[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 102 (Friday, July 20, 2001)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8002-S8004]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS BILL
Ms. LANDRIEU. Mr. President, I wish to rise for a few moments today
before we adjourn the Senate for the weekend to speak about one of the
appropriations bills that we are going to be dealing with when we
return next week and that we will work on through this summer session
into the fall. That appropriations bill is the District of Columbia
appropriations, which I have the great honor and privilege and
opportunity to serve now as Chair, along with my distinguished
colleague from Ohio, Senator DeWine, the ranking member. He and I have
worked together very closely for the last several months on that
appropriations committee. With the change in leadership, I find myself
as Chair of this important committee. I want to spend a minute talking
about that role and about some of the responsibilities that I see
coming along with that role.
First, let me say that Senator DeWine and I have been in close
communication on many issues that are important to the District. I have
great respect for the Mayor and members of the city council, and for
Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton for the great work she does for the
District. I look forward to working with them, along with the business
leaders, the community leaders, and the labor leaders in the city to
help this city be all that it can be and all that it should be.
I am a supporter of home rule and am a supporter of city leaders
making decisions for themselves in great measure about how this city
should be run, and I have great confidence in the ability of those
leaders that I just mentioned.
Particularly, I share the Mayor's vision for this city in large
measure. But one of the things that Senator DeWine and I, and others,
have spoken about--there are many Members of the Senate and the House,
not the least of whom is the Senator from West Virginia, Mr. Robert
Byrd, the Senator from Ohio, Mr. Voinovich, and the Senator from
Illinois, Mr. Durbin, all of whom play a vital role in the oversight,
if you will, of the District of Columbia. I have shared many of my
thoughts with them about proceeding in this particular role.
I want to outline a few issues that I would like to focus on and that
I will be conducting hearings on--and the many discussions with Members
of Congress on some of these issues.
One is the proper role of the chief financial officer. I think it is
the cornerstone of our post-Control-Board reform. The District has made
tremendous progress--4 years of surpluses, 4 years of better
management, and 4 years of developing policies that are helping the
District to regain its financial footing.
I think it is very important for us to focus on the role of the chief
financial officer to make sure that the new responsibilities he has
been given--it is my understanding that about 26 weighty
responsibilities for the financial operations of this District have
been handed to him by the city council and by our own laws here in
Congress--are matched with the proper authority and a proper power to
carry out those responsibilities.
I have spent a good bit of this week reading a very excellent report
by the DC Appleseed Center, entitled ``After the Control Board: The
Chief Financial Officer and Financial Management of the District of
Columbia,'' which is the sole focus of this report:
The DC Appleseed Center is an independent non-profit advocacy
organization dedicated to making the District of Columbia and the
Washington Metropolitan area a better place to live and work, focusing
primarily on strengthening the financial health of the District and
enhancing the performance of governmental institutions that affect the
District.
I ask unanimous consent that the list of the board of directors and
staff be printed in the Record.
There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in
the Record, as follows:
Board of Directors
Daniel M. Singer, Chair, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver &
Jacobson
Jacquelyn V. Helm, Vice-Chair, Law Office of Jacquelyn V.
Helm
Roderic L. Woodson, Secretary, Holland & Knight
Peter D. Ehrenhaft, Treasurer, Ablondi, Foster, Sobin &
Davidow
Nicholas W. Fels, Past-Chair, Covington & Burling
Robert B. Duncan, Hogan & Hartson
Bert Edwards, (retired), Arthur Andersen
Gary Epstein, Latham & Watkins
Curtis Etherly, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Bottling Companies
Rev. Graylan S. Hagler, Plymouth Congregational, United
Church of Christ
John W. Hechinger, Sr. (retired)
Richard B. Herzog, Harkins Cunningham
Carolyn B. Lamm, White & Case
Edward M. Levin (retired), U.S. Department of Commerce
Claudia L. McKoin, Verizon--Washington
Alan B. Morrison, Public Citizen Litigation Group
John Payton, Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering
Andrew Plepler, Fannie Mae Foundation
Gary M. Ratner, Washington Meeting Facilitators
Michael C. Rogers, Metropolitan Washington, Council of
Governments
Lawrence R. Walders, Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy
Affiliations listed only for purposes of identification
Staff
Joshua S. Wyner, Executive Director
Lori E. Parker, Deputy Director
Emily Greenspan, Program/Development Associate
Adam I. Lowe, Program Associate
Sara Pollock, Program Associate
Ms. LANDRIEU. Mr. President, it is an outstanding board of directors
with a very able staff.
I believe the District of Columbia council and the Mayor have
referred
[[Page S8003]]
very positively to this report. I myself will use it as a guideline as
I take responsibility of this committee because there are many terrific
suggestions outlined here about this particular issue--about the proper
authority and power of the CFO.
It is important that the financial officer who is assuming much of
the responsibility of the Control Board be properly balanced between
being responsive to the Mayor, the chief executive officer of this
city, if you will, and his responsibility to the public generally to
give independent, accurate, and timely financial information so we can
continue on this road to reform. This report will serve as great
guidance, and it will be the subject of much of our discussion.
Second, as I said in a public meeting last week with the Mayor and
with Delegate Norton, I agree with them on the structural changes that
the District needs to come to grips with that are necessary to provide
long-term financial health and prosperity for the District. There are,
indeed, some real problems, some structural flaws and some structural
deficits that are preventing the city from gathering the tax base and
the revenue base necessary to support such a strong and vibrant
community. That will be subject to some of our focus.
In addition, I assure all who look to the District of our continuing
push for modernization, streamlining operations of the District, and
reform of regulatory operations so that we minimize regulation and
maximize good results for everyone who lives and works here. That is
important.
I commend the Mayor for his extraordinary vision about what the
schools can be and should be in the District of Columbia. We have this
challenge everywhere around the Nation--every city, large and small,
every community, particularly a community with the large population of
citizens who may be under the poverty line; where citizens who may be
at some disadvantage economically and are struggling with how to create
vibrant, well-run and well-managed schools; where teachers are highly
motivated, well paid, and highly skilled; where students are getting
the kind of nurturing and support they need as well as a place where
time-honed values are presented to children with the right combination
of discipline and nurturing for them so they can grow, develop, and be
all that God intended when he created them.
I share the Mayor's vision for strengthening of the schools. I look
forward to working with the new initiatives on the development of
charter schools--with more flexibility and choice for parents and a
stronger academic outcome. I commend him for the work he is doing.
Also, of great interest, not only to me but to many Members of the
Senate, is the push for reforming the court system in the District.
Unfortunately, we have had these problems everywhere in our Nation.
There have been some real breakdowns in our child welfare system. We
have let many children down. We have not always come to their rescue
when they have cried. We have sometimes left children languishing in
foster care. We have taken their only parent they knew away from them,
and then failed to provide them with another one.
The system in the United States has caused a lot of pain and a lot of
grief. We have not supported our courts and our social workers and our
front line staffers the way we need to around this Nation. It is no
different here in the District.
So I am going to work very closely with Senator DeWine, the father of
eight children, who is a great leader for child welfare on the other
side of the aisle, and with Delegate Norton and Congressman DeLay, who
are very focused on this issue, to modernize and strengthen the courts,
to create a family- and child-centered court system so we stop letting
children fall through the cracks.
I read in a book recently that when we say, oh, well, the children
just fall through the cracks, actually that is not true because there
are no real cracks for children to fall through. What they fall through
are our fingers. They fall through our hands, hands that once held
them. They have fallen through. So it is our responsibility to make
sure the court system at every level and the child welfare system at
every level, as much as we can, are strengthened in the District.
Finally, in terms of issues, because of the great support and
feedback I have gotten from a wide variety of people--elected leaders,
as well as friends and neighbors of mine as a resident here in the
District, and actually living on Capitol Hill--I believe in the
importance of the recreational opportunities for children of the
District, to enhance those recreational opportunities to be
commensurate with the surrounding suburbs. In the State of Maryland and
in the State of Virginia, there are outstanding facilities where
children of those States are able to participate in first-class and
world-class sports and recreational activities. I think that is very
important for the children and families of this District. We want them
to have the same kinds of opportunities that children have in this
region and across the Nation.
I am pleased that the National Soccer Association, the U.S. Chamber
of Commerce--a broad bipartisan group of citizens around this city--are
rallying to the cause of creating this kind of atmosphere that is not
only important to children and families, but it is important to the
business community. It gives children something to say yes to.
I think, as adults, we have a responsibility to not just say no to
them but to give them some things to say yes to, such as outdoor
activities and recreation and team sports that build character and keep
children occupied at very positive activities.
So with those issues I just outlined, I want to conclude by simply
expressing, again, my support for the concept of home rule, but also to
recognize my role as the Chair of this subcommittee, to say that every
citizen in our Nation--every citizen, from every walk of life--has a
special interest in the District of Columbia. This city has to
function, obviously, and be responsive to the residents who live here--
the approximately 500,000 residents--but this District has a special
responsibility.
Unlike any other city--unlike New York or Philadelphia or New Orleans
or San Francisco or Chicago, or smaller communities around the Nation--
this city has a particular responsibility to every citizen of the
Nation because every citizen of this Nation looks to this city as the
Capital. It is part of our democratic heritage that we share as a
nation of citizens. So I will be trying to represent the interests of
those citizens in this debate as much as my ability will allow.
Finally, in my role as chair, I also see responsibility to the
Federal Government as an employer. We are the largest employer in this
District. In relation to large employers anywhere--whether it is Boeing
in Seattle or another large employer in another city somewhere in
America--the Federal Government employs more people in the District of
Columbia directly and indirectly, by far, than any other employer.
As an employer, we have an inherent interest in the financial
management of the city that we are in about its daily operations, and
we have standing in those discussions. So there is a balance between
home rule and the Federal Government's proper and legitimate
expressions, as the largest employer in this city, of how this
community should operate and how it should function.
Then, thirdly, there is a place at the table for the citizens in
every State and community about the District. I hope to be able to
balance those three truths as carefully as I can as chair.
I want to say one more thing about large employers. If Boeing is
dissatisfied with the way the city of Seattle was being run, they have
tremendous leverage. They can basically pick up and move their
operations. We have seen large corporations use that leverage many
times. We have seen employers pick up literally 10,000, 15,000
employees, and move out of a city to another place. They vote with
their feet. If they do not like the way things are run, they have that
opportunity, and employers everywhere exercise that option.
But I will point out, for this discussion, the Federal Government, as
an employer, does not truly have that option. We cannot move the
Capital. Some Senators have tried, but the Capital is here, and it is
going to stay here. We cannot move the central operation of this
Nation.
[[Page S8004]]
So while I would not want to use the word ``hostage'' in the wrong
way, we are subject to not have the same leverage that other large
employers have. So in the role as chair of this committee, I take on
extra responsibility to try to communicate, in as constructive a way as
possible, the views of the Federal Government as an employer.
Particularly in the areas of public safety and transportation, our
employees who work in the District, who are employed by the Federal
Government, have a legitimate standing in those debates.
So let me say, in closing, that I look forward to working with many
of my colleagues. Senator Byrd, himself, the distinguished Senator from
West Virginia, served for 7 years in the capacity as chair of this
committee. I cannot say at this date that I will serve as chair for 7
years--for as long as Senator Byrd served--but I can promise you, it
will be no less than 4 years. If I can make it 7, I may try, because it
is a lot of responsibility and it is a lot of work.
But I come to this chair at a time of great promise for this city,
and with a great leadership team to work with, the Mayor and the city
council, and who are poised for reform, some men and women who have
literally given blood, sweat, and tears to lift this District to a
place that holds great promise for not only the residents who live
here, including every single child who lives here today, but for
families everywhere.
So I am looking forward to that with great anticipation and great
enthusiasm and will, again, focus on these important issues.
I thank the Presiding Officer. I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BYRD. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________