[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 104 (Friday, September 8, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S8250-S8252]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
THE PRESIDENT IS BEGGING FOR OIL
Mr. CRAIG. Mr. President, for a few moments this morning, before we
get on with the debate on PNTR, I want to deal with an issue happening
in New York City right now. Our President is up there at the United
Nations Millennium Summit. Mr. President, there is something going on
on the side. In a back room, the President of the United States has
been sitting down with a Saudi Arabian sheik. Here is why: He is
begging. The President of the United States is begging a Saudi sheik to
reach over and turn their oil spigot on a little more and increase
their output of oil by about 700,000 barrels a day. Why? Because in the
last few days, crude prices have spiked to an all-time high of $35.39 a
barrel.
Why has that happened? Because the market has analyzed that there
isn't enough oil and the demand is ever increasing, and there is no
strategy in
[[Page S8251]]
this country to solve it. In May and June of this year, the President
tried to cover his tracks by sending the Secretary of Energy to Saudi
Arabia to beg, tin cup in hand. At that time, I think the press called
it the ``tin cup energy policy'' of this administration. Well, today in
New York City, behind closed doors, the President of the United
States--this great and all-powerful country--is begging a small country
in the Middle East for just a little more oil.
Here is what the market analysts are saying. They have said that they
fear that even the 700,000-barrel increase will not be enough to curb
the jump in prices for crude oil contracts in the futures market. I
mentioned yesterday they jumped to $35.39 a barrel. That is a
phenomenal spike. This price is the highest since, of course, the
battles of the Persian Gulf war of 1990. Why is this happening? Well,
many of us stood on the floor in May and June and July and discussed
the energy of our country and our energy needs. We were very frustrated
at that time because we had 8 years of no energy policy. You know, Al
Gore has been OPEC's best friend. There is no question about that. This
administration and Vice President Gore, during their tenure in office,
have allowed domestic oil production to drop by 17 percent and oil
imports to go up by at least 14, and maybe as high as 20 percent. Oil
imports averaged about 56 percent of all of our consumption, and now
they are predicted to be well over 64 percent in the year 2020.
Of course, there is a simple reason for that: For 8 long years, this
administration has had no policy. Let me tell you what Vice President
Al Gore has said. He says he wants to increase the use of natural gas,
although it has nearly quadrupled in price. Yet he wants to cancel
existing leases. Here is his quote:
I will do everything in my power to make sure there is no
new drilling, even in areas already leased by previous
administrations.
Here is a man asking to be President of the United States; yet he is
out in the field today campaigning and saying: I guarantee you there
will be no more increased production in this country, while his
President, behind closed doors in New York, is begging a foreign nation
to open its valves and increase production. Does it make any sense for
this great Nation to be on its knees begging Arab sheiks of the OPEC
nations to increase production while we go around saying we are going
to decrease production?
During the Clinton-Gore administration, there has been no energy
policy, no domestic oil or gas exploration or production--in 8 long
years. No new oil refineries. In fact, because of a lack of policy and
compliance with the Clean Air Act in this country, in the last 8 years,
we have closed 36 oil refineries. That is a staggering amount. We have
closed 36 oil refineries in the past 8 years. There is no new use of
coal. EPA has tried to shut down coal fired plants and are now suing
some in the East because they don't think they are in compliance with
certain standards. There is no new nuclear power. In fact, quite the
opposite has happened. We have tried here to solve the gridlock over
the production of energy and electricity by nuclear power, only to have
items vetoed time and again by the President.
Now, yesterday, the President said oil prices are too high. Gee whiz,
Bill, where have you been all summer? You're darn right they are too
high. You have done nothing about it nor has your Vice President,
except to say we will shut down production. He even went on to say that
it will impact not just America but it could result in a world impact,
and it could result in the specter of a recession here or abroad if
oil-producing countries do not raise production to bring down soaring
crude prices.
Well, what about production in our country? What are you doing here,
Vice President Gore? I will tell you what you are doing here. You are
saying: I am not going to allow new drilling; I am going to shut off
the areas where you can drill. I don't want to see more production in
this country.
That doesn't make a lot of sense.
Here is Gore's new energy plan:
Don't develop proven domestic energy;
Give $75 billion in new subsidies for new renewables and new
technology.
OK. Homeowner in the Northeast: You are just about to see your costs
for heat this winter go up 35, or 40, or 50 percent. The message to
you, homeowner, in the Northeast is: Vice President Gore is going to
invest $75 billion in subsidies and in new renewables, and in 10 or 15
years you can put a solar cell up or we can put a wind machine out on
the Adirondacks, and somehow we will generate this new abundance of
energy.
That is the answer for the problem today. That is the answer you are
being given. That will not work tomorrow. It will not work a week from
now.
I support renewables. We ought to clearly drive ourselves in that
direction as best we can. But my guess is when what is going on today
translates into the price of gas at the pump, and when the oil truck
backs up to your home in New York or Connecticut this winter and sticks
the hose in the oil barrel and starts cranking in the fuel oil that
will heat your home, and it is going to double or triple your fuel oil
costs, if it is available, who are you going to blame? Who are you
going to blame because of this dramatic increase?
My suggestion is that fingers deserve to be pointed to an
administration that has had no energy policy, has worked to shut down
all increased production, and, in fact, in a rather swaggering way has
suggested we will not drill anymore. We will not produce anymore. It is
somehow environmentally wrong to produce oil and energy in this
country. That is a fundamentally critical thing with which we have to
deal.
We have attempted to deal with it in the Senate. We have dealt with
these issues on a regular basis. We have introduced legislation to
bring about that increased production. We have suggested that these
great oil reserves we still have remaining in our country be allowed to
be drilled, and in an environmentally safe and sound way, that we bring
our production back on line.
In the nonlarge oil producing segment of our country, a segment
called stripper wells, oftentimes owned by farmers and ranchers through
the Southeast, the South, and the upper Midwest--if we, by tax
incentives alone, would guarantee them a margin, we could see a million
barrels a day come back on line--our oil; money that stays in our
country and doesn't go to Saudi Arabia to buy the limousines or the G-4
jet airplanes of the OPEC sheiks.
What is wrong with that policy, Mr. President? What is wrong with
that policy, Mr. Gore? Is it wrong to support domestic production at
home? I think not.
This is an issue we will spend a good deal more time with in the
coming days. But I thought with this press release coming out of New
York today, and we know the President has been talking with the Arab
sheiks yesterday, Mr. President, Mr. Bill Clinton, quit begging. Don't
beg these nations to produce. Turn our producers loose. Let us produce.
Let us become the great producing country again. Let us be the masters
of our own destiny. Don't apologize. And don't suggest to somebody this
winter when their heating bill goes up that it is some Arab sheik's
problem, that they shut the oil off. No. In the last 8 years, you have
shut the oil off, Mr. Gore. You have shut the oil off, Mr. Clinton,
because your policies have denied production and brought production
down at a time when we were increasing consumption and were the
beneficiaries of that consumption by an ever increased standard of
living in our country.
I am not ashamed, nor will I apologize for the citizens of my State
because they want to be consumers. But I will be angry about a
government that denies the kind of production that keeps the strong
economy. And that is exactly what is going on. In our great country
today, the only energy policy that exists in the Clinton/Gore
administration is a policy of begging, begging the producing nations of
this world to please turn on the valves and give us a few more barrels
of oil in hopes that it will drive the price down. The analysts say it
won't.
This winter, as we grow increasingly cold, I am very fearful the
citizens of the Northeast and in other cold areas, especially those who
still use heating oil for their space heat, will find the price tag
getting even higher, and my colleagues will be on the floor asking that
we offset that with Federal tax
[[Page S8252]]
dollars. I will not blame them for asking that.
But once again I will ask: Where was Mr. Gore? Where was Mr. Clinton
for these 8 long years when they knew the day would come that there
would be no oil to burn and we would have to beg to get oil?
I yield the floor. I see the principals are on the floor to continue
the debate on PNTR with China. I hope we can move that expeditiously
today. Thank you.
____________________