[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 28 (Friday, February 14, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Page S2519]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FISCAL YEAR 2003 OMNIBUS APPROPRIATIONS
Mr. BIDEN. Mr. President, my decision to vote for the omnibus
spending bill late last night was a difficult one. It is the largest
single spending bill ever passed by Congress. It represents work that
should have been completed last fall, and crams into one bill what
should have been 11 separate bills, each with its own separate debate
and deliberation. This is no way to legislate, and the final product
reflects that unfortunate process.
I was gratified that many important obligations received funding, but
unfortunately many others did not. At the same time, this massive
document contains far too many provisions that were never exposed to
the daylight of publicity and debate. My vote in favor of this bill was
a very close call.
First, the good news. Unlike an earlier version that I could not
support, this bill restored funds for Byrne grants that local law
enforcement agencies need in these dangerous times. In addition, I was
able to add language that permits local police to use COPS money for
the many hours of overtime involved as they meet the demands of
homeland defense. Law enforcement projects in my State of Delaware,
from State to county to local agencies, will receive $3.5 million in
funds from that COPS program.
But the bad news is that $3 billion for first responders was cut out
of this legislation. Those are funds to support firefighters and police
and local emergency response centers. Another $170 million was cut from
the Transportation Security Administration, despite the obvious need
for additional protection for our Nation's air, highway, and rail
systems. Funds for port security and border security were also cut. The
debate over these programs will continue soon, as we begin budget
debates for the coming year and a security supplemental spending bill,
and I will continue the fight to provide the citizens of this country
all of the protection they need.
And we must expose those last-minute, back-room deals that litter the
thousands of pages of this legislation. Some are clear wastes of
taxpayer money in these critical times. Others weaken important
environmental protections, and have no place in these spending bills.
On balance, I concluded that this legislation which allows the
Federal Government to continue its important functions narrowly
deserves my support. But there is much here that needs to be fixed, so
the debate that should have occurred on this huge, complicated bill
will continue.
____________________