[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 131 (Wednesday, October 18, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10706-S10707]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
FEDERAL PRISONER HEALTH CARE COPAYMENT ACT
Mr. JOHNSON. Mr. President, I am pleased the President recently
signed into law the Federal Prisoner Health Care Copayment Act. As you
know, Senator Jon Kyl and I introduced last year a bill to require
Federal prisoners to pay a nominal fee when they initiate certain
visits for medical attention. Fees collected from prisoners will either
be paid as restitution to victims or be deposited into the Federal
Crime Victims' Fund. My State of South Dakota is one of 38 States that
have implemented State-wide prisoner health care copayment programs.
The Department of Justice supported extending this prisoner health care
copayment program to Federal prisoners in an attempt to reduce
unnecessary medical procedures and ensure that adequate health care
services are available for prisoners who need them.
My interest in the prisoner health care copayment issue came from
discussions I had in South Dakota with a number of law enforcement
officials and US Marshal Lyle Swenson about the equitable treatment
between pre-sentencing Federal prisoners housed in county jails and the
county prisoners residing in those same facilities. Currently, county
prisoners in South Dakota are subject to State and local laws allowing
the collection of a health care copayment, while Marshals Service
prisoners are not, thereby allowing Federal prisoners to abuse health
care
[[Page S10707]]
resources at great cost to state and local law enforcement.
As our legislation moved through the Senate Judiciary Committee and
Senate last year, we had the opportunity to work on specific concerns
raised by South Dakota law enforcement officials and the US Marshals
Service. I sincerely appreciate Senator Kyl's willingness to
incorporate my language into the Federal Prisoner Health Care Copayment
Act that allows state and local facilities to collect health care
copayment fees when housing pre-sentencing federal prisoners.
I also worked with Senator Kyl and members of the Senate Judiciary
Committee to include sufficient flexibility in the Kyl-Johnson bill for
the Bureau of Prisons and local facilities contracting with the
Marshals Service to maintain preventive-health priorities. The Kyl-
Johnson bill prohibits the refusal of treatment for financial reasons
or for appropriate preventive care. I am pleased this provision was
included to pre-empt long term, and subsequently more costly, health
problems among prisoners.
The goal of the Kyl-Johnson Federal Prisoner Health Care Copayment
Act is not about generating revenue for the Federal, State, and local
prison systems. Instead, current prisoner health care copayment
programs in 38 States illustrate the success in reducing the number of
frivolous health visits and strain on valuable health care resources.
The Kyl-Johnson bill will ensure that adequate health care is available
to those prisoners who need it, without straining the budgets of
taxpayers.
____________________