[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 132 (Thursday, October 4, 2001)]
[Senate]
[Page S10270]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
AVIATION SECURITY
Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, the day of September 11 has been
eloquently described by the preceding speaker, Senator Torricelli. Its
consequences are unknown. In fact, one of the great questions none of
us can answer at this point is: What are the unintended consequences of
what will follow this attack over a period of weeks and months?
However, this is not our purpose. Our purpose is to get an aviation
security bill done. That is why this Senator from West Virginia chooses
to speak.
I wish to make a couple of very clear points. We have not yet passed
an aviation security bill. There were those who said, no, you cannot
work on the aviation industry's financial condition until you have done
an aviation security bill. That was an understandable argument, as well
as those who talk about people who have lost their jobs. There really
was not much point in doing an aviation security bill if there weren't
any airplanes flying. That had to be done as a first order of business.
They are flying. They have picked up a modest amount of business. It
has increased about 7 percent in the last week, but they are still in a
very bad position, even with the money we gave them after forcing them
to ground all of their airplanes for a period of time.
In any event, that and the loan guarantees part is done and so now we
move on to aviation security, which we ought to do. One could say,
well, that is a fairly easy subject. We could go ahead and do that
promptly and without much fuss.
That is not quite the case. There is a lot involved, which is
serious, which is complex, a lot of back and forth about which is the
best agency to do this or that and how do people feel about it, what
are the costs involved.
That being said, the Department of Transportation, under President
Bush's leadership, immediately after September 11, took some very
strong steps with respect to our airports and our airlines. Within
days, Congress sent, as I have indicated, its strong support with an
emergency financial package that, in fact, included $3 billion, still
unknown to most people, for airport security. That was included to be
used at the discretion of the President, which was fine. Most of that
has been used for sky marshals and other items. Urgent aviation
security efforts are already in place. The money is there. Now we are
talking about a bill for a broader aviation security purpose.
In the few weeks that have passed since September 11, a large group
has been working around the clock through a lot of very contentious
issues, not easy issues, to try to resolve what should be in an
aviation security bill that would best serve the Nation, not just in
the next months but in the coming years. One can say, therefore, that
the Aviation Security Act is a result of these efforts. It is not
finally worked out. There was to be a meeting this morning with the
Secretary of Transportation. He was called to the White House. There
are still details pending. That is not the point. We are on it and
moving at the point, for those who come down to speak on it, because we
want this done if at all possible this week, with the American people
knowing that aviation security is at the top of our legislative agenda.
I am very proud to have joined Senator Hollings, Senator McCain,
Senator Hutchinson as original cosponsors, and I rise in strong support
of the managers' amendment because we have been working closely with
Senator Lott and Senator Daschle. I can report there is broad
bipartisan support within this body on both sides of the aisle as to
what we ought to do. That has come through in meetings and compromises.
That is a very important fact and bodes well for the bill.
The truth is, the horrific attacks of September 11 do reflect broad
intelligence and other failures.
____________________