[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 128 (Thursday, October 3, 2002)]
[Senate]
[Pages S9866-S9867]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
ECONOMIC RECOVERY
Mr. WYDEN. Madam President, thousands of working families in Oregon
feel as if they have been hit by an economic wrecking ball. From
Ontario to Portland, OR workers have been laid off their jobs, left to
fend for themselves, while their medical and energy bills skyrocket,
and they have been left out of what Larry Lindsey and the
administration's economic team keep calling an economic recovery.
Oregonians are hungry for leadership on the economic issue. We are
trying to do our part at home down the road at the election. All of
Oregon's elected officials are going to be working with the private
sector on a new economic game plan. I think starting in January, with
the ISTEA legislation, we will have an opportunity to make some
important investments. But Oregonians expect economic leadership from
Washington, DC, now. That is what they want today.
I am anxious to work with the administration on these issues, but
there has just not been the leadership forthcoming. For example, on the
trade issue, I cast a vote--unpopular with many with whom I am close--
to give the President the authority to negotiate trade agreements.
Trade involves one out of seven jobs in Oregon. The trade jobs pay
better than the nontrade jobs. So I want to meet the administration
halfway.
Unfortunately, the administration and its economic team is not
willing to move forward and, in fact, is moving backward on a host of
issues. I want to outline several of those this morning, Madam
President.
It is very obvious we need a transfusion--immediate transfusion--that
can restore our economic health. There is nothing that could bring our
economy back faster than getting increased transportation funds for the
States. One State after another has shown that money for transportation
projects, particularly repaving and other maintenance items, gets money
into our economy and creates family wage employment for our workers
faster than any other area.
A number of Senators, Democrats and Republicans, understand this.
Unfortunately, the administration's economic team does not agree. They
continue to propose significantly less money than is needed for our
economic and transportation needs and push for it.
While the transportation officials of my State calculate that the
administration's approach will mean tens of millions of dollars less
funding for Oregon's struggling economy and hundreds of fewer family
wage construction jobs that could put our citizens back to work, the
administration persists in taking an approach that I think is a huge
mistake for our country, particularly our economic needs.
On the health issue, something the Chair knows much about, we can
find common ground, for example, on a measure that could significantly
lower health costs, a bipartisan approach involving making wider use of
generic drugs, the same drug as essentially the brand name in the
majority of instances.
Senators of both political parties want to support this issue. There
is support on the Democratic side and the Republican side. The
administration will not support something that could have immediate
benefit--immediate benefit--for the economic crunch that our citizens
face and would have bipartisan support in the Senate.
Finally, it seems on issues such as unemployment compensation, we
have Senators, again, who would like to move forward to provide what I
call this transfusion of assistance to the people who are so hard hit.
Thousands of laid-off workers are exhausting their temporary extension
of benefits every week. The program expires on December 31 of this
year. Anyone laid off before June 30 of this year is going to lose all
their benefits come December 31, and anyone who lost a job after June
30 will not have any Federal extension in place when their State
benefits expire.
For my home State with soaring unemployment, this means that nearly
30,000 laid-off workers currently getting a temporary extension of
unemployment compensation would see the end of their benefits at the
end of the year, according to the Department of Labor.
Again, it seems to me this is an issue where Democrats and
Republicans could, as has happened so often, come together and provide
some solace, some actual relief to these families who are hurting in
our country. I will be talking more about this issue in the days ahead
while working on a significant
[[Page S9867]]
health reform proposal that I have been discussing with colleagues.
I come back in closing to the central reason I have come to the
Chamber, and that is that in my State and in much of the country, our
families are hurting and our economy is hemorrhaging. I have listed
three issues where, if there was some leadership from the
administration--transportation, lowering medical costs immediately,
particularly on the prescription side, which has the support of
Senators of both parties, the expanded access to generic drugs, and
finally unemployment compensation--three steps where, with a little bit
of leadership from the administration on these vital economic issues,
we could take steps now that would help working families.
Let's not go the wrong way. Let's find an opportunity for Democrats
and Republicans to work on key issues and go the right way, which means
providing economic relief to our working families.
I know the Senator from Georgia has been waiting very patiently. I
yield the floor, Madam President.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Georgia.
____________________