[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 124 (Friday, October 6, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S10073-S10074]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE HAZARD SUPPORT SYSTEM
Mr. AKAKA. Mr. President, Benjamin Franklin once described how ``for
want of nail the shoe was lost; for want of a shoe the horse was lost;
and for want of a horse the rider was lost.''
I wish to call the Senate's attention today to a similar situation.
For $13 million, we could help prevent hundreds of millions of dollars
in losses from forest fires.
This case involves a Federal program which can help detect wild fires
and volcanic activity from space. It is a small program that has been
in a pilot phase for a couple of years but which is now operational.
Except it is not operating. It stopped when funding for it ended on
September 30, 2000. Unfortunately, funds to keep it going have not been
authorized or appropriated for the next fiscal year.
The program, which only recently came to my attention, is called the
Hazard Support System. It is operated by the United States Geological
Survey (USGS) and is a forceful example of how today's modern
technologies can be employed to the benefit of us all.
For several years, our fire and volcanic agencies have been working
with the Department of Defense to realize the potential dual use of the
nation's ballistic missile warning satellites to argument existing fire
detection and suppression capabilities and to monitor global volcanic
activity.
We have heard a great deal about fires over the past few months. On
average there about 100,000 wildland fires in the United States each
year, destroying millions of acres of timber, rangeland, and homes at
the cost of hundred of millions of dollars. In 1994, federal fire
suppression cost $920 million.
Here is a system--the Hazard Support System--which can detect fires
of less than a quarter acre in size and dispatch warnings via the
Internet to fire fighters in five minutes, saving potentially millions
of dollars--not to mention people's homes--and it is not being funded.
The system's utility is not limited to forest fires but also can be
used to detect volcanic eruptions and to track ash clouds.
One can ask why should we care about tracking ash clouds?
Imagine cruising through an ash cloud in a airplane at 30,000 feet
above Alaska: volcanic ash is sucked into the jet's engines where it
instantly melts, coating the inside of the engines, cutting off the
flow of oxygen, and causing the engines to stall. The plane drops to
10,000 feet where the engines restart only because the rapid descent
has dislodged the ash crust. This actually happened to an aircraft in
Alaska.
[[Page S10074]]
Jet radars and weather satellites cannot detect ash clouds. To these
systems, ash looks like water vapor. With ash from volcanic explosions
traveling around the world at high altitudes, we cannot fly safely
unless we have the ability to track these clouds. Every year about 10
volcanic eruptions penetrate the altitude range of air traffic. Seven
passenger airliners have experienced engine power losses, and plane
repair and replacement costs, as of 1994, exceeded $200 million.
Most of the world's volcanoes can erupt without warning. There is no
global volcano monitoring capability. Currently, less than half of
America's 65 potentially active volcanoes are monitored for signs of
activity--but not their ash clouds. We have active volcanoes in Alaska,
Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii. Most of the volcanoes in
the Aleutian Islands are active but, along this major international
airline route, only 10 percent of these volcanoes are monitored. Only
10 percent of the world's 1,500 potentially active volcanoes are under
constant surveillance.
The USGS' Hazard Support System fuses the fire- and volcanic-activity
detection capabilities of the world's environmental weather satellites
with that of our ballistic missile warning satellites--without
affecting their primary national security mission--to provide 24-hour
worldwide detection.
The cost of this system for its first year would be $13.5 million and
$5 million thereafter. The benefits of this program for states in the
Western part of the United States are obvious. I have been assured by
the Administration that the only reason funding for this program was
not requested for the next fiscal year was because, at the time of the
budget preparation, the system was not yet operational. It is now
operational and proven.
I intend to seek funding for a small program with a huge return in
protecting Americans from future forest fires and the danger of
catastrophic airline crashes. I would urge my colleagues to join me in
support of this program.
____________________