[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 96 (Tuesday, July 16, 2002)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6830-S6831]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
UNANIMOUS CONSENT REQUEST--H.R. 5011
Mr. REID. Mr. President, as I indicated this morning, we are
tremendously anxious to move to our first appropriations bill. I
repeat, the President has been pushing us on these bills. We marked up
in the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee today the largest Defense
appropriations bill in the history of the country.
We have already reported out of the subcommittee and the full
committee the military construction appropriations bill, and we have
not been able to get it to the floor. There has been an objection on
the other side to moving forward.
Mr. President, some have suggested we just bring it to the floor. We
cannot just bring it to the floor because then we get into the cloture
process and that takes many days. We are now trying to go forward on
the prescription drug bill, and we are in a cloture situation there,
having filed cloture on the motion to proceed, and we are going to vote
on that tomorrow unless something comes in the meantime.
I am basically going to propound the same unanimous consent request I
did before. The majority leader was on the floor. The Republican leader
has been on the floor. The Republican leader, to his credit, has said
he thinks we should move forward with this. Today, I spent some time
with him and indicated what we can do to move this forward. He had just
finished a meeting with the President.
We want to move forward with this bill. We are doing everything we
can to move forward. We were told the last time the reason we are not
moving forward--and I spoke with the junior Senator from Arizona, and I
know how strongly he believes we have to do something about the
firefighting problems. I am from the West. We have two big fires
burning in Nevada right now. I am concerned about them, but the
firefighting problems of our country have never been funded in the
military construction appropriations bill.
We are going to have the ability in the supplemental where it should
be done. It is an emergency. We have been blocked from doing that by
the administration, but it will be done, as it has always been done
during my tenure, if not in a supplemental, in the Interior
appropriations bill, chaired by Senator Byrd, the President pro tempore
of the Senate. I hope they will allow to us move forward on this.
There are military projects that will have to wait until we pass this
bill. So here I go: I ask unanimous consent that at a time to be
determined by the majority leader, following consultation with the
Republican leader, the Senate may proceed to the consideration of
Calendar No. 486, H.R. 5011, the military construction appropriations
bill, and that it be considered under the following limitations:
That immediately after the bill is reported, all after the enacting
clause be stricken and the text of Calendar No. 479, S. 2709, the
Senate committee-reported bill be inserted in lieu thereof; that debate
time on the bill and substitute amendment be limited to a total of 45
minutes, with an additional 20 minutes under the control of Senator
McCain; that the only other amendment in order be an amendment offered
by Senators Feinstein and Hutchison of Texas, which is at the desk;
with debate limited to 10 minutes on the Feinstein-Hutchison amendment;
that upon the use or yielding back of time on the amendment, without
further intervening action or debate, the Senate proceed to vote on
adoption of the amendment; that all debate time not already identified
in this agreement be equally divided and controlled between the chair
and ranking member of the subcommittee or their designee; that upon
disposition of the Feinstein-Hutchison amendment, and the use or
yielding back of all time, the substitute amendment, as amended, be
agreed to; the bill, as amended, be read three times; that section 303
of the Congressional Budget Act be waived; and the Senate then proceed
to a vote on passage of the bill; that upon passage of the bill, the
Senate insist on its amendment, request a conference with the House on
the disagreeing votes of the two Houses, and that the Chair be
authorized to appoint conferees on the part of the Senate, without
further intervening action or debate.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The Senator from Arizona.
Mr. KYL. Reluctantly, I must object at this time on behalf of a group
of other Senators and myself, not to the terms of the unanimous consent
agreement as has been outlined by the Senator from Nevada, but rather
to bringing up the bill until there has been an agreement reached on
how to deal with the supplemental funding for dealing with these
wildfires.
I think the Senator from Nevada is absolutely correct that that
funding should be on the supplemental appropriations bill.
Unfortunately, it has not been put on that bill so far. There are a lot
of different reasons alleged to exist for that. It seems everybody is
willing to do it but somehow or another they cannot all get together to
make it happen, and if it does not happen on that bill, the only other
alternative is to try to do it on the military construction bill.
The Interior Department appropriations bill is not likely to be able
to come before us in a timely fashion so the money that is needed for
replenishing these Forest Service accounts can be replenished before
the end of the fiscal year, and that is the reason we have to retain
this option.
I hope that within the next several hours an agreement can be reached
and these funds will be put on the supplemental appropriations bill, as
the Senator from Nevada suggests, and then we can move on with this
important legislation. Until then, we do need this as a possible way to
move forward with the funding that it seems everybody is for but they
just cannot find a way to make happen.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
The Senator from Nevada.
Mr. REID. Mr. President, I think this is too bad, for lack of a
better way to describe things. This bill is not the proper place for
this type of funding. With all due respect to my friend from Arizona,
this does not create any pressure, holding up the Military Construction
Subcommittee bill.
We have to understand that if we are going to take care of the men
and women who are defending our country, we need to take care of the
bills that fund them.
I have indicated I am concerned about firefighting in Nevada. We have
fires burning as I speak, but never in the history of this country,
that I am aware, have we funded firefighting through the military
construction bill, and we are not going to do it in the future. Holding
up this bill creates a false illusion that we are accomplishing
something regarding firefighting in this country.
I hope that in the next couple of hours, as my friend from Arizona
said, more deliberation can come and that we can move forward on this
bill.
I am terribly disappointed we do not have more things declared
emergencies. It is hard to believe, but the terrible disaster that
occurred in Oklahoma where a barge ran into part of our interstate
freeway system, dumped more than a score of cars in the river, killed
at last count about 14 people, that is not deemed an emergency to fix
that road. Now if that is not an emergency, I do not know what is. I do
not know what we are trying to accomplish with the numbers game, but
that is an emergency, if anything ever was an emergency.
Those fires that are burning, those are emergencies. They are not in
the next fiscal year, they are in this fiscal year. The fires are
burning right now. The fires in Arizona are not even out yet. They have
them under control, but they will be burning for weeks into the future.
They have large crews making sure they do not blow up again. I think
books will probably be written about that fire in Arizona, if not
articles. They were blowing out fireballs for miles, not a few hundred
feet or a thousand feet but, by some accounts, up to 3 miles. They were
blowing out big
[[Page S6831]]
bombs of fire and starting fires up to 3 miles away.
I do not know what is happening down at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, but
they have to come to their senses and realize that some things are
emergencies. The big fire in Colorado was started by somebody who
worked for the Forest Service. The big fire in Arizona, from the
information we have now, a firefighter started that fire. It is too
bad, but they were started. They are emergencies no matter how they
were started. It is like the fire burning some 30 miles from Las Vegas,
it was started by lightning, but they are emergencies, and they should
be declared emergencies, and they should be placed on the supplemental.
It does not count against any of the numbers we have. They are truly
emergencies.
We are going to offer this again before the day is out. We want to go
forward with that bill. The managers of that bill, the Senator from
California and the Senator from Texas, have done a remarkably good job.
This is a fine bill. I think it is remarkable they have been able to do
the job they have done. They have both tremendous interest in the
military, and they have both been speaking about the needs they have in
their respective States and the country.
The military construction bill goes beyond what we do in this
country. We have military construction we pay for that is outside this
country. So I hope my friend from Arizona will do what he can. He has
tremendous sway with the White House, and that is where the bottleneck
is, and it should stop.
In the meantime, let us move forward. We are only asking for a little
over an hour on this bill to complete it.
The only other thing, before my friend from Florida begins, is we are
expecting a very important unanimous consent agreement on
antiterrorism, and when that comes, if the Senator will allow me to
interrupt, we will make sure his remarks do not appear interrupted in
the Record.
____________________