[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 61 (Tuesday, May 14, 2002)]
[House]
[Pages H2398-H2399]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WACO MAMMOTH SITE AREA INTERIOR STUDY ACT
Mr. SOUDER. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 1925) to direct the Secretary of the Interior to study the
suitability and feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area
in Waco, Texas, as a unit of the National Park System, and for other
purposes, as amended.
The Clerk read as follows:
H.R. 1925
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT REGARDING WACO MAMMOTH SITE AREA.
(a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior, in consultation
with the State of Texas, the city of Waco, and other
appropriate organizations, shall carry out a special resource
study regarding the national significance, suitability, and
feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth Site Area located
in the city of Waco, Texas, as a unit of the National Park
System.
(b) Study Process and Completion.--Section 8(c) of Public
Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and
completion of the study required by this section.
(c) Submission of Study Results.--Not later than 3 years
after funds are first made available for this section, the
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Resources of the
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources of the Senate a report describing the
results of the study.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
Indiana (Mr. Souder) and the gentlewoman from the Virgin Islands (Mrs.
Christensen) each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Souder).
Mr. SOUDER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
H.R. 1925, introduced by my friend and colleague, the gentleman from
Texas (Mr. Edwards), would direct the Secretary of the Interior to
study the suitability and feasibility of designating the Waco Mammoth
Site Area in Waco, Texas, as a unit of the National Park System.
Located near the confluence of the Brazos and Bosque Rivers, the
Mammoth Site has become internationally known, as it contains the
remains of the largest known herd of Colombian mammoths, warm weather
cousins to the wooly mammoth, dying from the same event. To date, 22
mammoths have been found at the site that date back 28,000 years.
Mr. Speaker, this bill is supported by the majority and minority of
the committee. In addition, the bill is supported by the
administration, with the ongoing caveat that the maintenance backlog be
addressed first.
I would like to add my personal congratulations and interest in this.
When I was student body president at Indiana Purdue, Fort Wayne,
through the geology club they promoted the nickname ``The Mastedons.''
It was my honor to drive through, over the objection of many, mastedons
as the school name, which has stood for over 30 years. They are kind of
big cousins to the mammoths.
So I am glad to see we are working to preserve this site so that we
can have this for future generations to understand better the natural
processes that occurred in this country and the creatures that were
here before us. So, Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support H.R.
1925, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mrs. CHRISTENSEN. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1925, introduced by my good friend and colleague,
the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Edwards), directs the Secretary of the
Interior to study the suitability and feasibility of designating the
Waco Mammoth Site in Waco, Texas, as a unit of the National Park
System.
The Waco Mammoth Site is believed to contain the remains of the
largest concentration of mammoths killed during a single event. The
site is located close to the confluence of the Brazos and Bosque Rivers
near the city of Waco, Texas. The discovery of these mammoth remains
has received international attention and Baylor University in the City
of Waco have been working to protect the site.
In hearings before the Committee on Resources, we received testimony
on the unique paleontological resources found on this site. The study
called for by H.R. 1925 will examine what role, if any, that the
National Park Service can play in the protection and interpretation of
these unique resources.
Mr. Speaker, I want to commend my colleague, the gentleman from Texas
(Mr. Edwards). I support the bill, as amended, and look forward to its
passage by the House today.
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the sponsor of
the bill, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Edwards).
Mr. EDWARDS. Mr. Speaker, I want to first thank the gentlewoman from
the Virgin Islands (Mrs. Christensen) for yielding me this time and for
her courtesy and leadership on this legislation. I also want to commend
and thank my colleague, the gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Souder), for
his courtesies, his comments, as well as his leadership and long
understanding of the importance of these types of historic sites in our
country as a way to educate future generations of young people in
America about our history.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 1925 is called the Waco Mammoth Site Study Bill;
and as mentioned, it authorizes the study by the National Park Service
to consider including the Waco Mammoth Site as a unit in the National
Park System. Since there are numerous different designations in the
National Park System, one of the goals of this study would be to
determine the best fit for this historic site.
Mr. Speaker, as we have also heard, the Waco Mammoth Site is the
largest concentration in the world of prehistoric mammoths dying from
the same event. That is what makes this particular site unique and so
historically significant. It is located within the city limits of Waco,
Texas, my hometown, which also happens to be a suburb of the community
of Crawford, Texas, a well-known central Texas community today. It is
located at the confluence of the Brazos and Bosque Rivers.
The site was first discovered in 1978; and since 1984, Calvin Smith,
director of the Strecker Museum at Baylor University, has been leading
the effort to discovering the bones of now, I think there are even up
to 24 mammoths so far. We would not be here today had it not been for
the vision and dedication of Calvin Smith, and I want to thank him for
his role in this legislation.
What makes this site unique, as I mentioned, is the fact that so
many, in fact this could be twice the size of any previous mammoth
deaths at any one site for any one given cause. What I find absolutely
fascinating about it is that in the mud, again considering this was
28,000 years ago, we now have the remains of a 55-year-old bull and a
45-year-old female mammoth as they tried to lift their young calves
above the flood that consumed them all. It is my understanding that
this is the first known recording in history of parental instincts
being shown in a prehistoric setting such as this.
This discovery has received worldwide attention. Experts such as Dr.
Gary Haynes at the University of Nevada at Reno have said this site is
a valuable and unique treasure that should not be lost. Dr. Haynes
states the mammoth site, and I quote, ``is a
[[Page H2399]]
part of America's rich heritage from the far past, when a much more
diverse animal community populated the continent.''
This site can be valued as a learning tool for school children across
Texas and our country, as well as a site for study by professionals.
Mr. Speaker, I ask the House to approve this bill, thus bringing an
invaluable archeological find one step closer to being part, as I hope,
and as it should, a unit of the National Park System.
I thank all of my colleagues for their courtesy, again, their
leadership; and finally, Mr. Speaker, if I could just say that nothing
ever happens positive in this country or in this Congress without a
real team effort, and there were a lot of folks back home as well as
here in Washington that worked on this. I want to thank the gentleman
from Utah (Mr. Hansen), the chairman of the Committee on Resources, for
his support; the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall), the ranking
member, for his support; the gentleman from California (Mr.
Radanovich); the gentleman from Colorado (Mr. Hefley); the gentlewoman
from the Virgin Islands (Mrs. Christensen); and the gentleman from
Indiana (Mr. Souder). Again, we would not be here today without their
leadership.
And back home, those who first had this vision and have worked to
protect this site for years without Federal help so far, the city of
Waco, its leadership, represented by Mayor Linda Etheridge and the Waco
City Council and staff; people such as Margaret Mills; my friend Sam
Jack McGlassen, now diseased, who originally donated this property to
the city of Waco, Baylor University, for its important role in this
effort; and people such as Allen Samuels and Mr. and Mrs. Buddy Bostick
and so many others, who care about preserving our important history for
future generations.
I urge, Mr. Speaker, the House to vote in support of H.R. 1925.
Mrs. CHRISTENSEN. Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time,
and I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. SOUDER. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume to
conclude by saying that we are looking forward to seeing the continuing
development and study by the National Park Service. Our National Park
Service is not just great wild places; it is also important cultural
and archeological finds, such as Dinosaur National Park, such as Mesa
Verde, and other types of archeological finds.
This also proves that Texas not only has the biggest cattle, they at
one time had the big mammoths. Even before there were people, they had
huge mammoth ranches, apparently.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Souder) that the House suspend the rules
and pass the bill, H.R. 1925, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds having voted in favor
thereof) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________