[Congressional Record Volume 147, Number 34 (Wednesday, March 14, 2001)]
[House]
[Pages H909-H910]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
WOMEN'S HISTORY MONTH
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from Illinois (Mrs. Biggert) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mrs. BIGGERT. Mr. Speaker, as the Republican co-chair of the
Congressional Women's Caucus, I am very excited about what the 107th
Congress promises for women, particularly in the area of health care.
There have been great strides made in recent years in the area of
women's health care, and I think that since the month of March is
Women's History Month, I would like to thank my colleagues from the
Congressional Women's Caucus who are taking the time to come down here
this afternoon out of their busy schedules to discuss women's health
issues.
{time} 1315
I think that a number of women will be discussing issues from eating
disorders, breast cancer, and long-term care; and these are issues that
affect all women, no matter their age, race, nationality or sexual
orientation. I commend my colleagues for continually taking the lead on
these important issues and look forward to continuing our work in the
107th Congress.
Mr. Speaker, I would like to, I think, look at one issue, but I
cannot begin really without talking about that, for the first time in
history, that the House Subcommittee on Health will be chaired by a
women, the gentlewoman from Connecticut (Mrs. Johnson), our friend and
colleague. That is very fitting when the issues that affect women have
become so dramatic.
One of the issues that I would like to address in the area of women's
health care that I care deeply about is long-term care. I think long-
term care has long been called the sleeping giant of all U.S. social
problems. This issue affects all Americans but particularly women for
three reasons: Number 1 is we live longer; number 2, we are the ones
who take care of our aging relatives; and, number 3, we are much more
likely to retire with little or no pension savings. That makes us
especially vulnerable to the high costs of long-term care.
The Census Bureau estimates that there are currently 34 million
Americans aged 65 and older living in the United States. By 2030, that
number is expected to more than double to 70 million, some 20 percent
of the population. The fact that Americans are living longer and living
more healthy lifestyles than at any time before should be celebrated.
However, it does present a challenging public policy problem.
These numbers demonstrate the demand for long-term home or
institutional care is going to grow exponentially. Neither the public
nor the private sectors have adequately planned to meet the
overwhelming future demand for long-term care services.
We must increase the public's awareness of the importance of
preparing for long-term needs, as well as encourage individuals to save
for their future, to invest in IRAs and mutual funds and to purchase
long-term care insurance policies.
In addition, we must encourage employers to provide long-term care
coverage as part of their employee benefit plans.
This is why I plan to reintroduce legislation that I introduced in
the 106th Congress, the Live Long and Prosper Act, Long-term Care and
Retirement Enhancement to address this issue.
There are several ways my bill addresses the problem facing long-term
care.
First, my bill provides an above-the-line deduction, starting with 60
percent in 2002 and rising to 100 percent in 2006, for the cost of
long-term care insurance premiums paid during a given year for the
taxpayer, his or her spouse and dependents.
These provisions will make long-term care insurance more financially
accessible, particularly for the young and those with lower incomes.
Second, my bill gives employers the option of providing long-term
care insurance coverage as part of a cafeteria plan, in which employees
are able to choose from a variety of medical care or other benefits, or
flexible spending account, in which employees set aside pretax dollars
for copayments or deductibles on insurance plans.
Third, my bill provides an additional personal exemption to the
estimated 7 million Americans who provide custodial care to an elderly
relative living in their home. The exemption was valued at $2,750 in
1999 and should help to alleviate some of the financial burdens
involved with caring for a loved one at home.
[[Page H910]]
These are just a few of the provisions of the bill, and they
represent a market-based solution to an ever-growing demand for long-
term care services and financing. But the financial incentives alone
will not be enough to address the potential long-term care delivery and
financial crisis.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all of my colleagues to take a look at that bill
and to look at the women's health issues that are involved therein.
____________________