[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 127 (Wednesday, September 26, 2001)]
[Senate]
[Pages S9825-S9826]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
EMERGENCY TECHNOLOGY CORPS
Mr. WYDEN. Madam President, this morning I want to discuss a proposal
which I think is important in light of the tragic events that unfolded
on September 11, 2001.
As all of us now understand, the communications infrastructure in New
York, Washington, DC, and indeed the whole country, was severely
challenged that day. Wireless telephone networks were severely
overloaded and crashed. Wireless Internet access was suspended.
Telephone lines were cut, and communications for people literally in
communities around the east coast of the United States came to a
standstill. Even the immediate communication needs of rescue workers,
victims, families, and aid groups were a huge struggle to coordinate.
Survivors often couldn't let family members know they were safe, and
families of victims had no immediate central clearinghouse to find
information or file missing person reports.
The hospitals were inundated with searches, requests for help, and
offers of aid but with no way to match them to each other. Even some of
this country's premier aid organizations that have done such a
marvelous job helping rescue workers, survivors, and victims' families
faced immediate and severe challenges with respect to information
technology infrastructure. The New York Times drew a conclusion with
which I strongly agree. They said: There needs to be new ways to set up
emergency information systems.
That is what I would like to propose this morning. It seems to me
that what this country needs is essentially a technology equivalent of
the National Guard, an emergency technology guard--I have been calling
it in my mind Net Guard, or a national emergency technology guard--that
in times of crisis would be in a position to mobilize the Nation's
information technology, or IT, community to action quickly, just as the
National Guard is ready to move during emergencies.
It seems to me that in our leading technology companies in this
Nation there are the brains and the equipment to put in place net
guard, or this information technology guard, that could be deployed in
communities across the Nation when we face tragedies such as we saw in
New York City.
A national volunteer organization of trained and well-coordinated
units of information technology professionals from our leading
technology companies ought to be in a position to stand at ready with
the designated computer equipment, satellite dishes, wireless
communicators, and other equipment to quickly recreate and repair
compromised communications and technology infrastructure.
With congressional support, the leaders of our Nation's technology
companies could organize themselves, sell their employees and their
resource for this purpose. Medium- and small-sized businesses would be
able to contribute once a national framework is put in place. Certainly
the resources from the standpoint of the Federal level need not be
extensive. Individuals could be designated from existing human resource
programs of major and medium-sized firms and the technology
professionals would be trained to perform specific tasks in the event
of an emergency.
[[Page S9826]]
I intend to use the subcommittee that I chair of the full Commerce
Committee that is chaired by Senator Hollings to initiate a dialog
among congressional, corporate, military, and nonprofit leaders to
begin a new effort to mobilize information technology in times of
crises.
As we seek to prevent future disasters, I believe that the technology
professionals of this Nation in many of our leading companies--as most
Americans--want to use their skills, their equipment, and their talents
to answer this call and do their part.
I propose with a national emergency technology guard--what I call
tech guard--that we give to the leading information technology
professionals in this country a chance to use their ingenuity and
creativity to ensure that there is greater safety and stability for our
communities and our citizens in the coming days.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from California.
Mr. BYRD. Madam President, will the distinguished Senator yield?
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Absolutely.
Mr. BYRD. I assure her that if she wants the opportunity to proceed,
I will resist in my remarks and take my chair.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Fine. Please proceed.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from West Virginia is recognized.
Mr. BYRD. I thank the Chair.
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that I may speak for not to
exceed 40 minutes. I do so with the understanding, as I have already
indicated, I will be very glad to suspend my remarks at any time the
distinguished Senator from California wishes to take the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________