[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 81 (Tuesday, June 18, 2002)]
[Senate]
[Pages S5651-S5652]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[[Page S5651]]
HISPANIC EDUCATION
Mr. REID. Madam President, we speak frequently of America's security
needs and we do it with understanding. It is important to understand,
though, that the strength and security of our Nation requires more than
bombs and bullets and our brave men and women in uniform. The future of
our great country will be determined by our children and our
grandchildren, and their futures in turn will be shaped by the
education they receive today.
So what is a higher priority for America than educating our children
and making sure all children have the tools and opportunity to succeed?
In the future, classrooms and communities all across America will
resemble those we already see in the State of Nevada where students
from racial and ethnic minorities comprise an increasing percentage of
the school population. The Presiding Officer knows about which I speak,
being from the State of Florida which is diverse in nationalities,
ethnic groups, religions. It is a State of great diversity, as is
Nevada.
This is new in Nevada. It has been longstanding in Florida. Nevada's
schools now serve a large and rapidly growing number of Latino
students, including many with limited English language proficiency. The
Clark County School District, Las Vegas, is the sixth largest school
district in America, with about 240,000 students. Over 25 percent of
those students are Hispanic, and we support programs that provide all
students the resources they need. Therefore, we must keep in mind the
educational needs of Hispanic children. They have special needs in many
instances.
My Democratic colleagues and I will host our third annual Hispanic
Leadership Summit this week. We have invited 100 Hispanic leaders from
across the country to share their ideas and work together on key issues
facing the Hispanic community. Certainly education will continue to be
a top priority for the Democratic caucus.
Health care, jobs, the economy, immigration, and civil rights will
also be among the priorities on our agenda, and we will speak about
these subjects with Hispanic leaders who will come to Washington this
week.
Though education is viewed as a local issue because most decisions
are made by local leaders, school boards, principals, teachers and
parents, the Federal Government should and does play an important role
in helping to educate our youth.
Congress and President Bush agreed last year to work together to
improve the quality of education in America's public schools. We worked
in a bipartisan manner to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act and passed a strong educational reform program that
requires States to set high standards for every student and strengthen
Federal incentives to boost low-performing schools and significantly
improve educational achievement.
The legislation even had a catchy name: The No Child Left Behind Act.
Unfortunately, though, President Bush has not backed up his rhetoric
with the resources our children need. Just 1 month after signing
educational reform into law, the so-called No Child Left Behind Act, he
proposed a budget to cut almost $100 million in funding for the No
Child Left Behind Act. To highlight the impact of the Federal budget,
for example, on Nevada's schools, I hosted an Appropriations Committee
field hearing in Las Vegas this spring. We heard compelling testimony
about programs that have worked and passionate appeals for continued
support.
I, for one, will do all I can to restore funding for successful
educational programs that President Bush wants to cut. My Democratic
colleagues will join with me in this effort.
The Secretary of Education conducted townhall meetings in Las Vegas
shortly after our hearing--actually north of Las Vegas--as part of the
President's Commission on Education Excellence for Hispanic Americans.
I am pleased Secretary Paige visited Las Vegas so he could learn
about the challenges that teachers and students face. While the entire
Nation is struggling with overcrowded classrooms and teacher shortages,
these problems are particularly severe in Nevada, the fastest growing
State in the country.
At the hearing that I held, one of the witnesses was a young man by
the name of Alberto Maldonado. This was a hearing of the Appropriations
Committee. Alberto was born in Mexico City and moved to Las Vegas when
he was 15 years old. At age 15, he did not speak a word of English, and
he was mainstreamed into the schools. He enrolled in the 10th grade at
Las Vegas High School.
On the first day of school, Alberto was terrified. He walked into the
school not understanding a word of English or certainly much of our
culture. He now recalls with gratitude, he testified, the names of his
teachers in his English Language Learners Program and how they
influenced his life. Ms. Hernandez and Ms. Williams taught him English
words and sentence construction. Mr. Luna helped him learn about
English culture, and Ms. Monroy helped him learn to write English and
to read advanced materials.
Just 1 year after this young man, who could not speak a word of
English, enrolled in his new school, he passed the Nevada High School
Proficiency Examination in reading, writing, and mathematics. In his
senior year, he served as vice president of the Student Organization of
Latinos. After graduating from Las Vegas High School, Alberto attended
community college and went on to work with mentally and physically
challenged children.
He is a bright young man, and the reason I am sharing his story today
is because right now, there are tens of thousands just like Alberto in
Clark County--students who need to participate in the English Language
Learners Program if they are to have any hope of achieving the American
dream.
It is estimated there are 40,000 students just like Alberto. By the
2004-2005 school year, there will be almost 90,000 who will need these
services. I cannot understand why, at a time when our Nation needs to
support education more than ever, our President wants to freeze funding
for English Language Acquisition and Bilingual Education Programs.
Nevada also has the Nation's highest dropout rate. It is nothing I am
proud of, but it is a fact. One out of every 10 high school seniors in
Nevada drops out of school. This does not count those who dropped out
before they even got to high school.
The Dropout Prevention Program, which was authorized as part of the
No Child Left Behind Act, which was pushed strongly by Senator Bingaman
and me, is the only Federal educational program specifically targeted
to dropouts. The Hispanic community suffers from a persistently high
dropout rate, higher than any other ethnic group. Yet the President
wants to eliminate this dropout prevention program.
It is the only program, I repeat, that deals with dropouts. I hope he
will reconsider the administration's plans to eliminate a program of
such great importance for youth across America, including Hispanic
students who already have a high risk for dropping out of school.
There is another program called the GEAR UP program which supports
early college awareness for low-income youth starting in middle school
and helps them complete high school and enter college. Over one-third
of the students in the GEAR UP program are Hispanic.
This program is critical for Hispanic students who are more likely
than any other students to drop out of high school and, consequently,
less likely than others to attend and complete college. Again, I have a
hard time understanding how, as our Latino population continues to
increase, the President wants to freeze funding for yet another program
that is critical to the long-term success of Hispanic Americans. But
this is yet another example of saying the right thing without paying
for it.
The No Child Left Behind Act provides a blueprint for educational
reform. Real reform cannot occur without real resources. Without
adequate funding, it is reform in name only. That is not enough. We can
do better. We must do better.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. REID. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
[[Page S5652]]
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________