[Congressional Record Volume 148, Number 2 (Thursday, January 24, 2002)]
[House]
[Pages H50-H51]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THERE IS NO CHOICE IN CHINA
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Indiana (Mr. Pence) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, a woman 4 months pregnant flees to her
mother's village to avoid a forced abortion in China. Her brother, two
sisters and three other relatives are arrested as bargaining chips to
enforce China's brutal one-child-per-family policy.
{time} 1145
Three of her families' homes are destroyed. A second woman, 19 years
of age, is told that she is too young to have a baby. She does not meet
the government's age requirements for pregnancy. Her friends who
accompanied her to the local clinic for her mandatory abortion all nod
vigorously when asked by an undercover investigator if the young lady
would like to keep the baby. ``But the law forbids it,'' they add.
Sound barbaric?
There is no doubt, Mr. Speaker, on this week where millions of
Americans on either side of the debate over abortion gathered in our
Nation's capital,
[[Page H51]]
those of us who endorse what we call the right to life and many
thousands that endorse a woman's right to choose debated the question
of choice. But let us all understand on this week when we foment this
debate in Washington, Mr. Speaker, that there is no choice in China.
China's indefensible population control programs, though, do not just
have their detractors in the world. They actually have their promoters,
some of whom are sponsored by the United States Government. The United
Nations Population Fund, also known as the UNFPA, Mr. Speaker, has
described China's forced abortion policy as a, quote, remarkable
achievement. Proving their moral bankruptcy, Sven Burmester, the
representative for the U.N. Population Fund in Beijing, said, ``China
has the most successful family planning policy in the history of
mankind in terms of quantity, and with that,'' he added, ``China has
done mankind a favor.''
Also proving the moral bankruptcy of the UNFPA, Mr. Burmester of the
Fund said, in effect, my own view is that there is a generation of
Chinese who have sacrificed themselves to benefit society, and that
generation, presumably the generation expensed in China's policy of
forced abortion, is to be recognized.
But the U.N. Population Fund, Mr. Speaker, recently received a
significant increase in its funding from the U.S. Government. There
will be those who will say at the UNFPA that they only work in regions
where the Chinese government has suspended its oppressive one-child
policy. However, testimony in a recent House International Relations
Committee hearing revealed photographs of a UNFPA office located within
the China Office of Family Planning. The testimony also uncovered
evidence that the UNFPA is active in Sihui County in China in which
family planning is decidedly not voluntary. Officials have imposed age
requirements there for pregnancy and require birth permits, mandatory
sterilization and forced abortion. Those who refuse to comply with
these standards face fines, imprisonment and often the destruction of
their homes and property. There is no choice in China, Mr. Speaker.
But, sadly, in the waning days of the first session of the 107th
Congress, the UNFPA in the foreign operations bill recently received a
58 percent increase in its funding, $34 million, U.S. taxpayer paid.
The Mexico City Policy prohibits Federal funding of groups that perform
or even promote abortion services overseas.
So I rise today, Mr. Speaker, to urge the administration, as I did
before over 100,000 pro-life citizens on the National Mall on Tuesday,
I rise today to urge the administration to enforce the Mexico City
Policy, to seize the Kemp Kasten language in the foreign operations
bill and do what President Ronald Reagan did and do what President
George Herbert Walker Bush did, and that is render the amount the
foreign operations bill has provided to the UNFPA to zero. The people
of the United States of America deserve better than to have their
taxpayer dollars used to foment and to promote an organization that
praises China's forced abortion policy.
____________________