[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 99 (Wednesday, July 26, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7641-S7642]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
REMEMBERING SENATOR PAUL COVERDELL
Mr. GORTON. Mr. President, all last week I deferred coming to the
floor to speak about my friend, Paul Coverdell, on the ground that it
might be easier to do so this week. It is not. It is not, but it is
vitally important to memorialize such a friend.
Every Monday evening or Tuesday morning, Paul Coverdell and I sat at
the end of the table during leadership meetings in the majority
leader's office, with an opportunity to comment on all of the issues
that came before that group. Frequently, however, at the end of the
table, we would exchange whispered remarks on some of the other people
or subject matter, either present or not present. Paul Coverdell had a
wonderful sense of humor, there and elsewhere: Dry, gentle, always to
the point. It was a delightful pleasure to share those moments,
sometimes stressful, sometimes marvelously relaxed, with such a man.
If you sought advice on a matter of vitally important public policy,
Paul Coverdell was one of the first you would seek out. You knew that
anything he would discuss with you would be filled with wisdom and
common sense, and that stacking your remarks against his would focus
and sharpen your own thoughts and your own ideas. It hardly mattered
what the subject was--education, taxes, national security, a dozen
others; the advice was always good and always relevant.
If you then sought tactics or advice on how to accomplish a shared
goal, Paul Coverdell was a man whom you sought out. Particularly if
there were an individual in your own party, or in the other party, whom
you might be reluctant, for one reason or another, to approach, you
could ask Paul Coverdell to do it for you, and he would. There was no
task, there was no detail that was too small for him, none that he
thought was beneath him, if it was constructive, if it would help the
cause in the long term.
One way in which you can determine individuals' reactions to other
individuals is in a group. At the Republican conference meeting
immediately before the Fourth of July recess, Paul Coverdell, as the
Secretary of the conference, presented us a little plastic note card,
the top of which read ``Republican Policy.'' I no longer remember the
particular subject, but I do remember that first one or two people
said, ``I don't agree with point 3.'' Pretty soon, everyone was piling
on. Finally, one of our colleagues wrote across the top of this, ``One
Republican's Policy,'' and handed it back to Paul Coverdell, who just
went back to perfect his message.
Whom you tease, you generally love. That in many respects was an
expression of the love and respect his Republican colleagues had for
Paul Coverdell.
Paul Coverdell made us all proud of our profession, a profession
often criticized, in fact a profession rarely praised. When a State
sends a Paul Coverdell to the Senate, it is proof positive that our
system works. And when the Senate of the United States listens to and
respects and follows a Paul Coverdell, that, too, is proof that our
system works. When, as was my privilege, you come to know and be
befriended by a Paul Coverdell, you are especially privileged and
especially honored. I was so privileged. I was so honored.
I will not know his like again.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Ohio.
[[Page S7642]]
Mr. DeWINE. Mr. President, I congratulate my colleague from
Washington State on very eloquent comments about our dear friend, Paul
Coverdell. I had the chance a few days ago to make some more extensive
comments than I will tonight about Senator Coverdell. But I just want
to add, I had the opportunity, as many Members of the Senate did, to
travel to Atlanta this past weekend to participate in that very
wonderful service for our dear friend. I don't think it really hit me
that he was really gone until I got back this week to Washington and
started contemplating this Senate body without Paul Coverdell and all
that he meant to each and every one of us. He was our friend. We loved
him very much. This body, this institution, is a poorer place because
he is gone.
Each one of us is richer because we were privileged to know this very
gentle, this very kind, this very sweet, this very good man.
____________________