[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 132 (Thursday, October 4, 2001)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10277-S10279]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AIRPORT SECURITY
Mr. DORGAN. Let me ask a question in the largely empty Senate on a
Thursday afternoon. It is now 4:05. We came to the Senate this week
dealing with Defense authorization at a time when defense is critically
important to this country. This country was attacked. Thousands of
Americans tragically were killed by mass murderers who committed the
most heinous crime that any of us have ever seen.
The issue of defense at a moment when we are sending American men and
women who wear our country's uniform into harm's way is a very
important issue. Our first order of business in dealing with the
Defense authorization bill in the Senate was to have to vote on cloture
to shut off debate so we could complete this bill.
What does that say about our priorities? We had a cloture vote, we
got through that, we finished that bill, finally, and now it is
Thursday at 4:05 in the afternoon, and the subject is airport security.
When those commercial airliners hit the Trade Towers in New York, and
that commercial airliner hit the Pentagon, it is something that none of
us will ever forget--the image of the airplanes hitting the Trade
Towers in New York, seeing the fire at the Pentagon, seeing the crater
dug into the ground in Pennsylvania by the United Airlines jet. When
all of that happened, immediately the FAA shut down all air service in
the United States. Every single airplane was ordered grounded. All
commercial airlines flying and private airplanes flying in this country
were ordered grounded and, as I understand it, moved to the nearest
airport they could find.
At that moment of that day, September 11, the only thing in the skies
over Washington, New York, and other parts of the country were F-16s,
armed, flying combat missions over American cities.
Our commercial airlines were ordered grounded. None flew for a number
of days. And then commercial airlines were allowed to come back with
added security and they began to fly once again.
What has happened in this country is people have not been coming back
to the airports to use commercial air service because they are
concerned about the issue of security. Last week I boarded an airplane
and flew to North Dakota for the weekend and came back. I appreciate
the air service. I appreciate the added security at the airports. I
hope all Americans will understand a substantial amount is being done
in this country to try to make sure we will not see airplane hijackings
once again. It is important.
[[Page S10278]]
But the Congress is moving to do more with an airport security bill
that we have been considering for a number of days on the floor of the
Senate, but we cannot move forward. The issue of the Congress of the
United States to put sky marshals on virtually every flight in this
country, hiring a lot of sky marshals to say to the American people,
when you fly, someone will fly with you, a sky marshal, trained and
armed and ready to take over that plane if needed. That is an important
message to the American people.
When you fly, you will go through baggage screening that is not
haphazard as it is in some airports but screening by somebody who is
trained and following procedures. When you fly, that the airport
perimeter, at airports in this country, will be a perimeter that is
guarded, in which law enforcement understands what is happening around
that airport perimeter.
When you fly in the future, you will be on an airplane in which
someone is not going to be able to get through that cockpit door
because it is a hardened cockpit, as it is on some carriers overseas.
All of these things relate to the question, Do we provide confidence to
the American people that we have taken the steps as a country to
protect ourselves against hijackers?
So we bring a bill to the floor of the Senate, largely agreed to,
negotiated over a long period of time--and it is now Thursday at 10
minutes after 4--and we have a motion to proceed to the bill on airline
and airport security, a motion to proceed to the bill that we cannot
advance. There is a filibuster on the motion to proceed.
There is something fundamentally wrong with that. The last thing in
the world you would expect, in my judgment, is stalling on a motion to
proceed to the airport security bill in the Congress in the aftermath
of the September 11 tragedy.
If there are things people object to, if there are things they do not
like in this bill, things they want to change--if they have heartache
about something, let the bill come to the floor and offer an amendment.
Just offer it, grab a microphone, stand up, and have at it. We will be
here. We do not have to go anyplace real soon. There is nothing, in my
judgment, that has a higher priority than this at the moment.
If we do not get people back in the air, if we do not get commerce
going again in this country--business travelers and travelers for
vacations, pleasure travelers and so forth--if we do not have people
back in the air, we will not have a commercial aviation system left in
this country. They are hemorrhaging in red ink, and we did a bill to
try to provide some support for that, but that bill only lasts a very
short period of time. We must give people confidence that when they get
on an airplane, they are not going to have substantial risk of
hijacking, that the security procedures in place are going to protect
them. We must give them that confidence. That is what this legislation
is about, and it is just unfathomable to me that there is nothing
happening here because we have an objection on the motion to proceed.
My colleague from Nevada, Senator Reid, said if you will not agree to
go to the airport security bill, we have five appropriations bills that
should have been done by October 1 but we did not get them done. Let's
have an appropriations bill on the floor this afternoon. Let's work on
that. We can be here until midnight. Hard work is not something that is
a stranger to most people in this Chamber.
Do you know what? We have five appropriations bills that should have
been done already, and we cannot get one to the floor of the Senate
today because when the Senator from Nevada makes a unanimous consent
request--if you will not go to airport security, then let's go to an
appropriations bill--and the words ``I object'' are heard.
So who is objecting, and for what purpose? And how does it advance
this country's public policy interests, in a range of critically
important issues--notably airport security, which I think ought to rank
near the top, given what happened on September 11? How does it advance
this country's interest to shut this place down?--just stop it. It
doesn't seem to me to be the mood that ought to exist.
Post-September 11, we have had a period unprecedented, at least in my
judgment, here in the Congress. President Bush came to speak to a joint
session. I thought he gave a strong and powerful speech. I thought he
spoke for this country, saying this country is unified, this country
has one voice. That is a voice of determination saying to the rest of
the world that what happened in this country was a heinous act of mass
murder. We will find those who did it, and we will punish them, and we
will take all steps necessary to prevent that sort of thing from
happening again in America.
One part of that, and I must say a very important part of that, is
dealing with security in the area of commercial airlines and commercial
aviation. This legislation dealing with sky marshals, airport
screening, perimeter law enforcement, hardening of the cockpit, and so
many other issues--the appointment of an Assistant Secretary of
Transportation whose sole authority it is to deal with security--all of
that is in this legislation. So, on Thursday afternoon we sit in a
spooky quiet Chamber because somehow this cooperation is not there.
I am not here just to point my finger. I haven't named anybody or
talked about sides here. All I say is those who say ``I object'' when
we say at least let's move to the motion to proceed to the airport
security bill, when they say ``I object,'' I think they retard rather
than advance this country's interests on something so important and so
timely and so necessary at this moment.
The reason I wanted to speak beyond the piece of legislation I
introduced here is to say how disappointed I am this afternoon. I think
many of my colleagues feel the same way. I am not angry about it, I am
just disappointed. This is not what we should do. We know how to do
good public policy. We do good public policy by getting together and
getting the best of what everybody has to offer, not the worst of each.
If you have an objection, if you have a burr under your saddle
someplace about something, if you are cranky about something, got up on
the wrong side of the bed, didn't have sugar in your cereal, good for
you. That doesn't mean you have to hold up the whole place. If you have
a problem with something, come offer an amendment. These microphones
work at every single desk. Come offer an amendment, and if you have
enough support, you are going to win, and God bless you, that is the
way life is here in the Senate.
I understand people say we have a right to use the rules and the
rules allow us to object to a motion to proceed. That is true,
absolutely the case. But there are times, unusual times, in my
judgment, in this country, when the American people do not want to see
business at usual; when what the American people want to see is
cooperation and people coming here to say, we know we have a problem,
and when this country has a problem, we are one; we are going to work
together and solve it.
That doesn't mean every voice has to be singing exactly the same
note. Someone said when everyone in the room is thinking the same
thing, nobody is thinking very much. I am not asking for a unison of
thought, but I am asking that we decide to take some action in this
Congress. This is the opposite of action, and it is not the best of
what Congress has to offer the American people so soon after the
tragedy that occurred on September 11.
I express my disappointment as only one Member of the Senate. But I
hope very much others will join and we will begin next week--the Senate
has no votes tomorrow, and Monday is Columbus Day. The Senate will not
have votes on Monday. My hope is when we come back Tuesday, we will see
a series of actions on the part of the Senate with a new determination
to cooperate, to say, yes, let's do these things. We know they need to
get done; let's do them. Bring up the airport security bill, offer some
amendments, agree to some limitation on time on debate. If you don't
want to do that, that is fine, but it seems to me it makes sense to get
these things done. Bring the appropriations bills up. Let's get these
done. Let's work in a spirit of cooperation.
I am not saying one side is bad and the other side is good. I am
saying all of us are on the same side. There is only one side in
America at this point, and that is the side of trying to get the right
thing done at the right time for the American people.
[[Page S10279]]
I yield the floor, and I make a point of order a quorum is not
present.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Dorgan). The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. NELSON of Florida. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent the
quorum call be dispensed with.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The
Senator from Florida.
____________________