[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 127 (Wednesday, October 2, 2002)]
[House]
[Pages H6965-H6966]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from California (Mr. Baca) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. BACA. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to support full funding for the
``No Child Left Behind'' Act (H.R. 1). The new little red schoolhouse
entrances to the Department of Education building are a perfect example
that the Administration is ``all show and no tell'' when it comes to
education. By building those little red schoolhouses, at a cost of
$98,000, at least 160 children have already been left behind by the
Administration's cuts in education funding. The Bush Administration
thinks that the American people will see those schoolhouses and believe
that the Nation's children are in good hands under the Bush education
system.
The American people know better. Americans will notice when after
school programs are no longer available for their children. Americans
will notice when their special needs children cannot get extra help
from their own community schools.
Americans will notice when their teachers become frustrated because
they can't get the training they need to provide the best quality
instruction to their students. Americans will notice when these same
teachers have to leave their students because they can't get the
training required to meet the Administration's new accountability
standards. Americans will notice when their kids can't receive as much
in student loans, and don't have access to scholarships for low-income
students. And, Americans will notice when their kids who need help with
their English skills are falling behind because their schools no longer
provide training in English.
Since 1997, the average increase in Federal education funding has
been 12 percent a year--until now.
The Bush Administration proposes to increase Federal funding by only
0.5 percent, but flaunts the ``No Child Left Behind'' Act as its first
big accomplishment.
If leaving millions of children out in the cold when it comes to
their education is an accomplishment, then dark times lay ahead.
The Bush Administration has slashed about 82 percent of the budget
increase promised by the ``No Child Left Behind'' Act for low-income
students.
The President's budget cuts the expected increase for low-income
students from $5.65 billion to only $1 billion extracted from other
important programs.
Low-income students can expect to lose over $664 million in badly
needed funds.
[[Page H6966]]
English language training programs will now face a freeze in funding
even though 300,000 students with limited English will enroll in school
next year.
The Bush budget cuts English language training funding by almost 10
percent per child, but still requires testing of these students to
determine how to bring students up to new standards.
We should be helping school districts like those in my Congressional
district, which are struggling to make good on their promise to hire
more bilingual teachers to help the growing number of Spanish-speaking
children.
Instead, the Bush budget cuts funding for bilingual education and
teacher training.
The Bush administration's budget cuts special education programs by
so much that the goals set by the Individuals with Disabilities Act
(IDEA) cannot be met for at least 12 more years.
Special Education is underfunded by $500 million. The ``No Child Left
Behind'' Act requires that IDEA be met in 7 years, not 12.
The funds for the Teacher Quality State Grant program, which is the
primary Federal program for training teachers in core academic
subjects, have come to a halt.
92,000 fewer teachers will be trained than the Program currently
supports. The Bush Administration's budget is $404 million below the
amount promised in the ``No Child Left Behind'' for teacher training.
The Republican budget also freezes child care funding and includes
only a slight increase for Head Start. This will reduce the number of
children already eligible and leave millions empty-handed.
The Administration fails to fund its vital education program that
claims to leave no child behind. It seems that Republicans think that
simply by naming the education bill ``No Child Left Behind,'' they are
keeping their promise to the American people. Americans know better!
Americans deserve better!
I urge both the Administration and the Members of Congress to fully
fund the ``No Child Left Behind'' Act for the sake of our children.
____________________