[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 71 (Tuesday, June 4, 2002)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4933-S4934]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PRESCRIPTION DRUG BENEFITS FOR MEDICARE
Mr. MILLER. Madam President, let me read a few recent comments from
the media, always a jaded and cynical bunch, but in this case let's
hope their pessimism is wrong. Our senior citizens certainly pray that
it is.
From the National Journal, May 25:
It is becoming increasingly unlikely that Congress this
year will approve compromise legislation providing
prescription drug benefits for Medicare recipients.
The Wall Street Journal, June 3:
President Bush and Congress are unlikely to agree this year
on a promised Medicare benefit for prescription drugs.
World Market's Research Centre, May 20:
[[Page S4934]]
Neither party wants the other to be seen by the electorate
to have found the solution. Blocking the other's proposals
will continue to take precedence in the run-up to November.
Cox News Service, June 3:
Slim chances for agreement on prescription drugs.
And the L.A. Times:
Few on Capitol Hill think . . . they'll produce a bill this
year.
Columbus [Ohio] Dispatch:
Time is running out. . . .
The legislative year effectively ends when lawmakers leave for the
August recess.
Madam President, I could go on and on. There are dozens of articles
like this, but I think you get the idea. Hardly anyone thinks we are
going to do anything serious about prescription drug costs and
prescription drug coverage. Let us pray they are wrong--that they are
not right. But if the past is prologue, that is exactly the partisan
blame game that smells up this place sometimes.
I am interested in doing something now. I want results, not a
campaign issue. Time is running out, and I hate to tell you but some
people want it to run out. That is their game. They want to shuffle and
slouch and go through the motions while the clock does run out. That is
why I think I am going to bring a calendar in here, and just like we
count the shopping days left until Christmas, I am going to count the
days left until the August recess.
It would look just like this: 39 days left. I don't think we are
going to do anything today--another day shot.
Madam President, I know some may call that undignified. I hope they
do. I would like to get the meaning of dignity into this debate, into
this discussion. I will tell you what is undignified--an old woman with
trembling hands, trying to cut a pill in half so her medicine will last
a little longer. I will tell you about losing dignity--an old man proud
and self-sufficient all his life, admitting in whispered tones to his
pharmacist: I didn't know it was going to cost that much and I sure
don't want my check to bounce. I'll come back later.
I will tell you what undignified is--a couple who have lived together
for 55 years, using coffee grounds from the day before to stretch it
further because mama has to have her medicine.
So I don't want anybody talking to me about the loss of dignity, not
in this debate.
By the way, there is a difference between what is undignified and
what is obscene. What is obscene is making an 18.5-percent profit
margin--more than four times that of all other industries--and raking
in that kind of profit on the backs of our seniors.
I will tell you what is obscene--the giant pharmaceutical companies
spending three times more on advertising than they do on research.
Their ads are everywhere. How many times do we have to watch that woman
who has--got to go, got to go, got to go?
What is obscene is having 650 lobbyists to make sure we keep
shuffling and slouching--650 lobbyists. That is more than one for every
Member of Congress.
There are towns in Georgia that do not have that big a population. I
live in one.
I will tell you what is obscene--these lobbyists each make an average
of over $12,000 a month. That is three times more than what an average
schoolteacher or a registered nurse makes. We talk about predatory
lending, predatory lenders--what about predatory businesses that
protect their bottom lines at the expense of millions of people who
cannot afford drugs they have to have?
I know we have been told we are going to take this up sometime--
sometime this summer, sometime after hate crimes, sometime after this
bill, sometime after another bill, sometime later. There is an old
country saying. Probably nobody in this body has ever heard it, except
maybe the senior Senator from West Virginia and the two Senators from
South Carolina, somebody like us who has been around chickens in the
yard and knows about setting hens. There is an old saying that goes
like this: I hear you clucking but I can't find your nest.
It means I hear you talking, but I don't see any action.
I will tell you this, I don't want to be associated with any
political party that cannot comprehend the urgency of this stark need
of our seniors; that is unwilling to take some risks and that is
unwilling to compromise to get some results. If we fail to get some
results on this issue, we should be so ashamed that all incumbents
going into November--Democrats and Republicans alike--should have to go
around with a paper sack over their heads like sports fans sometimes do
when they are embarrassed by their team's performance.
We have to do something and we have to do something soon, Madam
President, and I know you share those desires.
____________________