[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 41 (Thursday, March 13, 2003)]
[House]
[Page H1877]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ONE NATION UNDER GOD
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Renzi) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. RENZI. Madam Speaker, on March 10, our children who attend public
schools in the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit Court, including my
home State of Arizona, were told not to start their day with the real
Pledge of Allegiance. An absurd ruling made by the Ninth Circuit Court
of Appeals last June held that the 1954 Federal act that added the
words ``under God'' to the Pledge of Allegiance violated the
Establishment Clause of the first amendment.
Madam Speaker, our great Nation rests upon the wisdom of our Founding
Fathers. Our Founding Fathers created a Nation based upon spiritual
beliefs, and yet judges continually misinterpret this founding
principle by citing the Establishment Clause.
So what really is the Establishment Clause? Within our Constitution,
the Establishment Clause was created to protect American citizens
against religious persecution, so that the government would not impose
one religion, the government religion, so that a government or king
would not impose his own spiritual or personal beliefs.
The Establishment Clause was not created by our Founding Fathers to
sterilize this Nation, to not allow this Nation to utter the name of
God. Just the opposite. The Constitution of the United States of
America, written by our Founding Fathers, states this clearly in
Article VII, in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and
eighty-seven.
So how ridiculous is it that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals can
prohibit our teachers and children from reciting the Pledge of
Allegiance in the public schools of nine western states, when the
Constitution itself speaks of God?
Using this perverted logic, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals must
now find our Constitution unconstitutional. This holding is a new low
for our Nation, a low that will harm our children.
A good teacher, Mr. Byron Bolen, who teaches American government in
Round Valley, Arizona, is concerned that we are undermining our
national traditions and taking focus away from our Founding Fathers by
not allowing the real Pledge in our classrooms. He believes this issue
has become more an issue not of separation of church and state, but an
issue that directly negates the patriotism that our children need to
learn towards their country.
As a teacher in the First District of Arizona, Mr. Bolen asked me how
far our courts will go to sterilize and remove God from our classroom
and public places.
Our Founding Fathers created a Nation based on truth and morality and
a love for democracy based upon a person's desire to conform to laws
which they revere. Our good natural tendencies as human beings is to
repel from evil and to be drawn towards goodness.
When hippie generation judges impose their own sterile secular
beliefs on the American people, they are establishing their agnostic
beliefs on Americans.
To go one step further, on February 28 the Court of Appeals in the
Ninth Circuit refused numerous requests by our President, the Congress
and local school districts to overturn their prior decision.
Twice now this court has ruled that reciting the real Pledge of
Allegiance is unconstitutional. Yet in the House of Representatives we
start our day with the real Pledge of Allegiance. Our institution
writes and debates our laws only after we recite the real Pledge of
Allegiance. We must act to allow our children to start their day the
way we start our day here in the House.
Therefore, I call upon the Supreme Court to review this case, to
review it expeditiously, and allow our children to honor our Nation by
reciting the real Pledge, and let them start their school day the way
we start our day.
____________________