[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 37 (Tuesday, April 9, 2002)]
[Senate]
[Pages S2385-S2386]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FOREST MANAGEMENT
Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, 6 years ago last month I gave my first
speech in the Senate Chamber. It dealt with an especially important
forestry issue. I continue to have significant interests in these
matters as chairman of the Subcommittee on Forests and Public Land
Management.
In particular, as chairman of this key subcommittee, I am committed
to ending the tradition of suspicion and disagreement that has
characterized so much of forest management over the decades. I am
pleased to be able to announce this morning a development that takes a
significant step in that direction.
In March of 1996, what brought me to this floor was my opposition to
the so-called salvage rider, an approach that allowed timber sales to
jeopardize the health of the forests in my home State of Oregon and
elsewhere. I believed then, as I do now, that salvage sales that
eliminate public input, prohibit legal appeal, and limit environmental
analysis, are anathema to responsible and effective forest management.
Now, 6 years later, I rise in this Senate to announce the cancellation
of a particularly important salvage rider timber sale and to emphasize
that, in my view, salvage riders are no way to do business in the
natural resources field.
I am pleased to be able to announce this morning the cancellation of
the Eagle Creek timber sale in my home State of Oregon. From its
inception, I believed the Eagle Creek salvage sale was not subject to
adequate review and that the planned logging would result in excessive
environmental damage. For more than 3 years, I have worked to prevent
that damage. In July of 2000, I called on the Department of Agriculture
to convene an independent review team to analyze the threat. The team
found that, indeed, the sale did pose a greater risk than anticipated
to the well-being of the Eagle Creek forest.
Today, I offer my thanks to Agriculture Secretary, Ann Veneman, who
followed through on her commitment to review the team's findings, for
choosing to implement them, and for effectively stopping the timber
sale that would have done significant environmental damage.
The Eagle Creek sale is an example of a sale that should never have
moved forward in the first place. At the core, section 318 salvage
sales are inherently flawed because they take the American people, the
public that we represent, out of the process of managing public land.
As I thank the Secretary of Agriculture for stopping this flawed sale
this morning, I call on the administration to oppose further salvage
riders. Those who would follow the failed Eagle Creek effort are no
more likely to respect the health of the Nation's forests or the wishes
and needs of the Nation's forest communities and stakeholders.
When the Government pursues natural resources issues with no
opportunity for public comment, discussion, or appeal, the only result
is distrust and dissention. As chairman of the Subcommittee on Forests
and Public Lands Management, on my watch I am going to do everything to
work with my colleagues on a bipartisan basis to avoid that kind of
approach.
I am especially pleased the county payments laws that I authored with
our colleague from Idaho, Senator Larry Craig, are an example of how
the logjam over forest policy can be broken. That is an approach that
provides for the ecological health of forests and also helps to ensure
the economic survival for scores of rural communities. Our county
payments legislation helps widen the way for a real discussion of
forest management policy and an open discussion that must continue.
I come to the floor this morning to reaffirm my commitment to new and
[[Page S2386]]
inclusive approaches to addressing the issues of forest management.
The administration has now made the right decision on Eagle Creek. It
is time to halt the destructive practice of salvage sales around this
country.
I look forward to working on a bipartisan basis with our colleagues
and with the Secretary of Agriculture to promote a balanced forest
policy that protects the remaining old growth in our national forests.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. REID. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mrs. Clinton). Without objection, it is so
ordered.
____________________