[Congressional Record Volume 149, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 22, 2003)]
[Senate]
[Page S1363]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
30TH ANNIVERSARY OF ROE V. WADE
Ms. CANTWELL. Mr. President, I rise today to speak on the 30th
anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision.
Thirty years ago, in 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court held that women
have a constitutional right to an abortion. That decision, Roe v. Wade,
was carefully crafted to be both balanced and responsible while holding
the rights of women in America paramount in reproductive decisions. Roe
v. Wade held that women have a constitutional right to an abortion, but
after viability, States can ban abortions as long as they allow
exceptions when a woman's life or health is endangered. Since then,
while the Court has consistently ruled in favor of this right, there is
no doubt that this right is being eroded.
And today, the thirtieth anniversary of that landmark decision, I
especially want to thank those who are continuing to provide safe and
legal reproductive health care to the women of our community. In the
face of crippling challenges, especially violence and threats of
violence, these health care workers have held fast in their commitment
to provide the quality health care that all women deserve.
Like most Americans, I believe that we must work to reduce the number
of unwanted pregnancies through education and family planning. But I
also believe that our Constitution protects a woman's right to privacy,
and that this constitutional right encompasses the decision of whether
to terminate a pregnancy.
Unfortunately, we are seeing a concerted effort by those who seek to
overturn this right to stack our courts with ideological conservatives
who seek not only to weaken the right to make personal decisions about
one's own body, but also to make exercising that right a criminal
offense. As a Senator, I take my responsibility to advise and consent
on nominees to the Federal judiciary extremely seriously. While I
recognize the privilege of the President to select his nominees, I
believe it is critical that we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of
each nominee, since, unlike members of the President's cabinet and
other executive branch appointees, Federal judges receive lifetime
appointments, and are expected to interpret our Nation's laws in a fair
and balanced manner.
I am especially concerned that President Bush has chosen to
renominate several extremists on this issue, especially Priscilla Owen.
Her record demonstrates that, as a member of the strongly conservative
Texas Supreme Court, she was an activist judge, interpreting the law to
fit her ideological ends. Indeed, while President Bush's current White
House Counsel was serving on the Texas Supreme Court, then-Justice
Alberto Gonzales called one of her rulings ``an unconscionable act of
judicial activism.''
Many of my colleagues and I spend much of our time, and must continue
to do so, defending the actual right to have an abortion. But in my
mind, the easiest way to reduce the number of abortions is to prevent
unwanted pregnancies in the first place. And I simply don't understand
why so many anti-choice members don't understand that connection.
Studies show that the use of family planning reduces the probability
of a woman having an abortion by 85 percent. Unfortunately, the U.S.
still has 3 million unintended pregnancies each year in the United
States, half of which end in abortion. This is why I support the Equity
in Prescription Contraceptive Coverage Act, authored by Senator Olympia
Snowe of Maine, and why I will be cosponsoring that bill when she
reintroduces it.
The women in the Senate are in a unique position to fight against the
erosion of Roe. I stand with them today to honor those who came before
me in fighting for this right. Together we will continue to make sure
that the women of America have the right to privacy, and the
fundamental freedom of choice in our lives.
____________________