[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 53 (Thursday, May 2, 2002)]
[House]
[Pages H2078-H2090]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




    EXPRESSING SOLIDARITY WITH ISRAEL IN ITS FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM

  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and agree to the 
resolution (H. Res. 392) expressing solidarity with Israel in its fight 
against terrorism, as amended.
  The Clerk read as follows:

                              H. Res. 392

       Whereas the United States and Israel are now engaged in a 
     common struggle against terrorism and are on the front-lines 
     of a conflict thrust upon them against their will;
       Whereas hundreds of innocent Israelis and Palestinians have 
     died tragically in violence since September 2000;
       Whereas Palestinian organizations are engaging in an 
     organized, systematic, and deliberate campaign of terror 
     aimed at inflicting as many casualties as possible on the 
     Israeli population, including through the use of suicide 
     terrorist attacks;
       Whereas the number of Israelis killed during that time by 
     suicide terrorist attacks alone, on a basis proportional to 
     the United States population, is approximately 9,000, three 
     times the number killed in the terrorist attacks on New York 
     and Washington on September 11, 2001;
       Whereas Yasir Arafat and members of the Palestinian 
     leadership have failed to abide by their commitments to non-
     violence made in the Israel-PLO Declaration of Principles 
     (the ``Oslo accord'') of September 1993, including their 
     pledges (1) to adhere strictly to ``a peaceful resolution of 
     the conflict,'' (2) to resolve ``all outstanding issues 
     relating to permanent status through negotiations,'' (3) to 
     renounce ``the use of terrorism and other acts of violence,'' 
     and (4) to ``assume responsibility over all PLO elements and 
     personnel in order to assure their compliance [with the 
     commitment to nonviolence], prevent violence, and discipline 
     violators'';
       Whereas the continued terrorism and incitement committed 
     and supported by official arms of the Palestinian Authority 
     are a direct violation of these commitments;
       Whereas the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, which is part of 
     Arafat's Fatah organization and has been designated a 
     ``Foreign Terrorist Organization'' by the United States 
     Government, and other Fatah forces have murdered scores of 
     innocent Israelis;
       Whereas forces under Yasir Arafat's direct control were 
     involved in the Palestinian Authority's thwarted attempt to 
     obtain 50 tons of offensive weapons shipped from Iran in the 
     Karine-A, and effort that irrefutably proved Arafat's embrace 
     of the use and escalation of violence;
       Whereas the Israeli Government has documents found in the 
     offices of the Palestinian Authority that demonstrate the 
     crucial financial support the Palestinian Authority continues 
     to provide for terrorist acts, including suicide bombers;
       Whereas the recent escalation of Palestinian attacks, 
     killing 46 Israelis during the week of Passover, included a 
     heinous suicide-bombing at a religious ceremony which killed 
     27 and wounded more than a hundred, many critically, and was 
     perpetrated by a known terrorist whom Israel had previously 
     asked Yasir Arafat to arrest;
       Whereas this suicide attack occurred at the very time 
     United States envoy General Anthony Zinni was attempting to 
     negotiate a cease-fire that would lead to the resumption of 
     Israeli-Palestinians political negotiations;
       Whereas, just before the Passover attack, Israel had agreed 
     to General Zinni's cease-fire proposals, whereas Yasir Arafat 
     rejected them;
       Whereas Yasir Arafat continues to incite terror by, for 
     example, saying of the Passover suicide bomber, ``Oh, God, 
     give me a martyrdom like this'';
       Whereas Yasir Arafat and the PLO have a long history of 
     making and breaking anti-terrorism pledges;
       Whereas President George W. Bush declared at a joint 
     session of Congress on September 20, 2001, that ``[f]rom this 
     day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or

[[Page H2079]]

     support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a 
     hostile regime'';
       Whereas President Bush recently stated that he ``fully 
     understands Israel's need to defend herself'' and that he 
     ``respect(s)'' the fact that Israelis have ``seen a wave of 
     suicide bombers coming to the heart of their cities and 
     killing innocent people'';
       Whereas President Bush, in his speech of April 4, 2002, 
     stated that ``the situation in which he [Arafat] finds 
     himself today is largely of his own making''; that Arafat 
     ``missed his opportunities, and thereby betrayed the hopes of 
     the people he's supposed to lead''; and that, [g]iven his 
     [Arafat's] failure, the Israeli Government feels it must 
     strike at terrorist networks that are killing its citizens'';
       Whereas Israel's military operations are an effort to 
     defend itself against the unspeakable horrors of ongoing 
     terrorism and are aimed only at dismantling the terrorist 
     infrastructure in the Palestinian areas, an obligation Arafat 
     himself undertook but failed to carry out; and
       Whereas the process of Israeli withdrawal is nearly 
     complete: Now, therefore, be it
       Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
       (1) stands in solidarity with Israel as it takes necessary 
     steps to provide security to its people by dismantling the 
     terrorist infrastructure in the Palestinian areas;
       (2) remains committed to Israel's right to self-defense and 
     supports additional United States assistance to help Israel 
     defend itself;
       (3) condemns the recent wave of Palestinian suicide 
     bombings;
       (4) condemns the ongoing support of terror by Yasir Arafat 
     and others members of the Palestinian leadership;
       (5) demand that the Palestinian Authority at last fulfill 
     its commitment to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure in 
     the Palestinian areas, including any such infrastructure 
     associated with PLO and Palestinian Authority entities tied 
     directly to Yasir Arafat;
       (6) is gravely concerned that Arafat's actions are not 
     those of a viable partner for peace;
       (7) urges all Arab states to declare their unqualified 
     opposition to all forms of terrorism, including suicide 
     bombing;
       (8) commends the President for his leadership in addressing 
     the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly the efforts of 
     the Administration to engage countries throughout the region 
     to condemn and prevent terrorism and to prevent a widening of 
     the conflict;
       (9) urges all parties in the region to pursue vigorously 
     efforts to establish a just, lasting, and comprehensive peace 
     in the Middle East; and
       (10) encourages the international community to take action 
     to alleviate the humanitarian needs of the Palestinian 
     people.

  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Thornberry). Pursuant to House 
Resolution 404, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde) and the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos) each will control 30 minutes.
  For what purpose does the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall) 
rise?
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the resolution and 
request half of the time.
  The SPEAKER pre tempore. Is the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Lantos) opposed to the resolution?
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, no, I am not. I strongly support the 
resolution.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XV, the 
gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall) will control the time in 
opposition to the motion.
  The Chairs recognizes the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde) for 30 
minutes.


                             General Leave

  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all members may 
have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks 
and include extraneous material on the resolution under consideration.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Illinois?
  There was no objection.
  Mr HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I yield half of my time to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Lantos) and ask unanimous consent that he may be 
permitted to control that time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from Illinois?
  There was no objection.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos) 
will control 15 minutes.
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, I support the pending resolution offered by my friend, 
the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos), and the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. DeLay) and by many of our colleagues.
  For a moment, Mr. Speaker, put yourself in the position of the Prime 
Minister of Israel and more importantly in the position of the mothers 
and fathers of Israel. And I speak of Jews and Arabs, for both have 
been victims. Having concluded an agreement under which the parties 
foreswore the use of force to settle political disputes, you are 
suddenly subject to violent acts, including eventually the nearly daily 
horror of homicide bombings. You realize those acts are not opposed and 
actually seem to be supported by the leadership on the Palestine side.
  What are you to do? You just take action to defend yourself, your 
people, your children; and that is what Israel did and the American 
people support it. We must, of course, think beyond the current 
situation.
  The administration has done a good job at diffusing this crisis and 
minimizing the loss of life, but now they must arrive at a method to 
determine once and for all if Chairman Arafat, given sufficient 
pressure and incentive, can exert the required leadership. If not, 
someone with authority must take his place; but for now he is the 
leader of the Palestinian people and for their sake, if not his, we 
must go the extra mile. This will require a reconstruction on 
democratic grounds of the Palestinian Authority, a new deal for the 
Palestine people from their leaders. Good government, open markets, not 
corruption, cronyism and monopolies must prevail in the Palestinian 
areas.
  The gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos) and I have now determined 
that we must add to the political and security steps that are part of 
the administration's plans. We must add an economic component to 
provide a prospect of a better life for the people of the region. A new 
Marshall Plan is needed to provide stability in the region, and I hope 
to develop a proposal in the near future with the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Lantos).
  The leadership of President Bush has been enormously helpful; and I 
am proud that he, the Congress, and the American people are standing up 
for our friends in the Middle East at this crucial moment in its 
history.
  Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished 
Democratic leader, the gentleman from Missouri (Mr. Gephardt).
  (Mr. GEPHARDT asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. GEPHARDT. Mr. Speaker, with this resolution today the House of 
Representatives is standing in solidarity with the people of Israel and 
for peace in the Middle East. We are defending a people, a democracy, 
and a friend that shares our commitment to the universal values 
cherished by all human beings in the world.
  Since 1948, America has stood with Israel when Harry Truman rejected 
the advice of his staff and formally recognized Israel as a sovereign 
nation. Since that time Israel's strength and America's leadership have 
been essential in advancing these goals. We cannot stand on the 
sidelines as Israel's security and the prospect of peace are 
undermined.
  We must not waiver in our commitment to those, Arab and Israeli 
alike, who have chosen the path of peace.
  A few months ago I visited the Middle East and saw firsthand that 
Israel is in a moment of great danger. Over the past several months 
Israel has endured terrorist attacks unrelenting in frequency and 
severity. In the past 18 months, more than 450 Israelis have been 
killed and over 4,000 have been wounded in attacks. For a country the 
size of Israel, these numbers are staggering. Proportionally, this 
equates to more than 21,000 American deaths and over 200,000 American 
injuries. Yet the Israeli people remain strong, and they remain 
determined to increase their security and pursue a lasting peace in the 
region.
  The American people are also committed to these goals: first, to 
preserve and strengthen Israel's security; second, to help Israel and 
its neighbors end the violence and the threats posed by terrorism; 
third, to resume a dialogue among those committed to a just and lasting 
peace for all. This is not an issue that politics should infect.
  What is important here is that Americans stand together and be 
bipartisan, and that the administration and the Congress speak with one 
voice as much as humanly possible on this issue.
  We must continue to lead efforts to bring about peace in the Middle 
East.

[[Page H2080]]

We are committed to the vision of two independent states living side by 
side in peace, security and prosperity. We seek a resolution of the 
conflict between Israel and all of its neighbors. We recognize the 
humanitarian needs of all people in the region, and we support efforts 
to address these needs.
  This is an important issue for the security of every human being in 
America, everybody in the Middle East and maybe everybody in the world. 
With this resolution we will stand by Israel, we will stand for peace, 
and we will stand for a future that brings peace and prosperity to all 
of the people of the Middle East.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
  Mr. Speaker, this is probably the most political nonpartisan 
resolution in the history of Congress. I have every bit of empathy and 
concern for those innocent Israelis that have lost their lives. And the 
statistics in the resolution, they have been demonstrated here today; 
but no mention has been made of the innocent Palestinians that have 
been killed by Israeli forces and settlers. In terms of U.S. numbers, 
this amounts to more than 30,000 dead, 120,000 wounded and maimed.
  So let us look at this issue in a balanced approach. Let us send a 
balanced message to the Middle East. The tens of thousands of Americans 
that have come to our Nation's capital demonstrating on both sides, 
Israelis have come, Palestinians have come, they need to see that 
Washington and the Congress is balanced in our efforts here.
  Neither side has fulfilled their agreements under Oslo. Let us get 
that straight. You have heard the attacks against Arafat. Sure he has 
not fulfilled them. Neither have the Israelis. Neither side, neither 
side is an angel here. Neither side is an angel. Let us get that on the 
record perfectly clear as well.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Michigan 
(Mr. Dingell).
  (Mr. DINGELL asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. DINGELL. Mr. Speaker, we have seen this resolution or one very 
like it before. The same thoughts that we saw before we see before us 
today, and that is that this is not a balanced resolution. It is not in 
the interests of Israel. It is not in the interests of the Palestinian 
people, and it is not in the interest of the United States. It is 
simply a denunciation of the Palestinians, and it does nothing to set 
out a picture of balance as the position of the United States.
  It is time the United States recognizes something. Our commitment, 
and I am a part of that, to Israel for its continued existence requires 
that there be peace in the Middle East, and it requires that the United 
States function as an honest broker and as a friend to all parties and 
to all countries in that area. We can and we should and we do and we 
denounce terrorism. It is wrong.
  But this denunciation of terrorism is not the kind of mechanism that 
will bring peace. It does not posture the United States as a friend to 
all. It does not posture the United States as an honest broker seeking 
to defend the interests of peace and to establish a place and a climate 
in which Israelis and Israel and Palestinians and a Palestinian state 
may live at peace. It simply takes one side. That is no way to get 
ourselves in the position of being an honest broker.
  I would like to read something that was said by a man wiser than I 
and wiser than most of us here. He said this: ``I truly tell you, we 
have before us today an opportunity for peace which time will never 
repeat and we must seize if we are really serious in struggling for 
peace. If we weaken or fritter away this opportunity we shall end in a 
new blood-bath. He who has conspired to lose it will have the curse of 
humanity and history upon his head.''
  These are the words that Anwar Sadat spoke to the Israeli Knesset in 
1977. I would remind you that Sadat, like Yizak Rabin, paid the highest 
price for his search for peace.
  I would tell you that until the United States recognizes the need for 
us and this country to function as an honest broker for peace, there 
will be no peace, there will be no security for Israel, there will be 
no security for the Palestinians and no security for the United States.
  Mr. Speaker, today we are debating yet another irresponsible 
Congressional resolution that does absolutely nothing to help end the 
violence that plagues the Israeli and Palestinian people. I rise in 
opposition to this resolution, which at a very delicate time undermines 
the Bush Administration's efforts to ease tensions, end violence, and 
bring about a fair peace that will be acceptable and beneficial to 
Israelis and Palestinians. This resolution sends exactly the wrong 
signal at this perilous time. It will only further fan the flames of 
violence, increase regional instability, and compromises our war on 
terrorism.
  With American forces engaged in battle, the Administration needs 
Congress to support its diplomatic efforts, particularly the effort to 
bring about peace in Israel and the Occupied Territories. The 
Administration needs Congress to support its efforts to engage both the 
Israelis and Palestinians as an honest broker that sees the death of 
any innocent human being as a tragedy and threat to the long-term 
interests of the parties involved, our regional allies, and the United 
States. Congress must stand for peace, for it is peace along that will 
benefit Israel, Palestine, and the United States. The Administration 
does not need Congress to pass one-sided, proactive measures that 
undermine U.S. diplomacy and our ability to address this problem, which 
has proven to be a cancer on Israel, Palestine, the region, and U.S. 
diplomacy.
  Consistent and fair U.S. leadership is critical to proving Israel 
security and allowing the Palestinian people to live with dignity, and 
is the best and perhaps only viable hope for reducing bloodshed. As bad 
as the situation is today, there are rays of hope that we must not 
block. We have an opportunity for peace, and numerous diplomatic 
initiatives--based on U.S. leadership and building on the Mitchell 
Committee Report, the Tenet plan, and the Saudi Proposal--that must 
move forward. These measures could prevent the widening of this 
conflict into a war in which there will not be a winner regardless of 
military outcome.
  Passage of H. Res. 392 will undermine the Administration, diminish 
U.S. leverage with the Palestinians, and further damage U.S. 
creditability in the region. If the U.S. fails to act as a peace 
proponent now, there will most certainly be a leadership vacuum in the 
region. This will hurt our allies, including Israel.
  Mr. Speaker, what is the vision of the Administration? Secretary 
Colin Powell said that is to build, ``a region where Israelis and Arabs 
can live together in peace, security, and dignity.'' To do this he 
noted that both parties must take steps, some painful, in order to 
reach a just conclusion to this conflict. H. Res. 392 does not embody 
this vision, and it does not embody peace.
  Why aren't we debating H. Con. Res. 253, a bill I introduced that 
endorses the Mitchell Commission recommendations? Why aren't we 
debating H. Res. 394, which my colleague from Oregon, Mr. DeFazio, 
introduced? Why aren't we debating H. Res. 382, that my friend Alcee 
Hastings introduced? All these bills are balanced, and urge a peaceful 
settlement to the ongoing conflict that is endangering the region and 
the world. Why aren't we urging the parties to work with the 
Administration to end the violence and make peace?
  Let me read you a statement made from a man wiser than I:

       I truly tell you: we have before us today an opportunity 
     for peace which time will never repeat and we must seize it 
     if we are really serious in struggling for peace. If we 
     weaken or fritter away this opportunity we shall end in a new 
     blood-bath; he who has conspired to lose it will have the 
     curse of humanity and history on his head.

  Mr. Speaker, these are the words Anwar Sadat spoke to the Israeli 
Knesset in 1977. Sadat, like Yitzak Rabin, paid the highest personal 
price for peace. Let us remember these words and these brave men, and 
champion efforts to bring about a just and lasting peace. Let's be on 
the right side of history. Vote down this resolution, and support the 
Administration's efforts to solve this conflict and bring peace to this 
troubled land.

                              {time}  1515

  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the 
distinguished gentleman from New York (Mr. Gilman).
  (Mr. GILMAN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. 
Hyde) for yielding me the time.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of H. Res. 392 in expressing 
America's solidarity with Israel in its fight against terrorism, and I 
commend the gentleman from Texas (Mr. DeLay) for his leadership and the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos), the ranking minority member of 
our committee,

[[Page H2081]]

for their cosponsorship of this resolution which makes several 
significant policy statements.
  The PLO and Chairman Arafat have long been suspected, but it was only 
recently made clear that they were engaged in an organized deliberate 
campaign of terror aimed at inflicting as many casualties as possible 
on the Israeli population by their suicide bombings. It is obvious that 
Mr. Arafat has not been any partner for peace.
  The amount of illegal weapons seized from the Palestinians by the 
Israelis is decisive evidence of their warlike intentions. Moreover, 
Mr. Arafat has continued to incite terror by stating with regard to the 
Passover massacre suicide bomber, ``Oh God, give me a martyrdom like 
this.''
  This proposal concludes that Mr. Arafat and the Palestinian Authority 
have failed to abide by their commitments, pursued an ongoing terrorism 
campaign against the State of Israel. The Passover massacre was 
perpetrated by a terrorist whom Israel had previously had called on Mr. 
Arafat to arrest.
  This resolution, which I am pleased to cosponsor, maintains its firm 
commitment to Israel's right of self-defense. Mr. Speaker, political 
disputes can only be solved through negotiation, through compromise and 
the building of trust and not by violence and certainly not by suicide 
bombings.
  Accordingly, I strongly urge support of H. Res. 392, and I urge my 
colleagues to fully support this measure.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield as much time as he may consume to 
the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Kildee).
  (Mr. KILDEE asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. KILDEE. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Lantos) for yielding me the time.
  Mr. Speaker, I have always been a strong supporter of the State of 
Israel, the people of Israel, and their need to live in peace behind 
secure borders, enjoying normal relations with their neighbors and the 
world.
  I am an equally strong supporter of the rights of the Palestinian 
people to live in peace in their own state, behind secure borders, 
enjoying normal relations with their neighbors and the world.
  I agree with the sponsors of this resolution that the recent spate of 
Palestinian suicide bombings of Israeli civilians is horrific, and 
deserves condemnation. We must stand united against terrorism, in all 
its forms.
  However, I am concerned with some of the deficiencies of this 
resolution.
  President Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell are exerting great 
efforts to move the Middle East peace process forward. The United 
States is the only country that has the resources, the will, and the 
influence with both sides to help bring them to a peaceful solution.
  Both President Bush and Secretary Powell have raised questions about 
the effect of this resolution.
  The Congress should rightly praise the President's peace efforts. But 
we should also encourage the Arab countries to embrace the Saudi peace 
proposal for an Israeli withdrawal from the occupied territories, 
coupled with a complete recognition and acceptance by the Arab 
countries of Israel's right to secure borders and normal relations with 
her neighbors.
  It is also unfortunate that the sponsors of the resolution did not 
insert language sought by the Bush White House that would acknowledge 
the suffering of the Palestinian people.
  Peace will not come to this region until both sides are willing to 
give up some of their maximal goals, including the questions of 
refugees and settlements. And it means both sides must be invested in 
the success of the peace process and in maintaining peaceful relations 
between the Israeli and Palestinian peoples.
  Mr. Speaker, I will vote for H. Res. 392, despite its deficiencies as 
a way of expressing solidarity with the people of Israel during a time 
of strife. But we must never lose sight of the need to also acknowledge 
the suffering and the political rights and aspirations of the 
Palestinian people.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am delighted to yield 1 minute to the 
gentlewoman from Connecticut (Ms. DeLauro).
  Ms. DeLAURO. Mr. Speaker, in the last 18 months we have watched while 
nearly 400 Israelis, mostly civilians, have died in the violence in the 
Middle East. We have watched the escalation that has cost so many 
Palestinians their lives in a senseless intifada. We seek an end to 
violence and we ask for peace to all the people of the Middle East.
  The established Palestinian leadership cannot decide on which side of 
the line they stand, but this is a moral line that one cannot straddle 
in pursuit of political goals. Whether or not they ordered the 
terrorists into action or whether they turned a blind eye, it is they 
who are responsible for the violence that kills the innocent and kills 
the young people who are suicide bombers today.
  Israel is not perfect, but I believe that Israel does not wage war on 
innocents. Israel knows that there is no compromise with terrorism.
  America lost its innocence after September 11, and that caused us 
again to view and understanding of the forces of evil that can threaten 
our survival. There is no more important moment for solidarity. With 
only 6 million people in the preciously small place, Israel needs our 
voice. Our solidarity is borne of our common instinctive response to 
that September 11 attack. With this resolution, we renew the solidarity 
in a common cause.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the 
gentlewoman from North Carolina (Mrs. Clayton).
  (Mrs. CLAYTON asked and was given permission to revise and extend her 
remarks and include extraneous material.)
  Mrs. CLAYTON. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from West Virginia 
for yielding me the time.
  I am going to enter into the Record at this point a statement by 
Desmond Tutu, who asks for a balance for peace and a way to bring peace 
together.

                   [From the Guardian, Apr. 29, 2002]

                       Apartheid in the Holy Land

                           (By Desmond Tutu)

       In our struggle against apartheid, the great supporters 
     were Jewish people. They almost instinctively had to be on 
     the side of the disenfranchised, of the voiceless ones, 
     fighting injustice, oppression and evil. I have continued to 
     feel strongly with the Jews. I am patron of a holocaust 
     center in South Africa. I believe Israel has a right to 
     secure borders.
       What is not so understandable, not justified, is what it 
     did to another people to guarantee its existence. I've been 
     very deeply distressed in my visit to the Holy Land; it 
     reminded me so much of what happened to us black people in 
     South Africa. I have seen the humiliation of the Palestinians 
     at checkpoints and roadblocks, suffering like us when young 
     white police officers prevented us from moving about.
       On one of my visits to the Holy Land I drove to a church 
     with the Anglican bishop in Jerusalem. I could hear tears in 
     his voice as he pointed to Jewish settlements. I thought of 
     the desire of Israelis for security. But what of the 
     Palestinians who have lost their land and homes?
       I have experienced Palestinians pointing to what were their 
     homes, now occupied by Jewish Israelis. I was walking with 
     Canon Naim Ateek (the head of the Sabeel Ecumenical Centre) 
     in Jerusalem. He pointed and said: ``Our home was over there. 
     We were driven out of our home; it is now occupied by Israeli 
     Jews.''
       My heart aches. I say why are our memories so short. Have 
     our Jewish sisters and brothers forgotten their humiliation? 
     Have they forgotten the collective punishment, the home 
     demolitions, in their own history so soon? Have they turned 
     their backs on their profound and noble religious traditions? 
     Have they forgotten that God cares deeply about the 
     downtrodden?
       Israel will never get true security and safety through 
     oppressing another people. A true peace can ultimately be 
     built only on justice. We condemn the violence of suicide 
     bombers, and we condemn the corruption of young minds taught 
     hatred; but we also condemn the violence of military 
     incursions in the occupied lands, and the inhumanity that 
     won't let ambulances reach the injured.
       The military action of recent days, I predict with 
     certainty, will not provide the security and peace Israelis 
     want; it will only intensify the hatred.
       Isreal has three options: revert to the previous stalemated 
     situation; exterminate all Palestinians; or--I hope--to 
     strive for peace based on justice, based on withdrawal from 
     all the occupied territories, and the establishment of a 
     viable Palestinian state on those territories side by side 
     with Israel, both with secure borders.
       We in South Africa had a relatively peaceful transition. If 
     our madness could end as it did, it must be possible to do 
     the same everywhere else in the world. If peace could come to 
     South Africa, surely it can come to the Holy Land?
       My brother Naim Ateek has said what we used to say: ``I am 
     not pro- this people or that. I am pro-justice, pro-freedom. 
     I am anti-injustice, anti-oppression.''
       But you know as well as I do that, somehow, the Israeli 
     government is placed on a pedestal [in the US], and to 
     criticize it is to be immediately dubbed anti-semitic, as if 
     the Palestinians were not semitic. I am not even anti-white, 
     despite the madness of that group. And how did it come about 
     that Israel was collaborating with the apartheid government 
     on security measures?
       People are scared in this country [the US], to say wrong is 
     wrong because the Jewish

[[Page H2082]]

     lobby is powerful--very powerful. Well, so what? For goodness 
     sake, this is God's world! We live in a moral universe. The 
     apartheid government was very powerful, but today it no 
     longer exists. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pinochet, 
     Milosevic, and Idi Amin were all powerful, but in the end 
     they bit the dust.
       Injustice and oppression will never prevail. Those who are 
     powerful have to remember the litmus test that God gives to 
     the powerful: what is your treatment of the poor, the hungry, 
     the voiceless? And on the basis of that, God passes judgment.
       We should put out a clarion call to the government of the 
     people of Israel, to the Palestinian people and say: peace is 
     possible, peace based on justice is possible. We will do all 
     we can to assist you to achieve this peace, because it is 
     God's dream, and you will be able to live amicably together 
     as sisters and brothers.

  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Wisconsin (Mr. Obey), a member of the Appropriations Committee.
  Mr. OBEY. Mr. Speaker, Oh, little town of Bethlehem, we witness and 
we cry, Israelis and Palestinians, both practice eye for eye.
  Made blind by rage and terror, they make a just God cry, and crush 
the hopes of all the years while still more children die.
  Our senators and congressmen produce a rash appeal, selective words 
of blame are used, instead of words that heal.
  Put politics and word games before the cause of peace and make it 
still more difficult to bring the region peace.
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Coble).
  Mr. COBLE. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. 
Hyde) for yielding the time to me.
  I have been in the People's House, Mr. Speaker, for nine terms, and 
during each term, peace in the Middle East has been debated at length. 
Here we are again today.
  I care not who speaks for Israel or for the PLO, but I do care who 
rejects terrorism and who embraces it. We cannot stand idly by and see 
innocent persons slain day after day. This peace process must be driven 
by reason, not anger and hostility.
  Israel has demonstrated that it can live in peace with its Arab 
neighbors, and reasonable men and women representing each side of this 
conflict should formulate a peace plan whereby bloodshed in the Middle 
East becomes a sordid plank of the past, and peace, an ingredient that 
sweeps across the Middle East, to be enjoyed by Israelis as well as 
Palestinians.
  This should be our prayer.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am delighted to yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Crowley).
  Mr. CROWLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of this 
important resolution. On September 11, raw, cold blooded terror 
exploded in the United States of America, the type of terror that 
Israelis know far too well.
  Here in the United States we point to one single day, September 11, 
and remember the unspeakable carnage and terror. Israelis cannot point 
to one single day of terror because they live with terror every single 
day.
  As someone who lost a family member on September 11, each time a 
homicide bomber attacks a cafe in Israel, it reawakens my grief and my 
anger, and I know the impact of each explosion is felt in the hearts 
and minds of every single American.
  Israel and the United States are fighting the same enemy. Our enemies 
have different faces but a common objective.
  The U.S. has found it easy to identify our enemy but often difficult 
to identify our true friends. A friend is someone with whom one shares 
a common cause and struggle. Our cause is peace and our friend is 
Israel.
  It is time to stand up and speak with one resolute voice and say, 
Israel, we are in this together.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from 
Michigan (Mr. Conyers).
  Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Speaker, is there anyone in this body or Nation that 
does not know that the U.S. government is friendly with Israel and 
supports their cause? Now, I would ask the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. 
Hyde), the chairman, why were there no hearings? I would ask the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos), the ranking member, why were 
there no hearings?
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. CONYERS. I yield to the gentleman from California.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I will be delighted to respond to the 
gentleman.
  There was no reason for the lack of hearings. This issue has been 
discussed ad nauseam and ad infinitum, and the tragedy which is 
unfolding in the area compelled us to move expeditiously. We will be 
delighted to have extended hearings, as I am sure the Chairman plans, 
on the whole issue of peace in the Middle East.
  Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Speaker, as my ranking member and friend knows, we 
are trying to construct an environment that we can talk about this 
matter among ourselves and that there needs to be a national dialogue 
around the country.
  I have talked with the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde) about it, 
to which he has agreed. I have talked with the senior Senators from 
Delaware, North Dakota, the gentleman from New York (Mr. Gilman), the 
gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall), and the gentlewoman from 
California (Ms. Woolsey).
  Here is what Martin Luther King said, ``We are caught in an 
inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of 
destiny.''
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am delighted and proud to yield 2 minutes 
to the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Pelosi), our distinguished 
Democratic whip, and my friend and neighbor.
  Ms. PELOSI. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from California (Mr. 
Lantos) for yielding me the time.
  Mr. Speaker, today as we are engaged in this very sad and difficult 
debate on this floor of the House, there is an ongoing tragedy in the 
Middle East, and indeed, we mourn the loss of life on both sides of the 
conflict.
  Yes, the U.S. and Israel have had an unbreakable friendship based on 
our shared commitment to peace, stability and democracy. A secure 
Israel can only prevail if there is peace in the Middle East.
  Less than 2 years ago, Israeli and Palestinian leaders met at Camp 
David, and we were hopeful of an agreement that all issues of permanent 
status, including the establishment of a Palestinian state and a secure 
State of Israel would be resolved.
  Prime Minister Barak made a generous and historic proposal. Chairman 
Arafat missed that historic opportunity when he failed to seize it and 
to negotiate a peaceful settlement of the Middle East crisis.
  We must return to that effort sooner rather than later. Neither 
Israel nor the Palestinians can afford to abandon the search for peace.
  The United States must lead at this critical time. We know that when 
the United States is involved, there is less violence in the Middle 
East.
  Terrorism and suicide bombings must not be the price that is paid for 
a free society. The goal of terrorists is to instill fear. They kill 
not just to destroy lives but to change the way people live and the way 
a country thrives.
  In order to build a better future for his people, Chairman Arafat 
must become a viable partner for peace. It is only through honest 
negotiations, not through violence, that the Palestinians can achieve 
their goal, which most of us support, the creation of a Palestinian 
state.
  That is why I am pleased that the resolution before us today calls 
for the international community to provide humanitarian assistance to 
Palestinians, and the United States must be a strong part of that. We 
must build upon the efforts of the heroes who have built the foundation 
for peace. We must honor the legacy of the martyr for peace, Prime 
Minister Rabin, and work for a secure Israel and for peace in the 
Middle East. As I said, that can only happen with a secure Palestinian 
state.
  In the spirit of Rabin, we must be guided by his words, ``No more 
bloodshed, no more tears.''
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Thornberry). The gentleman from Illinois 
(Mr. Hyde) has 9\1/2\ minutes remaining. The gentleman from California 
(Mr. Lantos) has 10 minutes remaining. The gentleman from West Virginia 
(Mr. Rahall) has 23\1/2\ minutes remaining.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from 
Ohio (Mr. Kucinich).
  Mr. KUCINICH. Mr. Speaker, I declare my support for the State of 
Israel and the security of the Israeli people. I

[[Page H2083]]

also declare my support for a Palestinian state and the security of a 
Palestinian people. So I will vote present today because I believe the 
security of Israel requires the security of the Palestinians.
  I will vote present because I believe the United States can do better 
through honest brokering and a principled commitment to peaceful 
coexistence. Today we are missing an opportunity to lead people of the 
Middle East toward a secure and stable future together.
  This resolution equates Israel's dilemma, which is the outcome of the 
Palestinian struggle for self-determination, with the United States 
campaign against the criminal organization, al Qaeda. Unfortunately, 
our own policy is undefined, amorphous, without borders, without limits 
and without congressional oversight.
  For this Congress to place the historic Israeli-Palestinian conflict 
into the context of the current fashion of U.S. global policy pitches, 
Israelis and Palestinians alike into a black hole of policy without 
purpose and conflict, without resolution.
  The same humanity which requires us to acknowledge with profound 
concern the pain and suffering of the people of Israel requires a 
similar expression for the pain and suffering of the Palestinians. When 
our brothers and sisters are fighting to the death, instead of 
declaring solidarity with one against the other, should we not declare 
solidarity with both for peace so that both may live in security and 
freedom?
  If we seek to require the Palestinians who do not have their own 
state to adhere to a higher standard of conduct, should we not also ask 
Israel with over a half century experience with Statehood to adhere to 
a basic standard of conduct, including meeting the requirements of 
international law?
  There is a role for the Congress and the administration in helping to 
bring a lasting peace in the Middle East. However, this resolution does 
not create that role.

                              {time}  1530

  After today, we will still need to determine a course of action to 
bring about peace. This course will require multilateral diplomacy, 
which strengthens cooperation among all countries in the region. It 
will require focused, unwavering attention. It will require sufficient 
financial resources. And it will require that our Nation have the 
political will to bring about a true and a fair and sustainable 
resolution of the conflict.
  When this Congress enters into the conflict and takes sides between 
Israel and Palestine, we do not help to achieve peace, but the 
opposite. Similarly, the administration should consider that when it 
conducts a war against terrorism without limits, the principle of war 
is quickened everywhere in the world, including the Middle East. When 
it talks incessantly about invading Iraq, the tempo of war is picked up 
everywhere.
  If we truly want peace in the Middle East, this resolution is 
counterproductive. I will vote ``present'' because I do not believe 
this resolution dignifies the role towards creating peace which this 
Congress can and must fulfill.
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Horn), my very learned colleague.
  Mr. HORN. Mr. Speaker, September 11 showed Americans the results of 
the devastating effects of terrorism in our lives and communities. 
Sadly, citizens of Israel must deal with terrorism every day. The 
terrorists want to destroy Israel. As the only democracy in the Middle 
East, Israel embodies the ideals and virtues that we treasure as 
Americans.
  Let us support the people of Israel. The peace will only come when 
Israel and its Arab neighbors come together and work out a realistic 
and honest agreement. For that to occur, acts of terrorism must end and 
Israel's right to exist in peace must be recognized and honored.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from California (Mr. Sherman).
  (Mr. SHERMAN asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. SHERMAN. Mr. Speaker, today Israel faces an attack on its 
continued existence by those who reject a two-state solution. Now is 
the time for us to demonstrate our solidarity with those under 
terrorist attack. We should not be balanced between those who target 
civilians for death and those seeking to protect themselves from 
terror.
  For those who thirst for balance, recognize that this resolution is 
but a drop in the bucket of world commentary, and this resolution will 
help balance, will help offset the rash of anti-Israel diatribes and 
anti-Semitic violence.
  Some will disagree with the exact drafting of this or that clause in 
this resolution, but the world will little notice the exact text 
however. The vote total, will blaze in headlines worldwide. Let that 
vote total demonstrate that no one can drive a wedge between the United 
States and Israel, and no one can drive a wedge between Democrats and 
the pro-Israel community.
  Vote yes!
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from 
Ohio (Ms. Kaptur).
  Ms. KAPTUR. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in the cause of peace and to 
express my concern about the content and the timing of this resolution, 
and I urge my colleagues to vote ``present.''
  Just before we adjourned last year, I introduced House Resolution 
328, a bill expressing the sense of Congress that during the holiday 
season peace should be America's top priority in the Middle East. I was 
greatly disappointed, in fact I was shocked, that the leadership 
refused to bring up such a mild but hopeful bill on this floor. They 
never considered peace a priority.
  The killing escalated over the holidays and into this year. What a 
corrosive impact this is having on the young minds of our world. If 
Congress truly wants to encourage peace, then let us do it 
constructively.
  I agree with the gentleman from Texas (Mr. DeLay) that hundreds more 
innocent Israelis and Palestinians have died tragically in the ongoing 
violence. But his one-sided resolution will only fan the killing 
frenzy. It offers no encouragement for the Arab states to have a place 
at the peace table.
  Israel cannot make peace alone. This resolution envisions no 
Palestinian state as key in the peace process. At its worst, I fear it 
represents crass domestic politics in this election year. By contrast, 
President Bush and Secretary Powell have both asked that Congress put 
this bill on hold.
  Instead of supporting our ally, Israel, this resolution further 
endangers the delicate balance so necessary to bring peace to the 
entire region. Let us be a true partner for peace, not just with Israel 
but as well with the Arab states in the region, surely those that have 
suffered bloodshed in their common cause with Israel, for a just and 
lasting peace.
  Mr. Speaker, a just peace process must be inclusive or it will not be 
sustained. America must stand for inclusion. I urge the Members to vote 
``present'' on this resolution, and in this way we will demonstrate 
America's continuing support for Israel but also that this resolution 
is half-drawn and ill-timed.
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
distinguished gentleman from New York (Mr. Houghton).
  Mr. HOUGHTON. Mr. Speaker, I am going to support this resolution. 
There is no question about it. We have to support Israel, irrespective 
of what party is in charge. The people of Israel are our friends. In 
these horrible and dangerous times, we just cannot turn our back on 
them. They have to know we are there for them.
  Having said that, I must admit that I think the timing of this 
resolution leaves a lot to be desired. Here we are at a point of high 
tension. Both Israelis and the Palestinians are wounded and desperate 
and looking to us for leadership. Secretary Powell has come back from 
his trip and Prince Abdullah has made his suggestions. As we sit here, 
the quartet, the U.S.-U.N., U.N.-EU, and the Russian Federation are 
hammering out some sort of resolution in the White House.
  We must support Israel, but we must not turn our back against those 
on the other side, and they should know that, because our objective, 
primarily, has got to be peace.

[[Page H2084]]

  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Engel).
  (Mr. ENGEL asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the resolution, 
in support of Israel, our best ally, with whom we have shared values; 
freedom of the press, freedom of speech. Israel is an outpost of 
western democracy in a sea of dictatorships and tyrants. If we, 
rightfully so, can go halfway around the world to combat terror in 
Afghanistan, surely Israel should be allowed to do the same in her own 
back yard.
  For those who say the timing is wrong, the timing is right. Arafat 
has to know now that we will not allow him to use terror as a 
negotiating tool. The terror that has come out with the suicide 
bombers, three-quarters of those are affiliated with Arafat's Fateh 
group. We have to be consistent in the fight of against terrorism. No 
double standard. Because if we have a double standard, it undermines 
our fight against terrorism, and there is no moral equivalency between 
terrorism and self-defense.
  People who say we should be more balanced, why is the rest of the 
world not balanced? The Arabs will understand and will make peace when 
they know that our bond with Israel is unshakable. And this resolution 
goes a long way in solidifying that bond.
  We must vote ``yes.'' Vote against terror, vote ``yes'' on the 
resolution.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from 
Oregon (Mr. DeFazio), a gentleman who has sponsored a very balanced 
resolution in this body.
  Mr. DeFAZIO. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this 
time.
  When Yasir Arafat walked away from the peace agreement so painfully 
negotiated with President Clinton and Prime Minister Barak, he was 
recklessly irresponsible and not a leader in the interest of peace. He 
provided the fuel for the current endless, downward spiral of violence.
  But when Ariel Sharon engaged in provocative foray to the Temple 
Mount to foster his political ambitions, he provided the spark that 
ignited the fuel of Arafat and the current violence. And his actions 
since then have only fanned the flames. These are not men who will lead 
to peace, neither of them.
  The United States must stand tall as a powerful and honest broker of 
a balanced plan for peace. I believe that President Bush and Secretary 
of State Powell have made a strong and credible effort to bring an end 
to the violence and to begin a negotiated peace. They have offered a 
balanced plan. I have offered a resolution which mirrors their balanced 
plan. It will not be considered. It is not allowed to be debated. It 
will not be voted upon as an alternative. We only have this one 
resolution before us, which is totally slanted and biased and will only 
encourage more irresponsibility by Ariel Sharon.
  I thought there was one thing that might turn the tide in this 
struggle, and it was a horrible tragedy in the end of March. Look at 
these two young women. They look like sisters. One, Ayat al-Akhras, 18, 
was a suicide bomber who killed Rachel Levy at the grocery store, age 
17. I thought that both sides would be so appalled by this unbelievable 
tragedy and see the hopelessness of this that they might turn toward 
peace. But, no, that has not happened there.
  Let that happen here, in the home of democracy and peace. Let us not 
have the United States Congress somewhere to the right of the Likud in 
Israel. Let us have the United States Congress stand up for the 
American people, for peace and democracy in the Middle East. And this 
resolution that we are being forced to vote on today will not lead us 
in that direction.
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the 
gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Leach), the distinguished chairman of the 
Subcommittee on East Asia and the Pacific.
  Mr. LEACH. Mr. Speaker, I intend to vote for this resolution, with 
reservations. I will vote for it because the opposite perspective would 
be inexplicable. However, I have reservations on process and 
substantive grounds.
  This resolution is pressed in this body at this time, without 
administration support and without review by the committee of 
jurisdiction, all apparently because of concern that the Senate might 
competitively address the issue before the House.
  Substantively this resolution is unbalanced, untimely, and 
potentially counterproductive to the foreign policy interests of the 
United States and, implicitly, the viability of the State of Israel.
  It is the case that this Congress must unequivocally support the 
existence of the state of Israel. This is a moral imperative. But if 
Israel is to provide security for its people, it must recognize that 
the Palestinian people, despite a leadership that has misserved it, 
have legitimate aspirations. There can be no security for either 
Israelis or Palestinians unless fair and equitable borders are 
established delineating both a Palestinian and Israeli state.
  This resolution asserts a common U.S.-Israeli position on terrorism. 
The more difficult quid pro quo is to come: The expectation that if the 
United States and international community broker a credible peace 
agreement, the Knesset will seize the future and rise above the 
politics of the moment.
  We in this body can express with ease, and perhaps too much glibness, 
rhetorical concerns of the nature contained in this bill. What will be 
quantumly more difficult is for the Knesset and the Palestinian 
Authority to reach an accord that can provide for a future of peace and 
stability. Parties in the region simply must demonstrate more courage 
and more balanced judgment than this Congress is doing today.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume, 
before yielding to my next speaker, to just point out to my colleague 
who equated a suicide bomber with a victim that that is precisely what 
this resolution is all about. There is no moral equivalence between a 
suicide bomber and an innocent victim of a suicide bomber. I find this 
analogy he portrayed sickening.
  Mr. Speaker, I am delighted to yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
Pennsylvania (Mr. Hoeffel).
  Mr. HOEFFEL. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding me this 
time.
  With the passage of this resolution, we stand in solidarity with 
Israel and with her people, and offer our support and our sympathy. We 
are outraged by the use of terror against innocent civilians. It is 
time for the Arab leaders and the Palestinian leaders to completely 
renounce the use of terror, in word and in deed.
  There is no moral equivalency, as my friend from California has said, 
between the use of terror against innocent civilians and with Israeli 
self-defense. There are simple truths here. Israel has the right to 
defend herself, and this country should not be putting limits on that 
right of self-defense.
  I will join three of my colleagues, Mr. Speaker, in a trip this 
weekend to Israel to demonstrate by our presence the solidarity and 
concern and support that this House will voice through a majority vote 
here today.

                              {time}  1545

  We stand with Israel. Our support is rock solid, and Israel will 
survive.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Michigan (Mr. Bonior).
  Mr. BONIOR. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong opposition to this 
resolution. This resolution blindly supports Israel's actions against 
the Palestinians and wholly denies the generations of suffering of the 
Palestinian people. This would be wrong at any time, but in light of 
what has happened at Jenin and Bethlehem, Ramallah, Haifa, Jerusalem, 
and Netanya, and what continues to happen today, this resolution is 
dangerous.
  Like most Americans, I support Israel. However, just like most 
Americans, I do not support and will not support all of Israel's 
policies. Generations of Palestinians and Israelis have suffered in the 
region, but the violence of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict cannot be 
examined or addressed in isolation of decades of occupation of millions 
of Palestinians.
  Israeli suffering is something that this body understands and 
discusses. But what of the suffering of the Palestinian people? What of 
the history of

[[Page H2085]]

land confiscation, water rights, torture, settlements, collective 
punishments, home demolitions, curfews, administrative detentions, 
expulsions, child labor? Where is the language about the 1,000-plus 
Palestinians killed in the last 19 months, bodies found under rubble? 
Where is the language about the thousands made homeless by the 
bulldozers in Jenin alone? Where is the language about the relief 
agencies denied access to treat the sick and wounded? We know that 
relief agencies, including the International Committee of the Red 
Cross, were prevented from reaching and evacuating and treating the 
sick and wounded throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip, resulting in 
untold deaths, from the mother who bled to death from a normally 
nonfatal wound in front of her children, to the couple buried alive 
under rubble for 8 days. The stories coming to light are horrific.
  Rarely on this floor is there discussion of the nearly 420 
Palestinian villages destroyed at the time of Israel's founding in 
1948, or the 3.8 million refugees registered by the United Nations or 
the estimated 2 million others not registered. Palestinians live in 59 
different recognized refugees camps in misery, in poverty, with no hope 
of a better future for the next generations that are born into those 
camps.
  Can we know today what 38 percent employment in the West Bank or 75 
percent unemployment in Gaza can do to a population? While we cling to 
the hope of peace that Oslo would bring, Palestinians saw a remarkable 
growth in settlements. As of February, Peace Now estimates the 
settlers' population at 230,000, having approximately doubled in the 
last 10 years under Oslo.
  Mr. Speaker, this is not a good resolution. I encourage Members to 
vote against it.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from 
Nevada (Ms. Berkley).
  Ms. BERKLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of this resolution 
and as an advocate of a strong American-Israeli relationship. No 
country in the world is more familiar with what we Americans 
experienced on September 11 than is Israel.
  There are those who object to Israel's actions of self-defense. I ask 
those Members, what is America doing in Afghanistan? Are Israeli 
victims of terror in some way different from American victims? Do 
Americans have a right to self-defense and Israelis a right to die? The 
peace process is dead because the Palestinians killed it. It is time 
for Yasir Arafat and the so-called Palestinian leadership to express 
their desire for a Palestinian state living peacefully next to Israel 
rather than a Palestinian state in the place of Israel; and they need 
to say it in English and Arabic.
  The crisis in the Middle East has nothing to do with a Palestinian 
homeland. The Israelis have agreed to that long ago. It has everything 
to do with the survival of the State of Israel, which the Palestinians 
have yet to recognize. This resolution sends a clear message to the 
supporters of terrorism and the enemies of Israel that America will 
never be an ally to those who commit terror.
  Mr. Speaker, I ask all Members to support this resolution and stand, 
as this Member does, side by side with the people of the State of 
Israel.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from 
Washington (Mr. Inslee).
  (Mr. INSLEE asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. INSLEE. Mr. Speaker, of course Israel has a right to a military 
response to this immoral terrorism. Of course we stand with Israel. But 
this resolution has a major omission: it is too weak for America. It 
does not cut the mustard for America because it does not allow America 
to fulfill its manifest destiny of the only hope in the world of a 
force for peace to be an honest broker to help find justice and peace 
in this region of the world.
  It rightfully expresses our permanent, unalterable commitment to the 
security of a Jewish state in Israel, and it wrongfully excludes any 
reference, any reference of a recognition or even our interest in 
recognizing the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people for a 
viable state of their own. This is the national policy of the United 
States of America, but it was omitted from this resolution for 
partisan, political purposes.
  We rightfully condemn suicide bombing, but we cannot blind ourselves 
to the reality that when the world's only superpower totally ignores 
one people, it cannot serve effectively to bring peace to the other. We 
owe the Israeli people more than blind obedience to any of their 
government's policies. We cannot be a blinded giant. We owe them 
honesty, and it is honest to say that a national policy of refusing to 
accept and recognize the legitimate right of Palestinians to a viable 
state is not a step on the road to peace. Ultimately there will be 
justice for both, or there will be peace for neither. We know that 
violence breeds when hope dies and both parties are blinded by hate. 
Only we can bring hope to this region.
  Mr. Speaker, in doing so, we ought to give Israel the same love and 
assistance we would give our own brother. So as we would speak up when 
our brother makes a judgment as to his own harm, so we ought to speak 
out and say that the settlement policy on the West Bank is hurting 
Israel. In our acquiescence, our silence in this resolution hurts 
Israel and does not serve her true vision of high moral values for 
which we have always admired her.
  Mr. Speaker, to make it abundantly clear what this debate is about, 
and I see the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde) has stepped out, I 
would ask the majority party: Would the majority leadership accept a 
unanimous consent request to add to this resolution a simple sentence 
that would recognize the hope of the American people that both these 
parties can find viable states of their own, living in peace, one next 
to the other?
  Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
  Mr. INSLEE. I yield to the gentleman from New York.
  Mr. GILMAN. Mr. Speaker, I am not in a position to accept that 
statement at this time.
  Mr. INSLEE. Mr. Speaker, that is most regrettable because that is the 
aspiration of the American people and the world, and we ought to 
fulfill it.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from 
Virginia (Mr. Moran).
  Mr. MORAN of Virginia. Mr. Speaker, I deeply regret that I must vote 
against this resolution, not for what it says, but for what it does not 
say. Of course I agree with the strong condemnation of Palestinian 
suicide bombings killing so many innocent Israeli civilians. Terrorism 
is utterly intolerable, and it cannot be rationalized by other 
injustices.
  The Palestinian leadership's choice of violence against the innocent 
as a weapon of war does in fact justify retaliation. But how I wish we 
could have a leader with the greatness of Ghandi in the Middle East who 
understood that violence begets violence, as it has catapulted the 
region into killing and destruction.
  I must oppose this resolution because it is unbalanced and, thus, I 
believe counterproductive in bringing long-term peace and security to 
the people of Israel. It does not reference President Bush's words of 
April 4 and America's consistent foreign policy that Israel must stop 
the expansion and withdraw from the Palestinian-controlled territories 
before a sustainable peace can be achieved.
  This country supports U.N. Resolution 242, and Israel's unwillingness 
to comply is a contributing factor to the cycle of violence and 
despair.
  This House resolution does not make it clear, as Deputy Secretary of 
Defense Paul Wolfowitz said before thousands at an Israeli rally that 
America mourns the deaths of all innocent life, Israeli and 
Palestinian. Over 1,500 Palestinians and 500 Israelis have been killed 
just since September.
  Yes, many Arabs hate the U.S. for our prosperity and our way of life, 
but they especially hate us because they see us as turning a blind eye 
towards the aggression and adding to the daily humiliation that hardens 
the hearts of even the most peace-loving Palestinian people. And, yes, 
shame on the Arab states for too often being part of the problem rather 
than the solution, but their values and actions are not the standard by 
which we must measure ours. Our response should not be to further 
alienate these states, thus undercutting our efforts to persuade our 
Arab allies to help stem the Palestinian violence.

[[Page H2086]]

  We as a Nation are defined by our respect for all innocent human 
life, and believe that our power has a purpose to promote peace, 
understanding and mutual interdependence among all of the neighbors of 
the world. When whole towns and villages are reduced to rubble, when 
innocent loved ones are killed indiscriminately, and when the 
Palestinian people have been treated with such contempt by their 
occupiers, it breeds rage and desperation among a whole new generation 
of avengers; and a whole new cycle of vengeance, by any means, begins. 
That is not in our interest; and it is certainly not in Israel's 
interest, whose existence, security and future is not best served by 
this unbalanced resolution; and that is why it should be rejected.
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Issa).
  (Mr. ISSA asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. ISSA. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yield me this time 
to speak in favor of a bill, not because it is perfect, because like 
many of our resolutions, and like many Members have said, it is less 
than perfect. It does not speak in a balanced fashion about some of the 
other shortcomings.
  But I believe on the floor today we have to make a statement, a 
statement that the violence must end. A statement that now that 
Chairman Arafat has at least limited freedom of movement again, that he 
use this second chance to bring about an end to violence and a 
resumption in the altogether too necessary compromises that must be 
made if we are going to have peace in the Middle East, peace that will 
benefit both sides, that will end the violence on both sides, that will 
save lives on both sides.

                              {time}  1600

  So although we could all speak and speak rightfully about what is not 
in this legislation, or even what is maybe wrong in the resolution, I 
would ask my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to vote for this, to 
make this strong statement.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield such time as he may 
consume to my friend, the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Lynch).
  (Mr. LYNCH and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. LYNCH. Mr. Speaker, I realize that there are many Members that 
wanted to speak on this resolution today; and unfortunately for me, my 
seniority does not allow me to have an opportunity to speak.
  I have some remarks here, Mr. Speaker, on behalf of this resolution 
and in support of the people of Israel, and I will enter them into the 
Record at a later date.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
distinguished gentleman from Florida (Mr. Wexler).
  Mr. WEXLER. Mr. Speaker, the United States must stand in solidarity 
with Israel during this devastating time. Hundreds of Israelis have 
been murdered by Palestinian terrorists; and make no mistake, Yasir 
Arafat is directly responsible. The stark reality is that Arafat is no 
longer even remotely a partner in peace. Just the opposite. Arafat has 
eviscerated the promise he made at Oslo to renounce the use of violence 
against Israel. Just as we as Americans defend ourselves against 
terror, Israelis have the right, the obligation, to defend themselves 
against terror.
  It is unacceptable to condemn both Israel and Arafat simultaneously, 
as if there was any moral equivalency in their actions. This Congress 
must never rationalize or explain away acts of terror. What should be 
the message from Washington to Israel is, Mr. Sharon, defend your 
people, destroy the infrastructure of terror, and know that America 
stands with you.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman 
from Ohio (Mrs. Jones).
  Mrs. JONES of Ohio. Mr. Speaker, sometimes God puts you at the right 
place at the right time, and I know he did not want to hear that from 
us from the floor of the House. I know what he wanted to hear from us 
was let there be peace on Earth, and let it begin with me. Let there be 
peace on Earth, and let it begin with me.
  Let me step up to the plate and say to the world, I want peace, and I 
am going to do what it takes to give peace. Let me step up to the plate 
and say to the world, I have it within my power, within my hand, to 
make peace.
  As a kid, remember that saying they used to say, ``sticks and stones 
may break my bones, but names will never hurt me''? All we have is 
names on this piece of paper, throwing words.
  If we as a Congress sincerely believe in peace in the Middle East, 
let us get on some planes and go over there and sit down and talk to 
the people in the Middle East and make a difference. Let us stop 
talking and step up and give some action.
  I support Israel. I support Israel. My congressional district has 
many, many people of Jewish descent; and I am pleased to represent 
them, but I am pleased to believe in peace. Let there be peace on 
Earth, and let it begin with this Congress. Let us stop throwing words 
across the floor and every which way and make a difference.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentlewoman from 
North Carolina (Mrs. Clayton).
  Mrs. CLAYTON. I thank the gentleman for yielding me time.
  Mr. Speaker, I think it has been established that I am pro-Israel and 
I am also pro-peace and I am also pro-Palestine. We need to find a way 
to bring people together.
  I just want to quote just very briefly from a very insightful article 
by Desmond Tutu. He says, ``In our struggle against apartheid, the 
great supporters were Jewish people. They almost instinctively had to 
be on the side of the disenfranchised, of the voiceless ones, fighting 
injustice, oppression and evil. I have continued to feel strongly with 
the Jews. I am a patron of a Holocaust center in South Africa. I 
believe Israel has a right to secure borders.
  ``What is not so understandable, however, not justified, is what it 
did to another people to guarantee its existence. I have been very 
deeply distressed in my love for them and my love for the Holy Land. It 
reminds me much of what has happened to us as black people in South 
Africa. I have seen the humiliation of the Palestinians. Surely there 
are those who want terror, but not all the Palestinians. We need to 
find how we bring our beloved Israel and Palestine together for 
peace.''
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
gentleman from Florida (Mr. Deutsch).
  Mr. DEUTSCH. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to read the 
resolution, because what the resolution does is it speaks truth to 
power. Some of my colleagues who have spoken against the resolution I 
do not believe have read it, because there is nothing that is factually 
inaccurate in this resolution.
  It talks about, unfortunately, what is going on in Israel today. 
There is no Yasir Arafat exemption to the war on terrorism. What is 
going on today in fact is terrorist actions; and when those bombs are 
going off, whether it is in a Cafe in Haifa or Jerusalem or Natanya, 
they are not just trying to kill Jews. In fact, some Arabs have been 
killed, many Arabs have been killed by terrorist acts themselves. But 
in essence it is terrorist action against America.
  We need to pass this resolution. There are other issues we can talk 
about at another time. I urge my colleagues to read the resolution. As 
my good friend and colleague from California on the other aisle, who 
has been as concerned as any Member in this Chamber of the plight of 
the Palestinian people, and I praise him for his commitment to vote 
yes, I urge my friends and my colleagues on this side of the aisle to 
join with him and let there be no votes against this resolution, even 
with the objections that people have to the fact that some things are 
left out.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to my good 
friend, the gentlewoman from New York (Mrs. Maloney).
  (Mrs. MALONEY of New York asked and was given permission to revise 
and extend her remarks.)
  Mrs. MALONEY of New York. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for 
yielding me time and for his leadership on this important issue, and I 
stand strongly in support of his resolution.
  For 54 years, Israel has experienced terrorist attacks similar to the 
ones our country suffered on September 11.

[[Page H2087]]

After 9-11, our country took swift and sure action against the al 
Qaeda. Every Nation has the right to protect its population against 
terrorists, particularly terrorists that target civilians. That is what 
we are doing in the U.S., and that is what Israel should be allowed to 
do.
  The world should recognize that Israel has the right to use military 
means to protect its citizens and its borders. I welcome President 
Bush's decision to increase American involvement in efforts to reach a 
diplomatic solution to the current violence. Israelis and Palestinians 
must find a way to live peacefully with each other, and we have the 
moral obligation and strategic imperative to make that happen.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Thornberry). The gentleman from 
California (Mr. Lantos) has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining, the gentleman 
from West Virginia (Mr. Rahall) has 5\1/2\ minutes remaining, and the 
gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde) has 4\1/2\ minutes remaining and the 
right to close.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from 
Michigan (Mr. Conyers).
  Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Speaker, I want to congratulate those who have taken 
part in this debate. Except for a few shrill voices, there has been an 
honest exchange of views by all the Members here. And although that 
does not correct a faulty proceeding that brought this measure to the 
floor without a single hearing, can you imagine a motion of this 
moment, a resolution of this gravity, to never land down in the 
Committee on International Relations? I would say to the gentleman from 
Texas (Mr. DeLay), you are a political genius. What you know about 
foreign affairs, we will determine in the months to come.
  But what is most needed in Washington is an inclusive, open and 
respectful dialogue. And guess who has got to lead it? Us. There is 
nobody else in the United States. The Congress has to lead the 
dialogue.
  In the world, the United States has to lead the dialogue. Is there 
anyone that has a reservation about that point? I would yield to them 
immediately. Because we know that if peace is to come to the troubled 
Holy Land, it will come with the United States of America playing the 
major role as mediator, facilitator, and monitor. So our credibility 
must be as impeccable as we can possibly make it.
  The Secretary of State has told us very clearly that certain 
resolutions hinder our ability to play a constructive role. The 
Secretary of State says we must be very careful about the messages we 
send. The President of the United States begged the gentleman from 
Texas not to send anything to the floor only recently.
  So what I am saying is that we must realize that our role is not 
merely taking sides, but is acting as the world leader. It is in our 
hands, it is only in our hands, and I urge you to conduct yourselves 
accordingly.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the 
distinguished gentleman from New York (Mr. Nadler).
  Mr. NADLER. Mr. Speaker, Israel, like every other nation, has the 
right to self-defense. This resolution expresses our solidarity with 
Israel as she defends herself against the barbaric campaign of 
terrorism and expresses our determination that the violence must end.
  We are told the resolution is not balanced, but we should not be 
balanced between Palestinian terrorists and Israeli victims; between an 
Israel that offered breathtaking concessions for peace, and Arafat, who 
walked away from the table and deliberately started a war.
  We should not be balanced between the Palestinian Authority, whose 
method of negotiation is to murder as many Israeli civilians as 
possible in restaurants and pizza parlors and Passover seders, and 
Israel which exercises its right to defend its people by attacking 
terrorists and gunmen, not innocent civilians.
  We all want peace, but to attain peace we must stand in solidarity 
with Israel so Israel can feel secure in seeking peace.
  We can and should be an even-handed broker during negotiations, but 
we must stand forthrightly with Israel now against the terrorists if 
there are ever to be again real negotiations.
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume to 
close on my side.
  Mr. Speaker, this has been an interesting debate today; and I do 
congratulate all those that have participated in it and followed it, 
because it is a very emotional issue, it is a very difficult issue and 
a very delicate issue.
  There is no question, as I said in my opening comments, that America 
stands by Israel. They are our ally and should always be. Israel must 
protects itself. But the important question that we must ask is how 
Israel must protect itself.
  The first step is to acknowledge its role in creating the violent 
conditions in the region. The time has come to stop blaming everything 
on Arafat. That just will not get it anymore. Getting Arafat is no 
solution. I am not here to defend him, nor defend his actions. But 
getting Arafat is not the solution that is going to bring us peace.
  Continued humiliation is no solution. This is a method of operation 
of bullies, not of those who want to return to the peace process, to 
the negotiating table. ``Whereas anybody involved,'' that means give 
and take. Is that the real fear here of going to the negotiating table, 
where it means you have to give up something? Does the father of the 
Israeli settlement policy, the current Prime Minister, really fear 
about going to negotiations? That is a question that I think is 
legitimate to ask.

                              {time}  1615

  The military option will not secure a peace in the Middle East. The 
military option will not work. No peace can be achieved. There are many 
steps that we can take to offer a balanced approach too numerous to 
mention at this particular time. But the bottom line is we cannot 
dispossess a people and then attempt to govern them by occupying their 
land, by forcing them to subsist in refugee camps, by blocking roadways 
to their jobs, by refusing access to medical attention, by cutting them 
off from their schools and universities, and by discounting their 
humanity. This is not the roadway to peace.
  In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I think the bottom line is the 
Palestinians crave the recognition of their dignity; Israelis crave the 
dignity of recognition. It is incumbent upon this Congress to recognize 
both and do both. I ask for rejection of this one-sided resolution.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent for an additional 
1\1/2\ minutes so that we may accommodate the gentlewoman from Florida 
(Mrs. Meek). She will be our last speaker before I close.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Thornberry). Does the gentleman ask 
unanimous consent that both the opponents and proponents of the 
resolution be given an additional 1\1/2\ minutes?
  Mr. LANTOS. I am delighted to do so, Mr. Speaker.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from California?
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, reserving the right to object, and I really do 
not want to object, but a lot of people are trying to get planes this 
afternoon. The weather is very questionable. I am sure her minute and a 
half is not going to upset us too much, but if we could hold it to 
that.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, we appreciate that very much.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the 
gentleman from California?
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, reserving the right to object, and I shall 
not object, but I do want to note that this has been a good debate, and 
I would not object to the extension of more time, even another hour or 
2, or even 3 hours. I think we need to debate this issue more fully. It 
certainly has been debated fully in the Knesset in Israel, and I am 
glad to see this debate in the House of Representatives this afternoon, 
and I hope we will have more such debates.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Lantos) and the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. 
Rahall) each will receive an additional 1\1/2\ minutes.
  There was no objection.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentlewoman 
from Florida (Mrs. Meek).
  Mrs. MEEK of Florida. Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from 
California (Mr. Lantos) for yielding me this time.

[[Page H2088]]

  Unlike many of my colleagues, I do not profess to be a professor of 
foreign affairs, nor a diplomat. I come to this floor today to speak to 
my colleagues about Israel. I am a friend of Israel and I have been for 
more than 40 years. I do not plan to change now. I will remain so. I 
think the people of Israel and Israel itself has been my friend, so I 
do not plan to stay away from a friend of such long standing. I think 
that we should pass this resolution. We should not worry about the 
timeliness of it, but we should think about whether it is right or 
whether it is wrong, and when it comes to helping a friend who has been 
our friend for many years, a friend who believes in democracy, and a 
friend who believes in freedom.
  So we do not have a big debate here today, but we have people who 
believe in the right thing as they see it. The people of Israel deserve 
our support at this time. Whenever we have a friend in trouble, what do 
we do? We stand alongside of that friend. There is no right and left of 
this issue. There is only the right way, the straight and narrow way. 
It is a hard decision for many of my colleagues who are experts in 
foreign affairs, but I am saying be an expert of the people of Israel 
who have had to suffer for many years.
  Now is the time for us to stand up, straighten up and fly right. 
There is no good frog that will not praise his own pond. Israel is a 
part of our pond.
  Let there be no mistake about it, I am a friend of Israel--I have 
been since the forties--I will remain so. Israel must continue to have 
the right to exist.
  Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of this important resolution 
expressing our solidarity with Israel in its fight against terrorism. 
Mr. Speaker, this resolution sends a vital message: that we stand 
firmly with Israel and for peace and justice within the region. There's 
a debate as to the timeliness of this resolution--but I think the real 
issue is to stand up for peace at any time the people of Israel and 
their friends have stood for me.
  The resolution reaffirms our unwavering commitment to Israel's 
security and welfare, to the special relationship between the United 
States and Israel, and to the values of democracy and freedom that our 
two countries share. It supports Israel's right to defend its people 
from terrorism. I stand firmly with Israel and against terrorism. All 
of us should.
  Mr. Speaker, I fervently hope and pray that our efforts and those of 
the parties to the ongoing negotiations will achieve a real peace in 
the region and justice for Israelis and Palestinians. Yet however long 
and crooked the path to real peace may prove to be, we must be clear 
that we will never allow anyone in the Middle East to choose terrorism 
as a method of diplomacy.
  Israel is making progress toward returning the region to some degree 
of normalcy.
  America must continue to stand firm in its support of Israel in her 
time of need. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Israeli people, and 
with all who are committed to a just, lasting and permanent peace of 
freedom, security, and liberty for all in the region.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the 
gentleman from New York (Mr. Owens).
  (Mr. OWENS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his 
remarks.)
  Mr. OWENS. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of this resolution.
  Mr. Speaker, this resolution is far from perfect; however, in the 
context of an ongoing peace seeking process, this reaffirmation of 
America's bond with Israel is a vital step forward. God has blessed 
America. We are the only remaining superpower in the world. We, the 
people of the United States, alone have the capacity to serve as the 
Great Angels of the 21st Century. We can lead the way to solve the most 
intractable problems. The fullest possible engagement in the Mid East 
is now a necessity. We must now go the final mile and offer all the 
resources that we can muster to encourage peace. The whole world knows 
the self-evident truth that in our hearts and souls we are wedded to 
Israel. There is no formal treaty that states the obvious; however, it 
is understood that a threat to the survival of Israel is a threat to a 
piece of America. We are brothers and sisters for democracy; for 
freedom; for equality; for the equal treatment of both genders; for 
recognition and respect for all races, religious and creeds. Against 
the overwhelming residue of oppressive governance throughout the world, 
America and Israel are leaders for enlightenment and liberating 
progress. Who among us, if forced to make the choice, would not want 
his children to live in the State of Israel, instead of any one of the 
despotic, oppressive surrounding Mid East nations. Our world has been 
plunged into a war against more than terrorism. We are in a war against 
technologically advanced barbarism. We, too, have a tradition that 
believes in martyrdom, but it is not based on the reckless courage of 
murderers. The Christians who met Nero's lions were martyrs; the 
followers of Ghandhi were martyrs; the slain American civil rights 
freedom fighters were martyrs; suffering 27 years in prison, Nelson 
Mandela emerged as a martyr and invited three of his prison guards to 
dine with him at the presidential inauguration banquet. There are 
millions of us who are determined to continue the fight for justice for 
all. But the martyrdom of suicide bombers will never bring freedom and 
justice. And peace can never be achieved merely with tanks and guns. 
``War never leaves us thrilled/But maniacs demand to be killed.'' After 
we have blocked the murders of the maniacs, we must then go on to take 
the greatest risk. America must dare to exert a total pressure for 
peace. We must take the greatest risk of all. The Great Angels of 
America must be willing to support a formal treaty which guarantees 
defensible borders for Israel and guarantees an independent Palestinian 
state. No troops will be necessary to accomplish this feat. Our 
overwhelming moral force is adequate. We must just state this goal, set 
a deadline and make peace a reality. We shall overcome.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time to 
close for my side. It has been a good debate. The bottom line is, 
Israel is a democracy and Israel is our friend, and Israel is our ally 
in the global war against terrorism.
  In our war against Iraq 10 years ago, Israel stood with us. In our 
war against terrorism today, Israel is standing with us. In turn, we 
must stand with Israel in its war against terrorism.
  Mr. Speaker, it is particularly important that we adopt this 
resolution now at a time when Israel is subject to a vicious chorus of 
blind and bigoted hate. Our friends in Israel must be assured that they 
are not alone in facing the terrorist onslaught. We must make clear 
that there is no moral equivalence between terrorism and self-defense.
  Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to rise to the occasion and 
show our strong solidarity with the democratic state of Israel in our 
shared struggle against terrorism.
  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Does the gentleman from West Virginia seek 
to use his additional minute and a half?
  Mr. RAHALL. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the remaining time.
  Again, I say that there are other approaches and more balanced 
approaches that we can take that would further the cause of peace and 
that would further American interests in the region and certainly do 
this Congress a great deal more credibility. I do notice the main 
sponsor of the resolution has just walked on to the floor, the 
gentleman from Texas (Mr. DeLay), and I want to commend him for the 
last 2 sentences that he finally put in his resolution, urging all 
parties to pursue and establish a just and lasting and comprehensive 
peace in the Middle East, which I believe is only the second time in 
the whole resolution where the word ``peace'' was used, but 
nevertheless he finally got around to that. Then he did mention the 
suffering and the humanitarian needs of the Palestinian people in the 
very last line, and I appreciate that.
  I would ask him as he gets ready to close if he would also agree to 
the inclusion in his resolution of a line which, as President Bush has 
stated, recognizing the Palestinian state alongside an Israeli state.
  Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hyde) has 
4\1/2\ minutes remaining.
  Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to yield 4\1/2\ minutes to 
the gentleman from Texas (Mr. DeLay), the distinguished whip.
  Mr. DeLAY. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman for his work on this 
resolution and his indulgence and his stature, and I appreciate his 
support. I also thank the gentleman from California (Mr. Lantos), the 
ranking member on the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for his incredible 
courage and principle in co-authoring this resolution, and I appreciate 
his friendship.
  Mr. Speaker, these are very serious times. The principles and virtues 
that all of us revere and respect about America are under assault today 
in the Middle East. The people of Israel are

[[Page H2089]]

resisting a wave of terrorism. As we watch that violence directed 
against Israel, we are roused to resolve that terrorism, in all its 
forms, has to be defeated. There is no moral equivalence, there is no 
moral equivalence between a democratic government defending its 
citizens and a calculated strategy of death waged by terrorist 
organizations.
  Homicide bombings are evil incarnate. On the scales of justice and 
morality, they are no different from the attacks launched against the 
United States just last September. They serve only to satisfy the 
gruesome appetites of pure hatred and unrestrained wickedness, and they 
demonstrate beyond question that the abiding threat to peace in the 
Middle East stems from the groups which exist for the single purpose of 
destroying Israel.
  The citizens of free nations share a very special bond. It flows from 
our common commitment to a set of enduring principles. We trust 
democracy. We defend human rights. We live under the rule of law, and 
we seek good relations with every country wishing to coexist peacefully 
with other countries. Israel is the lone bastion of freedom in the 
region. Within Israel's own neighbors, peaceful transitions are nothing 
more than accidents of fate. Describing these countries as genuine 
democracies would be as inaccurate as calling an acorn an oak tree.
  It is time for every country in the Middle East to pass a fundamental 
test of a civilized world by unequivocally rejecting terrorism and 
acknowledging that bombings and other acts of terror render any 
underlying cause of terror or grievance illegitimate. Mr. Speaker, it 
is the test that President Bush laid down in this Chamber, right here, 
when he said, you are either with us or you are with the terrorists.
  The men and women of Israel must know that we recognize the broader 
significance of this struggle, that the attacks directed against Israel 
are attacks against liberty, and all free people must recognize that 
Israel's fight is our fight. Let every terrorist know that the American 
people will never abandon freedom, democracy, or Israel. America will 
never permit the Jewish state to fall to aggression.
  The search for peace cannot diminish and must not obscure the very 
key lessons of the past 40 years. Democracies must never negotiate with 
terrorists. And for that reason, Yasir Arafat strikes many of us as a 
highly unreliable vessel to carry the hope for peace. To turn from his 
past, it would be very difficult for him to do. The most promising sign 
for both the people of Israel and the Palestinian people would be the 
emergence of a moderate Palestinian leader who truly seeks a negotiated 
settlement for lasting peace. The United States cannot be a broker 
between one party that wants peace and the other party that wants 
terrorism. It cannot succeed. It has not succeeded. The peace process 
has been a failure for over 25 years. Today, the Palestinian men and 
women who wish nothing more than just to raise their family in peace 
have no voice. In fact, they are killed if they raise their head of 
moderation. Nothing will do more to bring peace to this region than the 
emergence of a Palestinian leader with the courage and support of the 
United States to accept Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state and a 
willingness to acknowledge Israel's legitimate security considerations. 
But until that day comes, every man and woman in Israel should know 
that they do not stand alone, because America stands with them.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. All time for debate has expired.
  The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Illinois 
(Mr. Hyde) that the House suspend the rules and agree to the 
resolution, H. Res. 392, as amended.
  The question was taken.
  The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds of 
those present have voted in the affirmative.


                             Recorded Vote

  Mr. LANTOS. Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.
  A recorded vote was ordered.
  The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 352, 
noes 21, answered ``present'' 29, not voting 32, as follows:

                             [Roll No. 126]

                               AYES--352

     Ackerman
     Aderholt
     Akin
     Allen
     Andrews
     Armey
     Baca
     Bachus
     Baird
     Baker
     Baldacci
     Ballenger
     Barcia
     Barrett
     Bartlett
     Barton
     Bass
     Bentsen
     Berkley
     Berman
     Berry
     Biggert
     Blagojevich
     Blumenauer
     Blunt
     Boehlert
     Boehner
     Bonilla
     Bono
     Boozman
     Borski
     Boswell
     Boyd
     Brady (PA)
     Brady (TX)
     Brown (SC)
     Bryant
     Burr
     Buyer
     Calvert
     Camp
     Capito
     Capps
     Cardin
     Carson (IN)
     Carson (OK)
     Castle
     Chabot
     Chambliss
     Clay
     Clement
     Clyburn
     Coble
     Collins
     Combest
     Costello
     Cox
     Coyne
     Cramer
     Crenshaw
     Crowley
     Cubin
     Culberson
     Cummings
     Cunningham
     Davis (CA)
     Davis (FL)
     Davis (IL)
     Davis, Jo Ann
     Davis, Tom
     Deal
     DeGette
     Delahunt
     DeLauro
     DeLay
     DeMint
     Deutsch
     Diaz-Balart
     Dicks
     Doggett
     Doolittle
     Doyle
     Dreier
     Duncan
     Dunn
     Edwards
     Ehlers
     Ehrlich
     Emerson
     Engel
     English
     Eshoo
     Etheridge
     Evans
     Ferguson
     Filner
     Flake
     Fletcher
     Foley
     Forbes
     Ford
     Fossella
     Frank
     Frelinghuysen
     Frost
     Gallegly
     Ganske
     Gekas
     Gephardt
     Gibbons
     Gilchrest
     Gillmor
     Gilman
     Gonzalez
     Goode
     Goodlatte
     Gordon
     Goss
     Graham
     Granger
     Graves
     Green (TX)
     Green (WI)
     Greenwood
     Grucci
     Gutierrez
     Gutknecht
     Hall (OH)
     Hall (TX)
     Hansen
     Harman
     Hart
     Hastings (FL)
     Hastings (WA)
     Hayes
     Hayworth
     Hefley
     Herger
     Hill
     Hilleary
     Hinchey
     Hinojosa
     Hobson
     Hoeffel
     Holden
     Holt
     Honda
     Horn
     Houghton
     Hoyer
     Hulshof
     Hunter
     Hyde
     Isakson
     Israel
     Issa
     Jackson-Lee (TX)
     Johnson (CT)
     Johnson (IL)
     Johnson, E. B.
     Johnson, Sam
     Jones (NC)
     Kanjorski
     Keller
     Kelly
     Kennedy (MN)
     Kennedy (RI)
     Kerns
     Kildee
     King (NY)
     Kingston
     Kirk
     Knollenberg
     Kolbe
     LaFalce
     LaHood
     Lampson
     Langevin
     Lantos
     Larsen (WA)
     Larson (CT)
     Latham
     LaTourette
     Leach
     Levin
     Lewis (CA)
     Lewis (GA)
     Lewis (KY)
     Linder
     Lipinski
     LoBiondo
     Lofgren
     Lowey
     Lucas (KY)
     Lucas (OK)
     Luther
     Lynch
     Maloney (CT)
     Maloney (NY)
     Manzullo
     Markey
     Mascara
     Matheson
     Matsui
     McCarthy (MO)
     McCarthy (NY)
     McCollum
     McCrery
     McGovern
     McInnis
     McIntyre
     McKeon
     McNulty
     Meehan
     Meek (FL)
     Meeks (NY)
     Menendez
     Mica
     Miller, Dan
     Miller, Gary
     Miller, Jeff
     Moore
     Moran (KS)
     Morella
     Myrick
     Nadler
     Napolitano
     Neal
     Nethercutt
     Ney
     Northup
     Norwood
     Nussle
     Olver
     Ortiz
     Osborne
     Ose
     Otter
     Owens
     Pallone
     Pascrell
     Pastor
     Pelosi
     Pence
     Peterson (PA)
     Phelps
     Pickering
     Pitts
     Platts
     Pombo
     Pomeroy
     Portman
     Price (NC)
     Pryce (OH)
     Putnam
     Quinn
     Radanovich
     Ramstad
     Rangel
     Regula
     Rehberg
     Reyes
     Reynolds
     Rodriguez
     Roemer
     Rogers (KY)
     Rogers (MI)
     Ross
     Rothman
     Roybal-Allard
     Royce
     Rush
     Ryan (WI)
     Ryun (KS)
     Sanchez
     Sandlin
     Sawyer
     Saxton
     Schaffer
     Schakowsky
     Schiff
     Schrock
     Scott
     Sensenbrenner
     Serrano
     Sessions
     Shadegg
     Shaw
     Shays
     Sherman
     Sherwood
     Shimkus
     Shows
     Shuster
     Simmons
     Simpson
     Skeen
     Skelton
     Slaughter
     Smith (NJ)
     Smith (TX)
     Smith (WA)
     Snyder
     Souder
     Spratt
     Stearns
     Strickland
     Stump
     Stupak
     Sununu
     Sweeney
     Tancredo
     Tanner
     Tauscher
     Tauzin
     Taylor (MS)
     Terry
     Thomas
     Thornberry
     Thune
     Tiahrt
     Tiberi
     Tierney
     Toomey
     Towns
     Turner
     Udall (CO)
     Udall (NM)
     Upton
     Velazquez
     Visclosky
     Vitter
     Walden
     Walsh
     Waters
     Watkins (OK)
     Watson (CA)
     Watts (OK)
     Waxman
     Weiner
     Weldon (FL)
     Weldon (PA)
     Weller
     Wexler
     Whitfield
     Wicker
     Wilson (NM)
     Wilson (SC)
     Wolf
     Wu
     Wynn
     Young (AK)

                                NOES--21

     Abercrombie
     Bonior
     Boucher
     Condit
     Conyers
     DeFazio
     Dingell
     Hilliard
     Inslee
     Jackson (IL)
     Kleczka
     Lee
     McKinney
     Miller, George
     Obey
     Paul
     Petri
     Rahall
     Rohrabacher
     Smith (MI)
     Stark

                        ANSWERED ``PRESENT''--29

     Baldwin
     Barr
     Becerra
     Bishop
     Brown (OH)
     Capuano
     Clayton
     Farr
     Hostettler
     Jones (OH)
     Kaptur
     Kilpatrick
     Kind (WI)
     Kucinich
     McDermott
     Mink
     Mollohan
     Moran (VA)
     Oberstar
     Payne
     Peterson (MN)
     Rivers
     Sabo
     Sanders
     Solis
     Thompson (CA)
     Thurman
     Watt (NC)
     Woolsey

                             NOT VOTING--32

     Bereuter
     Bilirakis
     Brown (FL)
     Burton
     Callahan
     Cannon
     Cantor
     Cooksey
     Crane
     Dooley
     Everett
     Fattah
     Hoekstra
     Hooley
     Istook
     Jefferson
     Jenkins
     John
     McHugh
     Millender-McDonald

[[Page H2090]]


     Murtha
     Oxley
     Riley
     Ros-Lehtinen
     Roukema
     Stenholm
     Sullivan
     Taylor (NC)
     Thompson (MS)
     Traficant
     Wamp
     Young (FL)

                              {time}  1653

  Mr. WELLER changed his vote from ``no'' to ``aye.''
  Ms. KILPATRICK and Mr. MORAN of Virginia changed their vote from 
``no'' to ``present.''
  Mr. MOLLOHAN changed his vote from ``aye'' to ``present.''
  So (two-thirds having voted in favor thereof) the rules were 
suspended and the resolution, as amended, was agreed to.
  The result of the vote was announced as above recorded.
  A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
  Stated for:
  Mr. DOOLEY of California. Mr. Speaker, due to district business, I 
was unable to cast a vote for H. Res. 392 to express solidarity with 
Israel in its fight against terrorism. Had I been present for the vote, 
I would have voted ``aye.''

                          ____________________