[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 29, 2002)]
[House]
[Pages H83-H84]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PRIVATIZATION OF MEDICARE
Mr. BROWN of Ohio. Madam Speaker, on Monday President Bush called the
Medicare program old and tired. He said he wants to give seniors better
options like those available in the private sector. He said he wants to
overhaul Medicare. He wants to overhaul Medicare and privatize
Medicare.
The President has every right to push his privatization agenda but
not by co-opting an issue like prescription drug coverage, as emotional
and important as it is, not by characterizing Medicare as a failed
program so that he can justify his goal of privatizing it. Whether it
is Social Security privatization or Medicare privatization, it is
disingenuous of the administration to portray privatization as
improving the system.
The retirement safety net was not put in place because liberals
wanted to make the Federal Government bigger, nor should it be
dismantled because conservatives want to make the Federal Government
smaller. The safety net of Medicare was put in place because the
private sector could not make a profit offering health insurance to
seniors, so they stopped doing it. It was put in place because the
values of this Nation are such that we believe Americans who helped
build the Nation's unrivaled prosperity through their working years
should not face financial uncertainty and hardship when they retire.
Pooling our resources into the public program we call Medicare is the
best way to provide consistent, equitable, reliable health care
benefits to our retirees. The stock market and the HMO industry may be
good at many things, but alleviating uncertainty and providing health
care are not two of them. Now the future of Social Security and
Medicare are on the line.
The President says that seniors deserve better options in Medicare;
that is why he favors privatization. Is Medicare inferior to the
private insurance market? Would seniors be better off with a voucher
that helps pay for coverage in an HMO?
Medicare is more reliable than private health plans. Medicare offers
more choice than private health plans. Medicare operates more
efficiently than private health plans. According to survey after
survey, including a recent one from nonpartisan Commonwealth Fund,
Medicare far outranks both employer-sponsored and individually
purchased private insurance as a trusted source, a trusted source of
health coverage. But the administration wants to give seniors more
choice and better options in Medicare.
Is it better to have your choice of HMOs than to be able to choose
your doctor under Medicare? Is it better to have your choice of HMOs
than being able to choose your hospital under Medicare? Is it better to
have your choice of HMOs than to be able to choose where any of your
health care is delivered, from whomever you want, to the way regular,
traditional government-sponsored Medicare fee for service works?
Medicare is a single plan that treats all beneficiaries equally,
provides maximum choice and access for patients and doctors. Contrast
that with the President's Medicare voucher program envisioned by the
administration. Instead of being guaranteed access to needed health
care services, seniors would be guaranteed access to a partial voucher
for private health insurance.
Medicare guarantees full choice of physicians. Private HMOs advocated
by the administration do not. Medicare guarantees full choice of any
hospital. HMOs, privatized Medicare; privatized HMOs do not. It appears
higher-income seniors could afford this voucher plan
[[Page H84]]
because they could go and buy an additional decent plan. Lower-income
enrollees would be relegated to restrictive alternatives.
In other words, when the President uses choice, it is really a code
word for wealth. Some choice.
Again, Medicare is a single plan that treats all beneficiaries
equally and provides maximum choice and maximum access for patients and
doctors. We should not allow this administration or any administration
to demonize Medicare, a program that served this Nation so well; nor
should we permit this administration or any administration to use
prescription drug coverage as the bait to lure us in this body to
privatizing Medicare for our seniors.
Medicare coverage is not old and tired. It is one of the best
programs government has ever put together. It is simply incomplete
without a prescription drug benefit. That is the Medicare issue.
I hope the President will abandon his privatization agenda and work
with us in this body to add a real prescription drug benefit for all
seniors. We do not need to fight over perceived and fabricated problems
in the current Medicare program. The system is not broken. It simply
needs prescription drug coverage to add to the Medicare system. We need
to address the real issue.
____________________