[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 130 (Tuesday, October 17, 2000)]
[House]
[Pages H10037-H10066]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




                               AMENDMENTS

  Under clause 8 of rule XVIII, proposed amendments were submitted as 
follows:

                                S. 2796

                        Offered By: Mr. Shuster

               (Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute)

       Amendment No. 1: Strike all after the enacting clause and 
     insert the following:

     SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

       (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water 
     Resources Development Act of 2000''.
       (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorization.
Sec. 102. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 103. Small project for bank stabilization.
Sec. 104. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 105. Small project for improvement of the quality of the 
              environment.
Sec. 106. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 107. Small project for shoreline protection.
Sec. 108. Small project for snagging and sediment removal.
Sec. 109. Petaluma River, Petaluma, California.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Cost sharing of certain flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 202. Harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 203. Nonprofit entities.
Sec. 204. Rehabilitation of Federal flood control levees.
Sec. 205. Flood mitigation and riverine restoration program.
Sec. 206. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 207. Native American reburial and transfer authority.
Sec. 208. Ability to pay.
Sec. 209. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 210. Property protection program.
Sec. 211. Engineering consulting services.
Sec. 212. Beach recreation.
Sec. 213. Performance of specialized or technical services.
Sec. 214. Design-build contracting.
Sec. 215. Independent review pilot program.
Sec. 216. Enhanced public participation.
Sec. 217. Monitoring.
Sec. 218. Reconnaissance studies.
Sec. 219. Fish and wildlife mitigation.
Sec. 220. Wetlands mitigation.
Sec. 221. Credit toward non-Federal share of navigation projects.
Sec. 222. Maximum program expenditures for small flood control 
              projects.
Sec. 223. Feasibility studies and planning, engineering, and design.
Sec. 224. Administrative costs of land conveyances.
Sec. 225. Dam safety.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, Nogales, Arizona.
Sec. 302. John Paul Hammerschmidt Visitor Center, Fort Smith, Arkansas.
Sec. 303. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 304. Ten- and Fifteen-Mile Bayous, Arkansas.
Sec. 305. Cache Creek basin, California.
Sec. 306. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 307. Norco Bluffs, Riverside County, California.
Sec. 308. Sacramento deep water ship channel, California.
Sec. 309. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 310. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 311. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 312. Fernandina Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 313. Tampa Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 314. East Saint Louis and vicinity, Illinois.
Sec. 315. Kaskaskia River, Kaskaskia, Illinois.
Sec. 316. Waukegan Harbor, Illinois.
Sec. 317. Cumberland, Kentucky.
Sec. 318. Lock and Dam 10, Kentucky River, Kentucky.
Sec. 319. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 320. Mayfield Creek and tributaries, Kentucky.
Sec. 321. Amite River and tributaries, East Baton Rouge Parish, 
              Louisiana.
Sec. 322. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 323. Atchafalaya River, Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black Louisiana.
Sec. 324. Red River Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Thomaston Harbor, Georges River, Maine.
Sec. 326. Breckenridge, Minnesota.
Sec. 327. Duluth Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 328. Little Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 329. Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 330. Green Brook Sub-Basin, Raritan River basin, New Jersey.
Sec. 331. New York Harbor and adjacent channels, Port Jersey, New 
              Jersey.
Sec. 332. Passaic River basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 333. Times Beach nature preserve, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 334. Garrison Dam, North Dakota.
Sec. 335. Duck Creek, Ohio.
Sec. 336. Astoria, Columbia River, Oregon.
Sec. 337. Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi.
Sec. 338. Bowie County levee, Texas.
Sec. 339. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 340. Buchanan and Dickenson Counties, Virginia.
Sec. 341. Buchanan, Dickenson, and Russell Counties, Virginia.
Sec. 342. Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 343. Wallops Island, Virginia.
Sec. 344. Columbia River, Washington.
Sec. 345. Mount St. Helens sediment control, Washington.
Sec. 346. Renton, Washington.
Sec. 347. Greenbrier Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 348. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 349. Water quality projects.
Sec. 350. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 351. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 352. Declaration of nonnavigability for Lake Erie, New York.
Sec. 353. Project deauthorizations.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Studies of completed projects.
Sec. 402. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 403. Lower Mississippi River resource assessment.
Sec. 404. Upper Mississippi River basin sediment and nutrient study.
Sec. 405. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 406. Ohio River System.
Sec. 407. Eastern Arkansas.
Sec. 408. Russell, Arkansas.
Sec. 409. Estudillo Canal, San Leandro, California.
Sec. 410. Laguna Creek, Fremont, California.
Sec. 411. Lake Merritt, Oakland, California.
Sec. 412. Lancaster, California.
Sec. 413. Napa County, California.
Sec. 414. Oceanside, California.
Sec. 415. Suisun Marsh, California.
Sec. 416. Lake Allatoona Watershed, Georgia.
Sec. 417. Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 418. Chicago sanitary and ship canal system, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 419. Long Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 420. Brush and Rock Creeks, Mission Hills and Fairway, Kansas.
Sec. 421. Coastal areas of Louisiana.
Sec. 422. Iberia Port, Louisiana.
Sec. 423. Lake Pontchartrain seawall, Louisiana.
Sec. 424. Lower Atchafalaya basin, Louisiana.
Sec. 425. St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 426. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
Sec. 427. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Sec. 428. Buffalo Harbor, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 429. Hudson River, Manhattan, New York.
Sec. 430. Jamesville Reservoir, Onondaga County, New York.
Sec. 431. Steubenviille, Ohio.
Sec. 432. Grand Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 433. Columbia Slough, Oregon.
Sec. 434. Reedy River, Greenville, South Carolina.
Sec. 435. Germantown, Tennessee.
Sec. 436. Houston ship channel, Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 437. Park City, Utah.
Sec. 438. Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Sec. 439. Upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
              Wisconsin.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Bridgeport, Alabama.
Sec. 502. Duck River, Cullman, Alabama.
Sec. 503. Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 504. Augusta and Devalls Bluff, Arkansas.
Sec. 505. Beaver Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 506. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation system, Arkansas and 
              Oklahoma.
Sec. 507. Calfed Bay Delta program assistance, California.
Sec. 508. Clear Lake basin, California.
Sec. 509. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California.
Sec. 510. Huntington Beach, California.
Sec. 511. Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 512. Penn Mine, Calaveras County, California.
Sec. 513. Port of San Francisco, California.
Sec. 514. San Gabriel basin, California.
Sec. 515. Stockton, California.
Sec. 516. Port Everglades, Florida.
Sec. 517. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 518. Ballard's Island, La Salle County, Illinois.
Sec. 519. Lake Michigan Diversion, Illinois.
Sec. 520. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 521. Campbellsville Lake, Kentucky.

[[Page H10038]]

Sec. 522. West View Shores, Cecil County, Maryland.
Sec. 523. Conservation of fish and wildlife, Chesapeake Bay, Maryland 
              and Virginia.
Sec. 524. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 525. Soo Locks, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 526. Duluth, Minnesota, alternative technology project.
Sec. 527. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 528. St. Louis County, Minnesota.
Sec. 529. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 530. Coastal Mississippi wetlands restoration projects.
Sec. 531. Missouri River Valley improvements.
Sec. 532. New Madrid County, Missouri.
Sec. 533. Pemiscot County, Missouri.
Sec. 534. Las Vegas, Nevada.
Sec. 535. Newark, New Jersey.
Sec. 536. Urbanized peak flood management research, New Jersey.
Sec. 537. Black Rock Canal, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 538. Hamburg, New York.
Sec. 539. Nepperhan River, Yonkers, New York.
Sec. 540. Rochester, New York.
Sec. 541. Upper Mohawk River basin, New York.
Sec. 542. Eastern North Carolina flood protection.
Sec. 543. Cuyahoga River, Ohio.
Sec. 544. Crowder Point, Crowder, Oklahoma.
Sec. 545. Oklahoma-tribal commission.
Sec. 546. Columbia River, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 547. John Day Pool, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 548. Lower Columbia River and Tillamook Bay estuary program, 
              Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 549. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 550. Willamette River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 551. Lackawanna River, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 552. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 553. Access improvements, Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 554. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 555. Chickamauga Lock, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 556. Joe Pool Lake, Texas.
Sec. 557. Benson Beach, Fort Canby State Park, Washington.
Sec. 558. Puget Sound and adjacent waters restoration, Washington.
Sec. 559. Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe, Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 560. Wynoochee Lake, Wynoochee River, Washington.
Sec. 561. Snohomish River, Washington.
Sec. 562. Bluestone, West Virginia.
Sec. 563. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 564. Tug Fork River, West Virginia.
Sec. 565. Virginia Point Riverfront Park, West Virginia.
Sec. 566. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 567. Fox River system, Wisconsin.
Sec. 568. Surfside/Sunset and Newport Beach, California.
Sec. 569. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 570. Great Lakes.
Sec. 571. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 572. Great Lakes dredging levels adjustment.
Sec. 573. Dredged material recyling.
Sec. 574. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 575. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 576. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 577. National recreation reservation service.
Sec. 578. Hydrographic survey.
Sec. 579. Lakes program.
Sec. 580. Perchlorate.
Sec. 581. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 582. Release of use restriction.
Sec. 583. Comprehensive environmental resources protection.
Sec. 584. Modification of authorizations for environmental projects.
Sec. 585. Land transfers.
Sec. 586. Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area 
              Wilderness, Minnesota.

             TITLE VI--COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION

Sec. 601. Comprehensive Everglades restoration plan.
Sec. 602. Sense of Congress concerning Homestead Air Force Base.

                 TITLE VIII--MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION

Sec. 701. Definitions.
Sec. 702. Missouri River Trust.
Sec. 703. Missouri River Task Force.
Sec. 704. Administration.
Sec. 705. Authorization of appropriations.

     SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

       In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
     the Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

     SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

       (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects 
     for water resources development and conservation and other 
     purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
     substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to 
     the conditions, described in the respective reports 
     designated in this subsection:
       (1) Barnegat inlet to little egg inlet, new jersey.--The 
     project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Barnegat 
     Inlet to Little Egg Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
     Engineers dated July 26, 2000, at a total cost of 
     $51,203,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $33,282,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,921,000.
       (2) Port of new york and new jersey, new york and new 
     jersey.--
       (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Port of New 
     York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey: Report of the 
     Chief of Engineers dated May 2, 2000, at a total cost of 
     $1,781,235,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $738,631,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $1,042,604,000.
       (B) Credit.--The Secretary may provide the non-Federal 
     interests credit toward cash contributions required--
       (i) before, during, and after construction for planning, 
     engineering and design, and construction management work that 
     is performed by the non-Federal interests and that the 
     Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project; 
     and
       (ii) during and after construction for the costs of the 
     construction that the non-Federal interests carry out on 
     behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
     necessary to implement the project.
       (b) Projects Subject to Final Report.--The following 
     projects for water resources development and conservation and 
     other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the 
     Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
     subject the conditions, recommended in a final report of the 
     Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the Chief is 
     completed not later than December 31, 2000:
       (1) False pass harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
     False Pass Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $15,164,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $8,238,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $6,926,000.
       (2) Unalaska harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
     Unalska Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $20,000,000, with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $8,000,000.
       (3) Rio de flag, flagstaff, arizona.--The project for flood 
     damage reduction, Rio de Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona, at a total 
     cost of $24,072,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $15,576,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,496,000.
       (4) Tres rios, arizona.--The project ecosystem restoration, 
     Tres Rios, Arizona, at a total cost of $99,320,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $62,755,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $36,565,000.
       (5) Los angeles harbor, california.--The project for 
     navigation, Los Angeles Harbor, California, at a total cost 
     of $153,313,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $43,735,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $109,578,000.
       (6) Murrietta creek, california.--The project for flood 
     damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Murrietta Creek, 
     California, described as alternative 6, based on the District 
     Engineer's Murrietta Creek feasibility report and 
     environmental impact statement dated October 2000, at a total 
     cost of $89,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $57,735,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $32,115,000. 
     The locally preferred plan described as alternative 6 shall 
     be treated as a final favorable report of the Chief 
     Engineer's for purposes of this subsection.
       (7) Santa barbara streams, lower mission creek, 
     california.--The project for flood damage reduction, Santa 
     Barbara streams, Lower Mission Creek, California, at a total 
     cost of $18,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $9,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,100,000.
       (8) Upper newport bay, california.--The project for 
     ecosystem restoration, Upper Newport Bay, California, at a 
     total cost of $32,475,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $21,109,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,366,000.
       (9) Whitewater river basin, california.--The project for 
     flood damage reduction, Whitewater River basin, California, 
     at a total cost of $27,570,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $17,920,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $9,650,000.
       (10) Delaware coast from cape henlopen to fenwick island.--
     The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
     Delaware Coast from Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, at a 
     total cost of $5,633,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $3,661,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,972,000.
       (11) Port sutton, florida.--The project for navigation, 
     Port Sutton, Florida, at a total cost of $6,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $4,000,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $2,000,000.
       (12) Barbers point harbor, hawaii.--The project for 
     navigation, Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii, at a total cost of 
     $30,003,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,524,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,479,000.
       (13) John myers lock and dam, indiana and kentucky.--The 
     project for navigation, John Myers Lock and Dam, Indiana and 
     Kentucky, at a total cost of $182,000,000. The costs of 
     construction of the project shall be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
     appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
     from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust 
     Fund.
       (14) Greenup lock and dam, kentucky and ohio.--The project 
     for navigation, Greenup Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Ohio, at a 
     total cost of $175,000,000. The costs of construction of the 
     project shall be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from 
     the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts 
     appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.

[[Page H10039]]

       (15) Ohio river mainstem, kentucky, illinois, indiana, 
     ohio, pennsylvania, and west virginia.--Projects for 
     ecosystem restoration, Ohio River Mainstem, Kentucky, 
     Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, at 
     a total cost of $307,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
     of $200,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $107,700,000.
       (16) Monarch-chesterfield, missouri.--The project for flood 
     damage reduction, Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri, at a total 
     cost of $67,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $44,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,700,000.
       (17) Antelope creek, lincoln, nebraska.--The project for 
     flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 
     a total cost of $49,788,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
     of $24,894,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $24,894,000.
       (18) Sand creek watershed, wahoo, nebraska.--The project 
     for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, Sand 
     Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, at a total cost of 
     $29,212,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,586,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,626,000.
       (19) Western sarpy and clear creek, nebraska.--The project 
     for flood damage reduction, Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, 
     Nebraska, at a total cost of $20,600,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $13,390,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $7,210,000.
       (20) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, cliffwood beach, new 
     jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
     reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Cliffwood Beach, 
     New Jersey, at a total cost of $5,219,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $3,392,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $1,827,000.
       (21) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, port monmouth, new 
     jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
     reduction, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Port Monmouth, New 
     Jersey, at a total cost of $32,064,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $20,842,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $11,222,000.
       (22) Dare county beaches, north carolina.--The project for 
     hurricane and storm damage reduction, Dare County beaches, 
     North Carolina, at a total cost of $69,518,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $49,846,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $19,672,000.
       (23) Wolf river, tennessee.--The project for ecosystem 
     restoration, Wolf River, Tennessee, at a total cost of 
     $10,933,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,106,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,827,000.
       (24) Duwamish/green, washington.--The project for ecosystem 
     restoration, Duwamish/Green, Washington, at a total cost of 
     $115,879,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $75,322,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $40,557,000.
       (25) Stillagumaish river basin, washington.--The project 
     for ecosystem restoration, Stillagumaish River basin, 
     Washington, at a total cost of $24,223,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $16,097,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $8,126,000.
       (26) Jackson hole, wyoming.--The project for ecosystem 
     restoration, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, at a total cost of 
     $52,242,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $33,957,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $18,285,000.

     SEC. 102. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for 
     each of the following projects and, if the Secretary 
     determines that a project is feasible, may carry out the 
     project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
     (33 U.S.C. 701s):
       (1) Buffalo island, arkansas.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Buffalo Island, Arkansas.
       (2) Anaverde creek, palmdale, california.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Anaverde Creek, Palmdale, California.
       (3) Castaic creek, old road bridge, santa clarita, 
     california.--Project for flood damage reduction, Castaic 
     Creek, Old Road bridge, Santa Clarita, California.
       (4) Santa clara river, old road bridge, santa clarita, 
     california.--Project for flood damage reduction, Santa Clara 
     River, Old Road bridge, Santa Clarita, California.
       (5) Columbia levee, columbia, illinois.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Columbia Levee, Columbia, Illinois.
       (6) East-west creek, riverton, illinois.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, East-West Creek, Riverton, Illinois.
       (7) Prairie du pont, illinois.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Prairie Du Pont, Illinois.
       (8) Monroe county, illinois.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Monroe County, Illinois.
       (9) Willow creek, meredosia, illinois.--Project for flood 
     damage reduction, Willow Creek, Meredosia, Illinois.
       (10) Dykes branch channel, leawood, kansas.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Dykes Branch channel improvements, 
     Leawood, Kansas.
       (11) Dykes branch tributaries, leawood, kansas.--Project 
     for flood damage reduction, Dykes Branch tributary 
     improvements, Leawood, Kansas.
       (12) Kentucky river, frankfort, kentucky.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Kentucky River, Frankfort, Kentucky.
       (13) Lakes maurepas and pontchartrain canals, st. john the 
     baptist parish, louisiana.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Lakes Maurepas and Pontchartrain Canals, St. John 
     the Baptist Parish, Louisiana.
       (14) Pennsville township, salem county, new jersey.--The 
     project for flood damage reduction, Pennsville Township, 
     Salem County, New Jersey.
       (15) Hempstead, new york.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Hempstead, New York.
       (16) Highland brook, highland falls, new york.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Highland Brook, Highland Falls, New 
     York.
       (17) Lafayette township, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, Lafayette Township, Ohio.
       (18) West lafayette, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
     reduction, West LaFayette, Ohio.
       (19) Bear creek and tributaries, medford, oregon.--Project 
     for flood damage reduction, Bear Creek and tributaries, 
     Medford, Oregon.
       (20) Delaware canal and brock creek, yardley borough, 
     pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Delaware 
     Canal and Brock Creek, Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
       (21) First creek, fountain city, knoxville, tennessee.--
     Project for flood damage reduction, First Creek, Fountain 
     City, Knoxville, Tennessee.
       (22) Mississippi river, ridgely, tennessee.--Project for 
     flood damage reduction, Mississippi River, Ridgely, 
     Tennessee.
       (b) Magpie Creek, Sacramento County, California.--In 
     formulating the project for Magpie Creek, California, 
     authorized by section 102(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 281) to be carried out 
     under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s), the Secretary shall consider benefits from the full 
     utilization of existing improvements at McClellan Air Force 
     Base that would result from the project after conversion of 
     the base to civilian use.

     SEC. 103. SMALL PROJECTS FOR BANK STABILIZATION.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
     14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
       (1) Maumee river, fort wayne, indiana.--Project for bank 
     stabilization, Maumee River, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
       (2) Bayou sorrell, iberville parish, louisiana.--Project 
     for bank stabilization, Bayou Sorrell, Iberville Parish, 
     Louisiana.

     SEC. 104. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is feasible, may carry out the project under section 
     107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
       (1) Whittier, alaska.--Project for navigation, Whittier, 
     Alaska.
       (2) Cape coral, florida.--Project for navigation, Cape 
     Coral, Florida.
       (3) East two lakes, tower, minnesota.--Project for 
     navigation, East Two Lakes, Tower, Minnesota.
       (4) Erie basin marina, buffalo, new york.--Project for 
     navigation, Erie Basin marina, Buffalo, New York.
       (5) Lake michigan, lakeshore state park, milwaukee, 
     wisconsin.--Project for navigation, Lake Michigan, Lakeshore 
     State Park, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
       (6) Saxon harbor, francis, wisconsin.--Project for 
     navigation, Saxon Harbor, Francis, Wisconsin.

     SEC. 105. SMALL PROJECT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
                   ENVIRONMENT.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for 
     improvement of the quality of the environment, Nahant Marsh, 
     Davenport, Iowa, and, if the Secretary determines that the 
     project is appropriate, may carry out the project under 
     section 1135(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)).

     SEC. 106. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the 
     following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a 
     project is appropriate, may carry out the project under 
     section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (33 U.S.C. 2330):
       (1) Arkansas river, pueblo, colorado.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Arkansas River, Pueblo, Colorado.
       (2) Hayden diversion project, yampa river, colorado.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Hayden Diversion 
     Project, Yampa River, Colorado.
       (3) Little econlockhatchee river basin, florida.--Project 
     for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Little Econlockhatchee 
     River basin, Florida.
       (4) Loxahatchee slough, palm beach county, florida.--
     Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Loxahatchee 
     Slough, Palm Beach County, Florida.
       (5) Stevenson creek estuary, florida.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Stevenson Creek estuary, Florida.
       (6) Chouteau island, madison county, illinois.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chouteau Island, Madison 
     County, Illinois.
       (7) Saginaw bay, bay city, michigan.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Saginaw Bay, Bay City, Michigan.
       (8) Rainwater basin, nebraska.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Rainwater Basin, Nebraska.

[[Page H10040]]

       (9) Cazenovia lake, madison county, new york.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cazenovia Lake, Madison 
     County, New York, including efforts to address aquatic 
     invasive plant species.
       (10) Chenango lake, chenango county, new york.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chenango Lake, Chenango 
     County, New York, including efforts to address aquatic 
     invasive plant species.
       (11) Eagle lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Eagle Lake, New York.
       (12) Ossining, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Ossining, New York.
       (13) Saratoga lake, new york.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Saratoga Lake, New York.
       (14) Schroon lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Schroon Lake, New York.
       (15) Central amazon creek, eugene, oregon.--Project for 
     aquatic ecosystem restoration, Central Amazon Creek, Eugene, 
     Oregon.
       (16) Eugene millrace, eugene, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Eugene Millrace, Eugene, Oregon.
       (17) Lone pine and lazy creeks, medford, oregon.--Project 
     for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Lone Pine and Lazy Creeks, 
     Medford, Oregon.
       (18) Tullytown borough, pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic 
     ecosystem restoration, Tullytown Borough, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 107. SMALL PROJECT FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for 
     shoreline protection, Hudson River, Dutchess County, New 
     York, and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     feasible, may carry out the project under section 3 of the 
     Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal participation in 
     the cost of protecting the shores of publicly owned 
     property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g; 60 
     Stat. 1056).

     SEC. 108. SMALL PROJECT FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for 
     clearing, snagging, and sediment removal, Sangamon River and 
     tributaries, Riverton, Illinois. If the Secretary determines 
     that the project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the 
     project under section 2 of the Flood Control Act of August 
     28, 1937 (50 Stat. 177).

     SEC. 109. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the Petaluma 
     River project, at the city of Petaluma, Sonoma County, 
     California, to provide a 100-year level of flood protection 
     to the city in accordance with the detailed project report of 
     the San Francisco District Engineer, dated March 1995, at a 
     total cost of $32,227,000.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for the project shall be 
     determined in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in 
     effect on October 11, 1996.
       (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
     Federal sponsor for any project costs that the non-Federal 
     sponsor has incurred in excess of the non-Federal share of 
     project costs, regardless of the date such costs were 
     incurred.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

     SEC. 201. COST SHARING OF CERTAIN FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION 
                   PROJECTS.

       Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(n) Level of Flood Protection.--If the Secretary 
     determines that it is technically sound, environmentally 
     acceptable, and economically justified, to construct a flood 
     control project for an area using an alternative that will 
     afford a level of flood protection sufficient for the area 
     not to qualify as an area having special flood hazards for 
     the purposes of the national flood insurance program under 
     the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et 
     seq.), the Secretary, at the request of the non-Federal 
     interest, shall recommend the project using the alternative. 
     The non-Federal share of the cost of the project assigned to 
     providing the minimum amount of flood protection required for 
     the area not to qualify as an area having special flood 
     hazards shall be determined under subsections (a) and (b).''.

     SEC. 202. HARBOR COST SHARING.

       (a) In General.--Sections 101 and 214 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 and 2241; 
     100 Stat. 4082-4084 and 4108-4109) are each amended by 
     striking ``45 feet'' each place it appears and inserting ``53 
     feet''.
       (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) 
     shall apply only to a project, or separable element of a 
     project, on which a contract for physical construction has 
     not been awarded before the date of enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 203. NONPROFIT ENTITIES.

       (a) Environmental Dredging.--Section 312 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 1272) is amended 
     by adding at the end the following:
       ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-
     Federal sponsor for any project carried out under this 
     section may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
     the affected local government.''.
       (b) Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment.--
     Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (33 U.S.C. 2309a) is amended by redesignating subsection (e) 
     as subsection (f) and by inserting after subsection (d) the 
     following:
       ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-
     Federal sponsor for any project carried out under this 
     section may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
     the affected local government.''.
       (c) Lakes Program.--Section 602 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148-4149) is amended by 
     redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e) and by 
     inserting after subsection (c) the following:
       ``(d) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-
     Federal sponsor for any project carried out under this 
     section may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of 
     the affected local government.''.

     SEC. 204. REHABILITATION OF FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL LEVEES.

       Section 110(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1990 (104 Stat. 4622) is amended by striking ``1992,'' and 
     all that follows through ``1996'' and inserting ``2001 
     through 2005''.

     SEC. 205. FLOOD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

       Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332(e)) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (22);
       (2) by striking the period at end of paragraph (23) and 
     inserting a semicolon;
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(24) Lester, St. Louis, East Savanna, and Floodwood 
     Rivers, Duluth, Minnesota;
       ``(25) Lower Hudson River and tributaries, New York;
       ``(26) Susquehanna River watershed, Bradford County, 
     Pennsylvania; and
       ``(27) Clear Creek, Harris, Galveston, and Brazoria 
     Counties, Texas.''.

     SEC. 206. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, in 
     cooperation with Indian tribes and other Federal agencies, to 
     study and determine the feasibility of implementing water 
     resources development projects that will substantially 
     benefit Indian tribes, and are located primarily within 
     Indian country (as defined in section 1151 of title 18, 
     United States Code), or in proximity to an Alaska Native 
     village (as defined in, or established pursuant to, the 
     Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et 
     seq.)).
       (b) Consultation and Coordination.--The Secretary shall 
     consult with the Secretary of the Interior on studies 
     conducted under this section.
       (c) Credits.--For any study conducted under this section, 
     the Secretary may provide credit to the Indian tribe for 
     services, studies, supplies, and other in-kind consideration 
     where the Secretary determines that such services, studies, 
     supplies, and other in-kind consideration will facilitate 
     completion of the study. In no event shall such credit exceed 
     the Indian tribe's required share of the cost of the study.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for 
     each of fiscal years 2002 through 2006. Not more than 
     $1,000,000 appropriated to carry out this section for a 
     fiscal year may be used to substantially benefit any one 
     Indian tribe.
       (e) Indian Tribe Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``Indian tribe'' means any tribe, band, nation, or other 
     organized group or community of Indians, including any Alaska 
     Native village, which is recognized as eligible for the 
     special programs and services provided by the United States 
     to Indians because of their status as Indians.

     SEC. 207. NATIVE AMERICAN REBURIAL AND TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
     appropriate Indian tribes, may identify and set aside land at 
     civil works projects managed by the Secretary for use as a 
     cemetery for the remains of Native Americans that have been 
     discovered on project lands and that have been rightfully 
     claimed by a lineal descendant or Indian tribe in accordance 
     with applicable Federal law. The Secretary, in consultation 
     with and with the consent of the lineal descendant or Indian 
     tribe, may recover and rebury the remains at such cemetery at 
     Federal expense.
       (b) Transfer Authority.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, the Secretary may transfer to an Indian 
     tribe land identified and set aside by the Secretary under 
     subsection (a) for use as a cemetery. The Secretary shall 
     retain any necessary rights-of-way, easements, or other 
     property interests that the Secretary determines necessary to 
     carry out the purpose of the project.
       (c) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``Indian 
     tribe'' and ``Native American'' have the meaning such terms 
     have under section 2 of the Native American Graves Protection 
     and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001).

     SEC. 208. ABILITY TO PAY.

       Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) is amended--
       (1) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--Any cost-sharing agreement under this 
     section for construction of an environmental protection and 
     restoration, flood control, or agricultural water supply 
     project shall be subject to the ability of a non-Federal 
     interest to pay.

[[Page H10041]]

       ``(2) Criteria and procedures.--The ability of a non-
     Federal interest to pay shall be determined by the Secretary 
     in accordance with criteria and procedures in effect under 
     paragraph (3) on the day before the date of enactment of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 2000; except that such 
     criteria and procedures shall be revised, and new criteria 
     and procedures shall be developed, within 180 days after such 
     date of enactment to reflect the requirements of such 
     paragraph (3).''; and
       (2) in paragraph (3)--
       (A) by inserting ``and'' after the semicolon at the end of 
     subparagraph (A)(ii);
       (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
       (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (B).

     SEC. 209. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

       The first sentence of section 234(d) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2323a(d)) is amended to 
     read as follows: ``There is authorized to be appropriated to 
     carry out this section $250,000 per fiscal year for fiscal 
     years beginning after September 30, 2000.''.

     SEC. 210. PROPERTY PROTECTION PROGRAM.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to implement a 
     program to reduce vandalism and destruction of property at 
     water resources development projects under the jurisdiction 
     of the Department of the Army. In carrying out the program, 
     the Secretary may provide rewards to individuals who provide 
     information or evidence leading to the arrest and prosecution 
     of individuals causing damage to Federal property, including 
     the payment of cash rewards.
       (b) Report.--Not later than 4 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
     Congress a report on the results of the program.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000 per 
     fiscal year for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 
     2000.

     SEC. 211. ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES.

       In conducting a feasibility study for a water resources 
     project, the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable, 
     should not employ a person for engineering and consulting 
     services if the same person is also employed by the non-
     Federal interest for such services unless there is only 1 
     qualified and responsive bidder for such services.

     SEC. 212. BEACH RECREATION.

       (a) In General.--In studying the feasibility of and making 
     recommendations concerning potential beach restoration 
     projects, the Secretary may not implement any policy that has 
     the effect of disadvantaging any such project solely because 
     50 percent or more of its benefits are recreational in 
     nature.
       (b) Procedures for Consideration and Reporting of 
     Benefits.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
     of this Act, the Secretary shall develop and implement 
     procedures to ensure that all of the benefits of a beach 
     restoration project, including those benefits attributable to 
     recreation, hurricane and storm damage reduction, and 
     environmental protection and restoration, are adequately 
     considered and displayed in reports for such projects.

     SEC. 213. PERFORMANCE OF SPECIALIZED OR TECHNICAL SERVICES.

       (a) In General.--Before entering into an agreement to 
     perform specialized or technical services for a State 
     (including the District of Columbia), a territory, or a local 
     government of a State or territory under section 6505 of 
     title 31, United States Code, the Secretary shall certify 
     that--
       (1) the services requested are not reasonably and 
     expeditiously available through ordinary business channels; 
     and
       (2) the Corps of Engineers is especially equipped to 
     perform such services.
       (b) Supporting Materials.--The Secretary shall develop 
     materials supporting such certification under subsection (a).
       (c) Annual Report to Congress.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than December 31 of each 
     calendar year, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee 
     on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate a report on the requests described in 
     subsection (a) that the Secretary received during such 
     calendar year.
       (2) Contents.--With respect to each request, the report 
     transmitted under paragraph (1) shall include a copy of the 
     certification and supporting materials developed under this 
     section and information on each of the following:
       (A) The scope of services requested.
       (B) The status of the request.
       (C) The estimated and final cost of the requested services.
       (D) Each district and division office of the Corps of 
     Engineers that has supplied or will supply the requested 
     services.
       (E) The number of personnel of the Corps of Engineers that 
     have performed or will perform any of the requested services.
       (F) The status of any reimbursement.

     SEC. 214. DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTING.

       (a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary may conduct a pilot 
     program consisting of not more than 5 projects to test the 
     design-build method of project delivery on various civil 
     engineering projects of the Corps of Engineers, including 
     levees, pumping plants, revetments, dikes, dredging, weirs, 
     dams, retaining walls, generation facilities, mattress 
     laying, recreation facilities, and other water resources 
     facilities.
       (b) Design-Build Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``design-build'' means an agreement between the Federal 
     Government and a contractor that provides for both the design 
     and construction of a project by a single contract.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this section, the Secretary shall report on the 
     results of the pilot program.

     SEC. 215. INDEPENDENT REVIEW PILOT PROGRAM.

       Title IX of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4183 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:

     ``SEC. 952. INDEPENDENT REVIEW PILOT PROGRAM.

       ``(a) Projects Subject to Independent Review.--The 
     Secretary shall undertake a pilot program in fiscal years 
     2001 through 2003 to determine the practicality and efficacy 
     of having feasibility reports of the Corps of Engineers for 
     eligible projects reviewed by an independent panel of 
     experts. The pilot program shall be limited to the 
     establishment of panels for not to exceed 5 eligible 
     projects.
       ``(b) Establishment of Panels.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a panel of 
     experts for an eligible project under this section upon 
     identification of a preferred alternative in the development 
     of the feasibility report.
       ``(2) Membership.--A panel established under this section 
     shall be composed of not less than 5 and not more than 9 
     independent experts who represent a balance of areas of 
     expertise, including biologists, engineers, and economists.
       ``(3) Limitation on appointments.--The Secretary shall not 
     appoint an individual to serve on a panel of experts for a 
     project under this section if the individual has a financial 
     interest in the project or has with any organization a 
     professional relationship that the Secretary determines may 
     constitute a conflict of interest or the appearance of 
     impropriety.
       ``(4) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult the 
     National Academy of Sciences in developing lists of 
     individuals to serve on panels of experts under this section.
       ``(5) Compensation.--An individual serving on a panel of 
     experts under this section may not be compensated but may 
     receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of 
     subsistence, in accordance with sections 5702 and 5703 of 
     title 5, United States Code.
       ``(c) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for 
     a project under this section shall--
       ``(1) review feasibility reports prepared for the project 
     after the identification of a preferred alternative;
       ``(2) receive written and oral comments of a technical 
     nature concerning the project from the public; and
       ``(3) transmit to the Secretary an evaluation containing 
     the panel's economic, engineering, and environmental analyses 
     of the project, including the panel's conclusions on the 
     feasibility report, with particular emphasis on areas of 
     public controversy.
       ``(d) Duration of Project Reviews.--A panel of experts 
     shall complete its review of a feasibility report for an 
     eligible project and transmit a report containing its 
     evaluation of the project to the Secretary not later than 180 
     days after the date of establishment of the panel.
       ``(e) Recommendations of Panel.--After receiving a timely 
     report on a project from a panel of experts under this 
     section, the Secretary shall--
       ``(1) consider any recommendations contained in the 
     evaluation;
       ``(2) make the evaluation available for public review; and
       ``(3) include a copy of the evaluation in any report 
     transmitted to Congress concerning the project.
       ``(f) Costs.--The cost of conducting a review of a project 
     under this section shall not exceed $250,000 and shall be a 
     Federal expense.
       ``(g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2003, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
     of the pilot program together with the recommendations of the 
     Secretary regarding continuation, expansion, and modification 
     of the pilot program, including an assessment of the impact 
     that a peer review program would have on the overall cost and 
     length of project analyses and reviews associated with 
     feasibility reports and an assessment of the benefits of peer 
     review.
       ``(h) Eligible Project Defined.--In this section, the term 
     `eligible project' means--
       ``(1) a water resources project that has an estimated total 
     cost of more than $25,000,000, including mitigation costs; 
     and
       ``(2) a water resources project--
       ``(A) that has an estimated total cost of $25,000,000 or 
     less, including mitigation costs; and
       ``(B)(i) that the Secretary determines is subject to a 
     substantial degree of public controversy; or
       ``(ii) to which an affected State objects.''.

     SEC. 216. ENHANCED PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.

       (a) In General.--Section 905 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282) is amended by adding 
     at the end the following:
       ``(e) Enhanced Public Participation.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish procedures 
     to enhance public participation in the development of each 
     feasibility study under subsection (a), including, if 
     appropriate, establishment of a stakeholder advisory group to 
     assist the Secretary with the development of the study.

[[Page H10042]]

       ``(2) Membership.--If the Secretary provides for the 
     establishment of a stakeholder advisory group under this 
     subsection, the membership of the advisory group shall 
     include balanced representation of social, economic, and 
     environmental interest groups, and such members shall serve 
     on a voluntary, uncompensated basis.
       ``(3) Limitation.--Procedures established under this 
     subsection shall not delay development of any feasibility 
     study under subsection (a).''.

     SEC. 217. MONITORING.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a monitoring 
     program of the economic and environmental results of up to 5 
     eligible projects selected by the Secretary.
       (b) Duration.--The monitoring of a project selected by the 
     Secretary under this section shall be for a period of not 
     less than 12 years beginning on the date of its selection.
       (c) Reports.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
     every 3 years a report on the performance of each project 
     selected under this section.
       (d) Eligible Water Resources Project Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``eligible project'' means a water 
     resources project, or separable element thereof--
       (1) for which a contract for physical construction has not 
     been awarded before the date of enactment of this Act;
       (2) that has a total cost of more than $25,000,000; and
       (3)(A) that has as a benefit-to-cost ratio of less than 1.5 
     to 1; or
       (B) that has significant environmental benefits or 
     significant environmental mitigation components.
       (e) Costs.--The cost of conducting monitoring under this 
     section shall be a Federal expense.

     SEC. 218. RECONNAISSANCE STUDIES.

       Section 905(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282(b)) is amended--
       (1) in the second sentence by inserting after 
     ``environmental impacts'' the following: ``(including whether 
     a proposed project is likely to have environmental impacts 
     that cannot be successfully or cost-effectively mitigated)''; 
     and
       (2) by inserting after the second sentence the following: 
     ``The Secretary shall not recommend that a feasibility study 
     be conducted for a project based on a reconnaissance study if 
     the Secretary determines that the project is likely to have 
     environmental impacts that cannot be successfully or cost-
     effectively mitigated.''.

     SEC. 219. FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION.

       (a) Design of Mitigation Projects.--Section 906(d) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)) 
     is amended--
       (1) by striking ``(1)'' and inserting ``(A)''; and
       (2) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(B)'';
       (3) by striking ``(d) After the date'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(d) Mitigation Plans as Part of Project Proposals.--
       ``(1) In general.--After the date'';
       (4) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Design of mitigation projects.--The Secretary shall 
     design mitigation projects to reflect contemporary 
     understanding of the science of mitigating the adverse 
     environmental impacts of water resources projects.
       ``(3) Recommendation of projects.--The Secretary shall not 
     recommend a water resources project unless the Secretary 
     determines that the adverse impacts of the project on aquatic 
     resources and fish and wildlife can be cost-effectively and 
     successfully mitigated.''; and
       (5) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) 
     (as designated by paragraph (3) of this subsection) with 
     paragraph (2) (as added by paragraph (4) of this subsection).
       (b) Concurrent Mitigation.--
       (1) Investigation.--The Comptroller General shall conduct 
     an investigation of the effectiveness of the concurrent 
     mitigation requirements of section 906 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283). In conducting the 
     investigation, the Comptroller General shall determine 
     whether or not there are instances in which less than 50 
     percent of required mitigation is completed before initiation 
     of project construction and the number of such instances.
       (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall transmit 
     to Congress a report on the results of the investigation.

     SEC. 220. WETLANDS MITIGATION.

       In carrying out a water resources project that involves 
     wetlands mitigation and that has an impact that occurs within 
     the service area of a mitigation bank, the Secretary, to the 
     maximum extent practicable and where appropriate, shall give 
     preference to the use of the mitigation bank if the bank 
     contains sufficient available credits to offset the impact 
     and the bank is approved in accordance with the Federal 
     Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of 
     Mitigation Banks (60 Fed. Reg. 58605 (November 28, 1995)) or 
     other applicable Federal law (including regulations).

     SEC. 221. CREDIT TOWARD NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF NAVIGATION 
                   PROJECTS.

       The second sentence of section 101(a)(2) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(2)) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``paragraph (3) and'' and inserting 
     ``paragraph (3),''; and
       (2) by striking ``paragraph (4)'' and inserting ``paragraph 
     (4), and the costs borne by the non-Federal interests in 
     providing additional capacity at dredged material disposal 
     areas, providing community access to the project (including 
     such disposal areas), and meeting applicable beautification 
     requirements''.

     SEC. 222. MAXIMUM PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR SMALL FLOOD 
                   CONTROL PROJECTS.

       Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
     701s) is amended by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$50,000,000''.

     SEC. 223. FEASIBILITY STUDIES AND PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND 
                   DESIGN.

       Section 105(a)(1)(E) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)(1)(E)) is amended by striking 
     ``Not more than \1/2\ of the'' and inserting ``The''.

     SEC. 224. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF LAND CONVEYANCES.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, the administrative costs associated with the conveyance 
     of property to a non-Federal governmental or nonprofit entity 
     shall be limited to not more than 5 percent of the value of 
     the property to be conveyed to such entity if the Secretary 
     determines, based on the entity's ability to pay, that such 
     limitation is necessary to complete the conveyance. The 
     Federal cost associated with such limitation shall not exceed 
     $70,000 for any one conveyance.
       (b) Specific Conveyance.--In carrying out subsection (a), 
     the Secretary shall give priority consideration to the 
     conveyance of 10 acres of Wister Lake project land to the 
     Summerfield Cemetery Association, Wister, Oklahoma, 
     authorized by section 563(f) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 359-360).
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $150,000 for 
     fiscal years 2001 through 2003.

     SEC. 225. DAM SAFETY.

       (a) Inventory and Assessment of Other Dams.--
       (1) Inventory.--The Secretary shall establish an inventory 
     of dams constructed by and using funds made available through 
     the Works Progress Administration, the Works Projects 
     Administration, and the Civilian Conservation Corps.
       (2) Assessment of rehabilitation needs.--In establishing 
     the inventory required under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
     shall also assess the condition of the dams on such inventory 
     and the need for rehabilitation or modification of the dams.
       (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
     date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit 
     to Congress a report containing the inventory and assessment 
     required by this section.
       (c) Interim Actions.--
       (1) In general.--If the Secretary determines that a dam 
     referred to in subsection (a) presents an imminent and 
     substantial risk to public safety, the Secretary is 
     authorized to carry out measures to prevent or mitigate 
     against such risk.
       (2) Exclusion.--The assistance authorized under paragraph 
     (1) shall not be available to dams under the jurisdiction of 
     the Department of the Interior.
       (3) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     assistance provided under this subsection shall be 65 percent 
     of such cost.
       (d) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall coordinate with the appropriate State dam 
     safety officials and the Director of the Federal Emergency 
     Management Agency.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section a total of 
     $25,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 
     1999, of which not more than $5,000,000 may be expended on 
     any one dam.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

     SEC. 301. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, NOGALES, ARIZONA.

       The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and 
     Tributaries, Nogales, Arizona, authorized by section 
     101(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
     Stat. 4606), and modified by section 303 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), is 
     further modified to provide that the Federal share of the 
     costs associated with addressing flood control problems in 
     Nogales, Arizona, arising from floodwater flows originating 
     in Mexico shall be 100 percent.

     SEC. 302. JOHN PAUL HAMMERSCHMIDT VISITOR CENTER, FORT SMITH, 
                   ARKANSAS.

       Section 103(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4813) is amended--
       (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Lake'' and 
     inserting ``Visitor Center''; and
       (2) in paragraph (1) by striking ``at the John Paul 
     Hammerschmidt Lake, Arkansas River, Arkansas'' and inserting 
     ``on property provided by the city of Fort Smith, Arkansas, 
     in such city''.

     SEC. 303. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARKANSAS.

       The project for flood control, Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, 
     authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
     construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors 
     for flood control, and other purposes'', approved June 28, 
     1938 (52 Stat. 1218), is modified to authorize the Secretary 
     to construct water intake facilities for the benefit of 
     Lonoke and White Counties, Arkansas.

     SEC. 304. TEN- AND FIFTEEN-MILE BAYOUS, ARKANSAS.

       The project for flood control, Saint Francis River Basin, 
     Missouri and Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 172), is modified to expand the 
     boundaries of the project to include Ten-

[[Page H10043]]

     and Fifteen-Mile Bayous near West Memphis, Arkansas. 
     Notwithstanding section 103(f) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4086), the flood control 
     work at Ten- and Fifteen-Mile Bayous shall not be considered 
     separable elements of the project.

     SEC. 305. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, 
     California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to evaluate the impacts of 
     the new south levee of the Cache Creek settling basin on the 
     city of Woodland's storm drainage system and to mitigate such 
     impacts at Federal expense and a total cost of $2,800,000.

     SEC. 306. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, 
     Larkspur, California, authorized by section 601(d) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to prepare a limited 
     reevaluation report to determine whether maintenance of the 
     project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified. If the Secretary determines that 
     maintenance of the project is technically sound, 
     environmentally acceptable, and economically justified, the 
     Secretary shall carry out the maintenance.

     SEC. 307. NORCO BLUFFS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       Section 101(b)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3667) is amended by striking ``$8,600,000'' 
     and all that follows through ``$2,150,000'' and inserting 
     ``$15,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $11,250,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,750,000''.

     SEC. 308. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship 
     Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to provide credit to the 
     non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
     of the project for the value of dredged material from the 
     project that is purchased by public agencies or nonprofit 
     entities for environmental restoration or other beneficial 
     uses.

     SEC. 309. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood control, Sacramento River, 
     California, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An 
     Act to provide for the control of the floods of the 
     Mississippi River and of the Sacramento River, California, 
     and for other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 (39 Stat. 
     949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy and Water 
     Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 
     301(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
     Stat. 3110), title I of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 1841), and section 305 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 299), 
     is further modified to direct the Secretary to provide the 
     non-Federal interest a credit of up to $4,000,000 toward the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project for direct and 
     indirect costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in 
     carrying out activities (including the provision of lands, 
     easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material 
     disposal areas) associated with environmental compliance for 
     the project if the Secretary determines that the activities 
     are integral to the project. If any of such costs were 
     incurred by the non-Federal interests before execution of the 
     project cooperation agreement, the Secretary may reimburse 
     the non-Federal interest for such pre-agreement costs instead 
     of providing a credit for such pre-agreement costs to the 
     extent that the amount of the credit exceeds the remaining 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project.

     SEC. 310. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

       The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, 
     Upper Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 
     101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
     Stat. 275), is modified to provide that the non-Federal share 
     of the cost of the project shall be 50 percent, with an 
     estimated Federal cost and non-Federal cost of $70,164,000 
     each.

     SEC. 311. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

       (a) Inclusion of Reach.--The project for shoreline 
     protection, Brevard County, Florida, authorized by section 
     101(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
     Stat. 3667), is modified to provide that, notwithstanding 
     section 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 
     the Secretary may incorporate in the project any or all of 
     the 7.1-mile reach of the project that was deleted from the 
     south reach of the project, as described in paragraph (5) of 
     the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 23, 
     1996, if the Secretary determines, in coordination with 
     appropriate local, State, and Federal agencies, that the 
     project as modified is technically sound, environmentally 
     acceptable, and economically justified.
       (b) Clarification.--Section 310(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by 
     inserting ``shoreline associated with the'' after ``damage to 
     the''.

     SEC. 312. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLORIDA.

       The project for navigation, Fernandina Harbor, Florida, 
     authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
     making appropriations for the construction, repair, 
     completion, and preservation of certain works on rivers and 
     harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 14, 1880 (21 
     Stat. 186), is modified to authorize the Secretary to realign 
     the access channel in the vicinity of the Fernandina Beach 
     Municipal Marina 100 feet to the west. The cost of the 
     realignment, including acquisition of lands, easements, 
     rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and 
     relocations, shall be a non-Federal expense.

     SEC. 313. TAMPA HARBOR, FLORIDA.

       The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, 
     authorized by section 4 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 
     September 22, 1922 (42 Stat. 1042), is modified to authorize 
     the Secretary to deepen and widen the Alafia Channel in 
     accordance with the plans described in the Draft Feasibility 
     Report, Alafia River, Tampa Harbor, Florida, dated May 2000, 
     at a total cost of $61,592,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $39,621,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $21,971,000.

     SEC. 314. EAST SAINT LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILLINOIS.

       The project for flood protection, East Saint Louis and 
     vicinity, Illinois (East Side levee and sanitary district), 
     authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
     (79 Stat. 1082), is modified to include ecosystem restoration 
     as a project purpose.

     SEC. 315. KASKASKIA RIVER, KASKASKIA, ILLINOIS.

       The project for navigation, Kaskaskia River, Kaskaskia, 
     Illinois, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1175), is modified to include 
     recreation as a project purpose.

     SEC. 316. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILLINOIS.

       The project for navigation, Waukegan Harbor, Illinois, 
     authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
     making appropriations for the construction, repair, 
     completion, and preservation of certain works on rivers and 
     harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 14, 1880 (21 
     Stat. 192), is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend 
     the upstream limit of the project 275 feet to the north at a 
     width of 375 feet if the Secretary determines that the 
     extension is feasible.

     SEC. 317. CUMBERLAND, KENTUCKY.

       Using continuing contracts, the Secretary shall initiate 
     construction of the flood control project, Cumberland, 
     Kentucky, authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and 
     Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), 
     in accordance with option 4 contained in the draft detailed 
     project report of the Nashville District, dated September 
     1998, to provide flood protection from the 100-year frequency 
     flood event and to share all costs in accordance with section 
     103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     2213).

     SEC. 318. LOCK AND DAM 10, KENTUCKY RIVER, KENTUCKY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may take all necessary 
     measures to further stabilize and renovate Lock and Dam 10 at 
     Boonesborough, Kentucky, with the purpose of extending the 
     design life of the structure by an additional 50 years, at a 
     total cost of $24,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $12,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $12,000,000.
       (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the term 
     ``stabilize and renovate'' includes the following activities: 
     stabilization of the main dam, auxiliary dam and lock; 
     renovation of all operational aspects of the lock; and 
     elevation of the main and auxiliary dams.

     SEC. 319. SAINT JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

       Section 321(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 303) is amended--
       (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Total'' and 
     inserting ``Federal''; and
       (2) by striking ``total'' and inserting ``Federal''.

     SEC. 320. MAYFIELD CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, KENTUCKY.

       The project for flood control, Mayfield Creek and 
     tributaries, Kentucky, carried out under section 205 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to 
     provide that the non-Federal interest shall not be required 
     to pay the unpaid balance, including interest, of the non-
     Federal share of the cost of the project.

     SEC. 321. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, EAST BATON ROUGE 
                   PARISH, LOUISIANA.

       The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, 
     Amite River and Tributaries, East Baton Rouge Parish, 
     Louisiana, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 277), is 
     modified to provide that cost sharing for the project shall 
     be determined in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), as in 
     effect on October 11, 1996.

     SEC. 322. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

       The Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System project, authorized 
     by section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4142), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
     construct the visitor center and other recreational features 
     identified in the 1982 project feasibility report of the 
     Corps of Engineers at or near the Lake End Park in Morgan 
     City, Louisiana.

     SEC. 323. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, 
                   LOUISIANA.

       The project for navigation Atchafalaya River and Bayous 
     Chene, Boeuf, and Black,

[[Page H10044]]

     Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to investigate the problems associated with the 
     mixture of freshwater, saltwater, and fine river silt in the 
     channel and to develop and carry out a solution to the 
     problem if the Secretary determines that the work is 
     technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified.

     SEC. 324. RED RIVER WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.

       The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife loses, Red 
     River Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) 
     and modified by section 4(h) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4016), section 102(p) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), 
     and section 301(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1996 (110 Stat. 3710), is further modified to authorize 
     the Secretary to purchase mitigation lands in any of the 7 
     parishes that make up the Red River Waterway District, 
     including the parishes of Caddo, Bossier, Red River, 
     Natchitoches, Grant, Rapides, and Avoyelles.

     SEC. 325. THOMASTON HARBOR, GEORGES RIVER, MAINE.

       The project for navigation, Georges River, Maine (Thomaston 
     Harbor), authorized by the first section of the Act entitled 
     ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, 
     and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
     harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 3, 1896 (29 
     Stat. 215), is modified to redesignate the following portion 
     of the project as an anchorage area: The portion lying 
     northwesterly of a line commencing at point N86,946.770, 
     E321,303.830 thence running northeasterly about 203.67 feet 
     to a point N86,994.750, E321,501.770.

     SEC. 326. BRECKENRIDGE, MINNESOTA.

       (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project for flood 
     control, Breckenridge, Minnesota, carried out under section 
     205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall 
     be $10,500,000.
       (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
     Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
     the project described in subsection (a) to take into account 
     the change in the Federal participation in the project in 
     accordance with this section.

     SEC. 327. DULUTH HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

       The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, Minnesota, 
     carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified to include the relocation 
     of Scenic Highway 61, including any required bridge 
     construction.

     SEC. 328. LITTLE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

       The project for clearing, snagging, and sediment removal, 
     East Bank of the Mississippi River, Little Falls, Minnesota, 
     authorized under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
     authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of 
     certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
     purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to construct the project 
     substantially in accordance with the plans contained in the 
     feasibility report of the District Engineer, dated June 2000.

     SEC. 329. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

       (a) In General.--The project for beneficial use of dredged 
     material at Poplar Island, Maryland, authorized by section 
     537 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
     3776), is modified to authorize the Secretary to provide the 
     non-Federal interest credit toward cash contributions 
     required--
       (1) before and during construction of the project, for the 
     costs of planning, engineering, and design and for 
     construction management work that is performed by the non-
     Federal interest and that the Secretary determines is 
     necessary to implement the project; and
       (2) during construction of the project, for the costs of 
     the construction that the non-Federal interest carries out on 
     behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
     necessary to carry out the project.
       (b) Reduction.--The private sector performance goals for 
     engineering work of the Baltimore District of the Corps of 
     Engineers shall be reduced by the amount of the credit under 
     paragraph (1).

     SEC. 330. GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, RARITAN RIVER BASIN, NEW 
                   JERSEY.

       The project for flood control, Green Brook Sub-Basin, 
     Raritan River Basin, New Jersey, authorized by section 401(a) 
     of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
     4119), is modified to direct the Secretary to prepare a 
     limited reevaluation report to determine the feasibility of 
     carrying out a nonstructural flood damage reduction project 
     at the Green Brook Sub-Basin. If the Secretary determines 
     that the nonstructural project is feasible, the Secretary may 
     carry out the nonstructural project.

     SEC. 331. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, PORT JERSEY, 
                   NEW JERSEY.

       The project for navigation, New York Harbor and adjacent 
     channels, Port Jersey, New Jersey, authorized by section 
     202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
     Stat. 4098) and modified by section 337 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 306-307), is 
     further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide the 
     non-Federal interests credit toward cash contributions 
     required--
       (1) before, during, and after construction for planning, 
     engineering and design, and construction management work that 
     is performed by the non-Federal interests and that the 
     Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project; 
     and
       (2) during and after construction for the costs of 
     construction that the non-Federal interests carry out on 
     behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
     necessary to implement the project.

     SEC. 332. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.

       (a) Reevaluation of Floodway Study.--The Secretary shall 
     review the Passaic River Floodway Buyout Study, dated October 
     1995, conducted as part of the project for flood control, 
     Passaic River Main Stem, New Jersey and New York, authorized 
     by section 101(a)(18) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607-4610), to calculate the benefits of a 
     buyout and environmental restoration using the method used to 
     calculate the benefits of structural projects under section 
     308(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
     U.S.C. 2318(b)).
       (b) Reevaluation of 10-Year Floodplain Study.--The 
     Secretary shall review the Passaic River Buyout Study of the 
     10-year floodplain beyond the floodway of the Central Passaic 
     River Basin, dated September 1995, conducted as part of the 
     Passaic River Main Stem project to calculate the benefits of 
     a buyout and environmental restoration using the method used 
     to calculate the benefits of structural projects under 
     section 308(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
     (33 U.S.C. 2318(b)).
       (c) Preservation of Natural Storage Areas.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the 
     acquisition of wetlands in the Central Passaic River Basin 
     for flood protection purposes to supplement the wetland 
     acquisition authorized by section 101(a)(18)(C)(vi) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4609).
       (2) Purchase.--If the Secretary determines that the 
     acquisition of wetlands evaluated under paragraph (1) is 
     cost-effective, the Secretary shall purchase the wetlands, 
     with the goal of purchasing not more than 8,200 acres.
       (d) Streambank Erosion Control Study.--The Secretary shall 
     review relevant reports and conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration, erosion control, and streambank restoration 
     along the Passaic River, from Dundee Dam to Kearny Point, New 
     Jersey.
       (e) Passaic River Flood Management Task Force.--
       (1) Establishment.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     non-Federal interest, shall establish a task force, to be 
     known as the ``Passaic River Flood Management Task Force'', 
     to provide advice to the Secretary concerning reevaluation of 
     the Passaic River Main Stem project.
       (2) Membership.--The task force shall be composed of 22 
     members, appointed as follows:
       (A) Appointment by secretary.--The Secretary shall appoint 
     1 member to represent the Corps of Engineers and to provide 
     technical advice to the task force.
       (B) Appointments by governor of new jersey.--The Governor 
     of New Jersey shall appoint 20 members to the task force, as 
     follows:
       (i) 2 representatives of the New Jersey legislature who are 
     members of different political parties.
       (ii) 3 representatives of the State of New Jersey.
       (iii) 1 representative of each of Bergen, Essex, Morris, 
     and Passaic Counties, New Jersey.
       (iv) 6 representatives of governments of municipalities 
     affected by flooding within the Passaic River Basin.
       (v) 1 representative of the Palisades Interstate Park 
     Commission.
       (vi) 1 representative of the North Jersey District Water 
     Supply Commission.
       (vii) 1 representative of each of--

       (I) the Association of New Jersey Environmental 
     Commissions;
       (II) the Passaic River Coalition; and
       (III) the Sierra Club.

       (C) Appointment by governor of new york.--The Governor of 
     New York shall appoint 1 representative of the State of New 
     York to the task force.
       (3) Meetings.--
       (A) Regular meetings.--The task force shall hold regular 
     meetings.
       (B) Open meetings.--The meetings of the task force shall be 
     open to the public.
       (4) Annual report.--The task force shall submit annually to 
     the Secretary and to the non-Federal interest a report 
     describing the achievements of the Passaic River flood 
     management project in preventing flooding and any impediments 
     to completion of the project.
       (5) Expenditure of funds.--The Secretary may use funds made 
     available to carry out the Passaic River Basin flood 
     management project to pay the administrative expenses of the 
     task force.
       (6) Termination.--The task force shall terminate on the 
     date on which the Passaic River flood management project is 
     completed.
       (f) Acquisition of Lands in the Floodway.--Section 1148 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254; 
     110 Stat. 3718-3719), is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:

[[Page H10045]]

       ``(e) Consistency With New Jersey Blue Acres Program.--The 
     Secretary shall carry out this section in a manner that is 
     consistent with the Blue Acres Program of the State of New 
     Jersey.''.
       (g) Study of Highlands Land Conservation.--The Secretary, 
     in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the 
     State of New Jersey, may study the feasibility of conserving 
     land in the Highlands region of New Jersey and New York to 
     provide additional flood protection for residents of the 
     Passaic River Basin in accordance with section 212 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 2332).
       (h) Restriction on Use of Funds.--The Secretary shall not 
     obligate any funds to carry out design or construction of the 
     tunnel element of the Passaic River Main Stem project.

     SEC. 333. TIMES BEACH NATURE PRESERVE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

       The project for improving the quality of the environment, 
     Times Beach Nature Preserve, Buffalo, New York, carried out 
     under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), is modified to include recreation as 
     a project purpose.

     SEC. 334. GARRISON DAM, NORTH DAKOTA.

       The Garrison Dam, North Dakota, feature of the project for 
     flood control, Missouri River Basin, authorized by section 
     9(a) of the Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 
     891), is modified to direct the Secretary to mitigate damage 
     to the water transmission line for Williston, North Dakota, 
     at Federal expense and a total cost of $3,900,000.

     SEC. 335. DUCK CREEK, OHIO.

       The project for flood control, Duck Creek, Ohio, authorized 
     by section 101(a)(24) of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the 
     Secretary carry out the project at a total cost of 
     $36,323,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $27,242,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,081,000.

     SEC. 336. ASTORIA, OREGON.

       The project for navigation, Columbia River, Astoria, 
     Oregon, authorized by the first section of the Act entitled 
     ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
     preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
     and for other purposes'', approved July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 
     637), is modified to provide that the Federal share of the 
     cost of relocating causeway and mooring facilities located at 
     the Astoria East Boat Basin shall be 100 percent but shall 
     not exceed $500,000.

     SEC. 337. NONCONNAH CREEK, TENNESSEE AND MISSISSIPPI.

       The project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee 
     and Mississippi, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary, if the Secretary 
     determines that it is feasible--
       (1) to extend the area protected by the flood control 
     element of the project upstream approximately 5 miles to 
     Reynolds Road; and
       (2) to extend the hiking and biking trails of the 
     recreational element of the project from 8.8 to 27 miles.

     SEC. 338. BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE, TEXAS.

       The project for flood control, Red River below Denison Dam, 
     Texas and Oklahoma, authorized by section 10 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), is modified to direct the 
     Secretary to implement the Bowie County levee feature of the 
     project in accordance with the plan described as Alternative 
     B in the draft document entitled ``Bowie County Local Flood 
     Protection, Red River, Texas Project Design Memorandum No. 1, 
     Bowie County Levee'', dated April 1997. In evaluating and 
     implementing the modification, the Secretary shall allow the 
     non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the 
     project in accordance with section 903(c) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the 
     extent that the Secretary's evaluation of the modification 
     indicates that applying such section is necessary to 
     implement the modification.

     SEC. 339. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

       The project for flood control, San Antonio channel, Texas, 
     authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 
     (68 Stat. 1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood 
     protection on the Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas, 
     and modified by section 103 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921), is further modified 
     to include environmental restoration and recreation as 
     project purposes.

     SEC. 340. BUCHANAN AND DICKENSON COUNTIES, VIRGINIA.

       The project for flood control, Levisa and Tug Forks of the 
     Big Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River, authorized by 
     section 202 of the Energy and Water Development 
     Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), and modified by 
     section 352 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3724-3725), is further modified to direct the 
     Secretary to determine the ability of Buchanan and Dickenson 
     Counties, Virginia, to pay the non-Federal share of the cost 
     of the project based solely on the criteria specified in 
     section 103(m)(3)(A)(i) of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(3)(A)(i)).

     SEC. 341. BUCHANAN, DICKENSON, AND RUSSELL COUNTIES, 
                   VIRGINIA.

       At the request of the John Flannagan Water Authority, 
     Dickenson County, Virginia, the Secretary may reallocate, 
     under section 322 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1990 (104 Stat. 4643-4644), water supply storage space in the 
     John Flannagan Reservoir, Dickenson County, Virginia, 
     sufficient to yield water withdrawals in amounts not to 
     exceed 3,000,000 gallons per day in order to provide water 
     for the communities in Buchanan, Dickenson, and Russell 
     Counties, Virginia, notwithstanding the limitation in section 
     322(b) of such Act.

     SEC. 342. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

       The project for beach erosion control and hurricane 
     protection, Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia, 
     authorized by section 101(22) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4804), is modified to 
     direct the Secretary to provide 50 years of periodic beach 
     nourishment beginning on the date on which construction of 
     the project was initiated in 1998.

     SEC. 343. WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

       Section 567(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 367) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$20,000,000''.

     SEC. 344. COLUMBIA RIVER, WASHINGTON.

       (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Columbia 
     River, Washington, authorized by the first section of the Act 
     entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, 
     repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers 
     and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 13, 1902 
     (32 Stat. 369), is modified to direct the Secretary, in the 
     operation and maintenance of the project, to mitigate damages 
     to the shoreline of Puget Island, at a total cost of 
     $1,000,000.
       (b) Allocation.--The cost of the mitigation shall be 
     allocated as an operation and maintenance cost of the Federal 
     navigation project.

     SEC. 345. MOUNT ST. HELENS, WASHINGTON.

       The project for sediment control, Mount St. Helens, 
     Washington, authorized by chapter IV of title I of the 
     Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 318-319), is 
     modified to authorize the Secretary to provide such cost-
     effective, environmentally acceptable measures as are 
     necessary to maintain the flood protection levels for 
     Longview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock on the Cowlitz 
     River, Washington, identified in the October 1985 report of 
     the Chief of Engineers entitled ``Mount St. Helens, 
     Washington, Decision Document (Toutle, Cowlitz, and Columbia 
     Rivers)'', printed as House Document number 99-135.

     SEC. 346. RENTON, WASHINGTON.

       (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
     Federal funds that may be expended for the project for flood 
     control, Renton, Washington, carried out under section 205 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1948, shall be $5,300,000.
       (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The 
     Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
     the project described in subsection (a) to take into account 
     the change in the Federal participation in the project in 
     accordance with this section.
       (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary may reimburse the non-
     Federal interest for the project described in subsection (a) 
     for costs incurred to mitigate overdredging.

     SEC. 347. GREENBRIER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3790) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' 
     and inserting ``$73,000,000''.

     SEC. 348. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

       The project for flood damage reduction, Lower Mud River, 
     Milton, West Virginia, authorized by section 580 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790), is 
     modified to direct the Secretary to carry out the project 
     substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to 
     the conditions, described in the watershed plan prepared by 
     the Natural Resources Conservation Service for the project, 
     dated 1992.

     SEC. 349. WATER QUALITY PROJECTS.

       Section 307(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4841) is amended by striking ``Jefferson and 
     Orleans Parishes'' and inserting ``Jefferson, Orleans, and 
     St. Tammany Parishes''.

     SEC. 350. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--Each of the following projects may be 
     carried out by the Secretary, and no construction on any such 
     project may be initiated until the Secretary determines that 
     the project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, 
     and economically justified, as appropriate:
       (1) Narraguagus river, milbridge, maine.--Only for the 
     purpose of maintenance as anchorage, those portions of the 
     project for navigation, Narraguagus River, Milbridge, Maine, 
     authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
     appropriations for the construction, repair, completion, and 
     preservation of certain works on rivers and harbors, and for 
     other purposes'', approved June 14, 1880 (21 Stat. 195), and 
     deauthorized under section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1962 (75 Stat. 1173), lying adjacent to and outside the 
     limits of the 11-foot and 9-foot channel authorized as part 
     of the project for navigation, authorized by such section 
     101, as follows:
       (A) An area located east of the 11-foot channel starting at 
     a point with coordinates N248,060.52, E668,236.56, thence 
     running south 36 degrees 20 minutes 52.3 seconds east 
     1567.242 feet to a point N246,798.21, E669,165.44, thence 
     running north 51 degrees 30 minutes 06.2 seconds west 839.855 
     feet to a point N247,321.01, E668,508.15, thence running 
     north 20 degrees 09 minutes 58.1 seconds west 787.801 feet to 
     the point of origin.

[[Page H10046]]

       (B) An area located west of the 9-foot channel starting at 
     a point with coordinates N249,673.29, E667,537.73, thence 
     running south 20 degrees 09 minutes 57.8 seconds east 
     1341.616 feet to a point N248,413.92, E668,000.24, thence 
     running south 01 degrees 04 minutes 26.8 seconds east 371.688 
     feet to a point N248,042.30, E668,007.21, thence running 
     north 22 degrees 21 minutes 20.8 seconds west 474.096 feet to 
     a point N248,480.76, E667,826.88, thence running north 79 
     degrees 09 minutes 31.6 seconds east 100.872 feet to a point 
     N248,499.73, E667,925.95, thence running north 13 degrees 47 
     minutes 27.6 seconds west 95.126 feet to a point N248,592.12, 
     E667,903.28, thence running south 79 degrees 09 minutes 31.6 
     seconds west 115.330 feet to a point N248,570.42, 
     E667,790.01, thence running north 22 degrees 21 minutes 20.8 
     seconds west 816.885 feet to a point N249,325.91, 
     E667,479.30, thence running north 07 degrees 03 minutes 00.3 
     seconds west 305.680 feet to a point N249,629.28, 
     E667,441.78, thence running north 65 degrees 21 minutes 33.8 
     seconds east 105.561 feet to the point of origin.
       (2) Cedar bayou, texas.--The project for navigation, Cedar 
     Bayou, Texas, authorized by the first section of the Act 
     entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, 
     repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers 
     and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved September 19, 
     1890 (26 Stat. 444), and modified by the first section of the 
     Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, 
     and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
     harbors, and for other purposes'', approved July 3, 1930 (46 
     Stat. 926), and deauthorized by section 1002 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4219), except 
     that the project is authorized only for construction of a 
     navigation channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide from mile 
     -2.5 (at the junction with the Houston Ship Channel) to mile 
     11.0 on Cedar Bayou.
       (b) Redesignation.--The following portion of the 11-foot 
     channel of the project for navigation, Narraguagus River, 
     Milbridge, Maine, referred to in subsection (a)(1) is 
     redesignated as anchorage: starting at a point with 
     coordinates N248,413.92, E668,000.24, thence running south 20 
     degrees 09 minutes 57.8 seconds east 1325.205 feet to a point 
     N247,169.95, E668,457.09, thence running north 51 degrees 30 
     minutes 05.7 seconds west 562.33 feet to a point N247,520.00, 
     E668,017.00, thence running north 01 degrees 04 minutes 26.8 
     seconds west 894.077 feet to the point of origin.

     SEC. 351. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
     579a(b)(2)), the following projects shall remain authorized 
     to be carried out by the Secretary:
       (1) The projects for flood control, Sacramento River, 
     California, modified by section 10 of the Flood Control Act 
     of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 900-901).
       (2) The project for flood protection, Sacramento River from 
     Chico Landing to Red Bluff, California, authorized by section 
     203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 314).
       (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) 
     shall not be authorized for construction after the last day 
     of the 7-year period beginning on the date of enactment of 
     this Act, unless, during such period, funds have been 
     obligated for the construction (including planning and 
     design) of the project.

     SEC. 352. DECLARATION OF NONNAVIGABILITY FOR LAKE ERIE, NEW 
                   YORK.

       (a) Area To Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--
     Unless the Secretary finds, after consultation with local and 
     regional public officials (including local and regional 
     public planning organizations), that the proposed projects to 
     be undertaken within the boundaries in the portions of Erie 
     County, New York, described in subsection (b), are not in the 
     public interest then, subject to subsection (c), those 
     portions of such county that were once part of Lake Erie and 
     are now filled are declared to be nonnavigable waters of the 
     United States.
       (b) Boundaries.--The portion of Erie County, New York, 
     referred to in subsection (a) are all that tract or parcel of 
     land, situate in the Town of Hamburg and the City of 
     Lackawanna, County of Erie, State of New York, being part of 
     Lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 
     25 of the Ogden Gore Tract and part of Lots 23, 24, and 36 of 
     the Buffalo Creek Reservation, Township 10, Range 8 of the 
     Holland Land Company's Survey and more particularly bounded 
     and described as follows:
       Beginning at a point on the westerly highway boundary of 
     Hamburg Turnpike (66.0 feet wide), said point being 547.89 
     feet South 19 deg.36'46'' East from the intersection of the 
     westerly highway boundary of Hamburg Turnpike (66.0 feet 
     wide) and the northerly line of the City of Lackawanna (also 
     being the southerly line of the City of Buffalo); thence 
     South 19 deg.36'46'' East along the westerly highway boundary 
     of Hamburg Turnpike (66.0 feet wide) a distance of 628.41 
     feet; thence along the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg 
     Turnpike as appropriated by the New York State Department of 
     Public Works as shown on Map No. 40-R2, Parcel No. 44 the 
     following 20 courses and distances:
       (1) South 10 deg.00'07'' East a distance of 164.30 feet;
       (2) South 18 deg.40'45'' East a distance of 355.00 feet;
       (3) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 2.00 feet;
       (4) South 18 deg.40'45'' East a distance of 223.00 feet;
       (5) South 22 deg.29'36'' East a distance of 150.35 feet;
       (6) South 18 deg.40'45'' East a distance of 512.00 feet;
       (7) South 16 deg.49'53'' East a distance of 260.12 feet;
       (8) South 18 deg.34'20'' East a distance of 793.00 feet;
       (9) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 4.00 feet;
       (10) South 18 deg.13'24'' East a distance of 132.00 feet;
       (11) North 71 deg.23'35'' East a distance of 4.67 feet;
       (12) South 18 deg.30'00'' East a distance of 38.00 feet;
       (13) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 4.86 feet;
       (14) South 18 deg.13'24'' East a distance of 160.00 feet;
       (15) South 71 deg.23'35'' East a distance of 9.80 feet;
       (16) South 18 deg.36'25'' East a distance of 159.00 feet;
       (17) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 3.89 feet;
       (18) South 18 deg.34'20'' East a distance of 180.00 feet;
       (19) South 20 deg.56'05'' East a distance of 138.11 feet;
       (20) South 22 deg.53'55'' East a distance of 272.45 feet to 
     a point on the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg Turnpike.

     Thence southerly along the westerly highway boundary of 
     Hamburg Turnpike, South 18 deg.36'25'' East, a distance of 
     2228.31 feet; thence along the westerly highway boundary of 
     Hamburg Turnpike as appropriated by the New York State 
     Department of Public Works as shown on Map No. 27 Parcel No. 
     31 the following 2 courses and distances:
       (1) South 16 deg.17'25'' East a distance of 74.93 feet;
       (2) along a curve to the right having a radius of 1004.74 
     feet; a chord distance of 228.48 feet along a chord bearing 
     of South 08 deg.12'16'' East, a distance of 228.97 feet to a 
     point on the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg Turnpike.

     Thence southerly along the westerly highway boundary of 
     Hamburg Turnpike, South 4 deg.35'35'' West a distance of 
     940.87 feet; thence along the westerly highway boundary of 
     Hamburg Turnpike as appropriated by the New York State 
     Department of Public Works as shown on Map No. 1 Parcel No. 1 
     and Map No. 5 Parcel No. 7 the following 18 courses and 
     distances:
       (1) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 1.00 feet;
       (2) South 7 deg.01'17'' West a distance of 170.15 feet;
       (3) South 5 deg.02'54'' West a distance of 180.00 feet;
       (4) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 3.00 feet;
       (5) South 5 deg.02'54'' West a distance of 260.00 feet;
       (6) South 5 deg.09'11'' West a distance of 110.00 feet;
       (7) South 0 deg.34'35'' West a distance of 110.27 feet;
       (8) South 4 deg.50'37'' West a distance of 220.00 feet;
       (9) South 4 deg.50'37'' West a distance of 365.00 feet;
       (10) South 85 deg.24'25'' East a distance of 5.00 feet;
       (11) South 4 deg.06'20'' West a distance of 67.00 feet;
       (12) South 6 deg.04'35'' West a distance of 248.08 feet;
       (13) South 3 deg.18'27'' West a distance of 52.01 feet;
       (14) South 4 deg.55'58'' West a distance of 133.00 feet;
       (15) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 1.00 feet;
       (16) South 4 deg.55'58'' West a distance of 45.00 feet;
       (17) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 7.00 feet;
       (18) South 4 deg.56'12'' West a distance of 90.00 feet.

     Thence continuing along the westerly highway boundary of Lake 
     Shore Road as appropriated by the New York State Department 
     of Public Works as shown on Map No. 7, Parcel No. 7 the 
     following 2 courses and distances:
       (1) South 4 deg.55'58'' West a distance of 127.00 feet;
       (2) South 2 deg.29'25'' East a distance of 151.15 feet to a 
     point on the westerly former highway boundary of Lake Shore 
     Road.

     Thence southerly along the westerly formerly highway boundary 
     of Lake Shore Road, South 4 deg.35'35'' West a distance of 
     148.90 feet; thence along the westerly highway boundary of 
     Lake Shore Road as appropriated by the New York State 
     Department of Public Works as shown on Map No. 7, Parcel No. 
     8 the following 3 courses and distances:
       (1) South 55 deg.34'35'' West a distance of 12.55 feet;
       (2) South 4 deg.35'35'' West a distance of 118.50 feet;
       (3) South 3 deg.04'00'' West a distance of 62.95 feet to a 
     point on the south line of the lands of South Buffalo Railway 
     Company.

     Thence southerly and easterly along the lands of South 
     Buffalo Railway Company the following 5 courses and 
     distances:
       (1) North 89 deg.25'14'' West a distance of 697.64 feet;
       (2) along a curve to the left having a radius of 645.0 
     feet; a chord distance of 214.38 feet along a chord bearing 
     of South 40 deg.16'48'' West, a distance of 215.38 feet;

[[Page H10047]]

       (3) South 30 deg.42'49'' West a distance of 76.96 feet;
       (4) South 22 deg.06'03'' West a distance of 689.43 feet;
       (5) South 36 deg.09'23'' West a distance of 30.93 feet to 
     the northerly line of the lands of Buffalo Crushed Stone, 
     Inc.

     Thence North 87 deg.13'38'' West a distance of 2452.08 feet 
     to the shore line of Lake Erie; thence northerly along the 
     shore of Lake Erie the following 43 courses and distances:
       (1) North 16 deg.29'53'' West a distance of 267.84 feet;
       (2) North 24 deg.25'00'' West a distance of 195.01 feet;
       (3) North 26 deg.45'00'' West a distance of 250.00 feet;
       (4) North 31 deg.15'00'' West a distance of 205.00 feet;
       (5) North 21 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 110.00 feet;
       (6) North 44 deg.00'53'' West a distance of 26.38 feet;
       (7) North 33 deg.49'18'' West a distance of 74.86 feet;
       (8) North 34 deg.26'26'' West a distance of 12.00 feet;
       (9) North 31 deg.06'16'' West a distance of 72.06 feet;
       (10) North 22 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 150.00 feet;
       (11) North 16 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 420.00 feet;
       (12) North 21 deg.l0'00'' West a distance of 440.00 feet;
       (13) North 17 deg.55'00'' West a distance of 340.00 feet;
       (14) North 28 deg.05'00'' West a distance of 375.00 feet;
       (15) North 16 deg.25'00'' West a distance of 585.00 feet;
       (16) North 22 deg.10'00'' West a distance of 160.00 feet;
       (17) North 2 deg.46'36'' West a distance of 65.54 feet;
       (18) North 16 deg.01'08'' West a distance of 70.04 feet;
       (19) North 49 deg.07'00'' West a distance of 79.00 feet;
       (20) North 19 deg.16'00'' West a distance of 425.00 feet;
       (21) North 16 deg.37'00'' West a distance of 285.00 feet;
       (22) North 25 deg.20'00'' West a distance of 360.00 feet;
       (23) North 33 deg.00'00'' West a distance of 230.00 feet;
       (24) North 32 deg.40'00'' West a distance of 310.00 feet;
       (25) North 27 deg.10'00'' West a distance of 130.00 feet;
       (26) North 23 deg.20'00'' West a distance of 315.00 feet;
       (27) North 18 deg.20'04'' West a distance of 302.92 feet;
       (28) North 20 deg.15'48'' West a distance of 387.18 feet;
       (29) North 14 deg.20'00'' West a distance of 530.00 feet;
       (30) North 16 deg.40'00'' West a distance of 260.00 feet;
       (31) North 28 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 195.00 feet;
       (32) North 18 deg.30'00'' West a distance of 170.00 feet;
       (33) North 26 deg.30'00'' West a distance of 340.00 feet;
       (34) North 32 deg.07'52'' West a distance of 232.38 feet;
       (35) North 30 deg.04'26'' West a distance of 17.96 feet;
       (36) North 23 deg.19'13'' West a distance of 111.23 feet;
       (37) North 7 deg.07'58'' West a distance of 63.90 feet;
       (38) North 8 deg.11'02'' West a distance of 378.90 feet;
       (39) North 15 deg.01'02'' West a distance of 190.64 feet;
       (40) North 2 deg.55'00'' West a distance of 170.00 feet;
       (41) North 6 deg.45'00'' West a distance of 240.00 feet;
       (42) North 0 deg.10'00'' East a distance of 465.00 feet;
       (43) North 2 deg.00'38'' West a distance of 378.58 feet to 
     the northerly line of Letters Patent dated February 21, 1968 
     and recorded in the Erie County Clerk's Office under Liber 
     7453 of Deeds at Page 45.

     Thence North 71 deg.23'35'' East along the north line of the 
     aforementioned Letters Patent a distance of 154.95 feet to 
     the shore line; thence along the shore line the following 6 
     courses and distances:
       (1) South 80 deg.14'01'' East a distance of 119.30 feet;
       (2) North 46 deg.15'13'' East a distance of 47.83 feet;
       (3) North 59 deg.53'02'' East a distance of 53.32 feet;
       (4) North 38 deg.20'43'' East a distance of 27.31 feet;
       (5) North 68 deg.12'46'' East a distance of 48.67 feet;
       (6) North 26 deg.11'47'' East a distance of 11.48 feet to 
     the northerly line of the aforementioned Letters Patent.

     Thence along the northerly line of said Letters Patent, North 
     71 deg.23'35'' East a distance of 1755.19 feet; thence South 
     35 deg.27'25'' East a distance of 35.83 feet to a point on 
     the U.S. Harbor Line; thence, North 54 deg.02'35'' East along 
     the U.S. Harbor Line a distance of 200.00 feet; thence 
     continuing along the U.S. Harbor Line, North 50 deg.01'45'' 
     East a distance of 379.54 feet to the westerly line of the 
     lands of Gateway Trade Center, Inc.; thence along the lands 
     of Gateway Trade Center, Inc. the following 27 courses and 
     distances:
       (1) South 18 deg.44'53'' East a distance of 623.56 feet;
       (2) South 34 deg.33'00'' East a distance of 200.00 feet;
       (3) South 26 deg.18'55'' East a distance of 500.00 feet;
       (4) South 19 deg.06'40'' East a distance of 1074.29 feet;
       (5) South 28 deg.03'18'' East a distance of 242.44 feet;
       (6) South 18 deg.38'50'' East a distance of 1010.95 feet;
       (7) North 71 deg.20'51'' East a distance of 90.42 feet;
       (8) South 18 deg.49'20'' East a distance of 158.61 feet;
       (9) South 80 deg.55'10'' East a distance of 45.14 feet;
       (10) South 18 deg.04'45'' East a distance of 52.13 feet;
       (11) North 71 deg.07'23'' East a distance of 102.59 feet;
       (12) South 18 deg.41'40'' East a distance of 63.00 feet;
       (13) South 71 deg.07'23'' West a distance of 240.62 feet;
       (14) South 18 deg.38'50'' East a distance of 668.13 feet;
       (15) North 71 deg.28'46'' East a distance of 958.68 feet;
       (16) North 18 deg.42'31'' West a distance of 1001.28 feet;
       (17) South 71 deg.17'29'' West a distance of 168.48 feet;
       (18) North 18 deg.42'31'' West a distance of 642.00 feet;
       (19) North 71 deg.17'37'' East a distance of 17.30 feet;
       (20) North 18 deg.42'31'' West a distance of 574.67 feet;
       (21) North 71 deg.17'29'' East a distance of 151.18 feet;
       (22) North 18 deg.42'31''West a distance of 1156.43 feet;
       (23) North 71 deg.29'21'' East a distance of 569.24 feet;
       (24) North 18 deg.30'39'' West a distance of 314.71 feet;
       (25) North 70 deg.59'36'' East a distance of 386.47 feet;
       (26) North 18 deg.30'39'' West a distance of 70.00 feet;
       (27) North 70 deg.59'36'' East a distance of 400.00 feet to 
     the place or point of beginning.
     Containing 1,142.958 acres.
       (c) Limits on Applicability; Regulatory Requirements.--The 
     declaration under subsection (a) shall apply to those parts 
     of the areas described in subsection (b) which are filled 
     portions of Lake Erie. Any work on these filled portions is 
     subject to all applicable Federal statutes and regulations, 
     including sections 9 and 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30 
     Stat. 1151; 33 U.S.C. 401 and 403), commonly known as the 
     River and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 of 
     the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and 
     the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
       (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of 
     enactment of this Act, any area or part thereof described in 
     subsection (a) of this section is not occupied by permanent 
     structures in accordance with the requirements set out in 
     subsection (c) of this section, or if work in connection with 
     any activity permitted in subsection (c) is not commenced 
     within 5 years after issuance of such permits, then the 
     declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part thereof 
     shall expire.

     SEC. 353. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

       (a) In General.--The following projects or portions of 
     projects are not authorized after the date of enactment of 
     this Act:
       (1) Black warrior and tombigbee rivers, jackson, alabama.--
     The project for navigation, Black Warrior and Tombigbee 
     Rivers, vicinity of Jackson, Alabama, authorized by section 
     106 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
     1987 (100 Stat. 3341-199).
       (2) Sacramento deep water ship channel, california.--The 
     portion of the project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water 
     Ship Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), 
     beginning from the confluence of the Sacramento River and the 
     Barge Canal to a point 3,300 feet west of the William G. 
     Stone Lock western gate (including the William G. Stone Lock 
     and the Bascule Bridge and Barge Canal). All waters within 
     such portion of the project are declared to be nonnavigable 
     waters of the United States solely for purposes of the 
     General Bridge Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.) and 
     section 9 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401), 
     commonly known as the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 
     1899.
       (3) Bay island channel, quincy, illinois.--The access 
     channel across Bay Island into Quincy Bay at Quincy, 
     Illinois, constructed under section 107 of the River and 
     Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577).
       (4) Warsaw boat harbor, illinois.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Illinois Waterway, Illinois and 
     Indiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1175), known as the Warsaw Boat Harbor, 
     Illinois.
       (5) Rockport harbor, rockport, massachusetts.--The 
     following portions of the project for navigation, Rockport 
     Harbor, Massachusetts, carried out under section 107 of the 
     River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
       (A) The portion of the 10-foot harbor channel the 
     boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
     N605,741.948, E838,031.378, thence running north 36 degrees 
     04 minutes

[[Page H10048]]

     40.9 seconds east 123.386 feet to a point N605,642.226, 
     E838,104.039, thence running south 05 degrees 08 minutes 35.1 
     seconds east 24.223 feet to a point N605,618.100, 
     E838,106.210, thence running north 41 degrees 05 minutes 10.9 
     seconds west 141.830 feet to a point N605,725.000, 
     E838,013.000, thence running north 47 degrees 19 minutes 04.1 
     seconds east 25.000 feet to the point of origin.
       (B) The portion of the 8-foot north basin entrance channel 
     the boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
     N605,742.699, E837,977.129, thence running south 89 degrees 
     12 minutes 27.1 seconds east 54.255 feet to a point 
     N605,741.948, E838,031.378, thence running south 47 degrees 
     19 minutes 04.1 seconds west 25.000 feet to a point 
     N605,725.000, E838,013.000, thence running north 63 degrees 
     44 minutes 19.0 seconds west 40.000 feet to the point of 
     origin.
       (C) The portion of the 8-foot south basin anchorage the 
     boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
     N605,563.770, E838,111.100, thence running south 05 degrees 
     08 minutes 35.1 seconds east 53.460 feet to a point 
     N605,510.525, E838,115.892, thence running south 52 degrees 
     10 minutes 55.5 seconds west 145.000 feet to a point 
     N605,421.618, E838,001.348, thence running north 37 degrees 
     49 minutes 04.5 seconds west feet to a point N605,480.960, 
     E837,955.287, thence running south 64 degrees 52 minutes 33.9 
     seconds east 33.823 feet to a point N605,466.600, 
     E837,985.910, thence running north 52 degrees 10 minutes 55.5 
     seconds east 158.476 feet to the point of origin.
       (6) Scituate harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
     project for navigation, Scituate Harbor, Massachusetts, 
     authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1954 
     (68 Stat. 1249), consisting of an 8-foot anchorage basin and 
     described as follows: Beginning at a point with coordinates 
     N438,739.53, E810,354.75, thence running northwesterly about 
     200.00 feet to coordinates N438,874.02, E810,206.72, thence 
     running northeasterly about 400.00 feet to coordinates 
     N439,170.07, E810,475,70, thence running southwesterly about 
     447.21 feet to the point of origin.
       (7) Duluth-superior harbor, minnesota and wisconsin.--The 
     portion of the project for navigation, Duluth-Superior 
     Harbor, Minnesota and Wisconsin, authorized by the first 
     section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations 
     for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
     public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
     approved June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 212), known as the 21st 
     Avenue West Channel, beginning at the most southeasterly 
     point of the channel N423074.09, E2871635.43 thence running 
     north-northwest about 1854.83 feet along the easterly limit 
     of the project to a point N424706.69, E2870755.48, thence 
     running northwesterly about 111.07 feet to a point on the 
     northerly limit of the project N424777.27, E2870669.46, 
     thence west-southwest 157.88 feet along the north limit of 
     the project to a point N424703.04, E2870530.38, thence south-
     southeast 1978.27 feet to the most southwesterly point 
     N422961.45, E2871469.07, thence northeasterly 201.00 feet 
     along the southern limit of the project to the point of 
     origin.
       (8) Tremley point, new jersey.--The portion of the Federal 
     navigation channel, New York and New Jersey Channels, New 
     York and New Jersey, authorized by the first section of the 
     Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, 
     and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
     harbors, and for other purposes'', approved August 30, 1935 
     (49 Stat. 1028), and modified by section 101 of the River and 
     Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 164), that consists of a 35-foot 
     deep channel beginning at a point along the western limit of 
     the authorized project, N644100.411, E129256.91, thence 
     running southeasterly about 38.25 feet to a point 
     N644068.885, E129278.565, thence running southerly about 
     1,163.86 feet to a point N642912.127, E129150.209, thence 
     running southwesterly about 56.89 feet to a point N642864.09, 
     E2129119.725, thence running northerly along the existing 
     western limit of the existing project to the point of origin.
       (9) Angola, new york.--The project for erosion protection, 
     Angola Water Treatment Plant, Angola, New York, constructed 
     under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
     701r).
       (10) Wallabout channel, brooklyn, new york.--The portion of 
     the project for navigation, Wallabout Channel, Brooklyn, New 
     York, authorized by the first section of the Act entitled 
     ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, 
     and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
     harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 3, 1899 (30 
     Stat. 1124), that is located at the northeast corner of the 
     project and is described as follows:
       Beginning at a point forming the northeast corner of the 
     project and designated with the coordinate of North N 
     682,307.40; East 638,918.10; thence along the following 6 
     courses and distances:
       (A) South 85 degrees, 44 minutes, 13 seconds East 87.94 
     feet (coordinate: N 682,300.86 E 639,005.80).
       (B) North 74 degrees, 41 minutes, 30 seconds East 271.54 
     feet (coordinate: N 682,372.55 E 639,267.71).
       (C) South 4 degrees, 46 minutes, 02 seconds West 170.95 
     feet (coordinate: N 682,202.20 E 639,253.50).
       (D) South 4 degrees, 46 minutes, 02 seconds West 239.97 
     feet (coordinate: N 681,963.06 E 639,233.56).
       (E) North 50 degrees, 48 minutes, 26 seconds West 305.48 
     feet (coordinate: N 682,156.10 E 638,996.80).
       (F) North 3 degrees, 33 minutes, 25 seconds East 145.04 
     feet (coordinate: N 682,300.86 E 639,005.80).
       (b) Rockport Harbor, Massachusetts.--The project for 
     navigation, Rockport Harbor, Massachusetts, carried out under 
     section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
     577), is modified--
       (1) to redesignate a portion of the 8-foot north outer 
     anchorage as part of the 8-foot approach channel to the north 
     inner basin described as follows: the perimeter of the area 
     starts at a point with coordinates N605,792.110, 
     E838,020.009, thence running south 89 degrees 12 minutes 27.1 
     seconds east 64.794 feet to a point N605,791.214, 
     E838,084.797, thence running south 47 degrees 18 minutes 54.0 
     seconds west 40.495 feet to a point N605,763.760, 
     E838,055.030, thence running north 68 degrees 26 minutes 49.0 
     seconds west 43.533 feet to a point N605,779.750, 
     E838,014.540, thence running north 23 degrees 52 minutes 08.4 
     seconds east 13.514 feet to the point of origin; and
       (2) to realign a portion of the 8-foot north inner basin 
     approach channel by adding an area described as follows: the 
     perimeter of the area starts at a point with coordinates 
     N605,792.637, E837,981.920, thence running south 89 degrees 
     12 minutes 27.1 seconds east 38.093 feet to a point 
     N605,792.110, E838,020.009, thence running south 23 degrees 
     52 minutes 08.4 seconds west 13.514 feet to a point 
     N605,779.752, E838,014.541, thence running north 68 degrees 
     26 minutes 49.0 seconds west 35.074 feet to the point of 
     origin.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

     SEC. 401. STUDIES OF COMPLETED PROJECTS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study under section 216 of 
     the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1830) of each of the 
     following completed projects:
       (1) Escambia bay and river, florida.--Project for 
     navigation, Escambia Bay and River, Florida.
       (2) Illinois river, havana, illinois.--Project for flood 
     control, Illinois River, Havana, Illinois, authorized by 
     section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 
     1583).
       (3) Spring lake, illinois.--Project for flood control, 
     Spring Lake, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood 
     Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1584).
       (4) Port orford, oregon.--Project for flood control, Port 
     Orford, Oregon, authorized by section 301 of River and Harbor 
     Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092).

     SEC. 402. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

       Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4164) is amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 729. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

       ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may assess the water 
     resources needs of interstate river basins and watersheds of 
     the United States. The assessments shall be undertaken in 
     cooperation and coordination with the Departments of the 
     Interior, Agriculture, and Commerce, the Environmental 
     Protection Agency, and other appropriate agencies, and may 
     include an evaluation of ecosystem protection and 
     restoration, flood damage reduction, navigation and port 
     needs, watershed protection, water supply, and drought 
     preparedness.
       ``(b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with 
     Federal, tribal, State, interstate, and local governmental 
     entities in carrying out the assessments authorized by this 
     section. In conducting the assessments, the Secretary may 
     accept contributions of services, materials, supplies and 
     cash from Federal, tribal, State, interstate, and local 
     governmental entities where the Secretary determines that 
     such contributions will facilitate completion of the 
     assessments.
       ``(c) Priority Consideration.--The Secretary shall give 
     priority consideration to the following interstate river 
     basins and watersheds:
       ``(1) Delaware River.
       ``(2) Potomac River.
       ``(3) Susquehanna River.
       ``(4) Kentucky River.
       ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.''.

     SEC. 403. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT.

       (a) Assessments.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Secretary of the Interior and the States of Arkansas, 
     Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and 
     Tennessee, shall undertake, at Federal expense, for the Lower 
     Mississippi River system--
       (1) an assessment of information needed for river-related 
     management;
       (2) an assessment of natural resource habitat needs; and
       (3) an assessment of the need for river-related recreation 
     and access.
       (b) Period.--Each assessment referred to in subsection (a) 
     shall be carried out for 2 years.
       (c) Reports.--Before the last day of the second year of an 
     assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary, in 
     cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States 
     of Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, 
     Missouri, and Tennessee, shall transmit to Congress a report 
     on the results of the assessment to Congress. The report 
     shall contain recommendations for--
       (1) the collection, availability, and use of information 
     needed for river-related management;

[[Page H10049]]

       (2) the planning, construction, and evaluation of potential 
     restoration, protection, and enhancement measures to meet 
     identified habitat needs; and
       (3) potential projects to meet identified river access and 
     recreation needs.
       (d) Lower Mississippi River System Defined.--In this 
     section, the term ``Lower Mississippi River system'' means 
     those river reaches and adjacent floodplains within the Lower 
     Mississippi River alluvial valley having commercial 
     navigation channels on the Mississippi mainstem and 
     tributaries south of Cairo, Illinois, and the Atchafalaya 
     basin floodway system.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $1,750,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 404. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN SEDIMENT AND NUTRIENT 
                   STUDY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal 
     expense, a study--
       (1) to identify significant sources of sediment and 
     nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River basin; and
       (2) to describe and evaluate the processes by which the 
     sediments and nutrients move, on land and in water, from 
     their sources to the Upper Mississippi River and its 
     tributaries.
       (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
     shall consult the Departments of Agriculture and the 
     Interior.
       (c) Components of the Study.--
       (1) Computer modeling.--As part of the study, the Secretary 
     shall develop computer models at the subwatershed and basin 
     level to identify and quantify the sources of sediment and 
     nutrients and to examine the effectiveness of alternative 
     management measures.
       (2) Research.--As part of the study, the Secretary shall 
     conduct research to improve understanding of--
       (A) the processes affecting sediment and nutrient (with 
     emphasis on nitrogen and phosphorus) movement;
       (B) the influences of soil type, slope, climate, vegetation 
     cover, and modifications to the stream drainage network on 
     sediment and nutrient losses; and
       (C) river hydrodynamics in relation to sediment and 
     nutrient transformations, retention, and movement.
       (d) Use of Information.--Upon request of a Federal agency, 
     the Secretary may provide information to the agency for use 
     in sediment and nutrient reduction programs associated with 
     land use and land management practices.
       (e) Report to Congress.--Not later than 3 years after the 
     date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit 
     to Congress a report on the results of the study, including 
     findings and recommendations.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

     SEC. 405. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

       Section 459(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 333) is amended by striking ``date of 
     enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``first date on which 
     funds are appropriated to carry out this section.''.

     SEC. 406. OHIO RIVER SYSTEM.

       The Secretary may conduct a study of commodity flows on the 
     Ohio River system at Federal expense. The study shall include 
     an analysis of the commodities transported on the Ohio River 
     system, including information on the origins and destinations 
     of these commodities and market trends, both national and 
     international.

     SEC. 407. EASTERN ARKANSAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the 
     recommendations in the Eastern Arkansas Region Comprehensive 
     Study of the Memphis District Engineer, dated August 1990, to 
     determine whether the plans outlined in the study for 
     agricultural water supply from the Little Red River, 
     Arkansas, are feasible and in the Federal interest.
       (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
     of the reevaluation.

     SEC. 408. RUSSELL, ARKANSAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the 
     preliminary investigation report for agricultural water 
     supply, Russell, Arkansas, entitled ``Preliminary 
     Investigation: Lone Star Management Project'', prepared for 
     the Lone Star Water Irrigation District, to determine whether 
     the plans contained in the report are feasible and in the 
     Federal interest.
       (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
     of the evaluation.

     SEC. 409. ESTUDILLO CANAL, SAN LEANDRO, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction along the Estudillo Canal, San Leandro, California.

     SEC. 410. LAGUNA CREEK, FREMONT, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction in the Laguna Creek watershed, Fremont, California.

     SEC. 411. LAKE MERRITT, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for ecosystem 
     restoration, flood damage reduction, and recreation at Lake 
     Merritt, Oakland, California.

     SEC. 412. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the report of 
     the city of Lancaster, California, entitled ``Master Plan of 
     Drainage'', to determine whether the plans contained in the 
     report are feasible and in the Federal interest, including 
     plans relating to drainage corridors located at 52nd Street 
     West, 35th Street West, North Armargosa, and 20th Street 
     East.
       (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
     of the evaluation.

     SEC. 413. NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project to 
     address water supply, water quality, and groundwater problems 
     at Miliken, Sarco, and Tulocay Creeks in Napa County, 
     California.
       (b) Use of Existing Data.--In conducting the study, the 
     Secretary shall use data and information developed by the 
     United States Geological Survey in the report entitled 
     ``Geohydrologic Framework and Hydrologic Budget of the Lower 
     Miliken-Sarco-Tulocay Creeks Area of Napa, California''.

     SEC. 414. OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study, at Federal expense, to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for 
     shoreline protection at Oceanside, California. In conducting 
     the study, the Secretary shall determine the portion of beach 
     erosion that is the result of a Navy navigation project at 
     Camp Pendleton Harbor, California.

     SEC. 415. SUISUN MARSH, CALIFORNIA.

       The investigation for Suisun Marsh, California, authorized 
     under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
     2000 (Public Law 106-60), shall be limited to evaluating the 
     feasibility of the levee enhancement and managed wetlands 
     protection program for Suisun Marsh, California.

     SEC. 416. LAKE ALLATOONA WATERSHED, GEORGIA.

       Section 413 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 324) is amended to read as follows:

     ``SEC. 413. LAKE ALLATOONA WATERSHED, GEORGIA.

       ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
     comprehensive study of the Lake Allatoona watershed, Georgia, 
     to determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem 
     restoration and resource protection measures.
       ``(b) Matters To Be Addressed.--The study shall address 
     streambank and shoreline erosion, sedimentation, water 
     quality, fish and wildlife habitat degradation and other 
     problems relating to ecosystem restoration and resource 
     protection in the Lake Allatoona watershed.''.

     SEC. 417. CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for 
     shoreline protection along the Chicago River, Chicago, 
     Illinois.
       (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
     shall consult, and incorporate information available from, 
     appropriate Federal, State, and local government agencies.

     SEC. 418. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL SYSTEM, CHICAGO, 
                   ILLINOIS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     advisability of reducing the use of the waters of Lake 
     Michigan to support navigation in the Chicago sanitary and 
     ship canal system, Chicago, Illinois.

     SEC. 419. LONG LAKE, INDIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for environmental 
     restoration and protection, Long Lake, Indiana.

     SEC. 420. BRUSH AND ROCK CREEKS, MISSION HILLS AND FAIRWAY, 
                   KANSAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the 
     preliminary engineering report for the project for flood 
     control, Mission Hills and Fairway, Kansas, entitled 
     ``Preliminary Engineering Report: Brush Creek/Rock Creek 
     Drainage Improvements, 66th Street to State Line Road'', to 
     determine whether the plans contained in the report are 
     feasible and in the Federal interest.
       (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
     of the evaluation.

     SEC. 421. COASTAL AREAS OF LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of developing measures to floodproof major 
     hurricane evacuation routes in the coastal areas of 
     Louisiana.

     SEC. 422. IBERIA PORT, LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for navigation, Iberia 
     Port, Louisiana.

     SEC. 423. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN SEAWALL, LOUISIANA.

       Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary shall complete a post-authorization change 
     report on the project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake 
     Pontchartrain, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), to incorporate and 
     accomplish structural modifications to the seawall providing 
     protection along the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain from 
     the New Basin Canal on the west to the Inner Harbor 
     Navigation Canal on the east.

     SEC. 424. LOWER ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LOUISIANA.

       As part of the Lower Atchafalaya basin reevaluation study, 
     the Secretary shall determine the feasibility of carrying out 
     a project

[[Page H10050]]

     for flood damage reduction, Stephensville, Louisiana.

     SEC. 425. ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH, LOUISIANA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for flood damage 
     reduction on the east bank of the Mississippi River in St. 
     John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana.

     SEC. 426. LAS VEGAS VALLEY, NEVADA.

       Section 432(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 327) is amended by inserting ``recreation,'' 
     after ``runoff),''.

     SEC. 427. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.

       Section 433 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 327) is amended--
       (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The''; and
       (2) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(b) Evaluation of Flood Damage Reduction Measures.--In 
     conducting the study, the Secretary shall evaluate flood 
     damage reduction measures that would otherwise be excluded 
     from the feasibility analysis based on policies of the Corps 
     of Engineers concerning the frequency of flooding, the 
     drainage area, and the amount of runoff.''.

     SEC. 428. BUFFALO HARBOR, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the advisability and potential impacts of declaring 
     as nonnavigable a portion of the channel at Control Point 
     Draw, Buffalo Harbor, Buffalo New York.
       (b) Contents.--The study conducted under this section shall 
     include an examination of other options to meet intermodal 
     transportation needs in the area.

     SEC. 429. HUDSON RIVER, MANHATTAN, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of establishing a Hudson River Park 
     in Manhattan, New York City, New York. The study shall 
     address the issues of shoreline protection, environmental 
     protection and restoration, recreation, waterfront access, 
     and open space for the area between Battery Place and West 
     59th Street.
       (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study under subsection 
     (a), the Secretary shall consult the Hudson River Park Trust.
       (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
     enactment of this section, the Secretary shall transmit to 
     Congress a report on the result of the study, including a 
     master plan for the park.

     SEC. 430. JAMESVILLE RESERVOIR, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, flood damage reduction, and water quality, 
     Jamesville Reservoir, Onondaga County, New York.

     SEC. 431. STEUBENVIILLE, OHIO.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of developing a public port along the Ohio River 
     in the vicinity of Steubenville, Ohio.

     SEC. 432. GRAND LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

       Section 560(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3783) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``date of enactment of this Act'' and 
     inserting ``date of enactment of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 2000''; and
       (2) by inserting ``and Miami'' after ``Pensacola Dam''.

     SEC. 433. COLUMBIA SLOUGH, OREGON.

       Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary shall complete under section 1135 of the 
     Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) a 
     feasiblility study for the ecosystem restoration project at 
     Columbia Slough, Oregon. If the Secretary determines that the 
     project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project 
     on an expedited basis under such section.

     SEC. 434. REEDY RIVER, GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, flood damage reduction, and streambank 
     stabilization on the Reedy River, Cleveland Park West, 
     Greenville, South Carolina.

     SEC. 435. GERMANTOWN, TENNESSEE.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood 
     control and related purposes along Miller Farms Ditch, Howard 
     Road Drainage, and Wolf River Lateral D, Germantown, 
     Tennessee.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary--
       (1) shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the costs 
     of the feasibility study the value of the in-kind services 
     provided by the non-Federal interests relating to the 
     planning, engineering, and design of the project, whether 
     carried out before or after execution of the feasibility 
     study cost-sharing agreement if the Secretary determines the 
     work is necessary for completion of the study; and
       (2) for the purposes of paragraph (1), shall consider the 
     feasibility study to be conducted as part of the Memphis 
     Metro Tennessee and Mississippi study authorized by 
     resolution of the Committee on Transportation and 
     Infrastructure, dated March 7, 1996.
       (c) Limitation.--The Secretary may not reject the project 
     under the feasibility study based solely on a minimum amount 
     of stream runoff.

     SEC. 436. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, GALVESTON, TEXAS.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of constructing barge lanes adjacent to the 
     Houston Ship Channel from Redfish Reef to Morgan Point in 
     Galveston, Texas.

     SEC. 437. PARK CITY, UTAH.

       The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
     feasibility of carrying out a project for water supply, Park 
     City, Utah.

     SEC. 438. MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the report 
     for the project for flood damage reduction and environmental 
     restoration, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, entitled ``Interim 
     Executive Summary: Menominee River Flood Management Plan'', 
     dated September 1999, to determine whether the plans 
     contained in the report are cost-effective, technically 
     sound, environmentally acceptable, and in the Federal 
     interest.
       (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results 
     of the evaluation.

     SEC. 439. UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILLINOIS 
                   AND WISCONSIN.

       Section 419 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 324-325) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(d) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide the non-Federal 
     interest credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the study for work performed by the non-Federal interest 
     before the date of the study's feasibility cost-share 
     agreement if the Secretary determines that the work is 
     integral to the study.''.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

     SEC. 501. BRIDGEPORT, ALABAMA.

       (a) Determination.--The Secretary shall review the 
     construction of a channel performed by the non-Federal 
     interest at the project for navigation, Tennessee River, 
     Bridgeport, Alabama, to determine the Federal navigation 
     interest in such work.
       (b) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines under 
     subsection (a) that the work performed by the non-Federal 
     interest is consistent with the Federal navigation interest, 
     the Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interest an 
     amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of construction 
     of the channel.

     SEC. 502. DUCK RIVER, CULLMAN, ALABAMA.

       The Secretary shall provide technical assistance to the 
     city of Cullman, Alabama, in the management of construction 
     contracts for the reservoir project on the Duck River.

     SEC. 503. SEWARD, ALASKA.

       The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency one-time 
     basis, necessary repairs of the Lowell Creek Tunnel in 
     Seward, Alaska, at Federal expense and a total cost of 
     $3,000,000.

     SEC. 504. AUGUSTA AND DEVALLS BLUFF, ARKANSAS.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may operate, maintain, and 
     rehabilitate 37 miles of levees in and around Augusta and 
     Devalls Bluff, Arkansas.
       (b) Reimbursement.--After incurring any cost for operation, 
     maintenance, or rehabilitation under subsection (a), the 
     Secretary may seek reimbursement from the Secretary of the 
     Interior of an amount equal to the portion of such cost that 
     the Secretary determines is a benefit to a Federal wildlife 
     refuge.

     SEC. 505. BEAVER LAKE, ARKANSAS.

       The contract price for additional storage for the Carroll-
     Boone Water District beyond that which is provided for in 
     section 521 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 345) shall be based on the original construction 
     cost of Beaver Lake and adjusted to the 2000 price level net 
     of inflation between the date of initiation of construction 
     and the date of enactment of this Act.

     SEC. 506. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, 
                   ARKANSAS AND OKLAHOMA.

       Taking into account the need to realize the total economic 
     potential of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation 
     system, the Secretary shall expedite completion of the 
     Arkansas River navigation study, including the feasibility of 
     increasing the authorized channel from 9 feet to 12 feet and, 
     if justified, proceed directly to project preconstruction 
     engineering and design.

     SEC. 507. CALFED BAY DELTA PROGRAM ASSISTANCE, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate with 
     appropriate Federal and State agencies in planning and 
     management activities associated with the CALFED Bay Delta 
     Program (in this section referred to as the ``Program'') and 
     shall, to the maximum extent practicable and in accordance 
     with all applicable laws, integrate the activities of the 
     Corps of Engineers in the San Joaquin and Sacramento River 
     basins with the long-term goals of the Program.
       (b) Cooperative Activities.--In carrying out this section, 
     the Secretary--
       (1) may accept and expend funds from other Federal agencies 
     and from public, private, and non-profit entities to carry 
     out ecosystem restoration projects and activities associated 
     with the Program; and
       (2) may enter into contracts, cooperative research and 
     development agreements, and cooperative agreements, with 
     Federal and public, private, and non-profit entities to carry 
     out such projects and activities.
       (c) Geographic Scope.--For the purposes of the 
     participation of the Secretary under this section, the 
     geographic scope of the Program shall be the San Francisco 
     Bay and the

[[Page H10051]]

     Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary and their watershed 
     (also known as the ``Bay-Delta Estuary''), as identified in 
     the agreement entitled the ``Framework Agreement Between the 
     Governor's Water Policy Council of the State of California 
     and the Federal Ecosystem Directorate''.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for 
     fiscal years 2002 through 2005.

     SEC. 508. CLEAR LAKE BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

       Amounts made available to the Secretary by the Energy and 
     Water Appropriations Act, 2000 (113 Stat. 483 et seq.) for 
     the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Clear Lake 
     basin, California, to be carried out under section 206 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), may 
     only be used for the wetlands restoration and creation 
     elements of the project.

     SEC. 509. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, 
                   CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage 
     reduction under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
     (33 U.S.C. 701s) at the Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and 
     Knightsen, California, if the Secretary determines that the 
     project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified.

     SEC. 510. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall carry out under section 205 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) a project for 
     flood damage reduction in Huntington Beach, California, if 
     the Secretary determines that the project is technically 
     sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
     justified.

     SEC. 511. MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall carry out under section 205 of the 
     Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) a project for 
     flood damage reduction in Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, 
     California, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified.

     SEC. 512. PENN MINE, CALAVERAS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
     Federal interest for the project for aquatic ecosystem 
     restoration, Penn Mine, Calaveras County, California, carried 
     out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 
     of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), $4,100,000 for the Federal share of 
     costs incurred by the non-Federal interest for work carried 
     out by the non-Federal interest for the project.
       (b) Source of Funding.--Reimbursement under subsection (a) 
     shall be from amounts appropriated before the date of 
     enactment of this Act for the project described in subsection 
     (a).

     SEC. 513. PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) Emergency Measures.--The Secretary shall carry out, on 
     an emergency basis, measures to address health, safety, and 
     environmental risks posed by floatables and floating debris 
     originating from Piers 24 and 64 in the Port of San 
     Francisco, California, by removing such floatables and 
     debris.
       (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to 
     determine the risk to navigation posed by floatables and 
     floating debris originating from Piers 24 and 64 in the Port 
     of San Francisco, California, and the cost of removing such 
     floatables and debris.
       (c) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
     $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 514. SAN GABRIEL BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

       (a) San Gabriel Basin Restoration.--
       (1) Establishment of fund.--There shall be established 
     within the Treasury of the United States an interest bearing 
     account to be known as the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund 
     (in this section referred to as the ``Restoration Fund'').
       (2) Administration of fund.--The Restoration Fund shall be 
     administered by the Secretary, in cooperation with the San 
     Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority or its successor 
     agency.
       (3) Purposes of fund.--
       (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the amounts 
     in the Restoration Fund, including interest accrued, shall be 
     utilized by the Secretary--
       (i) to design and construct water quality projects to be 
     administered by the San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority 
     and the Central Basin Water Quality Project to be 
     administered by the Central Basin Municipal Water District; 
     and
       (ii) to operate and maintain any project constructed under 
     this section for such period as the Secretary determines, but 
     not to exceed 10 years, following the initial date of 
     operation of the project.
       (B) Cost-sharing limitation.--The Secretary may not 
     obligate any funds appropriated to the Restoration Fund in a 
     fiscal year until the Secretary has deposited in the Fund 
     an amount provided by non-Federal interests sufficient to 
     ensure that at least 35 percent of any funds obligated by 
     the Secretary are from funds provided to the Secretary by 
     the non-Federal interests. The San Gabriel Basin Water 
     Quality Authority shall be responsible for providing the 
     non-Federal amount required by the preceding sentence. The 
     State of California, local government agencies, and 
     private entities may provide all or any portion of such 
     amount.
       (b) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the 
     activities described in this section, the Secretary shall 
     comply with any applicable Federal and State laws.
       (c) Relationship to Other Activities.--Nothing in this 
     section shall be construed to affect other Federal or State 
     authorities that are being used or may be used to facilitate 
     the cleanup and protection of the San Gabriel and Central 
     groundwater basins. In carrying out the activities described 
     in this section, the Secretary shall integrate such 
     activities with ongoing Federal and State projects and 
     activities. None of the funds made available for such 
     activities pursuant to this section shall be counted against 
     any Federal authorization ceiling established for any 
     previously authorized Federal projects or activities.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--
       (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
     the Restoration Fund established under subsection (a) 
     $85,000,000. Such funds shall remain available until 
     expended.
       (2) Set-aside.--Of the amounts appropriated under paragraph 
     (1), no more than $10,000,000 shall be available to carry out 
     the Central Basin Water Quality Project.
       (e) Adjustment.--Of the $25,000,000 made available for San 
     Gabriel Basin Groundwater Restoration, California, under the 
     heading ``Construction, General'' in title I of the Energy 
     and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2001--
       (1) $2,000,000 shall be available only for studies and 
     other investigative activities and planning and design of 
     projects determined by the Secretary to offer a long-term 
     solution to the problem of groundwater contamination caused 
     by perchlorates at sites located in the city of Santa 
     Clarita, California; and
       (2) $23,000,000 shall be deposited in the Restoration Fund, 
     of which $4,000,000 shall be used for remediation in the 
     Central Basin, California.

     SEC. 515. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall evaluate the feasibility of the Lower 
     Mosher Slough element and the levee extensions on the Upper 
     Calaveras River element of the project for flood control, 
     Stockton Metropolitan Area, California, carried out under 
     section 211(f)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to determine the eligibility of such 
     elements for reimbursement under section 211 of such Act (33 
     U.S.C. 701b-13). If the Secretary determines that such 
     elements are technically sound, environmentally acceptable, 
     and economically justified, the Secretary shall reimburse 
     under section 211 of such Act the non-Federal interest for 
     the Federal share of the cost of such elements.

     SEC. 516. PORT EVERGLADES, FLORIDA.

       Notwithstanding the absence of a project cooperation 
     agreement, the Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
     interest for the project for navigation, Port Everglades 
     Harbor, Florida, $15,003,000 for the Federal share of costs 
     incurred by the non-Federal interest in carrying out the 
     project and determined by the Secretary to be eligible for 
     reimbursement under the limited reevaluation report of the 
     Corps of Engineers, dated April 1998.

     SEC. 517. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

       (a) In General.--In coordination with the Florida Keys 
     Aqueduct Authority, appropriate agencies of municipalities of 
     Monroe County, Florida, and other appropriate public agencies 
     of the State of Florida or Monroe County, the Secretary may 
     provide technical and financial assistance to carry out 
     projects for the planning, design, and construction of 
     treatment works to improve water quality in the Florida Keys 
     National Marine Sanctuary.
       (b) Criteria for Projects.--Before entering into a 
     cooperation agreement to provide assistance with respect to a 
     project under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that--
       (1) the non-Federal sponsor has completed adequate planning 
     and design activities, as applicable;
       (2) the non-Federal sponsor has completed a financial plan 
     identifying sources of non-Federal funding for the project;
       (3) the project complies with--
       (A) applicable growth management ordinances of Monroe 
     County, Florida;
       (B) applicable agreements between Monroe County, Florida, 
     and the State of Florida to manage growth in Monroe County, 
     Florida; and
       (C) applicable water quality standards; and
       (4) the project is consistent with the master wastewater 
     and stormwater plans for Monroe County, Florida.
       (c) Consideration.--In selecting projects under subsection 
     (a), the Secretary shall consider whether a project will have 
     substantial water quality benefits relative to other projects 
     under consideration.
       (d) Consultation.--In carrying out this section, the 
     Secretary shall consult with--
       (1) the Water Quality Steering Committee established under 
     section 8(d)(2)(A) of the Florida Keys National Marine 
     Sanctuary and Protection Act (106 Stat. 5054);
       (2) the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force 
     established by section 528(f) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3771-3773);
       (3) the Commission on the Everglades established by 
     executive order of the Governor of the State of Florida; and
       (4) other appropriate State and local government officials.
       (e) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of a project carried out under this section shall not be less 
     than 35 percent.

[[Page H10052]]

       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $100,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.

     SEC. 518. BALLARD'S ISLAND, LASALLE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

       The Secretary may provide the non-Federal interest for the 
     project for the improvement of the quality of the 
     environment, Ballard's Island, LaSalle County, Illinois, 
     carried out under section 1135 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C 2309a), credit toward the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project for work 
     performed by the non-Federal interest after July 1, 1999, if 
     the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
     project.

     SEC. 519. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, ILLINOIS.

       Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (110 Stat. 4253; 113 Stat. 339) is amended by inserting 
     after ``2003'' the following: ``and $800,000 for each fiscal 
     year beginning after September 30, 2003,''.

     SEC. 520. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

       The Secretary shall provide the non-Federal interest for 
     the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, 
     Indiana, carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 2330), credit toward the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project for work 
     performed by the non-Federal interest before the date of 
     execution of the project cooperation agreement if the 
     Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
     project.

     SEC. 521. CAMPBELLSVILLE LAKE, KENTUCKY.

       The Secretary shall repair the retaining wall and dam at 
     Campbellsville Lake, Kentucky, to protect the public road on 
     top of the dam at Federal expense and a total cost of 
     $200,000.

     SEC. 522. WEST VIEW SHORES, CECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND.

       Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 
     Act, the Secretary shall carry out an investigation of the 
     contamination of the well system in West View Shores, Cecil 
     County, Maryland. If the Secretary determines that a disposal 
     site for a Federal navigation project has contributed to the 
     contamination of the well system, the Secretary may provide 
     alternative water supplies, including replacement of wells, 
     at Federal expense.

     SEC. 523. CONSERVATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, CHESAPEAKE BAY, 
                   MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA.

       Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1986 (33 U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following: ``In addition, there is authorized to be 
     appropriated $20,000,000 to carry out paragraph (4).''.

     SEC. 524. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

       The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage 
     reduction and environmental restoration, Muddy River, 
     Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts, substantially in 
     accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, 
     described in the draft evaluation report of the New England 
     District Engineer entitled ``Phase I Muddy River Master 
     Plan'', dated June 2000.

     SEC. 525. SOO LOCKS, SAULT STE. MARIE, MICHIGAN.

       The Secretary may not require a cargo vessel equipped with 
     bow thrusters and friction winches that is transiting the Soo 
     Locks in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, to provide more than 2 
     crew members to serve as line handlers on the pier of a lock, 
     except in adverse weather conditions or if there is a 
     mechanical failure on the vessel.

     SEC. 526. DULUTH, MINNESOTA, ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT.

       (a) Project Authorization.--Section 541(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3777) is 
     amended--
       (1) by striking ``implement'' and inserting ``conduct full 
     scale demonstrations of''; and
       (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, 
     including technologies evaluated for the New York/New Jersey 
     Harbor under section 405 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2239 note; 106 Stat. 4863)''.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 541(b) of 
     such Act is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
     ``$3,000,000''.

     SEC. 527. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     State of Minnesota, shall design and construct the project 
     for environmental restoration and recreation, Minneapolis, 
     Minnesota, substantially in accordance with the plans 
     described in the report entitled ``Feasibility Study for 
     Mississippi Whitewater Park, Minneapolis, Minnesota'', 
     prepared for the Minnesota department of natural resources, 
     dated June 30, 1999.
       (b) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project shall be determined in accordance with title I of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et 
     seq.).
       (2) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way.--The non-Federal 
     interest shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary 
     for construction of the project and shall receive credit for 
     the cost of providing such lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, and dredged material disposal areas toward the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project.
       (3) Operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and 
     replacement.--The operation, maintenance, repair, 
     rehabilitation, and replacement of the project shall be a 
     non-Federal responsibility.
       (4) Credit for non-federal work.--The non-Federal interest 
     shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
     of the project for work performed by the non-Federal interest 
     before the date of execution of the project cooperation 
     agreement if the Secretary determines that the work is 
     integral to the project.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 528. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

       The Secretary shall carry out under section 204 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) a 
     project in St. Louis County, Minnesota, by making beneficial 
     use of dredged material from a Federal navigation project.

     SEC. 529. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

       The Secretary shall prepare a general reevaluation report 
     on the project for flood control, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, 
     authorized by section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (84 Stat. 1825), and, if the Secretary determines that the 
     project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
     economically justified, shall carry out the project. In 
     carrying out the reevaluation, the Secretary shall include 
     river dredging as a component of the study.

     SEC. 530. COASTAL MISSISSIPPI WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECTS.

       (a) In General.--In order to further the purposes of 
     section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (33 U.S.C. 2326) and section 206 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), the Secretary shall 
     participate in restoration projects for critical coastal 
     wetlands and coastal barrier islands in the State of 
     Mississippi that will produce, consistent with existing 
     Federal programs, projects, and activities, immediate and 
     substantial restoration, preservation, and ecosystem 
     protection benefits, including the beneficial use of dredged 
     material if such use is a cost-effective means of disposal of 
     such material.
       (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary, in coordination with 
     other Federal, tribal, State, and local agencies, may 
     identify and implement projects described in subsection (a) 
     after entering into an agreement with an appropriate non-
     Federal interest in accordance with this section.
       (c) Cost Sharing.--Before implementing any project under 
     this section, the Secretary shall enter into a binding 
     agreement with the non-Federal interests. The agreement shall 
     provide that the non-Federal responsibility for the project 
     shall be as follows:
       (1) To acquire any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary 
     for implementation of the project.
       (2) To hold and save harmless the United States free from 
     claims or damages due to implementation of the project, 
     except for the negligence of the Federal Government or its 
     contractors.
       (3) To pay 35 percent of project costs.
       (d) Nonprofit Entity.--For any project undertaken under 
     this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
     entity with the consent of the affected local government.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

     SEC. 531. MISSOURI RIVER VALLEY IMPROVEMENTS.

       (a) Missouri River Mitigation Project.--The project for 
     mitigation of fish and wildlife losses, Missouri River Bank 
     Stabilization and Navigation Project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, 
     and Nebraska authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143) and 
     modified by section 334 of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 306), is further modified to authorize 
     $200,000,000 for fiscal years 2001 through 2010 to be 
     appropriated to the Secretary for acquisition of 118,650 
     acres of land and interests in land for the project.
       (b) Upper Missouri River Aquatic and Riparian Habitat 
     Mitigation Program.--
       (1) In general.--
       (A) Study.--The Secretary shall complete a study that 
     analyzes the need for additional measures for mitigation of 
     losses of aquatic and terrestrial habitat from Fort Peck Dam 
     to Sioux City, Iowa, resulting from the operation of the 
     Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir project in the States of 
     Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Montana.
       (B) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
     Congress a report describing the results of the study.
       (2) Pilot program.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and 
     the affected State fish and wildlife agencies, shall develop 
     and administer a pilot mitigation program that--
       (A) involves the experimental releases of warm water from 
     the spillways at Fort Peck Dam during the appropriate 
     spawning periods for native fish;
       (B) involves the monitoring of the response of fish to, and 
     the effectiveness toward the preservation of native fish and 
     wildlife habitat as a result of, such releases; and
       (C) requires the Secretary to provide compensation for any 
     loss of hydropower at Fort Peck Dam resulting from 
     implementation of the pilot program; and
       (D) does not effect a change in the Missouri River Master 
     Water Control Manual.

[[Page H10053]]

       (3) Reservoir fish loss study.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
     North Dakota Game and Fish Department and the South Dakota 
     Department of Game, Fish and Parks, shall complete a study to 
     analyze and recommend measures to avoid or reduce the loss of 
     fish, including rainbow smelt, through Garrison Dam in North 
     Dakota and Oahe Dam in South Dakota.
       (B) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
     Congress a report describing the results of the study.
       (4) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated--
       (A) to complete the study under paragraph (3) $200,000; and
       (B) to carry out the other provisions of this subsection 
     $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2010.
       (c) Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers Enhancement 
     Project.--Section 514(g) of the Water Resources Development 
     Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 342) is amended to read as follows:
       ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out activities under this section $5,000,000 for 
     each of fiscal years 2001 through 2010.''.

     SEC. 532. NEW MADRID COUNTY, MISSOURI.

       For purposes of determining the non-Federal share for the 
     project for navigation, New Madrid County Harbor, Missouri, 
     carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
     1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), the Secretary shall consider Phases 1 
     and 2 as described in the report of the District Engineer, 
     dated February 2000, as one project and provide credit to the 
     non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of the 
     combined project for work performed by the non-Federal 
     interest on Phase 1 of the project.

     SEC. 533. PEMISCOT COUNTY, MISSOURI.

       The Secretary shall provide the non-Federal interest for 
     the project for navigation, Caruthersville Harbor, Pemiscot 
     County, Missouri, carried out under section 107 of the River 
     and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), credit toward the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of the project for in-kind work 
     performed by the non-Federal interest after December 1, 1997, 
     if the Secretary determines that the work is integral to the 
     project.

     SEC. 534. LAS VEGAS, NEVADA.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (1) Committee.--The term ``Committee'' means the Las Vegas 
     Wash Coordinating Committee.
       (2) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the Las Vegas Wash 
     comprehensive adaptive management plan, developed by the 
     Committee and dated January 20, 2000.
       (3) Project.--The term ``Project'' means the Las Vegas Wash 
     wetlands restoration and Lake Mead water quality improvement 
     project and includes the programs, features, components, 
     projects, and activities identified in the Plan.
       (b) Participation in Project.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with the 
     Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the 
     Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of the Interior 
     and in partnership with the Committee, shall participate in 
     the implementation of the Project to restore wetlands at Las 
     Vegas Wash and to improve water quality in Lake Mead in 
     accordance with the Plan.
       (2) Cost sharing requirements.--
       (A) In general.--The non-Federal interests shall pay 35 
     percent of the cost of any project carried out under this 
     section.
       (B) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal interests 
     shall be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
     maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all 
     projects carried out under this section.
       (C) Federal lands.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     this subsection, the Federal share of the cost of a project 
     carried out under this section on Federal lands shall be 100 
     percent, including the costs of operation and maintenance.
       (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 535. NEWARK, NEW JERSEY.

       (a) In General.--Using authorities under law in effect on 
     the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, the 
     Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the 
     Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the 
     heads of other appropriate Federal agencies shall assist the 
     State of New Jersey in developing and implementing a 
     comprehensive basinwide strategy in the Passaic, Hackensack, 
     Raritan, and Atlantic Coast floodplain areas for coordinated 
     and integrated management of land and water resources to 
     improve water quality, reduce flood hazards, and ensure 
     sustainable economic activity.
       (b) Technical Assistance, Staff, and Financial Support.--
     The heads of the Federal agencies referred to in subsection 
     (a) may provide technical assistance, staff, and financial 
     support for the development of the floodplain management 
     strategy.
       (c) Flexibility.--The heads of the Federal agencies 
     referred to in subsection (a) shall exercise flexibility to 
     reduce barriers to efficient and effective implementation of 
     the floodplain management strategy.
       (d) Research.--In coordination with academic and research 
     institutions for support, the Secretary may conduct a study 
     to carry out this section.

     SEC. 536. URBANIZED PEAK FLOOD MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, NEW 
                   JERSEY.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop and implement 
     a research program to evaluate opportunities to manage peak 
     flood flows in urbanized watersheds located in the State of 
     New Jersey.
       (b) Scope of Research.--The research program authorized by 
     subsection (a) shall be accomplished through the New York 
     District of Corps of Engineers. The research shall include 
     the following:
       (1) Identification of key factors in the development of an 
     urbanized watershed that affect peak flows in the watershed 
     and downstream.
       (2) Development of peak flow management models for 4 to 6 
     watersheds in urbanized areas with widely differing geology, 
     shapes, and soil types that can be used to determine optimal 
     flow reduction factors for individual watersheds.
       (c) Location.--The activities authorized by this section 
     shall be carried out at the facility authorized by section 
     103(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 106 
     Stat. 4812-4813, which may be located on the campus of the 
     New Jersey Institute of Technology.
       (d) Report to Congress.--The Secretary shall evaluate 
     policy changes in the planning process for flood damage 
     reduction projects based on the results of the research under 
     this section and transmit to Congress a report on such 
     results not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of 
     this Act.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $11,000,000 for 
     fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2000.

     SEC. 537. BLACK ROCK CANAL, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall provide technical assistance in support 
     of activities of non-Federal interests related to the 
     dredging of Black Rock Canal in the area between the Ferry 
     Street Overpass and the Peace Bridge Overpass in Buffalo, New 
     York.

     SEC. 538. HAMBURG, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall complete the study of a project for 
     shoreline erosion, Old Lake Shore Road, Hamburg, New York, 
     and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
     feasible, the Secretary shall carry out the project.

     SEC. 539. NEPPERHAN RIVER, YONKERS, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall provide technical assistance to the 
     city of Yonkers, New York, in support of activities relating 
     to the dredging of the Nepperhan River outlet, New York.

     SEC. 540. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.

       The Secretary shall complete the study of a project for 
     navigation, Rochester Harbor, Rochester, New York, and, if 
     the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the 
     Secretary shall carry out the project.

     SEC. 541. UPPER MOHAWK RIVER BASIN, NEW YORK.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
     Secretary of Agriculture and the State of New York, shall 
     conduct a study, develop a strategy, and implement a project 
     to reduce flood damages, improve water quality, and create 
     wildlife habitat through wetlands restoration, soil and water 
     conservation practices, nonstructural measures, and other 
     appropriate means in the Upper Mohawk River Basin, at an 
     estimated Federal cost of $10,000,000.
       (b) Implementation of Strategy.--The Secretary shall 
     implement the strategy under this section in cooperation with 
     local landowners and local government. Projects to implement 
     the strategy shall be designed to take advantage of ongoing 
     or planned actions by other agencies, local municipalities, 
     or nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations with expertise in 
     wetlands restoration that would increase the effectiveness or 
     decrease the overall cost of implementing recommended 
     projects and may include the acquisition of wetlands, from 
     willing sellers, that contribute to the Upper Mohawk River 
     basin ecosystem.
       (c) Cooperation Agreements.--In carrying out activities 
     under this section, the Secretary shall enter into 
     cooperation agreements to provide financial assistance to 
     appropriate Federal, State, and local government agencies as 
     well as appropriate nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations 
     with expertise in wetlands restoration, with the consent of 
     the affected local government. Financial assistance provided 
     may include activities for the implementation of wetlands 
     restoration projects and soil and water conservation 
     measures.
       (d) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of activities carried out under this section shall be 25 
     percent and may be provided through in-kind services and 
     materials.
       (e) Upper Mohawk River Basin Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``Upper Mohawk River basin'' means the Mohawk River, its 
     tributaries, and associated lands upstream of the confluence 
     of the Mohawk River and Canajoharie Creek, and including 
     Canajoharie Creek, New York.

     SEC. 542. EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA FLOOD PROTECTION.

       (a) In General.--In order to assist the State of North 
     Carolina and local governments in mitigating damages 
     resulting from a major disaster, the Secretary shall carry 
     out flood damage reduction projects in eastern North Carolina 
     by protecting, clearing, and restoring channel dimensions 
     (including removing accumulated snags and other debris) in 
     the following rivers and tributaries:

[[Page H10054]]

       (1) New River and tributaries.
       (2) White Oak River and tributaries.
       (3) Neuse River and tributaries.
       (4) Pamlico River and tributaries.
       (b) Cost Share.--The non-Federal interest for a project 
     under this section shall--
       (1) pay 35 percent of the cost of the project; and
       (2) provide any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, and material disposal areas necessary for 
     implementation of the project.
       (c) Conditions.--The Secretary may not reject a project 
     based solely on a minimum amount of stream runoff.
       (d) Major Disaster Defined.--In this section, the term 
     ``major disaster'' means a major disaster declared under 
     title IV of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
     Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170 et seq.) and 
     includes any major disaster declared before the date of 
     enactment of this Act.
       (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for 
     fiscal years 2001 through 2003.

     SEC. 543. CUYAHOGA RIVER, OHIO.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
     assistance to non-Federal interests for an evaluation of the 
     structural integrity of the bulkhead system located along the 
     Cuyahoga River in the vicinity of Cleveland, Ohio, at a total 
     cost of $500,000.
       (b) Evaluation.--The evaluation described in subsection (a) 
     shall include design analysis, plans and specifications, and 
     cost estimates for repair or replacement of the bulkhead 
     system.

     SEC. 544. CROWDER POINT, CROWDER, OKLAHOMA.

       At the request of the city of Crowder, Oklahoma, the 
     Secretary shall enter into a long-term lease, not to exceed 
     99 years, with the city under which the city may develop, 
     operate, and maintain as a public park all or a portion of 
     approximately 260 acres of land known as Crowder Point on 
     Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma. The lease shall include such terms 
     and conditions as the Secretary determines are necessary to 
     protect the interest of the United States and project 
     purposes and shall be made without consideration to the 
     United States.

     SEC. 545. OKLAHOMA-TRIBAL COMMISSION.

       (a) Findings.--The House of Representatives makes the 
     following findings:
       (1) The unemployment rate in southeastern Oklahoma is 23 
     percent greater than the national average.
       (2) The per capita income in southeastern Oklahoma is 62 
     percent of the national average.
       (3) Reflecting the inadequate job opportunities and 
     dwindling resources in poor rural communities, southeastern 
     Oklahoma is experiencing an out-migration of people.
       (4) Water represents a vitally important resource in 
     southeastern Oklahoma. Its abundance offers an opportunity 
     for the residents to benefit from their natural resources.
       (5) Trends as described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) are 
     not conducive to local economic development, and efforts to 
     improve the management of water in the region would have a 
     positive outside influence on the local economy, help reverse 
     these trends, and improve the lives of local residents.
       (b) Sense of House of Representatives.--In view of the 
     findings described in subsection (a), and in order to assist 
     communities in southeastern Oklahoma in benefiting from their 
     local resources, it is the sense of the House of 
     Representatives that--
       (1) the State of Oklahoma and the Choctaw Nation of 
     Oklahoma and the Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma, should establish 
     a State-tribal commission composed equally of representatives 
     of such Nations and residents of the water basins within the 
     boundaries of such Nations for the purpose of administering 
     and distributing from the sale of water any benefits and net 
     revenues to the tribes and local entities within the 
     respective basins;
       (2) any sale of water to entities outside the basins should 
     be consistent with the procedures and requirements 
     established by the commission; and
       (3) if requested, the Secretary should provide technical 
     assistance, as appropriate, to facilitate the efforts of the 
     commission.

     SEC. 546. COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

       (a) Modeling and Forecasting System.--The Secretary shall 
     develop and implement a modeling and forecasting system for 
     the Columbia River estuary, Oregon and Washington, to provide 
     real-time information on existing and future wave, current, 
     tide, and wind conditions.
       (b) Use of Contracts and Grants.--In carrying out this 
     section, the Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, 
     cooperative agreements, and grants with colleges and 
     universities and other non-Federal entities.

     SEC. 547. JOHN DAY POOL, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

       (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use 
     Restrictions.--With respect to the lands described in each 
     deed listed in subsection (b)--
       (1) the reversionary interests and the use restrictions 
     relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished;
       (2) the human habitation or other building structure use 
     restriction is extinguished in each area where the elevation 
     is above the standard project flood elevation; and
       (3) the use of fill material to raise areas above the 
     standard project flood elevation, without increasing the risk 
     of flooding in or outside of the floodplain, is authorized, 
     except in any area constituting wetland for which a permit 
     under section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
     (33 U.S.C. 1344) would be required.
       (b) Affected Deeds.--The following deeds are referred to in 
     subsection (a):
       (1) The deeds executed by the United States and bearing 
     Morrow County, Oregon, Auditor's Microfilm Numbers 229 and 
     16226.
       (2) The deed executed by the United States and bearing 
     Benton County, Washington, Auditor's File Number 601766, but 
     only as that deed applies to the following portion of lands 
     conveyed by that deed:
       A tract of land lying in Section 7, Township 5 north, Range 
     28 east of the Willamette meridian, Benton County, 
     Washington, said tract being more particularly described as 
     follows:
       Commencing at the point of intersection of the centerlines 
     of Plymouth Street and Third Avenue in the First Addition to 
     the Town of Plymouth (according to the duly recorded Plat 
     thereof);
       thence westerly along the said centerline of Third Avenue, 
     a distance of 565 feet;
       thence south 54 deg. 10' west, to a point on the west line 
     of Tract 18 of said Addition and the true point of beginning;
       thence north, parallel with the west line of said Section 
     7, to a point on the north line of said Section 7;
       thence west along the north line thereof to the northwest 
     corner of said Section 7;
       thence south along the west line of said Section 7 to a 
     point on the ordinary high water line of the Columbia River;
       thence northeasterly along said high water line to a point 
     on the north and south coordinate line of the Oregon 
     Coordinate System, North Zone, said coordinate line being 
     east 2,291,000 feet;
       thence north along said line to a point on the south line 
     of First Avenue of said Addition;
       thence westerly along First Avenue to a point on southerly 
     extension of the west line of Tract 18;
       thence northerly along said west line of Tract 18 to the 
     point of beginning.
       (3) The deed recorded October 17, 1967, in book 291, page 
     148, Deed of Records of Umatilla County, Oregon, executed by 
     the United States.
       (c) No Effect on Other Needs.--Nothing in this section 
     affects the remaining rights and interests of the Corps of 
     Engineers for authorized project purposes.

     SEC. 548. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER AND TILLAMOOK BAY ESTUARY 
                   PROGRAM, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct studies and 
     ecosystem restoration projects for the lower Columbia River 
     and Tillamook Bay estuaries, Oregon and Washington.
       (b) Use of Management Plans.--
       (1) Lower columbia river estuary.--
       (A) In general.--In carrying out ecosystem restoration 
     projects under this section, the Secretary shall use as a 
     guide the Lower Columbia River estuary program's 
     comprehensive conservation and management plan developed 
     under section 320 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
     (33 U.S.C. 1330).
       (B) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out ecosystem 
     restoration projects under this section for the lower 
     Columbia River estuary in consultation with the States of 
     Oregon and Washington, the Environmental Protection Agency, 
     the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National 
     Marine Fisheries Service, and the Forest Service.
       (2) Tillamook bay estuary.--
       (A) In general.--In carrying out ecosystem restoration 
     projects under this section, the Secretary shall use as a 
     guide the Tillamook Bay national estuary project's 
     comprehensive conservation and management plan developed 
     under section 320 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
     (33 U.S.C. 1330).
       (B) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out ecosystem 
     restoration projects under this section for the Tillamook Bay 
     estuary in consultation with the State of Oregon, the 
     Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Fish and 
     Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and 
     the Forest Service.
       (c) Authorized Activities.--
       (1) In general.--In carrying out ecosystem restoration 
     projects under this section, the Secretary shall undertake 
     activities necessary to protect, monitor, and restore fish 
     and wildlife habitat.
       (2) Limitations.--The Secretary may not carry out any 
     activity under this section that adversely affects--
       (A) the water-related needs of the lower Columbia River 
     estuary or the Tillamook Bay estuary, including navigation, 
     recreation, and water supply needs; or
       (B) private property rights.
       (d) Priority.--In determining the priority of projects to 
     be carried out under this section, the Secretary shall 
     consult with the Implementation Committee of the Lower 
     Columbia River Estuary Program and the Performance 
     Partnership Council of the Tillamook Bay National Estuary 
     Project, and shall consider the recommendations of such 
     entities.
       (e) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
       (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section shall be 
     subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 105 of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).

[[Page H10055]]

       (2) Ecosystem restoration projects.--
       (A) In general.--Non-Federal interests shall pay 35 percent 
     of the cost of any ecosystem restoration project carried out 
     under this section.
       (B) Items provided by non-federal interests.--Non-Federal 
     interests shall provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, 
     dredged material disposal areas, and relocations necessary 
     for ecosystem restoration projects to be carried out under 
     this section. The value of such land, easements, rights-of-
     way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations shall 
     be credited toward the payment required under this paragraph.
       (C) In-kind contributions.--Not more than 50 percent of the 
     non-Federal share required under this subsection may be 
     satisfied by the provision of in-kind services.
       (3) Operation and maintenance.--Non-Federal interests shall 
     be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
     maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all 
     projects carried out under this section.
       (4) Federal lands.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     this subsection, the Federal share of the cost of a project 
     carried out under this section on Federal lands shall be 100 
     percent, including costs of operation and maintenance.
       (f) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (1) Lower columbia river estuary.--The term ``lower 
     Columbia River estuary'' means those river reaches having 
     navigation channels on the mainstem of the Columbia River in 
     Oregon and Washington west of Bonneville Dam, and the 
     tributaries of such reaches to the extent such tributaries 
     are tidally influenced.
       (2) Tillamook bay estuary.--The term ``Tillamook Bay 
     estuary'' means those waters of Tillamook Bay in Oregon and 
     its tributaries that are tidally influenced.
       (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 549. SKINNER BUTTE PARK, EUGENE, OREGON.

       Section 546(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1999 (113 Stat. 351) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following: ``If the Secretary participates in the project, 
     the Secretary shall carry out a monitoring program for 3 
     years after construction to evaluate the ecological and 
     engineering effectiveness of the project and its 
     applicability to other sites in the Willamette Valley.''

     SEC. 550. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

       Section 547 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 351-352) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(d) Research.--In coordination with academic and research 
     institutions for support, the Secretary may conduct a study 
     to carry out this section.''.

     SEC. 551. LACKAWANNA RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) In General.--Section 539(a) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3776) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1)(A);
       (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (1)(B) 
     and inserting ``; and''; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(C) the Lackawanna River, Pennsylvania.''.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 539(d) of 
     such Act (110 Stat. 3776-3777) is amended--
       (1) by striking ``(a)(1)(A) and'' and inserting 
     ``(a)(1)(A),''; and
       (2) by inserting ``, and $5,000,000 for projects undertaken 
     under subsection (a)(1)(C)'' before the period at the end.

     SEC. 552. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance to 
     the Delaware River Port Authority to deepen the Delaware 
     River at Pier 122 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this section.

     SEC. 553. ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS, RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

       The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may transfer any 
     unobligated funds made available to the Commonwealth for item 
     number 1278 of the table contained in section 1602 of Public 
     Law 105-178, to the Secretary for access improvements at the 
     Raystown Lake project, Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 554. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW 
                   YORK.

       Section 567 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
     (110 Stat. 3787-3788) is amended--
       (1) by striking subsection (a)(2) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(2) The Susquehanna River watershed upstream of the 
     Chemung River, New York, at an estimated Federal cost of 
     $10,000,000.''; and
       (2) by striking subsections (c) and (d) and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(c) Cooperation Agreements.--In conducting the study and 
     developing the strategy under this section, the Secretary 
     shall enter into cooperation agreements to provide financial 
     assistance to appropriate Federal, State, and local 
     government agencies as well as appropriate nonprofit, 
     nongovernmental organizations with expertise in wetlands 
     restoration, with the consent of the affected local 
     government. Financial assistance provided may include 
     activities for the implementation of wetlands restoration 
     projects and soil and water conservation measures.
       ``(d) Implementation of Strategy.--The Secretary shall 
     undertake development and implementation of the strategy 
     under this section in cooperation with local landowners and 
     local government officials. Projects to implement the 
     strategy shall be designed to take advantage of ongoing or 
     planned actions by other agencies, local municipalities, or 
     nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations with expertise in 
     wetlands restoration that would increase the effectiveness or 
     decrease the overall cost of implementing recommended 
     projects and may include the acquisition of wetlands, from 
     willing sellers, that contribute to the Upper Susquehanna 
     River basin ecosystem.''.

     SEC. 555. CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

       (a) Transfer From TVA.--The Tennessee Valley Authority 
     shall transfer $200,000 to the Secretary for the preparation 
     of a report of the Chief of Engineers for a replacement lock 
     at Chickamauga Lock and Dam, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
       (b) Report.--The Secretary shall accept and use the funds 
     transferred under subsection (a) to prepare the report 
     referred to in subsection (a).

     SEC. 556. JOE POOL LAKE, TEXAS.

       If the city of Grand Prairie, Texas, enters into a binding 
     agreement with the Secretary under which--
       (1) the city agrees to assume all of the responsibilities 
     (other than financial responsibilities) of the Trinity River 
     Authority of Texas under Corps of Engineers contract #DACW63-
     76-C-0166, including operation and maintenance of the 
     recreation facilities included in the contract; and
       (2) to pay the Federal Government a total of $4,290,000 in 
     2 installments, 1 in the amount of $2,150,000, which shall be 
     due and payable no later than December 1, 2000, and 1 in the 
     amount of $2,140,000, which shall be due and payable no later 
     than December 1, 2003,
     the Trinity River Authority shall be relieved of all of its 
     financial responsibilities under the contract as of the date 
     the Secretary enters into the agreement with the city.

     SEC. 557. BENSON BEACH, FORT CANBY STATE PARK, WASHINGTON.

       The Secretary shall place dredged material at Benson Beach, 
     Fort Canby State Park, Washington, in accordance with section 
     204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 
     2326).

     SEC. 558. PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, 
                   WASHINGTON.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in critical 
     restoration projects in the area of the Puget Sound and its 
     adjacent waters, including the watersheds that drain directly 
     into Puget Sound, Admiralty Inlet, Hood Canal, Rosario 
     Strait, and the eastern portion of the Strait of Juan de 
     Fuca.
       (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
     appropriate Federal, tribal, State, and local agencies, 
     (including the Salmon Recovery Funding Board, Northwest 
     Straits Commission, Hood Canal Coordinating Council, county 
     watershed planning councils, and salmon enhancement groups) 
     may identify critical restoration projects and may implement 
     those projects after entering into an agreement with an 
     appropriate non-Federal interest in accordance with the 
     requirements of section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) and this section.
       (c) Project Cost Limitation.--Of amounts appropriated to 
     carry out this section, not more than $2,500,000 may be 
     allocated to carry out any project.
       (d) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) In general.--The non-Federal interest for a critical 
     restoration project under this section shall--
       (A) pay 35 percent of the cost of the project;
       (B) provide any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
     relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary 
     for implementation of the project;
       (C) pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, repair, 
     replacement, and rehabilitation costs associated with the 
     project; and
       (D) hold the United States harmless from liability due to 
     implementation of the project, except for the negligence of 
     the Federal Government or its contractors.
       (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide credit to the non-
     Federal interest for a critical restoration project under 
     this section for the value of any lands, easements, rights-
     of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas 
     provided by the non-Federal interest for the project.
       (3) Meeting non-federal cost share.--The non-Federal 
     interest may provide up to 50 percent of the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of a project under this section through the 
     provision of services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind 
     services.
       (e) Critical Restoration Project Defined.--In this section, 
     the term ``critical restoration project'' means a water 
     resource project that will produce, consistent with existing 
     Federal programs, projects, and activities, immediate and 
     substantial environmental protection and restoration 
     benefits.
       (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

     SEC. 559. SHOALWATER BAY INDIAN TRIBE, WILLAPA BAY, 
                   WASHINGTON.

       (a) Placement of Dredged Material on Shore.--For the 
     purpose of addressing coastal erosion, the Secretary shall 
     place, on an emergency one-time basis, dredged material from 
     a Federal navigation project on the

[[Page H10056]]

     shore of the tribal reservation of the Shoalwater Bay Indian 
     Tribe, Willapa Bay, Washington, at Federal expense.
       (b) Placement of Dredged Material on Protective Dunes.--The 
     Secretary shall place dredged material from Willapa Bay on 
     the remaining protective dunes on the tribal reservation of 
     the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe, at Federal expense.
       (c) Study of Coastal Erosion.--The Secretary shall conduct 
     a study to develop long-term solutions to coastal erosion 
     problems at the tribal reservation of the Shoalwater Bay 
     Indian Tribe at Federal expense.

     SEC. 560. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WYNOOCHEE RIVER, WASHINGTON.

       (a) In General.--The city of Aberdeen, Washington, may 
     transfer its rights, interests, and title in the land 
     transferred to the city under section 203 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4632) to the 
     city of Tacoma, Washington.
       (b) Conditions.--The transfer under this section shall be 
     subject to the conditions set forth in section 203(b) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4632); 
     except that the condition set forth in paragraph (1) of such 
     section shall apply to the city of Tacoma only for so long as 
     the city of Tacoma has a valid license with the Federal 
     Energy Regulatory Commission relating to operation of the 
     Wynoochee Dam, Washington.
       (c) Limitation.--The transfer under subsection (a) may be 
     made only after the Secretary determines that the city of 
     Tacoma will be able to operate, maintain, repair, replace, 
     and rehabilitate the project for Wynoochee Lake, Wynoochee 
     River, Washington, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1193), in accordance with such 
     regulations as the Secretary may issue to ensure that such 
     operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and 
     rehabilitation is consistent with project purposes.
       (d) Water Supply Contract.--The water supply contract 
     designated as DACWD 67-68-C-0024 shall be null and void if 
     the Secretary exercises the reversionary right set forth in 
     section 203(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1990 (104 Stat. 4632).

     SEC. 561. SNOHOMISH RIVER, WASHINGTON.

       In coordination with appropriate Federal, tribal, and State 
     agencies, the Secretary may carry out a project to address 
     data needs regarding the outmigration of juvenile chinook 
     salmon in the Snohomish River, Washington.

     SEC. 562. BLUESTONE, WEST VIRGINIA.

       (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, the Tri-Cities Power Authority of West Virginia is 
     authorized to design and construct hydroelectric generating 
     facilities at the Bluestone Lake facility, West Virginia, 
     under the terms and conditions of the agreement referred to 
     in subsection (b).
       (b) Agreement.--
       (1) Agreement terms.--Conditioned upon the parties agreeing 
     to mutually acceptable terms and conditions, the Secretary 
     and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Southeastern 
     Power Administration, may enter into a binding agreement with 
     the Tri-Cities Power Authority under which the Tri-Cities 
     Power Authority agrees to each of the following:
       (A) To design and construct the generating facilities 
     referred to in subsection (a) within 4 years after the date 
     of such agreement.
       (B) To reimburse the Secretary for--
       (i) the cost of approving such design and inspecting such 
     construction;
       (ii) the cost of providing any assistance authorized under 
     subsection (c)(2); and
       (iii) the redistributed costs associated with the original 
     construction of the dam and dam safety if all parties agree 
     with the method of the development of the chargeable amounts 
     associated with hydropower at the facility.
       (C) To release and indemnify the United States from any 
     claims, causes of action, or liabilities which may arise from 
     such design and construction of the facilities referred to in 
     subsection (a), including any liability that may arise out of 
     the removal of the facility if directed by the Secretary.
       (2) Additional terms.--The agreement shall also specify 
     each of the following:
       (A) The procedures and requirements for approval and 
     acceptance of design, construction, and operation and 
     maintenance of the facilities referred in subsection (a).
       (B) The rights, responsibilities, and liabilities of each 
     party to the agreement.
       (C) The amount of the payments under subsection (f) of this 
     section and the procedures under which such payments are to 
     be made.
       (c) Other Requirements.--
       (1) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be expended for the 
     design, construction, and operation and maintenance of the 
     facilities referred to in subsection (a) prior to the date on 
     which such facilities are accepted by the Secretary under 
     subsection (d).
       (2) Reimbursement.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     law, if requested by the Tri-Cities Power Authority, the 
     Secretary may provide, on a reimbursable basis, assistance in 
     connection with the design and construction of the generating 
     facilities referred to in subsection (a).
       (d) Completion of Construction.--
       (1) Transfer of facilities.--Notwithstanding any other 
     provision of law, upon completion of the construction of the 
     facilities referred to in subsection (a) and final approval 
     of such facility by the Secretary, the Tri-Cities Power 
     Authority shall transfer without consideration title to such 
     facilities to the United States, and the Secretary shall--
       (A) accept the transfer of title to such facilities on 
     behalf of the United States; and
       (B) operate and maintain the facilities referred to in 
     subsection (a).
       (2) Certification.--The Secretary is authorized to accept 
     title to the facilities pursuant to paragraph (1) only after 
     certifying that the quality of the construction meets all 
     standards established for similar facilities constructed by 
     the Secretary.
       (3) Authorized project purposes.--The operation and 
     maintenance of the facilities shall be conducted in a manner 
     that is consistent with other authorized project purposes of 
     the Bluestone Lake facility.
       (e) Excess Power.--Pursuant to any agreement under 
     subsection (b), the Southeastern Power Administration shall 
     market the excess power produced by the facilities referred 
     to in subsection (a) in accordance with section 5 of the 
     Rivers and Harbors Act of December 22, 1944 (16 U.S.C. 825s; 
     58 Stat. 890).
       (f) Payments.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
     the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Southeastern 
     Power Administration, is authorized to pay in accordance with 
     the terms of the agreement entered into under subsection (b) 
     out of the revenues from the sale of power produced by the 
     generating facility of the interconnected systems of 
     reservoirs operated by the Secretary and marketed by the 
     Southeastern Power Administration--
       (1) to the Tri-Cities Power Authority all reasonable costs 
     incurred by the Tri-Cities Power Authority in the design and 
     construction of the facilities referred to in subsection (a), 
     including the capital investment in such facilities and a 
     reasonable rate of return on such capital investment; and
       (2) to the Secretary, in accordance with the terms of the 
     agreement entered into under subsection (b) out of the 
     revenues from the sale of power produced by the generating 
     facility of the interconnected systems of reservoirs operated 
     by the Secretary and marketed by the Southeastern Power 
     Administration, all reasonable costs incurred by the 
     Secretary in the operation and maintenance of facilities 
     referred to in subsection (a).
       (g) Authority of Secretary of Energy.--Notwithstanding any 
     other provision of law, the Secretary of Energy, acting 
     through the Southeastern Power Administration, is 
     authorized--
       (1) to construct such transmission facilities as necessary 
     to market the power produced at the facilities referred to in 
     subsection (a) with funds contributed by the Tri-Cities Power 
     Authority; and
       (2) to repay those funds, including interest and any 
     administrative expenses, directly from the revenues from the 
     sale of power produced by such facilities of the 
     interconnected systems of reservoirs operated by the 
     Secretary and marketed by the Southeastern Power 
     Administration.
       (h) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section affects any 
     requirement under Federal or State environmental law relating 
     to the licensing or operation of such facilities.

     SEC. 563. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 30 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 
     (102 Stat. 4030) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following:
       ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
     stabilization and preservation of the structure known as the 
     Jenkins House located within the Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp in 
     accordance with standards for sites listed on the National 
     Register of Historic Places.''.

     SEC. 564. TUG FORK RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide planning, 
     design, and construction assistance to non-Federal interests 
     for projects located along the Tug Fork River in West 
     Virginia and identified by the master plan developed pursuant 
     to section 114(t) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4820).
       (b) Priorities.--In providing assistance under this 
     section, the Secretary shall give priority to the primary 
     development demonstration sites in West Virginia identified 
     by the master plan referred to in subsection (a).
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.

     SEC. 565. VIRGINIA POINT RIVERFRONT PARK, WEST VIRGINIA.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide planning, 
     design, and construction assistance to non-Federal interests 
     for the project at Virginia Point, located at the confluence 
     of the Ohio and Big Sandy Rivers in West Virginia, identified 
     by the preferred plan set forth in the feasibility study 
     dated September 1999, and carried out under the West 
     Virginia-Ohio River Comprehensive Study authorized by a 
     resolution dated September 8, 1988, by the Committee on 
     Public Works and Transportation of the House of 
     Representatives.
       (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $3,100,000.

     SEC. 566. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

       Section 340(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended by inserting ``environmental 
     restoration,'' after ``distribution facilities,''.

     SEC. 567. FOX RIVER SYSTEM, WISCONSIN.

       Section 332(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1992 (106 Stat. 4852) is amended by adding at the end the 
     following: ``Such terms and conditions may include a

[[Page H10057]]

     payment or payments to the State of Wisconsin to be used 
     toward the repair and rehabilitation of the locks and 
     appurtenant features to be transferred.''.

     SEC. 568. SURFSIDE/SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA.

       The Secretary shall treat the Surfside/Sunset Newport Beach 
     element of the project for beach erosion, Orange County, 
     California, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
     Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1177), as continuing construction.

     SEC. 569. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

       (a) Illinois River Basin Defined.--In this section, the 
     term ``Illinois River basin'' means the Illinois River, 
     Illinois, its backwaters, side channels, and all tributaries, 
     including their watersheds, draining into the Illinois River.
       (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
       (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
     expeditiously as practicable, a proposed comprehensive plan 
     for the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the 
     Illinois River basin.
       (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
     comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of new 
     technologies and innovative approaches--
       (A) to enhance the Illinois River as a vital transportation 
     corridor;
       (B) to improve water quality within the entire Illinois 
     River basin;
       (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for plants 
     and wildlife; and
       (D) to increase economic opportunity for agriculture and 
     business communities.
       (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall 
     include such features as are necessary to provide for--
       (A) the development and implementation of a program for 
     sediment removal technology, sediment characterization, 
     sediment transport, and beneficial uses of sediment;
       (B) the development and implementation of a program for the 
     planning, conservation, evaluation, and construction of 
     measures for fish and wildlife habitat conservation and 
     rehabilitation, and stabilization and enhancement of land and 
     water resources in the basin;
       (C) the development and implementation of a long-term 
     resource monitoring program; and
       (D) the development and implementation of a computerized 
     inventory and analysis system.
       (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be 
     developed by the Secretary in consultation with appropriate 
     Federal agencies, the State of Illinois, and the Illinois 
     River Coordinating Council.
       (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
     date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit 
     to Congress a report containing the comprehensive plan.
       (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After transmission of 
     a report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall continue to 
     conduct such studies and analyses related to the 
     comprehensive plan as are necessary, consistent with this 
     subsection.
       (c) Critical Restoration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--If the Secretary, in cooperation with 
     appropriate Federal agencies and the State of Illinois, 
     determines that a restoration project for the Illinois River 
     basin will produce independent, immediate, and substantial 
     restoration, preservation, and protection benefits, the 
     Secretary shall proceed expeditiously with the implementation 
     of the project.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out projects under this 
     subsection $100,000,000 for fiscal years 2001 through 2004.
       (3) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out any project under this subsection shall not 
     exceed $5,000,000.
       (d) General Provisions.--
       (1) Water quality.--In carrying out projects and activities 
     under this section, the Secretary shall take into account the 
     protection of water quality by considering applicable State 
     water quality standards.
       (2) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive 
     plan under subsection (b) and carrying out projects under 
     subsection (c), the Secretary shall implement procedures to 
     facilitate public participation, including providing advance 
     notice of meetings, providing adequate opportunity for public 
     input and comment, maintaining appropriate records, and 
     making a record of the proceedings of meetings available for 
     public inspection.
       (e) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate and 
     coordinate projects and activities carried out under this 
     section with ongoing Federal and State programs, projects, 
     and activities, including the following:
       (1) Upper Mississippi River System-Environmental Management 
     Program authorized under section 1103 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652).
       (2) Upper Mississippi River Illinois Waterway System Study.
       (3) Kankakee River Basin General Investigation.
       (4) Peoria Riverfront Development General Investigation.
       (5) Illinois River Ecosystem Restoration General 
     Investigation.
       (6) Conservation Reserve Program and other farm programs of 
     the Department of Agriculture.
       (7) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State) and 
     Conservation 2000, Ecosystem Program of the Illinois 
     Department of Natural Resources.
       (8) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and 
     the Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the 
     Illinois Department of Agriculture.
       (9) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
     Conservation Service.
       (10) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the 
     Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
       (f) Justification.--
       (1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision 
     of law, in carrying out activities to restore, preserve, and 
     protect the Illinois River basin under this section, the 
     Secretary may determine that the activities--
       (A) are justified by the environmental benefits derived by 
     the Illinois River basin; and
       (B) shall not need further economic justification if the 
     Secretary determines that the activities are cost-effective.
       (2) Applicability.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any 
     separable element intended to produce benefits that are 
     predominantly unrelated to the restoration, preservation, and 
     protection of the Illinois River basin.
       (g) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
     projects and activities carried out under this section shall 
     be 35 percent.
       (2) Operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and 
     replacement.--The operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and 
     replacement of projects carried out under this section shall 
     be a non-Federal responsibility.
       (3) In-kind services.--The value of in-kind services 
     provided by the non-Federal interest for a project or 
     activity carried out under this section may be credited 
     toward not more than 80 percent of the non-Federal share of 
     the cost of the project or activity. In-kind services shall 
     include all State funds expended on programs and projects 
     which accomplish the goals of this section, as determined by 
     the Secretary. Such programs and projects may include the 
     Illinois River Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois 
     Conservation 2000 Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and 
     other appropriate programs carried out in the Illinois River 
     basin.
       (4) Credit.--
       (A) Value of lands.--If the Secretary determines that lands 
     or interests in land acquired by a non-Federal interest, 
     regardless of the date of acquisition, are integral to a 
     project or activity carried out under this section, the 
     Secretary may credit the value of the lands or interests in 
     land toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
     or activity. Such value shall be determined by the Secretary.
       (B) Work.--If the Secretary determines that any work 
     completed by a non-Federal interest, regardless of the date 
     of completion, is integral to a project or activity carried 
     out under this section, the Secretary may credit the value of 
     the work toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
     project or activity. Such value shall be determined by the 
     Secretary.

     SEC. 570. GREAT LAKES.

       (a) Great Lakes Tributary Model.--Section 516 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326b) is 
     amended--
       (1) by adding at the end of subsection (e) the following:
       ``(3) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2003, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
     Secretary's activities under this subsection.''; and
       (2) in subsection (g)--
       (A) by striking ``There is authorized'' and inserting the 
     following:
       ``(1) In general.--There is authorized'';
       (B) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(2) Great lakes tributary model.--In addition to amounts 
     made available under paragraph (1), there is authorized to be 
     appropriated to carry out subsection (e) $5,000,000 for each 
     of fiscal years 2002 through 2006.''; and
       (C) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) 
     (as designated by subparagraph (A) of this paragraph) with 
     paragraph (2) (as added by subparagraph (B) of this 
     paragraph).
       (b) Alternative Engineering Technologies.--
       (1) Development of plan.--The Secretary shall develop and 
     transmit to Congress a plan to enhance the application of 
     ecological principles and practices to traditional 
     engineering problems at Great Lakes shores.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $200,000. 
     Activities under this subsection shall be carried out at 
     Federal expense.
       (c) Fisheries and Ecosystem Restoration.--
       (1) Development of plan.--The Secretary shall develop and 
     transmit to Congress a plan for implementing Corps of 
     Engineers activities, including ecosystem restoration, to 
     enhance the management of Great Lakes fisheries.
       (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $300,000. 
     Activities under this subsection shall be carried out at 
     Federal expense.

     SEC. 571. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT 
                   REMEDIATION.

       Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
     (33 U.S.C. 1268 note; 110 Stat. 3763; 113 Stat. 338) is 
     amended--
       (1) in subsection (a)(2)(A) by striking ``50 percent'' and 
     inserting ``35 percent'';
       (2) in subsection (b)--

[[Page H10058]]

       (A) by striking paragraph (3);
       (B) in the first sentence of paragraph (4) by striking ``50 
     percent'' and inserting ``35 percent''; and
       (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3); and
       (3) in subsection (c) by striking ``$5,000,000 for each of 
     fiscal years 1998 through 2000.'' and inserting ``$10,000,000 
     for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005.''.

     SEC. 572. GREAT LAKES DREDGING LEVELS ADJUSTMENT.

       (a) Definition of Great Lake.--In this section, the term 
     ``Great Lake'' means Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron 
     (including Lake St. Clair), Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario 
     (including the St. Lawrence River to the 45th parallel of 
     latitude).
       (b) Dredging Levels.--In operating and maintaining Federal 
     channels and harbors of, and the connecting channels between, 
     the Great Lakes, the Secretary shall conduct such dredging as 
     is necessary to ensure minimal operation depths consistent 
     with the original authorized depths of the channels and 
     harbors when water levels in the Great Lakes are, or are 
     forecast to be, below the International Great Lakes Datum of 
     1985.

     SEC. 573. DREDGED MATERIAL RECYCLING.

       (a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary shall conduct a pilot 
     program to provide incentives for the removal of dredged 
     material from a confined disposal facility associated with a 
     harbor on the Great Lakes or the Saint Lawrence River and a 
     harbor on the Delaware River in Pennsylvania for the purpose 
     of recycling the dredged material and extending the life of 
     the confined disposal facility.
       (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
     completion of the pilot program, the Secretary shall transmit 
     to Congress a report on the results of the program.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.

     SEC. 574. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

       Section 503(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3756-3757; 113 Stat. 288) is amended by 
     adding at the end the following:
       ``(28) Tomales Bay watershed, California.
       ``(29) Kaskaskia River watershed, Illinois.
       ``(30) Sangamon River watershed, Illinois.
       ``(31) Lackawanna River watershed, Pennsylvania.
       ``(32) Upper Charles River watershed, Massachusetts.
       ``(33) Brazos River watershed, Texas.''.

     SEC. 575. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

       Section 509(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
     1996 (110 Stat. 3759; 113 Stat. 339) is amended by adding at 
     the end the following:
       ``(16) Cameron Loop, Louisiana, as part of the Calcasieu 
     River and Pass Ship Channel.
       ``(17) Morehead City Harbor, North Carolina.''.

     SEC. 576. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

       The requirements of section 2361 of title 10, United States 
     Code, shall not apply to any contract, cooperative research 
     and development agreement, cooperative agreement, or grant 
     entered into under section 229 of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3703) between the 
     Secretary and Marshall University or entered into under 
     section 350 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 310) between the Secretary and Juniata College.

     SEC. 577. NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVATION SERVICE.

       Notwithstanding section 611 of the Treasury and General 
     Government Appropriations Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 2861-515), the 
     Secretary may participate in the National Recreation 
     Reservation Service on an interagency basis and fund the 
     Department of the Army's share of the cost of activities 
     required for implementing, operating, and maintaining the 
     Service.

     SEC. 578. HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY.

       The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the 
     Administrator of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric 
     Administration to require the Secretary, not later than 60 
     days after the Corps of Engineers completes a project 
     involving dredging of a channel, to provide data to the 
     Administration in a standard digital format on the results of 
     a hydrographic survey of the channel conducted by the Corps 
     of Engineers.

     SEC. 579. PERCHLORATE.

       (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with 
     Federal, State, and local government agencies, may 
     participate in studies and other investigative activities and 
     in the planning and design of projects determined by the 
     Secretary to offer a long-term solution to the problem of 
     groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates.
       (b) Investigations and Projects.--
       (1) Bosque and leon rivers.--The Secretary, in coordination 
     with other Federal agencies and the Brazos River Authority, 
     shall participate under subsection (a) in investigations and 
     projects in the Bosque and Leon River watersheds in Texas to 
     assess the impact of the perchlorate associated with the 
     former Naval ``Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant'' at 
     McGregor, Texas.
       (2) Caddo lake.--The Secretary, in coordination with other 
     Federal agencies and the Northeast Texas Municipal Water 
     District, shall participate under subsection (a) in 
     investigations and projects relating to perchlorate 
     contamination in Caddo Lake, Texas.
       (3) Eastern santa clara basin.--The Secretary, in 
     coordination with other Federal, State, and local government 
     agencies, shall participate under subsection (a) in 
     investigations and projects related to sites that are sources 
     of perchlorates and that are located in the city of Santa 
     Clarita, California.
       (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--For the purposes of 
     carrying out this section, there is authorized to be 
     appropriated to the Secretary $25,000,000, of which not to 
     exceed $8,000,000 shall be available to carry out subsection 
     (b)(1), not to exceed $3,000,000 shall be available to carry 
     out subsection (b)(2), and not to exceed $7,000,000 shall be 
     available to carry out subsection (b)(3).

     SEC. 580. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION.

       Section 560 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (33 USC 2336; 113 Stat. 354-355) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``and design'' and 
     inserting ``design, and construction'';
       (2) in subsection (c) by striking ``50'' and inserting 
     ``35'';
       (3) in subsection (e) by inserting ``and colleges and 
     universities, including the members of the Western 
     Universities Mine-Land Reclamation and Restoration 
     Consortium, for the purposes of assisting in the reclamation 
     of abandoned noncoal mines and'' after ``entities''; and
       (4) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
       ``(f) Non-Federal Interests.--In this section, the term 
     `non-Federal interests' includes, with the consent of the 
     affected local government, nonprofit entities, 
     notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
     (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
       ``(g) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
     the costs of operation and maintenance for a project carried 
     out under this section shall be 100 percent.
       ``(h) Credit.--A non-Federal interest shall receive credit 
     toward the non-Federal share of the cost of a project under 
     this section for design and construction services and other 
     in-kind consideration provided by the non-Federal interest if 
     the Secretary determines that such design and construction 
     services and other in-kind consideration are integral to the 
     project.
       ``(i) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $10,000,000 of the 
     amounts appropriated to carry out this section may be 
     allotted for projects in a single locality, but the Secretary 
     may accept funds voluntarily contributed by a non-Federal or 
     Federal entity for the purpose of expanding the scope of the 
     services requested by the non-Federal or Federal entity.
       ``(j) No Effect on Liability.--The provision of assistance 
     under this section shall not relieve from liability any 
     person that would otherwise be liable under Federal or State 
     law for damages, response costs, natural resource damages, 
     restitution, equitable relief, or any other relief.
       ``(k) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
     to be appropriated to carry out this section $45,000,000. 
     Such sums shall remain available until expended.''.

     SEC. 581. LAKES PROGRAM.

       Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
     (100 Stat. 4148-4149) is further amended--
       (1) in subsection (b) by inserting ``and activity'' after 
     ``project'';
       (2) in subsection (c) by inserting ``and activities under 
     subsection (f)'' before the comma; and
       (3) by adding at the end the following:
       ``(f) Center for Lake Education and Research, Otsego Lake, 
     New York.--
       ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall construct an 
     environmental education and research facility at Otsego Lake, 
     New York. The purpose of the Center shall be to--
       ``(A) conduct nationwide research on the impacts of water 
     quality and water quantity on lake hydrology and the 
     hydrologic cycle;
       ``(B) develop technologies and strategies for monitoring 
     and improving water quality in the Nation's lakes; and
       ``(C) provide public education regarding the biological, 
     economic, recreational, and aesthetic value of the Nation's 
     lakes.
       ``(2) Use of research.--The results of research and 
     education activities carried out at the Center shall be 
     applied to the program under subsection (a) and to other 
     Federal programs, projects, and activities that are intended 
     to improve or otherwise affect lakes.
       ``(3) Biological monitoring station.--A central function of 
     the Center shall be to research, develop, test, and evaluate 
     biological monitoring technologies and techniques for 
     potential use at lakes listed in subsection (a) and 
     throughout the Nation.
       ``(4) Credit.--The non-Federal sponsor shall receive credit 
     for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward 
     its share of project costs.
       ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--In addition to sums 
     authorized by subsection (d), there is authorized to be 
     appropriated to carry out this subsection $6,000,000. Such 
     sums shall remain available until expended.''.

     SEC. 582. RELEASE OF USE RESTRICTION.

       (a) Release.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
     the Tennessee Valley Authority shall grant a release or 
     releases, without monetary consideration, from the 
     restriction covenant which requires that property described 
     in subsection (b) shall at all times be used solely for the 
     purpose of

[[Page H10059]]

     erecting docks and buildings for shipbuilding purposes or for 
     the manufacture or storage of products for the purpose of 
     trading or shipping in transportation.
       (b) Description of Property.--This section shall apply only 
     to those lands situated in the city of Decatur, Morgan 
     County, Alabama, and running along the easterly boundary of a 
     tract of land described in an indenture conveying such lands 
     to the Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation dated July 29, 1954, 
     and recorded in deed book 535 at page 6 in the office of the 
     Probate Judge of Morgan County, Alabama, which are owned or 
     may hereafter be acquired by the Alabama Farmers Cooperative, 
     Inc.

     SEC. 583. COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PROTECTION.

       (a) In General.--Under section 219(a) of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835), the 
     Secretary may provide technical, planning, and design 
     assistance to non-Federal interests to carry out water-
     related projects described in this section.
       (b) Non-Federal Share.--Notwithstanding section 219(b) of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835), 
     the non-Federal share of the cost of each project assisted in 
     accordance with this section shall be 25 percent.
       (c) Project Descriptions.--The Secretary may provide 
     assistance in accordance with subsection (a) to each of the 
     following projects:
       (1)  Marana, arizona.--Wastewater treatment and 
     distribution infrastructure, Marana, Arizona.
       (2) Eastern arkansas enterprise community, arkansas.--
     Water-related infrastructure, Eastern Arkansas Enterprise 
     Community, Cross, Lee, Monroe, and St. Francis Counties, 
     Arkansas.
       (3) Chino hills, california.--Storm water and sewage 
     collection infrastructure, Chino Hills, California.
       (4) Clear lake basin, california.--Water-related 
     infrastructure and resource protection, Clear Lake Basin, 
     California.
       (5) Desert hot springs, california.--Resource protection 
     and wastewater infrastructure, Desert Hot Springs, 
     California.
       (6) Eastern municipal water district, california.--Regional 
     water-related infrastructure, Eastern Municipal Water 
     District, California.
       (7) Huntington beach, california.--Water supply and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Huntington Beach, California.
       (8) Inglewood, california.--Water infrastructure, 
     Inglewood, California.
       (9) Los osos community service district, california.--
     Wastewater infrastructure, Los Osos Community Service 
     District, California.
       (10) Norwalk, california.--Water-related infrastructure, 
     Norwalk, California.
       (11) Key biscayne, florida.--Sanitary sewer infrastructure, 
     Key Biscayne, Florida.
       (12) South tampa, florida.--Water supply and aquifer 
     storage and recovery infrastructure, South Tampa, Florida.
       (13) Fort wayne, indiana.--Combined sewer overflow 
     infrastructure and wetlands protection, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
       (14) Indianapolis, indiana.--Combined sewer overflow 
     infrastructure, Indianapolis, Indiana.
       (15) St. charles, st. bernard, and plaquemines parishes, 
     louisiana.--Water and wastewater infrastructure, St. Charles, 
     St. Bernard, and Plaquemines Parishes, Louisiana.
       (16) St. john the baptist and st. james parishes, 
     louisiana.--Water and sewer improvements, St. John the 
     Baptist and St. James Parishes, Louisiana.
       (17) Union county, north carolina.--Water infrastructure, 
     Union County, North Carolina.
       (18) Hood river, oregon.--Water transmission 
     infrastructure, Hood River, Oregon.
       (19) Medford, oregon.--Sewer collection infrastructure, 
     Medford, Oregon.
       (20) Portland, oregon.--Water infrastructure and resource 
     protection, Portland, Oregon.
       (21) Coudersport, pennsylvania.--Sewer system extensions 
     and improvements, Coudersport, Pennsylvania.
       (22) Park city, utah.--Water supply infrastructure, Park 
     City, Utah.
       (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--
       (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
     $25,000,000 for providing assistance in accordance with 
     subsection (a) to the projects described in subsection (c).
       (2) Availability.--Sums authorized to be appropriated under 
     this subsection shall remain available until expended.
       (e) Additional Assistance for Critical Resource Projects.--
     The Secretary may provide assistance in accordance with 
     subsection (a) and assistance for construction for each the 
     following projects:
       (1) Duck river, cullman, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water 
     supply infrastructure, Duck River, Cullman, Alabama.
       (2) Union county, arkansas.--$52,000,000 for water supply 
     infrastructure, including facilities for withdrawal, 
     treatment, and distribution, Union County, Arkansas.
       (3) Cambria, california.--$10,300,000 for desalination 
     infrastructure, Cambria, California.
       (4) Los angeles harbor/terminal island, california.--
     $6,500,000 for wastewater recycling infrastructure, Los 
     Angeles Harbor/Terminal Island, California.
       (5) North valley region, lancaster, california.--
     $14,500,000 for water infrastructure, North Valley Region, 
     Lancaster, California.
       (6) San diego county, california.--$10,000,000 for water-
     related infrastructure, San Diego County, California.
       (7) South perris, california.--$25,000,000 for water supply 
     desalination infrastructure, South Perris, California.
       (8) Aurora, illinois.--$8,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure to reduce or eliminate combined sewer 
     overflows, Aurora, Illinois.
       (9) Cook county, illinois.--$35,000,000 for water-related 
     infrastructure and resource protection and development, Cook 
     County, Illinois.
       (10) Madison and st. clair counties, illinois.--$10,000,000 
     for water and wastewater assistance, Madison and St. Clair 
     Counties, Illinois.
       (11) Iberia parish, louisiana.--$5,000,000 for water and 
     wastewater infrastructure, Iberia Parish, Louisiana.
       (12) Kenner, louisiana.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
     infrastructure, Kenner, Louisiana.
       (13) Garrison and kathio township, minnesota.--$11,000,000 
     for a wastewater infrastructure project for the city of 
     Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
       (14) Newton, new jersey.--$7,000,000 for water filtration 
     infrastructure, Newton, New Jersey.
       (15) Liverpool, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
     infrastructure, including a pump station, Liverpool, New 
     York.
       (16) Stanly county, north carolina.--$8,900,000 for 
     wastewater infrastructure, Stanly County, North Carolina.
       (17) Yukon, oklahoma.--$5,500,000 for water-related 
     infrastructure, including wells, booster stations, storage 
     tanks, and transmission lines, Yukon, Oklahoma.
       (18) Allegheny county, pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for 
     water-related environmental infrastructure, Allegheny County, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (19) Mount joy township and conewago township, 
     pennsylvania.--$8,300,000 for water and wastewater 
     infrastructure, Mount Joy Township and Conewago Township, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (20) Phoenixville borough, chester county, pennsylvania.--
     $2,400,000 for water and sewer infrastructure, Phoenixville 
     Borough, Chester County, Pennsylvania.
       (21) Titusville, pennsylvania.--$7,300,000 for storm water 
     separation and treatment plant upgrades, Titusville, 
     Pennsylvania.
       (22)  Washington, greene, and fayette counties, 
     pennsylvania.--$8,000,000 for water and wastewater 
     infrastructure, Washington, Greene, and Fayette Counties, 
     Pennsylvania.

     SEC. 584. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 
                   PROJECTS.

       Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
     (106 Stat. 4835, 4836) is amended--
       (1) in subsection (e)(6) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$30,000,000'';
       (2) in subsection (f)(4) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$35,000,000'';
       (3) in subsection (f)(21) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$20,000,000'';
       (4) in subsection (f)(25) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$15,000,000'';
       (5) in subsection (f)(30) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$20,000,000'';
       (6) in subsection (f)(43) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and 
     inserting ``$35,000,000''; and
       (7) in subsection (f) by adding at the end the following 
     new paragraph:
       ``(44) Washington, d.c., and maryland.--$15,000,000 for the 
     project described in subsection (c)(1), modified to include 
     measures to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in 
     the Anacostia River watershed.''.

     SEC. 585. LAND CONVEYANCES.

       (a) Thompson, Connecticut.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
     deed without consideration to the town of Thompson, 
     Connecticut, all right, title, and interest of the United 
     States in and to the approximately 1.36-acre parcel of land 
     described in paragraph (2) for public ownership and use by 
     the town for fire fighting and related emergency services 
     purposes.
       (2) Land description.--The parcel of land referred to in 
     paragraph (1) is in the town of Thompson, county of Windham, 
     State of Connecticut, on the northerly side of West Thompson 
     Road owned by the United States and shown as Parcel A on a 
     plan by Provost, Rovero, Fitzback entitled ``Property Survey 
     Prepared for West Thompson Independent Firemen Association 
     #1'' dated August 24, 1998, bounded and described as follows:
       Beginning at a bound labeled WT-276 on the northerly side 
     line of West Thompson Road, so called, at the most south 
     corner of the Parcel herein described and at land now or 
     formerly of West Thompson Independent Firemen Association No. 
     1;
       Thence in a generally westerly direction by said northerly 
     side line of West Thompson Road, by a curve to the left, 
     having a radius of 640.00 feet a distance of 169.30 feet to a 
     point;
       Thence North 13 degrees, 08 minutes, 37 seconds East by the 
     side line of said West Thompson Road a distance of 10.00 feet 
     to a point;
       Thence in a generally westerly direction by the northerly 
     side line of said West Thompson Road, by a curve to the left 
     having a radius of 650.00 feet a distance of 109.88 feet to a 
     bound labeled WT-123, at land now or formerly of the United 
     States of America;
       Thence North 44 degrees, 43 minutes, 07 seconds East by 
     said land now or formerly of the United States of America a 
     distance of 185.00 feet to a point;

[[Page H10060]]

       Thence North 67 degrees, 34 minutes, 13 seconds East by 
     said land now or formerly of the United States of America a 
     distance of 200.19 feet to a point in a stonewall;
       Thence South 20 degrees, 49 minutes, 17 seconds East by a 
     stonewall and by said land now or formerly of the United 
     States of America a distance of 253.10 feet to a point at 
     land now or formerly of West Thompson Independent Firemen 
     Association No. 1;
       Thence North 57 degrees, 45 minutes, 25 seconds West by 
     land now or formerly of said West Thompson Independent 
     Firemen Association No. 1 a distance of 89.04 feet to a bound 
     labeled WT-277;
       Thence South 32 degrees, 14 minutes, 35 seconds West by 
     land now or formerly of said West Thompson Independent 
     Firemen Association No. 1 a distance of 123.06 feet to the 
     point of beginning.
       (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the parcel 
     described in paragraph (2) ceases to be held in public 
     ownership or used for fire fighting and related emergency 
     services, all right, title, and interest in and to the parcel 
     shall revert to the United States.
       (b) Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of 
     Columbia.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Lucy 
     Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses and 
     Missionaries Conducting Sibley Memorial Hospital (in this 
     subsection referred to as the ``Hospital'') by quitclaim deed 
     under the terms of a negotiated sale, all right, title, and 
     interest of the United States in and to the 8.864-acre parcel 
     of land described in paragraph (2) for medical care and 
     parking purposes. The consideration paid under such 
     negotiated sale shall reflect the value of the parcel, taking 
     into consideration the terms and conditions of the conveyance 
     imposed under this subsection.
       (2) Land description.--The parcel of land referred to in 
     paragraph (1) is the parcel described as follows: Beginning 
     at a point on the westerly right-of-way line of Dalecarlia 
     Parkway, said point also being on the southerly division line 
     of part of Square N1448, A&T Lot 801 as recorded in A&T 2387 
     and part of the property of the United States Government, 
     thence with said southerly division line now described:
       (A) North 35 deg. 05' 40'' West--436.31 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (B) South 89 deg. 59' 30'' West--550 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (C) South 53 deg. 48' 00'' West--361.08 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (D) South 89 deg. 59' 30'' West--466.76 feet to a point at 
     the southwesterly corner of the aforesaid A&T Lot 801, said 
     point also being on the easterly right-of-way line of 
     MacArthur Boulevard, thence with a portion of the westerly 
     division line of said A&T Lot 801 and the easterly right-of-
     way line of MacArthur Boulevard, as now described.
       (E) 78.62 feet along the arc of a curve to the right having 
     a radius of 650.98 feet, chord bearing and distance of North 
     06 deg. 17' 20'' West--78.57 feet to a point, thence crossing 
     to include a portion of aforesaid A&T Lot 801 and a portion 
     of the aforesaid Dalecarlia Reservoir Grounds, as now 
     described
       (F) North 87 deg. 18' 21'' East--258.85 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (G) North 02 deg. 49' 16'' West--214.18 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (H) South 87 deg. 09' 00'' West--238.95 feet to a point on 
     the aforesaid easterly right-of-way line of MacArthur 
     Boulevard, thence with said easterly right-of-way line, as 
     now described
       (I) North 08 deg. 41' 30'' East--30.62 feet to a point, 
     thence crossing to include a portion of aforesaid A&T Lot 801 
     and a portion of the aforesaid Dalecarlia Reservoir Grounds, 
     as now described
       (J) North 87 deg. 09' 00'' East--373.96 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (K) North 88 deg. 42' 48'' East--374.92 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (L) North 56 deg. 53' 40'' East--53.16 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (M) North 86 deg. 00' 15'' East--26.17 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (N) South 87 deg. 24' 50'' East--464.01 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (O) North 83 deg. 34' 31'' East--212.62 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (P) South 30 deg. 16' 12'' East--108.97 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (Q) South 38 deg. 30' 23'' East--287.46 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (R) South 09 deg. 03' 38'' West--92.74 feet to the point on 
     the aforesaid westerly right-of-way line of Dalecarlia 
     Parkway, thence with said westerly right-of-way line, as now 
     described
       (S) 197.74 feet along the arc of a curve to the right 
     having a radius of 916.00 feet, chord bearing and distance of 
     South 53 deg. 54' 43'' West--197.35 feet to the place of 
     beginning.
       (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance under this 
     subsection shall be subject to the following terms and 
     conditions:
       (A) Limitation on the use of certain portions of the 
     parcel.--The Secretary shall include in any deed conveying 
     the parcel under this section a restriction to prevent the 
     Hospital, and its successors and assigns, from constructing 
     any structure, other than a structure used exclusively for 
     the parking of motor vehicles, on the portion of the parcel 
     that lies between the Washington Aqueduct and Little Falls 
     Road.
       (B) Limitation on certain legal challenges.--The Secretary 
     shall require the Hospital, and its successors and assigns, 
     to refrain from raising any legal challenge to the operations 
     of the Washington Aqueduct arising from any impact such 
     operations may have on the activities conducted by the 
     Hospital on the parcel.
       (C) Easement.--The Secretary shall require that the 
     conveyance be subject to the retention of an easement 
     permitting the United States, and its successors and assigns, 
     to use and maintain the portion of the parcel described as 
     follows: Beginning at a point on the easterly or South 
     35 deg. 05' 40'' East--436.31 foot plat line of Lot 25 as 
     shown on a subdivision plat recorded in book 175 page 102 
     among the records of the Office of the Surveyor of the 
     District of Columbia, said point also being on the northerly 
     right-of-way line of Dalecarlia Parkway, thence running with 
     said easterly line of Lot 25 and crossing to include a 
     portion of the aforsaid Dalecarlia Reservoir Grounds as now 
     described:
       (i) North 35 deg. 05' 40'' West--495.13 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (ii) North 87 deg. 24' 50'' West--414.43 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (iii) South 81 deg. 08' 00'' West--69.56 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (iv) South 88 deg. 42' 48'' West--367.50 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (v) South 87 deg. 09' 00'' West--379.68 feet to a point on 
     the easterly right-of-way line of MacArthur Boulevard, thence 
     with said easterly right-of-way line, as now described
       (vi) North 08 deg. 41' 30'' East--30.62 feet to a point, 
     thence crossing to include a portion of the aforesaid 
     Dalecarlia Reservoir Grounds, as now described
       (vii) North 87 deg. 09' 00'' East--373.96 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (viii) North 88 deg. 42' 48'' East--374.92 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (ix) North 56 deg. 53' 40'' East--53.16 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (x) North 86 deg. 00' 15'' East--26.17 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (xi) South 87 deg. 24' 50'' East--464.01 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (xii) North 83 deg. 34' 31'' East--50.62 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (xiii) South 02 deg. 35' 10'' West--46.46 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (xiv) South 13 deg. 38' 12'' East--107.83 feet to a point, 
     thence
       (xv) South 35 deg. 05' 40'' East--347.97 feet to a point on 
     the aforesaid northerly right-of-way line of Dalecarlia 
     Parkway, thence with said right-of-way line, as now described
       (xvi) 44.12 feet along the arc of a curve to the right 
     having a radius of 855.00 feet, chord bearing and distance of 
     South 58 deg. 59' 22'' West--44.11 feet to the place of 
     beginning containing 1.7157 acres of land more or less as now 
     described by Maddox Engineers and Surveyors, Inc., June 2000, 
     Job #00015.
       (4) Appraisal.--Before conveying any right, title, or 
     interest under this subsection, the Secretary shall obtain an 
     appraisal of the fair market value of the parcel.
       (c) Ontonagon, Michigan.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
     deed without consideration to the Ontonagon County Historical 
     Society all right, title, and interest of the United States 
     in and to the parcel of land underlying and immediately 
     surrounding the lighthouse at Ontonagon, Michigan, consisting 
     of approximately 1.8 acres, together with any improvements 
     thereon, for public ownership and for public purposes.
       (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
     and the legal description of the real property described in 
     paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
     satisfactory to the Secretary.
       (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
     property described in paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
     public ownership or used for public purposes, all right, 
     title, and interest in and to the property shall revert to 
     the United States.
       (d) Pike County, Missouri.--
       (1) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), at 
     such time as S.S.S., Inc. conveys all right, title, and 
     interest in and to the parcel of land described in paragraph 
     (2)(A) to the United States, the Secretary shall convey by 
     quitclaim deed all right, title, and interest in the parcel 
     of land described in paragraph (2)(B) to S.S.S., Inc.
       (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
     paragraph (1) are the following:
       (A) Non-federal land.--8.99 acres with existing flowage 
     easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, adjacent to land 
     being acquired from Holnam, Inc. by the Corps of Engineers.
       (B) Federal land.--8.99 acres situated in Pike County, 
     Missouri, known as Government Tract Numbers FM-46 and FM-47, 
     administered by the Corps of Engineers.
       (3) Conditions.--The exchange of land under paragraph (1) 
     shall be subject to the following conditions:
       (A) Deeds.--
       (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the land described 
     in paragraph (2)(A) to the Secretary shall be by a quitclaim 
     deed acceptable to the Secretary.
       (ii) Federal land.--The instrument of conveyance used to 
     convey the land described in paragraph (2)(B) to S.S.S., Inc. 
     shall contain such reservations, terms, and conditions as the 
     Secretary considers necessary to allow the United States to 
     operate and maintain the Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation 
     Project.
       (B) Removal of improvements.--S.S.S., Inc. may remove any 
     improvements on the land described in paragraph (2)(A). The 
     Secretary may require S.S.S., Inc. to remove any improvements 
     on the land described in paragraph (2)(A). In either case, 
     S.S.S., Inc. shall hold the United States harmless from

[[Page H10061]]

     liability, and the United States shall not incur costs 
     associated with the removal or relocation of any of the 
     improvements.
       (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange under 
     paragraph (1) shall be completed not later than 2 years after 
     the date of enactment of this Act.
       (D) Legal description.--The Secretary shall provide the 
     legal description of the lands described in paragraph (2). 
     The legal description shall be used in the instruments of 
     conveyance of the lands.
       (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market 
     value, as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed 
     to S.S.S., Inc. by the Secretary under paragraph (1) exceeds 
     the appraised fair market value, as determined by the 
     Secretary, of the land conveyed to the United States by 
     S.S.S., Inc. under paragraph (1), S.S.S., Inc. shall make a 
     payment equal to the excess in cash or a cash equivalent to 
     the United States.
       (e) Candy Lake Project, Osage County, Oklahoma.--Section 
     563(c)(1)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 
     (113 Stat. 357) is amended by striking ``a deceased 
     individual'' and inserting ``an individual''.
       (f) Manor Township, Pennsylvania.--
       (1) In general.--In accordance with this subsection, the 
     Secretary shall convey by quitclaim deed to the township of 
     Manor, Pennsylvania, all right, title, and interest of the 
     United States in and to the approximately 113 acres of real 
     property located at Crooked Creek Lake, together with any 
     improvements on the land.
       (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
     and the legal description of the real property described in 
     paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
     satisfactory to the Secretary.
       (3) Consideration.--The Secretary may convey under this 
     subsection without consideration any portion of the real 
     property described in paragraph (1) if the portion is to be 
     retained in public ownership and be used for public park and 
     recreation or other public purposes.
       (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that any 
     portion of the property conveyed under paragraph (3) ceases 
     to be held in public ownership or to be used for public park 
     and recreation or other public purposes, all right, title, 
     and interest in and to such portion of property shall revert 
     to the Secretary.
       (5) Payment of costs.--The township of Manor, Pennsylvania 
     shall be responsible for all costs associated with a 
     conveyance under this subsection, including the cost of 
     conducting the survey referred to in paragraph (2).
       (g) New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam, Savannah River, South 
     Carolina, Below Augusta.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
     deed to the city of North Augusta and Aiken County, South 
     Carolina, the lock, dam, and appurtenant features at New 
     Savannah Bluff, including the adjacent approximately 50-acre 
     park and recreation area with improvements of the navigation 
     project, Savannah River Below Augusta, Georgia, authorized by 
     the first section of the River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 
     (46 Stat. 924), subject to the execution of an agreement by 
     the Secretary and the city of North Augusta and Aiken County, 
     South Carolina, that specifies the terms and conditions for 
     such conveyance.
       (2) Treatment of lock, dam, appurtenant features, and park 
     and recreation area.--The lock, dam, appurtenant features, 
     adjacent park and recreation area, and other project lands, 
     to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall not be treated as 
     part of any Federal water resources project after the 
     effective date of the transfer.
       (3) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and maintenance 
     of all features of the navigation project, other than the 
     lock, dam, appurtenant features, adjacent park and recreation 
     area, and other project lands to be conveyed under paragraph 
     (1), shall continue to be a Federal responsibility after the 
     effective date of the transfer under paragraph (1).
       (h) Tri-Cities Area, Washington.--Section 501(i) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3752-3753) 
     is amended--
       (1) by inserting before the period at the end of paragraph 
     (1) the following: ``; except that any of such local 
     governments, with the agreement of the appropriate district 
     engineer, may exempt from the conveyance to the local 
     government all or any part of the lands to be conveyed to the 
     local government''; and
       (2) by inserting before the period at the end of paragraph 
     (2)(C) the following: ``; except that approximately 7.4 acres 
     in Columbia Park, Kennewick, Washington, consisting of the 
     historic site located in the Park and known and referred to 
     as the Kennewick Man Site and such adjacent wooded areas as 
     the Secretary determines are necessary to protect the 
     historic site, shall remain in Federal ownership''.
       (i) Bayou Teche, Louisiana.--
       (1) In general.--After renovations of the Keystone Lock 
     facility have been completed, the Secretary may convey by 
     quitclaim deed without consideration to St. Martin Parish, 
     Louisiana, all rights, interests, and title of the United 
     States in the approximately 12.03 acres of land under the 
     administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary in Bayou Teche, 
     Louisiana, together with improvements thereon. The dam and 
     the authority to retain upstream pool elevations shall remain 
     under the jurisdiction of the Secretary. The Secretary shall 
     relinquish all operations and maintenance of the lock to St. 
     Martin Parish.
       (2) Conditions.--The following conditions apply to the 
     transfer under paragraph (1):
       (A) St. Martin Parish shall operate, maintain, repair, 
     replace, and rehabilitate the lock in accordance with 
     regulations prescribed by the Secretary which are consistent 
     with the project's authorized purposes.
       (B) The Parish shall provide the Secretary access to the 
     dam whenever the Secretary notifies the Parish of a need for 
     access to the dam.
       (C) If the Parish fails to comply with subparagraph (A), 
     the Secretary shall notify the Parish of such failure. If the 
     parish does not correct such failure during the 1-year period 
     beginning on the date of such notification, the Secretary 
     shall have a right of reverter to reclaim possession and 
     title to the land and improvements conveyed under this 
     section or, in the case of a failure to make necessary 
     repairs, the Secretary may effect the repairs and require 
     payment from the Parish for the repairs made by the 
     Secretary.
       (j) Joliet, Illinois.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
     deed without consideration to the Joliet Park District in 
     Joliet, Illinois, all right, title, and interest of the 
     United States in and to the parcel of real property located 
     at 622 Railroad Street in the city of Joliet, consisting of 
     approximately 2 acres, together with any improvements 
     thereon, for public ownership and use as the site of the 
     headquarters of the park district.
       (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
     and the legal description of the real property described in 
     paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
     satisfactory to the Secretary.
       (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
     property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
     public ownership or to be used as headquarters of the park 
     district or for other purposes, all right, title, and 
     interest in and to such property shall revert to the United 
     States.
       (k) Ottawa, Illinois.--
       (1) Conveyance of property.--Subject to the terms, 
     conditions, and reservations of paragraph (2), the Secretary 
     shall convey by quitclaim deed to the Young Men's Christian 
     Association of Ottawa, Illinois (in this subsection referred 
     to as the ``YMCA''), all right, title, and interest of the 
     United States in and to a portion of the easements acquired 
     for the improvement of the Illinois Waterway project over a 
     parcel of real property owned by the YMCA, known as the 
     ``Ottawa, Illinois YMCA Site'', and located at 201 E. Jackson 
     Street, Ottawa, La Salle County, Illinois (portion of NE \1/
     4\, S11, T33N, R3E 3PM), except that portion lying below the 
     elevation of 461 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
       (2) Conditions.--The following conditions apply to the 
     conveyance under paragraph (1):
       (A) The exact acreage and the legal description of the real 
     property described in paragraph (1) shall be determined by a 
     survey that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
       (B) The YMCA shall agree to hold and save the United States 
     harmless from liability associated with the operation and 
     maintenance of the Illinois Waterway project on the property 
     desscribed in paragraph (1).
       (C) If the Secretary determines that any portion of the 
     property that is the subject of the easement conveyed under 
     paragraph (1) ceases to be used as the YMCA, all right, 
     title, and interest in and to such easement shall revert to 
     the Secretary.
       (l) St. Clair and Benton Counties, Missouri.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Iconium 
     Fire Protection District, St. Clair and Benton counties, 
     Missouri, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all 
     right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
     parcel of land described in paragraph (2).
       (2) Land description.--The parcel of land to be conveyed 
     under paragraph (1) is the tract of land located in the 
     Southeast \1/4\ of Section 13, Township 39 North, Range 25 
     West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, St. Clair County, 
     Missouri, more particularly described as follows: Commencing 
     at the Southwest corner of Section 18, as designated by Corps 
     survey marker AP 18-1, thence northerly 11.22 feet to the 
     southeast corner of Section 13, thence 657.22 feet north 
     along the east line of Section 13 to Corps monument 18 1-C 
     lying within the right-of-way of State Highway C, being the 
     point of beginning of the tract of land herein described; 
     thence westerly approximately 210 feet, thence northerly 150 
     feet, thence easterly approximately 210 feet to the east line 
     of Section 13, thence southerly along said east line, 150 
     feet to the point of beginning, containing 0.723 acres, more 
     or less.
       (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
     property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
     public ownership or to be used as a site for a fire station, 
     all right, title, and interest in and to such property shall 
     revert to the United States.
       (m) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
       (1) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
     Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
     to any conveyance under this section.
       (2) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
     require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
     such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary 
     considers appropriate and necessary to protect the interests 
     of the United States.

[[Page H10062]]

       (3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance 
     is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
     reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate 
     transaction and environmental compliance costs, associated 
     with the conveyance.
       (4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
     under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
     any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
     after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
     conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
     liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
     date, on the real property conveyed.

     SEC. 586. BRUCE F. VENTO UNIT OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE 
                   AREA WILDERNESS, MINNESOTA.

       (a) Designation.--The portion of the Boundary Waters Canoe 
     Area Wilderness, Minnesota, situated north and cast of the 
     Gunflint Corridor and that is bounded by the United States 
     border with Canada to the north shall be known and designated 
     as the ``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe 
     Area Wilderness''.
       (b) Legal Reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
     regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
     States to the area referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
     deemed to be a reference to the ``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the 
     Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness''.

             TITLE VI--COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION

     SEC. 601. COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN.

       (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following 
     definitions apply:
       (1) Central and southern florida project.--
       (A) In general.--The term ``Central and Southern Florida 
     Project'' means the project for Central and Southern Florida 
     authorized under the heading ``central and southern florida'' 
     in section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 
     1176).
       (B) Inclusion.--The term ``Central and Southern Florida 
     Project'' includes any modification to the project authorized 
     by this section or any other provision of law.
       (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of 
     the State of Florida.
       (3) Natural system.--
       (A) In general.--The term ``natural system'' means all land 
     and water managed by the Federal Government or the State 
     within the South Florida ecosystem.
       (B) Inclusions.--The term ``natural system'' includes--
       (i) water conservation areas;
       (ii) sovereign submerged land;
       (iii) Everglades National Park;
       (iv) Biscayne National Park;
       (v) Big Cypress National Preserve;
       (vi) other Federal or State (including a political 
     subdivision of a State) land that is designated and managed 
     for conservation purposes; and
       (vii) any tribal land that is designated and managed for 
     conservation purposes, as approved by the tribe.
       (4) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the Comprehensive 
     Everglades Restoration Plan contained in the ``Final 
     Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental 
     Impact Statement'', dated April 1, 1999, as modified by this 
     section.
       (5) South florida ecosystem.--
       (A) In general.--The term ``South Florida ecosystem'' means 
     the area consisting of the land and water within the boundary 
     of the South Florida Water Management District in effect on 
     July 1, 1999.
       (B) Inclusions.--The term ``South Florida ecosystem'' 
     includes--
       (i) the Everglades;
       (ii) the Florida Keys; and
       (iii) the contiguous near-shore coastal water of South 
     Florida.
       (6) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of Florida.
       (b) Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan.--
       (1) Approval.--
       (A) In general.--Except as modified by this section, the 
     Plan is approved as a framework for modifications and 
     operational changes to the Central and Southern Florida 
     Project that are needed to restore, preserve, and protect the 
     South Florida ecosystem while providing for other water-
     related needs of the region, including water supply and flood 
     protection. The Plan shall be implemented to ensure the 
     protection of water quality in, the reduction of the loss of 
     fresh water from, and the improvement of the environment of 
     the South Florida ecosystem and to achieve and maintain the 
     benefits to the natural system and human environment 
     described in the Plan, and required pursuant to this section, 
     for as long as the project is authorized.
       (B) Integration.--In carrying out the Plan, the Secretary 
     shall integrate the activities described in subparagraph (A) 
     with ongoing Federal and State projects and activities in 
     accordance with section 528(c) of the Water Resources 
     Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769). Unless specifically 
     provided herein, nothing in this section shall be construed 
     to modify any existing cost share or responsibility for 
     projects as listed in subsection (c) or (e) of section 528 of 
     the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769).
       (2) Specific authorizations.--
       (A) In general.--
       (i) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out the projects 
     included in the Plan in accordance with subparagraphs (B), 
     (C), (D), and (E).
       (ii) Considerations.--In carrying out activities described 
     in the Plan, the Secretary shall--

       (I) take into account the protection of water quality by 
     considering applicable State water quality standards; and
       (II) include such features as the Secretary determines are 
     necessary to ensure that all ground water and surface water 
     discharges from any project feature authorized by this 
     subsection will meet all applicable water quality standards 
     and applicable water quality permitting requirements.

       (iii) Review and comment.--In developing the projects 
     authorized under subparagraph (B), the Secretary shall 
     provide for public review and comment in accordance with 
     applicable Federal law.
       (B) Pilot projects.--The following pilot projects are 
     authorized for implementation, after review and approval by 
     the Secretary, at a total cost of $69,000,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $34,500,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $34,500,000:
       (i) Caloosahatchee River (C-43) Basin ASR, at a total cost 
     of $6,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,000,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,000,000.
       (ii) Lake Belt In-Ground Reservoir Technology, at a total 
     cost of $23,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $11,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,500,000.
       (iii) L-31N Seepage Management, at a total cost of 
     $10,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000 and 
     an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,000,000.
       (iv) Wastewater Reuse Technology, at a total cost of 
     $30,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $15,000,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,000,000.
       (C) Initial projects.--The following projects are 
     authorized for implementation, after review and approval by 
     the Secretary, subject to the conditions stated in 
     subparagraph (D), at a total cost of $1,100,918,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $550,459,000 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $550,459,000:
       (i) C-44 Basin Storage Reservoir, at a total cost of 
     $112,562,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $56,281,000 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $56,281,000.
       (ii) Everglades Agricultural Area Storage Reservoirs--Phase 
     I, at a total cost of $233,408,000, with an estimated Federal 
     cost of $116,704,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
     $116,704,000.
       (iii) Site 1 Impoundment, at a total cost of $38,535,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $19,267,500 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $19,267,500.
       (iv) Water Conservation Areas 3A/3B Levee Seepage 
     Management, at a total cost of $100,335,000, with an 
     estimated Federal cost of $50,167,500 and an estimated non-
     Federal cost of $50,167,500.
       (v) C-11 Impoundment and Stormwater Treatment Area, at a 
     total cost of $124,837,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $62,418,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $62,418,500.
       (vi) C-9 Impoundment and Stormwater Treatment Area, at a 
     total cost of $89,146,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $44,573,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $44,573,000.
       (vii) Taylor Creek/Nubbin Slough Storage and Treatment 
     Area, at a total cost of $104,027,000, with an estimated 
     Federal cost of $52,013,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
     of $52,013,500.
       (viii) Raise and Bridge East Portion of Tamiami Trail and 
     Fill Miami Canal within Water Conservation Area 3, at a total 
     cost of $26,946,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $13,473,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,473,000.
       (ix) North New River Improvements, at a total cost of 
     $77,087,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $38,543,500 
     and an estimated non-Federal cost of $38,543,500.
       (x) C-111 Spreader Canal, at a total cost of $94,035,000, 
     with an estimated Federal cost of $47,017,500 and an 
     estimated non-Federal cost of $47,017,500.
       (xi) Adaptive Assessment and Monitoring Program, at a total 
     cost of $100,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
     $50,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $50,000,000.
       (D) Conditions.--
       (i) Project implementation reports.--Before implementation 
     of a project described in any of clauses (i) through (x) of 
     subparagraph (C), the Secretary shall review and approve for 
     the project a project implementation report prepared in 
     accordance with subsections (f) and (h).
       (ii) Submission of report.--The Secretary shall submit to 
     the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
     House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
     Public Works of the Senate the project implementation report 
     required by subsections (f) and (h) for each project under 
     this paragraph (including all relevant data and information 
     on all costs).
       (iii) Funding contingent on approval.--No appropriation 
     shall be made to construct any project under this paragraph 
     if the project implementation report for the project has not 
     been approved by resolutions adopted by the Committee on 
     Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
     Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
     Works of the Senate.
       (iv) Modified water delivery.--No appropriation shall be 
     made to construct the Water Conservation Area 3 
     Decompartmentalization and Sheetflow Enhancement Project 
     (including component AA, Additional S-345 Structures; 
     component

[[Page H10063]]

     QQ Phase 1, Raise and Bridge East Portion of Tamiami Trail 
     and Fill Miami Canal within WCA 3; component QQ Phase 2, WCA 
     3 Decompartmentalization and Sheetflow Enhancement; and 
     component SS, North New River Improvements) or the Central 
     Lakebelt Storage Project (including components S and EEE, 
     Central Lake Belt Storage Area) until the completion of the 
     project to improve water deliveries to Everglades National 
     Park authorized by section 104 of the Everglades National 
     Park Protection and Expansion Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r-8).
       (E) Maximum cost of projects.--Section 902 of the Water 
     Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2280) shall 
     apply to each project feature authorized under this 
     subsection.
       (c) Additional Program Authority.--
       (1) In general.--To expedite implementation of the Plan, 
     the Secretary may implement modifications to the Central and 
     Southern Florida Project that--
       (A) are described in the Plan; and
       (B) will produce a substantial benefit to the restoration, 
     preservation and protection of the South Florida ecosystem.
       (2) Project implementation reports.--Before implementation 
     of any project feature authorized under this subsection, the 
     Secretary shall review and approve for the project feature a 
     project implementation report prepared in accordance with 
     subsections (f) and (h).
       (3) Funding.--
       (A) Individual project funding.--
       (i) Federal cost.--The total Federal cost of each project 
     carried out under this subsection shall not exceed 
     $12,500,000.
       (ii) Overall cost.--The total cost of each project carried 
     out under this subsection shall not exceed $25,000,000.
       (B) Aggregate cost.--The total cost of all projects carried 
     out under this subsection shall not exceed $206,000,000, with 
     an estimated Federal cost of $103,000,000 and an estimated 
     non-Federal cost of $103,000,000.
       (d) Authorization of Future Projects.--
       (1) In general.--Except for a project authorized by 
     subsection (b) or (c), any project included in the Plan shall 
     require a specific authorization by Congress.
       (2) Submission of report.--Before seeking congressional 
     authorization for a project under paragraph (1), the 
     Secretary shall submit to Congress--
       (A) a description of the project; and
       (B) a project implementation report for the project 
     prepared in accordance with subsections (f) and (h).
       (e) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out a project authorized by subsection (b), (c), or 
     (d) shall be 50 percent.
       (2) Non-federal responsibilities.--The non-Federal sponsor 
     with respect to a project described in subsection (b), (c), 
     or (d), shall be--
       (A) responsible for all land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
     relocations necessary to implement the Plan; and
       (B) afforded credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
     cost of carrying out the project in accordance with paragraph 
     (5)(A).
       (3) Federal assistance.--
       (A) In general.--The non-Federal sponsor with respect to a 
     project authorized by subsection (b), (c), or (d) may use 
     Federal funds for the purchase of any land, easement, rights-
     of-way, or relocation that is necessary to carry out the 
     project if any funds so used are credited toward the Federal 
     share of the cost of the project.
       (B) Agriculture funds.--Funds provided to the non-Federal 
     sponsor under the Conservation Restoration and Enhancement 
     Program (CREP) and the Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) for 
     projects in the Plan shall be credited toward the non-Federal 
     share of the cost of the Plan if the Secretary of Agriculture 
     certifies that the funds provided may be used for that 
     purpose. Funds to be credited do not include funds provided 
     under section 390 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and 
     Reform Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 1022).
       (4) Operation and maintenance.--Notwithstanding section 
     528(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
     Stat. 3770), the non-Federal sponsor shall be responsible for 
     50 percent of the cost of operation, maintenance, repair, 
     replacement, and rehabilitation activities authorized under 
     this section. Furthermore, the Seminole Tribe of Florida 
     shall be responsible for 50 percent of the cost of operation, 
     maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation 
     activities for the Big Cypress Seminole Reservation Water 
     Conservation Plan Project.
       (5) Credit.--
       (A) In general.--Notwithstanding section 528(e)(4) of the 
     Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) and 
     regardless of the date of acquisition, the value of lands or 
     interests in lands and incidental costs for land acquired by 
     a non-Federal sponsor in accordance with a project 
     implementation report for any project included in the Plan 
     and authorized by Congress shall be--
       (i) included in the total cost of the project; and
       (ii) credited toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
     the project.
       (B) Work.--The Secretary may provide credit, including in-
     kind credit, toward the non-Federal share for the reasonable 
     cost of any work performed in connection with a study, 
     preconstruction engineering and design, or construction that 
     is necessary for the implementation of the Plan if--
       (i)(I) the credit is provided for work completed during the 
     period of design, as defined in a design agreement between 
     the Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor; or
       (II) the credit is provided for work completed during the 
     period of construction, as defined in a project cooperation 
     agreement for an authorized project between the Secretary and 
     the non-Federal sponsor;
       (ii) the design agreement or the project cooperation 
     agreement prescribes the terms and conditions of the credit; 
     and
       (iii) the Secretary determines that the work performed by 
     the non-Federal sponsor is integral to the project.
       (C) Treatment of credit between projects.--Any credit 
     provided under this paragraph may be carried over between 
     authorized projects in accordance with subparagraph (D).
       (D) Periodic monitoring.--
       (i) In general.--To ensure that the contributions of the 
     non-Federal sponsor equal 50 percent proportionate share for 
     projects in the Plan, during each 5-year period, beginning 
     with commencement of design of the Plan, the Secretary shall, 
     for each project--

       (I) monitor the non-Federal provision of cash, in-kind 
     services, and land; and
       (II) manage, to the maximum extent practicable, the 
     requirement of the non-Federal sponsor to provide cash, in-
     kind services, and land.

       (ii) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall conduct 
     monitoring under clause (i) separately for the 
     preconstruction engineering and design phase and the 
     construction phase.
       (E) Audits.--Credit for land (including land value and 
     incidental costs) or work provided under this subsection 
     shall be subject to audit by the Secretary.
       (f) Evaluation of Projects.--
       (1) In general.--Before implementation of a project 
     authorized by subsection (c) or (d) or any of clauses (i) 
     through (x) of subsection (b)(2)(C), the Secretary, in 
     cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor, shall complete, 
     after notice and opportunity for public comment and in 
     accordance with subsection (h), a project implementation 
     report for the project.
       (2) Project justification.--
       (A) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
     Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision 
     of law, in carrying out any activity authorized under this 
     section or any other provision of law to restore, preserve, 
     or protect the South Florida ecosystem, the Secretary may 
     determine that--
       (i) the activity is justified by the environmental benefits 
     derived by the South Florida ecosystem; and
       (ii) no further economic justification for the activity is 
     required, if the Secretary determines that the activity is 
     cost-effective.
       (B) Applicability.--Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to any 
     separable element intended to produce benefits that are 
     predominantly unrelated to the restoration, preservation, and 
     protection of the natural system.
       (g) Exclusions and Limitations.--The following Plan 
     components are not approved for implementation:
       (1) Water included in the plan.--
       (A) In general.--Any project that is designed to implement 
     the capture and use of the approximately 245,000 acre-feet of 
     water described in section 7.7.2 of the Plan shall not be 
     implemented until such time as--
       (i) the project-specific feasibility study described in 
     subparagraph (B) on the need for and physical delivery of the 
     approximately 245,000 acre-feet of water, conducted by the 
     Secretary, in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor, is 
     completed;
       (ii) the project is favorably recommended in a final report 
     of the Chief of Engineers; and
       (iii) the project is authorized by Act of Congress.
       (B) Project-specific feasibility study.--The project-
     specific feasibility study referred to in subparagraph (A) 
     shall include--
       (i) a comprehensive analysis of the structural facilities 
     proposed to deliver the approximately 245,000 acre-feet of 
     water to the natural system;
       (ii) an assessment of the requirements to divert and treat 
     the water;
       (iii) an assessment of delivery alternatives;
       (iv) an assessment of the feasibility of delivering the 
     water downstream while maintaining current levels of flood 
     protection to affected property; and
       (v) any other assessments that are determined by the 
     Secretary to be necessary to complete the study.
       (2) Wastewater reuse.--
       (A) In general.--On completion and evaluation of the 
     wastewater reuse pilot project described in subsection 
     (b)(2)(B)(iv), the Secretary, in an appropriately timed 5-
     year report, shall describe the results of the evaluation of 
     advanced wastewater reuse in meeting, in a cost-effective 
     manner, the requirements of restoration of the natural 
     system.
       (B) Submission.--The Secretary shall submit to Congress the 
     report described in subparagraph (A) before congressional 
     authorization for advanced wastewater reuse is sought.
       (3) Projects approved with limitations.--The following 
     projects in the Plan are approved for implementation with 
     limitations:
       (A) Loxahatchee national wildlife refuge.--The Federal 
     share for land acquisition in the project to enhance existing 
     wetland systems along the Loxahatchee National Wildlife 
     Refuge, including the Stazzulla tract, should be funded 
     through the budget of the Department of the Interior.

[[Page H10064]]

       (B) Southern corkscrew regional ecosystem.--The Southern 
     Corkscrew regional ecosystem watershed addition should be 
     accomplished outside the scope of the Plan.
       (h) Assurance of Project Benefits.--
       (1) In general.--The overarching objective of the Plan is 
     the restoration, preservation, and protection of the South 
     Florida Ecosystem while providing for other water-related 
     needs of the region, including water supply and flood 
     protection. The Plan shall be implemented to ensure the 
     protection of water quality in, the reduction of the loss of 
     fresh water from, the improvement of the environment of the 
     South Florida Ecosystem and to achieve and maintain the 
     benefits to the natural system and human environment 
     described in the Plan, and required pursuant to this section, 
     for as long as the project is authorized.
       (2) Agreement.--
       (A) In general.--In order to ensure that water generated by 
     the Plan will be made available for the restoration of the 
     natural system, no appropriations, except for any pilot 
     project described in subsection (b)(2)(B), shall be made for 
     the construction of a project contained in the Plan until the 
     President and the Governor enter into a binding agreement 
     under which the State shall ensure, by regulation or other 
     appropriate means, that water made available by each project 
     in the Plan shall not be permitted for a consumptive use or 
     otherwise made unavailable by the State until such time as 
     sufficient reservations of water for the restoration of the 
     natural system are made under State law in accordance with 
     the project implementation report for that project and 
     consistent with the Plan.
       (B) Enforcement.--
       (i) In general.--Any person or entity that is aggrieved by 
     a failure of the United States or any other Federal 
     Government instrumentality or agency, or the Governor or any 
     other officer of a State instrumentality or agency, to comply 
     with any provision of the agreement entered into under 
     subparagraph (A) may bring a civil action in United States 
     district court for an injunction directing the United States 
     or any other Federal Government instrumentality or agency or 
     the Governor or any other officer of a State instrumentality 
     or agency, as the case may be, to comply with the agreement.
       (ii) Limitations on commencement of civil action.--No civil 
     action may be commenced under clause (i)--

       (I) before the date that is 60 days after the Secretary and 
     the Governor receive written notice of a failure to comply 
     with the agreement; or
       (II) if the United States has commenced and is diligently 
     prosecuting an action in a court of the United States or a 
     State to redress a failure to comply with the agreement.

       (C) Trust responsibilities.--In carrying out his 
     responsibilities under this subsection with respect to the 
     restoration of the South Florida ecosystem, the Secretary of 
     the Interior shall fulfill his obligations to the Indian 
     tribes in South Florida under the Indian trust doctrine as 
     well as other applicable legal obligations.
       (3) Programmatic regulations.--
       (A) Issuance.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
     enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, after notice and 
     opportunity for public comment, with the concurrence of the 
     Governor and the Secretary of the Interior, and in 
     consultation with the Seminole Tribe of Florida, the 
     Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, the Administrator of 
     the Environmental Protection Agency, the Secretary of 
     Commerce, and other Federal, State, and local agencies, 
     promulgate programmatic regulations to ensure that the goals 
     and purposes of the Plan are achieved.
       (B) Concurrency statement.--The Secretary of the Interior 
     and the Governor shall, not later than 180 days from the end 
     of the public comment period on proposed programmatic 
     regulations, provide the Secretary with a written statement 
     of concurrence or nonconcurrence. A failure to provide a 
     written statement of concurrence or nonconcurrence within 
     such time frame will be deemed as meeting the concurrency 
     requirements of subparagraph (A)(i). A copy of any 
     concurrency or nonconcurrency statements shall be made a part 
     of the administrative record and referenced in the final 
     programmatic regulations. Any nonconcurrency statement shall 
     specifically detail the reason or reasons for the 
     nonconcurrence.
       (C) Content of regulations.--
       (i) In general.--Programmatic regulations promulgated under 
     this paragraph shall establish a process--

       (I) for the development of project implementation reports, 
     project cooperation agreements, and operating manuals that 
     ensure that the goals and objectives of the Plan are 
     achieved;
       (II) to ensure that new information resulting from changed 
     or unforeseen circumstances, new scientific or technical 
     information or information that is developed through the 
     principles of adaptive management contained in the Plan, or 
     future authorized changes to the Plan are integrated into the 
     implementation of the Plan; and
       (III) to ensure the protection of the natural system 
     consistent with the goals and purposes of the Plan, including 
     the establishment of interim goals to provide a means by 
     which the restoration success of the Plan may be evaluated 
     throughout the implementation process.

       (ii) Limitation on applicability of programmatic 
     regulations.--Programmatic regulations promulgated under this 
     paragraph shall expressly prohibit the requirement for 
     concurrence by the Secretary of the Interior or the Governor 
     on project implementation reports, project cooperation 
     agreements, operating manuals for individual projects 
     undertaken in the Plan, and any other documents relating to 
     the development, implementation, and management of individual 
     features of the Plan, unless such concurrence is provided for 
     in other Federal or State laws.
       (D) Schedule and transition rule.--
       (i) In general.--All project implementation reports 
     approved before the date of promulgation of the programmatic 
     regulations shall be consistent with the Plan.
       (ii) Preamble.--The preamble of the programmatic 
     regulations shall include a statement concerning the 
     consistency with the programmatic regulations of any project 
     implementation reports that were approved before the date of 
     promulgation of the regulations.
       (E) Review of programmatic regulations.--Whenever necessary 
     to attain Plan goals and purposes, but not less often than 
     every 5 years, the Secretary, in accordance with subparagraph 
     (A), shall review the programmatic regulations promulgated 
     under this paragraph.
       (4) Project-specific assurances.--
       (A) Project implementation reports.--
       (i) In general.--The Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor 
     shall develop project implementation reports in accordance 
     with section 10.3.1 of the Plan.
       (ii) Coordination.--In developing a project implementation 
     report, the Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor shall 
     coordinate with appropriate Federal, State, tribal, and local 
     governments.
       (iii) Requirements.--A project implementation report 
     shall--

       (I) be consistent with the Plan and the programmatic 
     regulations promulgated under paragraph (3);
       (II) describe how each of the requirements stated in 
     paragraph (3)(B) is satisfied;
       (III) comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
     1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);
       (IV) identify the appropriate quantity, timing, and 
     distribution of water dedicated and managed for the natural 
     system;
       (V) identify the amount of water to be reserved or 
     allocated for the natural system necessary to implement, 
     under State law, subclauses (IV) and (VI);
       (VI) comply with applicable water quality standards and 
     applicable water quality permitting requirements under 
     subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii);
       (VII) be based on the best available science; and
       (VIII) include an analysis concerning the cost-
     effectiveness and engineering feasibility of the project.

       (B) Project cooperation agreements.--
       (i) In general.--The Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor 
     shall execute project cooperation agreements in accordance 
     with section 10 of the Plan.
       (ii) Condition.--The Secretary shall not execute a project 
     cooperation agreement until any reservation or allocation of 
     water for the natural system identified in the project 
     implementation report is executed under State law.
       (C) Operating manuals.--
       (i) In general.--The Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor 
     shall develop and issue, for each project or group of 
     projects, an operating manual that is consistent with the 
     water reservation or allocation for the natural system 
     described in the project implementation report and the 
     project cooperation agreement for the project or group of 
     projects.
       (ii) Modifications.--Any significant modification by the 
     Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor to an operating manual 
     after the operating manual is issued shall only be carried 
     out subject to notice and opportunity for public comment.
       (5) Savings clause.--
       (A) No elimination or transfer.--Until a new source of 
     water supply of comparable quantity and quality as that 
     available on the date of enactment of this Act is available 
     to replace the water to be lost as a result of implementation 
     of the Plan, the Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor shall 
     not eliminate or transfer existing legal sources of water, 
     including those for--
       (i) an agricultural or urban water supply;
       (ii) allocation or entitlement to the Seminole Indian Tribe 
     of Florida under section 7 of the Seminole Indian Land Claims 
     Settlement Act of 1987 (25 U.S.C. 1772e);
       (iii) the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida;
       (iv) water supply for Everglades National Park; or
       (v) water supply for fish and wildlife.
       (B) Maintenance of flood protection.--Implementation of the 
     Plan shall not reduce levels of service for flood protection 
     that are--
       (i) in existence on the date of enactment of this Act; and
       (ii) in accordance with applicable law.
       (C) No effect on tribal compact.--Nothing in this section 
     amends, alters, prevents, or otherwise abrogates rights of 
     the Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida under the compact among 
     the Seminole Tribe of Florida, the State, and the South 
     Florida Water Management District, defining the scope and use 
     of water rights of the Seminole Tribe of

[[Page H10065]]

     Florida, as codified by section 7 of the Seminole Indian Land 
     Claims Settlement Act of 1987 (25 U.S.C. 1772e).
       (i) Dispute Resolution.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary and the Governor shall 
     within 180 days from the date of enactment of this Act 
     develop an agreement for resolving disputes between the Corps 
     of Engineers and the State associated with the implementation 
     of the Plan. Such agreement shall establish a mechanism for 
     the timely and efficient resolution of disputes, including--
       (A) a preference for the resolution of disputes between the 
     Jacksonville District of the Corps of Engineers and the South 
     Florida Water Management District;
       (B) a mechanism for the Jacksonville District of the Corps 
     of Engineers or the South Florida Water Management District 
     to initiate the dispute resolution process for unresolved 
     issues;
       (C) the establishment of appropriate timeframes and 
     intermediate steps for the elevation of disputes to the 
     Governor and the Secretary; and
       (D) a mechanism for the final resolution of disputes, 
     within 180 days from the date that the dispute resolution 
     process is initiated under subparagraph (B).
       (2) Condition for report approval.--The Secretary shall not 
     approve a project implementation report under this section 
     until the agreement established under this subsection has 
     been executed.
       (3) No effect on law.--Nothing in the agreement established 
     under this subsection shall alter or amend any existing 
     Federal or State law, or the responsibility of any party to 
     the agreement to comply with any Federal or State law.
       (j) Independent Scientific Review.--
       (1) In general.--The Secretary, the Secretary of the 
     Interior, and the Governor, in consultation with the South 
     Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, shall establish an 
     independent scientific review panel convened by a body, such 
     as the National Academy of Sciences, to review the Plan's 
     progress toward achieving the natural system restoration 
     goals of the Plan.
       (2) Report.--The panel described in paragraph (1) shall 
     produce a biennial report to Congress, the Secretary, the 
     Secretary of the Interior, and the Governor that includes an 
     assessment of ecological indicators and other measures of 
     progress in restoring the ecology of the natural system, 
     based on the Plan.
       (k) Outreach and Assistance.--
       (1) Small business concerns owned and operated by socially 
     and economically disadvantaged individuals.--In executing the 
     Plan, the Secretary shall ensure that small business concerns 
     owned and controlled by socially and economically 
     disadvantaged individuals are provided opportunities to 
     participate under section 15(g) of the Small Business Act (15 
     U.S.C. 644(g)).
       (2) Community outreach and education.--
       (A) In general.--The Secretary shall ensure that impacts on 
     socially and economically disadvantaged individuals, 
     including individuals with limited English proficiency, and 
     communities are considered during implementation of the Plan, 
     and that such individuals have opportunities to review and 
     comment on its implementation.
       (B) Provision of opportunities.--The Secretary shall 
     ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that public 
     outreach and educational opportunities are provided, during 
     implementation of the Plan, to the individuals of South 
     Florida, including individuals with limited English 
     proficiency, and in particular for socially and economically 
     disadvantaged communities.
       (l) Report to Congress.--Beginning on October 1, 2005, and 
     periodically thereafter until October 1, 2036, the Secretary 
     and the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the 
     Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Commerce, 
     and the State of Florida, shall jointly submit to Congress a 
     report on the implementation of the Plan. Such reports shall 
     be completed not less often than every 5 years. Such reports 
     shall include a description of planning, design, and 
     construction work completed, the amount of funds expended 
     during the period covered by the report (including a detailed 
     analysis of the funds expended for adaptive assessment under 
     subsection (b)(2)(C)(xi)), and the work anticipated over the 
     next 5-year period. In addition, each report shall include--
       (1) the determination of each Secretary, and the 
     Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
     concerning the benefits to the natural system and the human 
     environment achieved as of the date of the report and whether 
     the completed projects of the Plan are being operated in a 
     manner that is consistent with the requirements of subsection 
     (h);
       (2) progress toward interim goals established in accordance 
     with subsection (h)(3)(B); and
       (3) a review of the activities performed by the Secretary 
     under subsection (k) as they relate to socially and 
     economically disadvantaged individuals and individuals with 
     limited English proficiency.
       (m) Report on Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project.--Not 
     later than 180 after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
     Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report containing a 
     determination as to whether the ongoing Biscayne Aquifer 
     Storage and Recovery Program located in Miami-Dade County has 
     a substantial benefit to the restoration, preservation, and 
     protection of the South Florida ecosystem.
       (n) Full Disclosure of Proposed Funding.--
       (1) Funding from all sources.--The President, as part of 
     the annual budget of the United States Government, shall 
     display under the heading ``Everglades Restoration'' all 
     proposed funding for the Plan for all agency programs.
       (2) Funding from corps of engineers civil works program.--
     The President, as part of the annual budget of the United 
     States Government, shall display under the accounts 
     ``Construction, General'' and ``Operation and Maintenance, 
     General'' of the title ``Department of Defense--Civil, 
     Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers--Civil'', the 
     total proposed funding level for each account for the Plan 
     and the percentage such level represents of the overall 
     levels in such accounts. The President shall also include an 
     assessment of the impact such funding levels for the Plan 
     would have on the budget year and long-term funding levels 
     for the overall Corps of Engineers civil works program.
       (o) Surplus Federal Lands.--Section 390(f)(2)(A)(i) of the 
     Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (110 
     Stat. 1023) is amended by inserting after ``on or after the 
     date of enactment of this Act'' the following: ``and before 
     the date of enactment of the Water Resource Development Act 
     of 2000''.
       (p) Severability.--If any provision or remedy provided by 
     this section is found to be unconstitutional or unenforceable 
     by any court of competent jurisdiction, any remaining 
     provisions in this section shall remain valid and 
     enforceable.

     SEC. 602. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING HOMESTEAD AIR FORCE 
                   BASE.

       (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
       (1) the Everglades is an American treasure and includes 
     uniquely-important and diverse wildlife resources and 
     recreational opportunities;
       (2) the preservation of the pristine and natural character 
     of the South Florida ecosystem is critical to the regional 
     economy;
       (3) as this legislation demonstrates, Congress believes it 
     to be a vital national mission to restore and preserve this 
     ecosystem and accordingly is authorizing a significant 
     Federal investment to do so;
       (4) Congress seeks to have the remaining property at the 
     former Homestead Air Base conveyed and reused as 
     expeditiously as possible, and several options for base reuse 
     are being considered, including as a commercial airport; and
       (5) Congress is aware that the Homestead site is located in 
     a sensitive environmental location, and that Biscayne 
     National Park is only approximately 1.5 miles to the east, 
     Everglades National Park approximately 8 miles to the west, 
     and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary approximately 
     10 miles to the south.
       (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
       (1) development at the Homestead site could potentially 
     cause significant air, water, and noise pollution and result 
     in the degradation of adjacent national parks and other 
     protected Federal resources;
       (2) in their decisionmaking, the Federal agencies charged 
     with determining the reuse of the remaining property at the 
     Homestead base should carefully consider and weigh all 
     available information concerning potential environmental 
     impacts of various reuse options;
       (3) the redevelopment of the former base should be 
     consistent with restoration goals, provide desirable numbers 
     of jobs and economic redevelopment for the community, and be 
     consistent with other applicable laws;
       (4) consistent with applicable laws, the Secretary of the 
     Air Force should proceed as quickly as practicable to issue a 
     final SEIS and Record of Decision so that reuse of the former 
     air base can proceed expeditiously;
       (5) following conveyance of the remaining surplus property, 
     the Secretary, as part of his oversight for Everglades 
     restoration, should cooperate with the entities to which the 
     various parcels of surplus property were conveyed so that the 
     planned use of those properties is implemented in such a 
     manner as to remain consistent with the goals of the 
     Everglades restoration plan; and
       (6) by August 1, 2002, the Secretary should submit a report 
     to the appropriate committees of Congress on actions taken 
     and make any recommendations for consideration by Congress.

                 TITLE VII--MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION

     SEC. 701. DEFINITIONS.

       In this title, the following definitions apply:
       (1) Pick-sloan program.--The term ``Pick-Sloan program'' 
     means the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program authorized 
     by section 9 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 891).
       (2) Plan.--The term ``plan'' means the plan for the use of 
     funds made available by this title that is required to be 
     prepared under section 705(e).
       (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of South 
     Dakota.
       (4) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Missouri 
     River Task Force established by section 705(a).
       (6) Trust.--The term ``Trust'' means the Missouri River 
     Trust established by section 704(a).

     SEC. 702. MISSOURI RIVER TRUST.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established a committee to be 
     known as the Missouri River Trust.

[[Page H10066]]

       (b) Membership.--The Trust shall be composed of 25 members 
     to be appointed by the Secretary, including--
       (1) 15 members recommended by the Governor of South Dakota 
     that--
       (A) represent equally the various interests of the public; 
     and
       (B) include representatives of--
       (i) the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural 
     Resources;
       (ii) the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks;
       (iii) environmental groups;
       (iv) the hydroelectric power industry;
       (v) local governments;
       (vi) recreation user groups;
       (vii) agricultural groups; and
       (viii) other appropriate interests;
       (2) 9 members, 1 of each of whom shall be recommended by 
     each of the 9 Indian tribes in the State of South Dakota; and
       (3) 1 member recommended by the organization known as the 
     ``Three Affiliated Tribes of North Dakota'' (composed of the 
     Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara tribes).

     SEC. 703. MISSOURI RIVER TASK FORCE.

       (a) Establishment.--There is established the Missouri River 
     Task Force.
       (b) Membership.--The Task Force shall be composed of--
       (1) the Secretary (or a designee), who shall serve as 
     Chairperson;
       (2) the Secretary of Agriculture (or a designee);
       (3) the Secretary of Energy (or a designee);
       (4) the Secretary of the Interior (or a designee); and
       (5) the Trust.
       (c) Duties.--The Task Force shall--
       (1) meet at least twice each year;
       (2) vote on approval of the plan, with approval requiring 
     votes in favor of the plan by a majority of the members;
       (3) review projects to meet the goals of the plan; and
       (4) recommend to the Secretary critical projects for 
     implementation.
       (d) Assessment.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date on 
     which funding authorized under this title becomes available, 
     the Secretary shall submit to the other members of the Task 
     Force a report on--
       (A) the impact of the siltation of the Missouri River in 
     the State, including the impact on the Federal, State, and 
     regional economies, recreation, hydropower generation, fish 
     and wildlife, and flood control;
       (B) the status of Indian and non-Indian historical and 
     cultural sites along the Missouri River;
       (C) the extent of erosion along the Missouri River 
     (including tributaries of the Missouri River) in the State; 
     and
       (D) other issues, as requested by the Task Force.
       (2) Consultation.--In preparing the report under paragraph 
     (1), the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of 
     Energy, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of 
     Agriculture, the State, and Indian tribes in the State.
       (e) Plan for Use of Funds Made Available by This Title.--
       (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date on 
     which funding authorized under this title becomes available, 
     the Task Force shall prepare a plan for the use of funds made 
     available under this title.
       (2) Contents of plan.--The plan shall provide for the 
     manner in which the Task Force shall develop and recommend 
     critical restoration projects to promote--
       (A) conservation practices in the Missouri River watershed;
       (B) the general control and removal of sediment from the 
     Missouri River;
       (C) the protection of recreation on the Missouri River from 
     sedimentation;
       (D) the protection of Indian and non-Indian historical and 
     cultural sites along the Missouri River from erosion;
       (E) erosion control along the Missouri River; or
       (F) any combination of the activities described in 
     subparagraphs (A) through (E).
       (3) Plan review and revision.--
       (A) In general.--The Task Force shall make a copy of the 
     plan available for public review and comment before the plan 
     becomes final, in accordance with procedures established by 
     the Task Force.
       (B) Revision of plan.--
       (i) In general.--The Task Force may, on an annual basis, 
     revise the plan.
       (ii) Public review and comment.--In revising the plan, the 
     Task Force shall provide the public the opportunity to review 
     and comment on any proposed revision to the plan.
       (f) Critical Restoration Projects.--
       (1) In general.--After the plan is approved by the Task 
     Force under subsection (c)(2), the Secretary, in coordination 
     with the Task Force, shall identify critical restoration 
     projects to carry out the plan.
       (2) Agreement.--The Secretary may carry out a critical 
     restoration project after entering into an agreement with an 
     appropriate non-Federal interest in accordance with section 
     221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
       (3) Indian projects.--To the maximum extent practicable, 
     the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 30 percent of 
     the funds made available for critical restoration projects 
     under this title shall be used exclusively for projects that 
     are--
       (A) within the boundary of an Indian reservation; or
       (B) administered by an Indian tribe.
       (g) Cost Sharing.--
       (1) Assessment.--
       (A) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out the assessment under subsection (d) shall be 50 
     percent.
       (B) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
     of carrying out the assessment under subsection (d) may be 
     provided in the form of services, materials, or other in-kind 
     contributions.
       (2) Plan.--
       (A) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     preparing the plan under subsection (e) shall be 50 percent.
       (B) Non-federal share.--Not more than 50 percent of the 
     non-Federal share of the cost of preparing the plan under 
     subsection (e) may be provided in the form of services, 
     materials, or other in-kind contributions.
       (3) Critical restoration projects.--
       (A) In general.--A non-Federal cost share shall be required 
     to carry out any critical restoration project under 
     subsection (f) that does not primarily benefit the Federal 
     Government, as determined by the Task Force.
       (B) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
     carrying out a critical restoration project under subsection 
     (f) for which the Task Force requires a non-Federal cost 
     share under subparagraph (A) shall be 65 percent, not to 
     exceed $5,000,000 for any critical restoration project.
       (C) Non-federal share.--
       (i) In general.--Not more than 50 percent of the non-
     Federal share of the cost of carrying out a critical 
     restoration project described in subparagraph (B) may be 
     provided in the form of services, materials, or other in-kind 
     contributions.
       (ii) Required non-federal contributions.--For any critical 
     restoration project described in subparagraph (B), the non-
     Federal interest shall--

       (I) provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged 
     material disposal areas, and relocations;
       (II) pay all operation, maintenance, replacement, repair, 
     and rehabilitation costs; and
       (III) hold the United States harmless from all claims 
     arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of 
     the project.

       (iii) Credit.--The non-Federal interest shall receive 
     credit for all contributions provided under clause (ii)(I).

     SEC. 704. ADMINISTRATION.

       (a) In General.--Nothing in this title diminishes or 
     affects--
       (1) any water right of an Indian tribe;
       (2) any other right of an Indian tribe, except as 
     specifically provided in another provision of this title;
       (3) any treaty right that is in effect on the date of 
     enactment of this Act;
       (4) any external boundary of an Indian reservation of an 
     Indian tribe;
       (5) any authority of the State that relates to the 
     protection, regulation, or management of fish, terrestrial 
     wildlife, and cultural and archaeological resources, except 
     as specifically provided in this title; or
       (6) any authority of the Secretary, the Secretary of the 
     Interior, or the head of any other Federal agency under a law 
     in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, including--
       (A) the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 
     et seq.);
       (B) the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 
     U.S.C. 470aa et seq.);
       (C) the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 
     et seq.);
       (D) the Act entitled ``An Act for the protection of the 
     bald eagle'', approved June 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.);
       (E) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.);
       (F) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
     seq.);
       (G) the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation 
     Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
       (H) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 
     et seq.);
       (I) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.); 
     and
       (J) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
     U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
       (b) Federal Liability for Damage.--Nothing in this title 
     relieves the Federal Government of liability for damage to 
     private property caused by the operation of the Pick-Sloan 
     program.
       (c) Flood Control.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
     this title, the Secretary shall retain the authority to 
     operate the Pick-Sloan program for the purposes of meeting 
     the requirements of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 
     887, 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.).

     SEC. 705. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

       There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to 
     carry out this title $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 
     through 2005, $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 
     through 2009, and $10,000,000 in fiscal year 2010. Such funds 
     shall remain available until expended.