[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 158 (Thursday, November 15, 2001)]
[House]
[Page H8233]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE PLIGHT OF BLACK FARMERS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from North Carolina (Mrs. Clayton) is recognized for 5
minutes.
Mrs. CLAYTON. Mr. Speaker, over the last 9 years I have come to this
floor to talk about the plight of rural America. I have talked about
farmers, including small farmers, disadvantaged farmers and minority
farmers.
Today, I rise again to talk about the plight of the black farmers who
have suffered a saga of mistreatment, discrimination and benign
neglect. I would say that both the problems, as well as their
possibilities, really transcend region, transcend race. It encompasses
a wide array of individuals that go beyond just black Americans but
includes Hispanics, includes Asian, includes Indian Americans and women
as well.
This issue also affects the disabled. A wheelchair-bound white male
in Michigan has felt the sting of unfair discriminatory practices on
the part of the Agriculture Department and contacted the Agriculture
Department, who are there to serve; and indeed, all who are involved in
farming as a way of life are affected by the mistreatment and by the
lost opportunities that the black farmers would have.
All farmers are affected by changes and forces that have been
experienced in this new world order or this new economy of the world.
There are several factors that have caused small farmers to decline or
to accelerate the decline of these small producers. They include
globalization of commerce, economies of scale, limited access to
capital and technological advances. The existence of worldwide markets
for all commodities, not just agriculture, but all commodities, are
feeling this, have created unique market forces and pressures that
producers of the past did not have to compete against.
American's producers have to cope with the substantially larger and
less accommodating world market in which to sell their merchandise and
their commodities, with competitors who play by sometime significantly
different rules.
In 1992, when we first started looking at farmers and the demise of
farmers, we saw the landscape was very different, and we compared the
landscape as it was in 1920, when we had over 6 million farms in the
United States. Things have changed obviously. Close to one-sixth of
those farmers were really in North Carolina; 926,000 small farmers were
in North Carolina.
When we looked at it again in 1992, the landscape was very different.
For only 1 percent of 1.9 million farmers in the United States were
then operated by African Americans. Since the 2000 census, that decline
has even gone further. At that time, it was only 18,816 farmers. That
is a paltry number of African Americans when we consider that we
represent more than 13 percent of the total population.
In my home State of North Carolina, there has been a 64 percent
decline in minority farmers just over the last 15 years, from 6,996
farms in 1978 to 2,498 farms, again when we measured from this time in
1992. There are several reasons why a number of minorities and limited
resource farmers indeed are declining so rapidly, but the one that has
been documented time and time again is the discrimination in the credit
extended by the Department of Agriculture, the very agency established
by the U.S. Government to accommodate and to assist the special needs
of all farmers and ranchers.
The issue was first raised in 1968 when the U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights established that the USDA discriminated both in internal
employee actions and external program delivery activities. An ensuing
USDA employee focus group that was established in 1970 again reported
that USDA was callous in their institutional attitude and demeanor
regarding civil rights and equal opportunity.
In 1982, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights examined the issue yet
again and published the report called The Decline of the Black Farmers
in America. The Commission concluded that there were widespread
prejudicial practices in loan approval, loan servicing, farm management
assistance as administered by then what we used to call the Farmers
Home Administration.
However, as no improvement was forthcoming, indeed my friend the
gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Conyers) had a report. I want to tell my
colleagues that this saga has been going on. In fact, the gentleman
from Michigan (Mr. Conyers) in his operational committee, as he chaired
it, had a report and he called it The Minority Farmer: A Disappearing
Resource. Well, we have an obligation then. We should do better.
Mr. Speaker, I will be coming to this floor more than once again to
raise a consciousness that we cannot have this benign neglect, this
mistreatment and this discrimination.
____________________