[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 130 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[House]
[Page H9969]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
DESIGNATING CERTAIN LANDS IN VIRGINIA AS WILDERNESS AREAS
Mr. CALVERT. Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the
bill (H.R. 4646) to designate certain National Forest System lands
within the boundaries of the State of Virginia as wilderness areas, and
for other purposes, as amended.
The Clerk read as follows:
H.R. 4646
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of
the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS.
Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to designate certain
National Forest System lands in the States of Virginia and
West Virginia as wilderness areas'', approved June 7, 1988
(102 Stat. 584) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and inserting
a semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following new paragraphs:
``(7) certain lands in the George Washington National
Forest, which comprise approximately 5,963 acres, as
generally depicted on a map entitled `The Priest Wilderness
Study Area', dated June 6, 2000, and which shall be known as
the Priest Wilderness Area; and
``(8) certain lands in the George Washington National
Forest, which comprise approximately 4,608 acres, as
generally depicted on a map entitled `The Three Ridges
Wilderness Study Area', dated June 6, 2000, and which shall
be known as the Three Ridges Wilderness Area.''.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to the rule, the gentleman from
California (Mr. Calvert) and the gentleman from New Mexico (Mr. Udall)
each will control 20 minutes.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert).
Mr. CALVERT. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may
consume.
H.R. 4646 was introduced by the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goode)
to designate two areas in the George Washington National Forest in
Virginia as wilderness. Both areas were recommended for wilderness
studies in the George Washington National Forest plan completed in
1993.
I understand these are steep rugged areas, and that there is some
concern that the Forest Service will continue to allow the use of
motorized equipment, such as chainsaws or access by vehicles if it is
necessary to fight fire or otherwise respond to emergencies. To address
this concern, my colleague wisely included language stating the
wilderness designation would not prevent firefighting companies or
rescue squads from doing what is needed in emergency situations.
While I would prefer to retain this language, at the request of the
gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goode), I am offering a substitute
amendment which removes this clause. He has received assurance from the
Forest Service that such access is approved quickly when needed.
With this assurance, I ask support for the Virginia Wilderness Act
under suspension of the rules.
Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. UDALL of New Mexico. Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I
may consume.
(Mr. UDALL of New Mexico asked and was given permission to revise and
extend his remarks.)
Mr. UDALL of New Mexico. Madam Speaker, H.R. 4646 adds approximately
10,570 acres to the National Wilderness Preservation System in George
Washington National Forest in the State of Virginia. The two additions,
the Priest and Three Ridges areas, were recommended for wilderness
study in the forest management plan in 1993.
The areas, within easy access of the Appalachian Trail, contain
rugged terrain and spectacular mountain scenery. We are pleased to see
this addition to the wilderness system.
We are also pleased to see the removal of a provision allowing tree
cutting and motorized use by county firefighters and rescue squads in
and around wilderness areas. The Wilderness Act allows motorized use in
wilderness areas only in the event of emergencies and to control fire,
insects and disease. Forest Service policies allow forest supervisors
to approve motorized equipment and vegetation cutting in emergencies.
The removal of the provision makes H.R. 4646 consistent with the
Wilderness Act. It also makes the bill identical in substance to
Senator Robb's companion measure, S. 2865, which passed the Senate on
October 6, 2000. If the House had chosen to take up Senator Robb's
bill, it would have been on its way to the President. By choosing to
take up the House version, the House is unnecessarily protracting the
process and risking not getting a bill.
While I regret this choice, the bill enjoys administration and
widespread public support, and I urge my colleagues to support it.
Madam Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I yield back
the balance of my time.
Mr. CALVERT. Madam Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and
I yield back the balance of my time.
The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the
gentleman from California (Mr. Calvert) that the House suspend the
rules and pass the bill, H.R. 4646, as amended.
The question was taken; and (two-thirds having voted in favor
thereof) the rules were suspended and the bill, as amended, was passed.
The title of the bill was amended so as to read: ``A bill to
designate certain National Forest System lands within the boundaries of
the State of Virginia as wilderness areas.''.
A motion to reconsider was laid on the table.
____________________