[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 41 (Monday, April 15, 2002)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2676-S2678]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. INOUYE:
S. 2127. A bill for the relief of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada
for settlement of certain claims against the United States; to the
Committee on the Judiciary.
Mr. INOUYE. Madam President, almost seven years ago, I stood before
you to submit a resolution ``to provide an opportunity for the
Pottawatomi Nation in Canada to have the merits of their claims against
the United States determined by the United States Court of Federal
Claims.''
That bill was submitted as Senate Resolution 223, which referred the
Pottawatomi's claim to the Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Federal
Claims and required the Chief Judge to report back to the Senate and
provide sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law to enable
the Congress to determine whether the claim of the Pottawatomi Nation
in Canada is legal or equitable in nature, and the amount of damages,
if any, which may be legally or equitably due from the United States.
Earlier this year, the Chief Judge of the Court of Federal Claims
reported back that the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada has a legitimate
and credible legal claim. Thereafter, by settlement stipulation, the
United States has taken the position that it would be ``fair, just and
equitable'' to settle the claims of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada
for the sum of $1,830,000. This settlement amount was reached by the
parties after seven years of extensive, fact-intensive litigation.
Independently, the court concluded that the settlement amount is ``not
a gratuity'' and that the ``settlement was predicated on a credible
legal claim.'' Pottawatomi Nation in Canada, et al. v. United States,
Cong. Ref. 94-1037X at 28 (Ct. Fed. Cl., September 15, 2000) (Report of
Hearing Officer).
The bill I introduce today is to authorize the appropriation of those
funds that the United States has concluded would be ``fair, just and
equitable'' to satisfy this legal claim. If enacted, this bill will
finally achieve a measure of justice for a tribal nation that has for
far too long been denied.
For the information of our colleagues, this is the historical
background that informs the underlying legal claim of the Canadian
Pottawatomi.
The members of the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada are one of the
descendant groups, successors-in-interest, of the historical
Pottawatomi Nation and their claim originates in the latter part of the
18th Century. The historical Pottawatomi Nation was aboriginal to the
United States. They occupied and possessed a vast expanse in what is
now the States of Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin.
From 1795 to 1833, the United States annexed most of the traditional
land of the Pottawatomi Nation through a series of treaties of cession,
many of these cessions were made under extreme duress and the threat of
military action. In exchange, the Pottawatomis were repeatedly made
promises that the remainder of their lands would be secure and, in
addition, that the United States would pay certain annuities to the
Pottawatomi.
In 1829, the United States formally adopted a Federal policy of
removal, an effort to remove all Indian tribes from their traditional
lands east of the Mississippi River to the west. As part of that
effort, the government increasingly pressured the Pottawatomis to cede
the remainder of their traditional lands, some five millions acres in
and
[[Page S2677]]
around the city of Chicago and remove themselves west. For years, the
Pottawatomis steadfastly refused to cede the remainder of their tribal
territory. Then in 1833, the United States, pressed by settlers seeking
more land, sent a Treaty Commission to the Pottawatomi with orders to
extract a cession of the remaining lands. The Treaty Commissioners
spent two weeks using extraordinarily coercive tactics, including
threats of war, in an attempt to get the Pottawatomis to agree to cede
their territory. Finally, those Pottawatomis who were present relented
and on September 26, 1993, they ceded their remaining tribal estate
through what would be known as the Treaty of Chicago. Seventy-seven
members of the Pottawatomi Nation signed the Treaty of Chicago. Members
of the ``Wisconsin Band'' were not present and did not assent to the
cession.
In exchange for their land, the Treaty of Chicago provided that the
United States would give to the Pottawatomis five million acres of
comparable land in what is now Missouri. The Pottawatomi were familiar
with the Missouri land, aware that it was similar to their homeland.
But the Senate refused to ratify that negotiated agreement and
unilaterally switched the land to five million acres in Iowa. The
Treaty Commissioners were sent back to acquire Pottawatomi assent to
the Iowa land. All but seven of the original 77 signatories refused to
accept the change even with promises that if they were dissatisfied
``justice would be done. Nevertheless, the Treaty of Chicago was
ratified as amended by the Senate in 1834. Subsequently, the
Pottawatomis sent a delegation to evaluate the land in Iowa. The
delegation reported back that the land was ``not fit for snakes to live
on.''
While some Pottawatomis removed westward, many of the Pottawatomis
particularly the Wisconsin Band, whose leaders never agreed to the
Treaty, refused to do so. By 1836, the United States began to
forcefully remove Pottawatomis who remained in the east with
devastating consequences. As is true with many other American Indian
tribes, the forced removal westward came at great human cost. Many of
the Pottawatomi were forcefully removed by mercenaries who were paid on
a per capita basis government contract. Over one-half of the Indians
removed by these means died en route. Those who reached Iowa were
almost immediately removed further to inhospitable parts of Kansas
against their will and without their consent.
Knowing of these conditions, many of the Pottawatomis including most
of those in the Wisconsin Band vigorously resisted forced removal. To
avoid Federal troops and mercenaries, much of the Wisconsin Band
ultimately found it necessary to flee to Canada. They were often
pursued to the border by government troops, government-paid mercenaries
or both. Official files of the Canadian and United States governments
disclose that many Pottawatomis were forced to leave their homes
without their horses or any of their possessions other than the clothes
on their backs.
By the late 1830s, the government refused payment of annuities to any
Pottawatomi groups that had not removed west. In the 1860s, members of
the Wisconsin Band, those still in their traditional territory and
those forced to flee to Canada, petitioned Congress for the payment of
their treaty annuities promised under the Treaty of Chicago and all
other cession treaties. By the Act of June 25, 1864 (13 Stat. 172) the
Congress declared that the Wisconsin Band did not forfeit the annuities
by not removing and directed that the share of the Pottawatomi Indians
who had refused to relocate to the west should be retained for their
use in the United States Treasury. (H.R. Rep. No. 470, 64th Cong., p.
5, as quoted on page 3 of memo dated October 7, 1949). Nevertheless,
much of the money was never paid to the Wisconsin Band.
In 1903, the Wisconsin Band, most of whom now resided in three areas,
the States of Michigan and Wisconsin and the Province of Ontario,
petitioned the Senate once again to pay them their fair portion of
annuities as required by the law and treaties. (Sen. Doc. No. 185, 57th
Cong., 2d Sess.) By the Act of June 21, 1906 (34 Stat. 380), the
Congress directed the Secretary of the Interior to investigate claims
made by the Wisconsin Band and estabish a role of the Wisconsin Band
Pottawatomis that still remained in the East. In addition, the Congress
ordered the Secretary to determine ``the [Wisconsin Bands]
proportionate shares of the annuities, trust funds, and other moneys
paid to or expended for the tribe to which they belong in which the
claimant Indians have not shared, [and] the amount of such monies
retained in the Treasury of the United States to the credit of the
clamant Indians as directed the provision of the Act of June 25,
1864.''
In order to carry out the 1906 Act, the Secretary of Interior
directed Dr. W.M. Wooster to conduct an enumeration of Wisconsin Band
Pottawatomi in both the United States and Canada. Dr. Wooster
documented 2007 Wisconsin Pottawatomis: 457 in Wisconsin and Michigan
and 1550 in Canada. He also concluded that the proportionate share of
annuities for the Pottawatomis in Wisconsin and Michigan was $477,339
and that the proportionate share of annuities due the Pottawatomi
Nation in Canada was $1,517,226. The Congress thereafter enacted a
series of appropriation Acts from June 30, 1913 to May 29, 1928 to
satisfy most of money owed to those Wisconsin Band Pottawatomis
residing in the United States. However, the Wisconsin Band Pottawatomis
who resided in Canada were never paid their share of the tribal funds.
Since that time, the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada has diligently and
continuously sought to enforce their treaty rights, although until this
congressional reference, they had never been provided their day in
court. In 1910, the United States and Great Britain entered into an
agreement for the purpose of dealing with claims between both
countries, including claims of Indian tribes within their respective
jurisdictions, by creating the Pecuniary Claims Tribunal. From 1910 to
1938, the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada diligently sought to have their
claim heard in this international forum. Overlooked for more pressing
international matters of the period, including the intervention of
World War I, the Pottawatomis then came to the U.S. Congress for
redress of their claim.
In 1946, the Congress waived its sovereign immunity and established
the Indian Claims Commission for the purpose of granting tribes their
long-delayed day in court. The Indian Claims Commission Act (ICCA)
granted the Commission jurisdiction over claims such as the type
involved here. In 1948, the Wisconsin Band Pottawatomis from both sides
of the border, brought suit together in the Indian Claims Commission
for recovery of damages. Hannahville Indian Community v. U.S., No. 28
(Ind. Cl. Comm. Filed May 4, 1948). Unfortunately, the Indian Claims
Commission dismissed Pottawatomi Nation in Canada's part of the claim
ruling that the Commission had no jurisdiction to consider claims of
Indians living outside territorial limits of the United States.
Hannahville Indian Community v. U.S., 115 Ct. Cl. 823 (1950). The claim
of the Wisconsin Band residing in the United States that was filed in
the Indian Claims Commission was finally decided in favor of the
Wisconsin Band by the U.S. Claims Court in 1983. Hannahville Indian
Community v. United States, 4 Ct. Cl. 445 (1983). The Court of Claims
concluded that the Wisconsin Band was owed a member's proportionate
share of unpaid annuities from 1838 through 1907 due under various
treaties, including the Treaty of Chicago and entered judgment for the
American Wisconsin Band Pottawatomis for any monies not paid. Still the
Pottawatomi Nation in Canada was excluded because of the jurisdictional
limits of the ICCA.
Undaunted, the Pottawatomi Nation in Canada came to the Senate and
after careful consideration, we finally gave them their long-awaited
day in court through the congressional reference process. The court has
not reported back to us that their claim is meritorious and that the
payment that this bill would make constitutes a ``fair, just and
equitable'' resolution to this claim.
The Pottawatomi Nation in Canada has sought justice for over 150
years. They have done all that we asked in order to establish their
claim. Now it is time for us to finally live up to the promise our
government made so many years ago. It will not correct all the wrongs
of the past, but it is a demonstration that this government is
[[Page S2678]]
willing to admit when it has left unfulfilled an obligation and that
the United States is willing to do what we can to see that justice, so
long delayed, is not now denied.
Finally, I would just note that the claim of the Pottawatomi Nation
in Canada is supported through specific resolutions by the National
Congress of American Indians, the oldest, largest and most-
representative tribal organization here in the United States, the
Assembly of First Nations, which includes all recognized tribal
entities in Canada, and each and every of the Pottawatomi tribal groups
that remain in the United States today.
______