[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 62 (Tuesday, May 8, 2001)]
[House]
[Pages H2005-H2006]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Texas (Mr. Green) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. GREEN of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I rise to speak tonight to discuss a
report that was just released yesterday from the National Institute for
Health Care Management Foundation, which stated that spending on
prescription drugs has increased almost 19 percent in the last year. I
am deeply troubled by this report, as it underscores a critical need
for this Congress to modernize Medicare to include a prescription drug
benefit.
Spending on retail outpatient prescription drugs rose almost 19
percent in 2000, from $111 billion to $131.9 billion. Approximately
half of that spending increase can be attributed to just 23
prescription drugs or pharmaceuticals. Among those drugs are the
blockbuster ones we hear about, Vioxx, Lipitor, Celebrex and
Glucophage, which I am not pronouncing correctly, but the very drugs
that seniors rely on every day to treat chronic long-term illnesses
such as diabetes, arthritis or high cholesterol. In fact, my mother-in-
law, of those four drugs, actually takes three of them every day.
For the seniors that have no prescription drug coverage, they simply
have no choice but to pay top dollar for these expensive medications or
go without; and that is what they are doing every day, they are going
without, because they cannot afford them. Fully one-third of our
Medicare beneficiaries, and these are old numbers, because that was
before so many of our Medicare HMOs withdrew from the market, at least
one-third of them have no prescription drug coverage at all.
I hear from constituents literally every day who have to make these
tough choices on whether to pay their electric bill or their
prescription drugs. In fact, I have a letter I just received today from
a constituent who tells me: ``I am holding off on some of my
medications until my Social Security checks are deposited in the bank
on the 3rd, and I am out of some of them already.'' Seniors are
struggling literally from Social Security check to Social Security
check hoping they have enough medication until the end of the month.
Another constituent of mine was hospitalized for a severe infection.
When she was dismissed from the hospital she was given three new
prescriptions, one which cost more than $700. Imagine an 85-year-old
woman being asked to pay $700 for one prescription. The other two cost
her an additional $150, bringing her grand total for these new
prescriptions, only new ones for this current illness, to $850 on one
trip to the pharmacy. Talk about adding insult to injury.
Unfortunately, the high costs of prescription drugs are only getting
worse. The recent government study predicts that the mapping of the
human genome, the aging of the baby boom generation that I am a part
of, and the increase in spending on biomedical research will lead to
the introduction of
[[Page H2006]]
more and more prescription drugs. This is the good part of it, because
we are living longer and healthier, but this is sometimes a mixed
blessing from a policy perspective. The influx of these drugs can only
mean new treatments and therapies for what are now incurable and
serious diseases, but it also means that the demand for these drugs and
also the cost of these drugs will rise.
Congress cannot sit idly by while our seniors, our parents and our
grandparents, are forced to pay more and more of their hard-earned
retirement on prescription drugs, and they cannot afford it.
Unfortunately, we have seen little action during this Congress. We have
actually had one or two hearings in the Subcommittee on Health of the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, but we have not gone any further.
For the past 100 days, all we have heard about is a tax cut. What we
need to do is start addressing prescription drugs for senior citizens,
those 40 million hard-working Americans who now rely on Medicare.
The $300 billion I understand that may be in the budget that will
actually come out of the Medicare reform legislation for prescription
drugs is just not adequate. The real problem for our seniors is every
time I go to the grocery store at home or a town hall meeting or visit
with my seniors, I am approached on what we can do about prescription
drugs for seniors. They want to know why in Washington we are not doing
something about it, because they see it as an imperative that if it is
not a problem today, it has been a problem for over a year and we have
not addressed it.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues on both sides, the majority and the
minority, we need to pass a prescription drug benefit that is part of
Medicare. Just like a doctor or hospital, our prescription drugs should
be paid for for our seniors as part of Medicare. We may not be able to
afford the 80 percent that we do now for doctors and hospitals, but we
ought to be able to grow into that.
Mr. Speaker, $300 billion is a start, but we have a long way to go.
It is a crisis now for our senior citizens. It is a crisis for our
parents and our grandparents, and we need to do something about it now.
____________________