[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 177 (Wednesday, December 19, 2001)]
[House]
[Pages H10365-H10366]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2001
Mrs. MORELLA. Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
Senate bill (S. 1202) to amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5
U.S.C. App.) to extend the authorization of appropriations for the
Office of Government Ethics through fiscal year 2006.
The Clerk read as follows:
S. 1202
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Office of Government Ethics
Authorization Act of 2001''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.
Section 405 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5
U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking ``1997 through 1999'' and
inserting ``2002 through 2006''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentlewoman from
Maryland (Mrs. Morella) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Davis)
each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Maryland (Mrs. Morella).
General Leave
Mrs. MORELLA. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members
may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their
remarks on the bill under consideration.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the
gentlewoman from Maryland?
There was no objection.
Mrs. MORELLA. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, S. 1202 is critically important to ensuring honesty,
integrity, and impartiality in the executive branch of the Federal
Government. The bill would reauthorize the Office of Government Ethics
through fiscal year 2006.
With a budget of $10 million and a staff of only 82, the Office of
Government Ethics is a small agency. Despite its small size, however,
it performs a vital function.
The office, established in 1978, fosters high ethical standards for
government employees. It oversees compliance by Federal departments and
agencies with a variety of ethics laws. It issues rules and regulations
for Federal employees to follow on such matters as conflict of
interest, post-employment restrictions, standards of conduct, and
financial disclosure. The office also reviews financial disclosure
statements of certain Presidential nominees and, when necessary,
recommends corrective action if it finds violations of ethics laws.
In addition, the office trains employees in ethics, provides formal
and informal guidance on the interpretation and application of various
ethics laws, and it evaluates the effectiveness of conflict of interest
and other ethics laws.
During the last Congress, the Subcommittee on Civil Service and
Agency Organization of the Committee on Government Reform held an
oversight hearing on the Office of Government Ethics. That hearing
revealed that the office has performed its duties exceedingly well.
There is no question that the office has earned reauthorization from
this Congress.
So, Mr. Speaker, I urge adoption of this bill.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
Mr. Speaker, as the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Civil
Service and Agency Organization, I am pleased to join with the
gentlewoman from Maryland in support of S. 1202, a bill to amend the
Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to extend the authorization of
appropriations for the Office of Government Ethics through fiscal year
2006.
OGE's mission is not only to prevent and resolve conflicts of
interest and to foster high ethical standards for Federal employees,
but also to strengthen the public's confidence so that the government's
business is conducted with impartiality and integrity. OGE does this
by, one, reviewing and certifying the financial disclosure forms filed
by Presidential nominees requiring Senate confirmation; two, serving as
the primary source of advice in counseling on conduct and financial
disclosure issues; and, three, by providing information on promoting
understanding of ethical standards in executive agencies.
OGE and its staff are well regarded by the Federal agencies with whom
[[Page H10366]]
they do business. OGE has played an essential and significant role in
fostering the public's trust in the integrity of government.
Mr. Speaker, there is no component of government more important than
that of assuring the public's trust. OGE helps to build and maintain
that kind of trust that is essential for an orderly, ethical, and
respectable conduct of the Nation's business. For those reasons, I urge
swift passage of this bill.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mrs. MORELLA. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I want to thank the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Davis) for his words
and tell him that I do value working with him on the Subcommittee on
Civil Service and Agency Organization. I also want to thank Senator
Lieberman who chairs the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs for
his sponsorship of this bill. Indeed, accolades to the gentleman from
Indiana (Mr. Burton), the chairman of the committee on Government
Reform and Oversight, and the gentleman from California (Mr. Waxman),
the ranking member, for their support of this legislation. Also, thanks
should go to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Sensenbrenner), the
chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, for his cooperation in
expediting consideration of this measure.
Mr. Speaker, promoting high ethical standards in the Federal
Government is critically important if the citizens of this country are
to have confidence in its operation. For this reason, I urge all
Members to support S. 1202 and the reauthorization of the Office of
Government Ethics.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentlewoman from Maryland (Mrs. Morella) that the House suspend the
rules and pass the Senate bill, S. 1202.
The question was taken.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the opinion of the Chair, two-thirds of
those present have voted in the affirmative.
Mr. DAVIS of Illinois. Mr. Speaker, I object to the vote on the
ground that a quorum is not present and make the point of order that a
quorum is not present.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to clause 8, rule XX and the
Chair's prior announcement, further proceedings on this motion will be
postponed.
The point of no quorum is considered withdrawn.
____________________