[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 46 (Tuesday, April 23, 2002)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Pages E605-E606]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




       PROTECTING AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE SACRED LANDS

                                 ______
                                 

                        HON. FRANK PALLONE, JR.

                             of new jersey

                    in the house of representatives

                        Tuesday, April 23, 2002

  Mr. PALLONE. Mr. Speaker, as a member of the Congressional Native 
American Caucus, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 2085, the 
Valley of Chiefs Native American Sacred Site Preservation Act, which 
would safeguard an area very sacred to a number of Indian tribes, and 
ask that my colleagues support this bill as well. In addition, I want 
to comment on the need to protect other threatened American Indian and 
Alaska Native (AI/AN) sacred lands.
  Our many democratic forums establish an opportunity for discussions 
to take place to

[[Page E606]]

better understand the social, economic, legal, and political complexity 
of AI/AN realities, before related legislation is brought to the House 
floor for a vote. As congressional history demonstrates, the decisions 
to make as Representatives can either positively or negatively impact 
AI/AN people, and their nations, tribes, bands, villages, and 
communities.
  For example, between 1887 and 1934, the U.S. Government took over 90 
million acres of land from American Indians without compensation--
including sacred lands. More recently, between 1945 and 1968, Congress 
decided that Federal recognition and assistance to more than 100 tribes 
should be terminated. This termination policy created economic disaster 
for many American Indians, and their nations, resulting in millions of 
acres of valuable natural resource land being lost through tax 
forfeiture sales. This is a primary reason why AI/AN families have the 
biggest poverty level of any group in the country, at a rate of 31 
percent on some Indian reservations.
  By holding hearings on the impact of legislation related to American 
Indians and Alaska Natives, Congress moved to rectify its prior 
decisions by passing self-determination and self-governance policies. 
As a result of such policies, AI/AN nations and villages have greater 
control over their lands and resources. They have made great strides 
toward reversing the economic blight that resulted from previous 
Federal policies, and have revived their unique cultures and nations.
  Congress must withstand pressure from those individuals and groups 
that call for back tracking to old AI/AN policies, such as termination 
and reduction of AI/AN sovereign rights. We must acknowledge and learn 
from our mistakes, and not repeat them in the future because AI/AN 
nations and people are relying upon our commitments.
  The United States Constitution recognizes that American Indian 
Nations are sovereign governments. Hundreds of treaties, the Supreme 
Court, the President, and the Congress have repeatedly affirmed that 
Indian nations retain their inherent powers of self-government. In 
addition, the U.S. Government is committed to a trustee relationship 
with the Indian nations. This trust relationship requires the Federal 
Government to exercise the highest degree of care with tribal and 
Indian lands and resources.
  Sacred lands, and ceremonies associated with those lands, are a 
necessary expression of AI/AN spirituality, and often are key to 
individual an collective wellness. This necessity is situated deep in 
the ancient history of these Indian nations and maintains a prominent 
place in the fact-based stories hand down from one generation to 
another. Since the coming of the Europeans to these shores in the late 
14th century, these sacred lands have been subject to intrusion and 
disturbance as settlers laid claim to lands of the AI/AN people.
  In 1978, Congress passed the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, 
recognizing the necessity of upholding the protection of AI/AN 
spirituality within the ambit of the religious freedom guaranteed by 
the first amendment to the United States Constitution. Unfortunately, 
litigation in the courts since then to safeguard sacred lands, and the 
ceremonies associated with those lands, has for the most part been 
unsuccessful.
  Rather than safeguard sacred lands, these cases have upheld multiple 
intrusions upon them and maintained a history of subordination of AI/AN 
spirituality to the interests of dominating groups. Federal Government 
representatives, leaders of historic religions, and judiciary members 
must develop more tolerance and expand their definitions of what 
constitutes a proper sacred place.
  Culture and legal scholar, Davis Mayberry-Lewis, writes:

       American Indian religions consider the earth as sacred, 
     whereas the secular culture that surrounds them considers the 
     earth to be real estate. It is hard for the strong to give up 
     their ingrained habit of overpowering the weak, but it is 
     essential if we are to make multiethnic societies like our 
     own work with a minimum of civility.

  Anthropologist Elizabeth Brandt states:

       The free practice of many Indian religions requires privacy 
     and undisturbed access to culturally and religiously 
     significant sites and their resources. It is irrevocably tied 
     to specific places in the world which derive their power and 
     sacred character from their natural undisturbed state.

  Ultimately, how free are we, really, if the first religions of our 
great country cannot be protected? I also ask you, what if, despite 
your objections to the contrary, your spiritual place was being bull 
dozed for economic activity or spiked for scaling purposes? How would 
you feel, what would you think and what would you do?
  Therefore I strongly support H.R. 2085, the Valley of Chiefs Native 
American Sacred Site Preservation Act, which would safeguard an area 
very sacred to a number of Indian tribes, and ask that my colleagues 
support this bill as well.
  I also call for additional Sacred Land legislation to be developed in 
consultation with Indian Country. Furthermore, the establishment of a 
governmentwide, effective, and comprehensive procedure that safeguards 
the loss of further AI/AN sacred lands must be enacted. We must move 
swiftly in conjunction with AI/AN nations before more sacred lands, 
such as Mt. Shasta and Medicine Lake of California, Devil's Tower, and 
Black Hills of South Dakota, to name a few, are further desecrated and 
damaged.

                          ____________________