
widespread poverty, and battle institutionalized corruption. Although
the task is daunting, as Nicaragua remains to this day the second
poorest country in the Western Hemisphere after despairingly devastated
Haiti, it is not insurmountable with the help of allies like the United
States.
H.R. 868 reflects our commitment to assisting Nicaragua in meeting
its many challenges in a couple of ways. First, the Nicaragua Property
Dispute Settlement Act enables us to bolster the efforts of the
Nicaraguan administration to address the claims of U.S. citizens who
have had property expropriated by previous Nicaraguan administrations.
Equally importantly, our legislation signals our strong support for the
new administration as it attempts to purge Nicaraguan institutions of
cronyism and corruption.
As we consider H.R. 868, I am confident that President Bolanos is as
resolved as we are to strengthen the ties between our two countries by
working together on issues of common concern like voting patterns at
the United Nations.
I encourage all of my colleagues to support this bill.
Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am delighted to yield such time as he may
consume to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Delahunt), my good
friend and distinguished colleague.
Mr. DELAHUNT. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California (Mr.
Lantos) for yielding me this time.
Mr. Speaker, a constituent once asked if minor pieces of legislation
that we consider on the suspension calendar actually matter,
particularly those that concern foreign nations. My response was that
it is important to remember, especially in this era of the Internet and
instant communication and CNN, that what might appear to be trivial to
us is seen quite differently elsewhere and can have significant long-
lasting effects. This bill, for example.
While to some it may seem to be an obscure piece of legislation
dealing with a tiny, impoverished nation, one that is not on the
Security Council, and given the challenges that we face with the war
against terrorism and imminent invasion of Iraq, a distressed economy,
a health care crisis, it might even seem to be an afterthought. But it
is not an afterthought for the people of Nicaragua, and it should not
be an afterthought for the United States. In fact, this bill has the
potential to be critically important for Nicaragua's future, for
Central America's future and, ultimately, for our own future.
As the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Ballenger) indicated,
Nicaragua, after Haiti, is the second poorest nation in the hemisphere.
It was battered by years of war. It is a place where the magnitude of
corruption by the political leadership has been enormous, especially
recent ones. Now Nicaragua finally has a president in Enrique Bolanos,
an honest man who genuinely wants to make a difference. This bill can
help him and that fragile democracy that he presides over.
As the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos) and the gentleman from
North Carolina (Mr. Ballenger) have indicated, current U.S. law
prevents us from providing certain kinds of foreign aid to countries
that have seized the property of American citizens. Never mind that
these seizures occurred under previous governments. Never mind that
some of these claimants were not U.S. citizens at the time of the
seizures, which I believe violates international law; but that is a
debate for another day. This legislation changes that.
As the chairman of the subcommittee indicated, after a certain period
of time, new claims will no longer prevent Nicaragua from receiving
U.S. aid and will not prevent the United States Government from
assisting our fellow citizens who seek and deserve justice, and it will
not end the Government of Nicaragua's responsibility to settle these
claims. But this bill will do much to nurture Nicaragua's efforts to
develop its democracy; and it will encourage a new spirit of respect
and cooperation between that impoverished nation and the United States.
Mr. Speaker, I want to commend my friend, my colleague, my chairman,
the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Ballenger), for introducing this
bill. It is just more evidence of his attention to this hemisphere and
his love for its people. He and I do not always agree on how to deal
with all of our neighbors, but we do agree that they deserve far more
of our attention, and our respect. So I am grateful to him for inviting
me to cosponsor this important piece of legislation.
{time} 1445
Mr. Speaker, it is my hope that the passage of this legislation is
followed quickly by an increased program of U.S. assistance to
Nicaragua, particularly to develop its judicial system and strengthen
its legislative body. While I have full confidence in President
Bolanos, it is the development of strong democratic institutions that
will allow democracy to prosper and flourish in Nicaragua.
Reports speak of a reconstruction program for Iraq in excess of $100
billion. For far too long we have failed to adequately engage in our
own neighborhood. We cannot continue to ignore our neighbors in Central
America, the Caribbean, and South America. To do so, we do so at our
own risk.
Once upon a time, Nicaragua was front and center in our policy
debates. That war that many in this Chamber spent enormous time and
effort on this floor debating and discussing has faded from our
memories, and Nicaragua has receded from the spotlight. However, this
modest bill, in a rather nuanced and subtle way, will help Nicaragua
move closer to the democracy its people so justly deserve and desire. I
urge my colleagues to support it.
Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I
yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Terry). The question is on the motion
offered by the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Ballenger) that the
House suspend the rules and pass the bill, H.R. 868.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds of
those present have voted in the affirmative.
Mr. BALLENGER. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.
[[Page H1917]]
The yeas and nays were ordered.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8 of rule XX and the
Chair's prior announcement, further proceedings on this motion will be
postponed.
____________________