[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 122 (Tuesday, September 24, 2002)]
[House]
[Page H6475]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE FEDERAL DEBT
Mr. SMITH of Michigan. Mr. Speaker, tonight I and some others are
going to do a one hour special order, on some of the problems, the
misconceptions about the debt of the Federal Government. The policy
committee that I serve on, the Republican Policy Committee, met with
Art Laffer, who I consider an esteemed economist in this country. One
of my questions to Art was what is worse as far as being a downside to
economic growth--the debt and going deeper into debt in this country or
having tax increases, and he said they are both about the same. They
take private money out of circulation that could be used to expand
businesses and jobs.
And that brings a question that this body must consider. How big
should the Federal Government be in terms of a percentage of gross
domestic product? How fast should the expenditures of this Congress
grow compared to inflation? We have been growing from 2 to 4 times the
rate of inflation every year for the last 20 years. The elections of
politicians to come up with new programs, to come up with pork barrel
projects to take back to their districts probably enhances the chances
that they are going to be reelected. So the tendency has been to have
government grow faster than the economy, faster than the ability of the
American taxpayer to pay, and certainly faster than what is good for us
in terms of increasing taxes and debt.
Politicians, Members of Congress, Members of the Senate, the
President have tended to say, well, we can expand government and not
have it quite so visible in terms of the American worker digging into
their pockets, if we pay for some of that increased spending with
increased debt.
When I was first elected to Congress 10 years ago the debt of the
Federal Government was four trillion dollars. Today guess what the debt
is in just under 10 years? The current debt of the Federal Government
is $6.2 trillion. A 50 percent increase in 10 years. So we can imagine
if we project that kind of debt increase for the next 20 years we are
leaving our kids and our grandkids a tremendous indebtedness burden
because we think the expenditures today are so important that it
justifies higher taxes and more debt for our kids to pay.
I think there is a misunderstanding about debt. We have said we have
paid the debt down. Actually, the total debt of this country over the
last 20 years has continued to increase, and so has the obligation of
our kids to pay off our overzealous spending. I am a farmer from
Michigan. Our tradition has been to try to pay off the mortgage on the
farm to give our kids a little better chance. In Congress we are doing
the opposite. We are increasing that obligation.
Tune in tonight to the special orders and we will talk more on the
problems of going deeper and deeper into debt and the increased
downside for the economy.
____________________