[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 152 (Tuesday, November 6, 2001)]
[Senate]
[Page S11504]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
STATUS OF HART OFFICE BUILDING REMEDIATION PROJECT
Mr. DASCHLE. Mr. President, I want to update the Senate on a
situation that is of interest to many people and of acute interest to
many of us: the remediation of the Hart Senate Office Building.
It was 3 weeks ago yesterday that an envelope containing anthrax was
opened in my Hart office by a member of my staff. It is the
responsibility of the Environmental Protection Agency to recommend how
the Hart Building is to be remediated. No other entity has the
expertise to make those recommendations.
One week ago today, on October 30, the Environmental Protection
Agency officially took control of the Hart Building and the Hart
remediation project. At the time, EPA officials outlined for us what
they said was an experimental but promising plan to use a chlorine
dioxide fumigant throughout the building to kill the anthrax spores.
Under that plan, the Hart Building could have reopened as early as
November 13--1 week from today. Unfortunately, it is now clear that EPA
will not be able to meet its initial optimistic schedule. EPA now says
that the Hart Building will not re-open until at least November 21.
Earlier today, EPA officials came to the Hill to brief Senators who
have offices in the Hart Building on the reasons for the delay. They
also spoke with chiefs of staff and office managers from those offices.
Since this situation affects the entire Senate family, I want to share
what the EPA officials told us. When EPA told us last week about their
plans to remediate the entire Hart Building using chlorine dioxide as a
fumigant, they said they believed it was the safest, most effective,
most comprehensive, and least disruptive way to remediate Hart. At the
same time, they said their plan would not be final until it had passed
a peer review--until leading scientists in government and the private
sector had examined it and agreed it was a reasonable way to go.
According to EPA, over the weekend, some of those scientists raised
questions about the plan. While they all agreed that a chlorine dioxide
fumigant will kill anthrax spores, some of the experts EPA consulted
expressed concerns about using chloride dioxide gas on a building as
large as the Hart Building. According to EPA officials, this is not a
scientific issue. It is an engineering issue. As a result of these
questions, EPA is now formulating a new plan for the Hart Building.
The Senate Sergeant at Arms has appropriately insisted that the
entire Hart Building be tested for anthrax. The building will remain
closed until the EPA deems that it is safe to reenter. I understand the
frustration and disappointment of Senators and staff who have been
displaced by the Hart Building closure. We have all been greatly
inconvenienced, and we are anxious to get back to the regular order in
our offices. But we are dealing with a deadly bacteria. Safety must
come before convenience. Twenty members of my staff and 8 other members
of the Senate family were exposed to anthrax when that letter was
opened. I do not want one more person to have to face that situation.
It is important that we all understand the EPA, and only the EPA, has
the expertise to declare the Hart Building safe. We will follow their
lead and re-open Hart when they certify it is safe to do so. The safety
and health of the people who work in the Hart Building and those who
visit there must be our guide.
I appreciate the patience and the understanding of all our
colleagues, their staffs, and those who find themselves as dislocated
as my staff. I intend to continue to give periodic reports as they are
necessary, and I will share whatever information is made available as
soon as it is provided to me.
____________________