[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 135 (Wednesday, October 10, 2001)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10430-S10431]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CONSIDERATION OF AN ENERGY BILL
Mr. BINGAMAN. Madam President, I want to just make a few brief points
regarding an announcement I made last evening about how we would try to
proceed through the remainder of the session to get consideration of an
energy
[[Page S10431]]
bill. I indicated in that announcement that the majority leader had
asked me to work with other Senators on the Energy Committee, as well
as Senators on other committees, to put together a proposal that could
be brought to the floor by the leadership for consideration, and that
in light of that, we would not proceed to try to mark up a bill in the
Energy Committee, as I expect probably there will not be markups of
other portions of a proposed energy bill in some of other committees
that would have jurisdiction.
First, as I understand it, the majority leader's assignment was
clear. He wants the Senate to be in a position to move to consideration
of an energy bill in a timely fashion. And it was his view that this
process of putting a bill together, and hopefully on a consensus basis,
involving input from all Senators--Democrats and Republicans--was the
best way to do that.
We will now have an opportunity to deal with some of the energy
issues that cross committee jurisdictional lines; and there are many of
those. I think it is clear to people that many of the energy issues
also involved the Environment and Public Works Committee. There are
clearly issues involving the Finance Committee regarding energy-related
tax incentives or incentives for use of particular types of energy. All
of that, of course, would be expected to be part of a larger piece of
legislation with which the Senate would deal.
Second, I want to respond to a couple of the comments that were made
earlier in this Chamber by some of my colleagues, particularly on the
Republican side of the aisle, indicating that they believed this was
partisan and this would make the consideration of energy in the Senate
a partisan issue.
I see it as just the opposite. I am interested in the input from all
Senators. I think those on the committee know I have invested a
substantial amount of time, in the past several months, seeking and
having individual meetings with Senators on both sides of the aisle to
discuss some of these difficult issues.
My hope is that we can put together a piece of legislation that will
reflect the provisions around which we can form a consensus; and some
of those will come from the Republican side of the aisle and,
certainly, some will come from the Democratic side of the aisle.
My colleagues on the committee are aware we have made that effort to
work in a bipartisan way. I see no disadvantage to any member of the
committee from the procedure the majority leader has proposed. If there
are good ideas related to energy policy, of course, the first choice
would be to try to have them included in the bill the majority leader
brings up for consideration. If those ideas are not included in that
package, for whatever reason, any Senator, whether Democrat or
Republican, would be in a position to offer those as an amendment.
I don't see anyone being disadvantaged by the procedure the majority
leader has proposed. I was disappointed to hear in one of the
statements this morning a somewhat colorful account of how this
decision was supposed to have been made. That purported account was not
accurate in any respect, as far as I know. The decision was simply made
by the majority leader that if we proceeded in this way, in his view,
this process would hold out the best chance for us to get an energy
bill considered by the Senate and passed in a timely fashion. On that
basis, it is advisable for all Senators to support the decision of the
majority leader to try to move ahead on a bipartisan basis. That will
certainly be my best effort in the committee.
I look forward to working with all colleagues, both on the Energy
Committee and with other committees that claim jurisdiction and have
jurisdiction on different aspects of a comprehensive energy bill.
Madam President, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey.
Mr. TORRICELLI. Madam President, I ask unanimous consent to address
the Senate for 10 minutes.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________