[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 116 (Tuesday, September 26, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S9257-S9258]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
Mr. LUGAR. Mr. President, I rise to call attention to report language
in the Senate version of the Commerce, Justice, and State, the
Judiciary, and related agencies appropriations bill, which directs the
National Endowment for Democracy (NED) to spend 20 percent of its
budget on ``nation-building'' activities in four war-stricken areas.
The language appears in the committee report. Although the language is
not mandatory, it sends a strong message that compliance by NED is
expected. I believe that the language should be deleted.
I would like to commend the work of the chairman and ranking member
of the CJS Appropriations subcommittee, Senator Gregg and Senator
Hollings, for providing the NED with the resources to conduct its vital
work. NED and its four core institutes do an exceptional job in
assisting grassroots democrats in more than 80 countries around the
world. NED has a strong track record, developed through involvement in
virtually every critical struggle for democracy over the past fifteen
years. NED supported the democratic movements that helped bring about
peaceful transitions to democracy in Poland, the Czech Republic, Chile,
and South Africa. NED is also playing an important role in supporting
some of the newer democracies, such as Indonesia, Nigeria, Croatia, and
Mexico.
I am very familiar with the work of NED and its institutes because I
serve on NED's Board of Directors. I serve on the Board along with two
other Senators and two Members of the House representing both political
parties. We
[[Page S9258]]
are all concerned about the implications of the committee's report
language on the operations and mission of the Endowment.
In its report, the committee recommends that NED spend 20 percent of
its entire budget to reconstitute civil governments in four seriously
troubled areas--Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Kosovo,
and East Timor. I am pleased to report that NED is working in each of
these areas on long-term democratic development. The Endowment is
helping non-governmental organizations, whose leaders are facing grave
danger to their personal safety, as they report on human rights abuses,
campaign for peace, and provide independent news and information to the
public.
We need to keep in mind that NED's mission is not to ``build''
nations or governments, but to help promote democracy. It does this
giving a helping hand to those inside other countries through financial
and technical assistance to nurture a strong civil society and market
economy. NED is successful precisely because it targets its assistance
to grassroots democratic groups.
I do not support the report language because its implementation would
undermine NED's mission while forcing NED to withdraw scarce resources
from other priority countries. It would be a mistake to divert NED's
modest budget to a handful of crisis situations which are already
receiving enormous sums of international assistance. It is unlikely
that the funds suggested in the report language could positively impact
these war-torn areas, but by consuming 20 percent of NED's budget, the
language will hamstring NED's ability to perform its work in many other
critical countries.
NED is a cost-effective investment that advances our national
interest and our fundamental values of democracy and freedom. It is
crucial, therefore, that we address the committee's goals in the report
language without compromising the ability of NED to carry out its work
effectively.
I urge the Senate and House conferees on the Commerce, Justice, and
State, the Judiciary, and related agencies appropriations bill to
delete the report language directing the NED to expend funds for
nation-building activities in four troubled conflicts.
____________________