[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 34 (Tuesday, March 4, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Pages S3052-S3053]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
A PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFIT FOR SENIORS
Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, having said that, I want to mention two
additional quick items.
We have had a discussion, and will have a discussion, about the
subject of Medicare. It will be a significant issue in this Congress,
and should be. We have been talking, for a long while, about the health
needs of senior citizens who do not have access to prescription drugs
because they are too expensive. Too many senior citizens are told: You
must take prescription drugs for these ailments you have; and they
discover: Well, I can't take prescription drugs. I don't have the
money.
Republicans and Democrats have been debating how to add a
prescription drug benefit to the Medicare plan. Today I see the
President is going to send us a proposal that says we would like to
give everybody a discount card who would qualify under Medicare, and
then say to others, if they want to get some real help for real
prescription drug coverage, they have to join an HMO or a managed care
organization. That doesn't make any sense to me as a matter of public
policy. We need to put downward pressure on prescription drug prices
first and foremost.
Second, I believe we ought to provide a prescription drug benefit in
the Medicare Program. If we were writing that program today, we would
do that. I
[[Page S3053]]
don't think we ought to hinge that on the requirement that someone join
an HMO.
I have been in the Chamber telling stories for 3, 4 years about what
is happening to HMOs. Some of them are wonderful. But the construct of
an HMO says to a senior citizen: By the way, here is your doctor. We
will choose your doctor. You don't get to go to the doctor of your
choice. Here is the doctor available for you. By the way, in too many
circumstances, we have seen that in many of those organizations, major
health care is a function of profit and loss.
I told the story, when we debated a Patients' Bill of Rights, about
an HMO. A woman fell off a cliff in the Shenandoah Mountains. She was
injured badly, had a long fall, broke many bones, had internal
injuries. She was taken to a hospital in a coma. As she was wheeled
into the hospital room on a gurney, there was a question whether she
would survive. She did survive. It took a long while. Month after
month, she finally convalesced and survived.
Her HMO told her: We will not pay for your emergency room treatment
because you didn't have prior approval for emergency room use.
This is a woman hauled into the emergency room in a coma and was
told: You don't get paid for the emergency room because you didn't get
prior approval. Is that nuts? Of course it is. That is exactly what
happened to this woman because somebody was looking at her in terms of
profit and loss. That is not the way someone's person or body should be
presented in the medical system. This is not profit and loss. It is
about saving lives.
To say to senior citizens we will help them with the cost of
prescription drugs but only if they go into an HMO or a managed care
organization does not make much sense to me. This Congress can do
better than that. We must do better.
____________________