[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 96 (Friday, July 21, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S7436-S7437]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MINORITY JUDICIAL NOMINEES IN 106TH CONGRESS
Mr. LEAHY. Mr. President, I am glad to see the Senate confirming
Judge Johnnie Rawlinson to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today.
She will be an outstanding member of that Circuit. I thank Senator Reid
for all of his hard work on this nomination. I also commend our
Democratic Leader for getting Judge Rawlinson and the other nominations
reported yesterday confirmed by unanimous consent today. No one has
worked harder than Senator Daschle to try to get the Senate to act on
President Clinton's judicial nominees and I thank him for his dedicated
efforts.
On July 13, 2000, President Clinton spoke before the NAACP Convention
in Baltimore and lamented the fact that the Senate has been slow to act
on his judicial nominees who are women and minorities. He said: ``The
quality of justice suffers when highly-qualified women and minority
candidates, fully vetted, fully supported by the American Bar
Association, are denied the opportunity to serve for partisan political
reasons.'' He went on to say: ``The face of injustice is not
compassion; it is indifference, or worse. For the integrity of the
courts and the strength of our Constitution, I ask the Republicans to
give these people a vote. Vote them down if you don't want them on.'' I
wholeheartedly agree with the President.
I was encouraged to hear Senator Lott recently and repeatedly say
that he continues to urge the Judiciary Committee to make progress on
judicial nominations. The Majority Leader said: ``There are a number of
nominations that have had hearings, nominations that are ready for a
vote and other nominations that have been pending for quite some time
and that should be considered.'' He went on to note that the groups of
judges he expects us to report to the Senate will include ``not only
district judges but circuit judges.''
The United States Senate is the scene where some 50 years ago, in
October 1949, the Senate confirmed President Truman's nomination of
William Henry Hastie to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the
first Senate confirmation of an African American to our federal
district courts and courts of appeal. This Senate is also where some 30
years ago the Senate confirmed President Johnson's nomination of
Thurgood Marshall to the United States Supreme Court.
And this is where last October, the Senate wrongfully rejected
President Clinton's nomination of Justice Ronnie White. That vote made
me doubt seriously whether this Senate, serving at the end of a half
century of progress, would have voted to confirm Judge Hastie or
Justice Marshall.
On October 5, 1999, the Senate Republicans voted in lockstep to
reject the nomination of Justice Ronnie White to the federal court in
Missouri--a nomination that had been waiting 27 months for a vote. For
the first time in almost 50 years a nominee to a federal district court
was defeated by the United States Senate. There was no Senate debate
that day on the nomination. There was no open discussion--just that
which took place behind the closed doors of the Republican caucus lunch
that led to the party-line vote.
It is unfortunate that the Republican Senate has on a number of
occasions delayed consideration of too many women and minority
nominees. The treatment of Judge Richard Paez and Marsha Berzon are
examples from earlier this year. Both of these nominees were eventually
confirmed this past March by wide margins.
I have been calling for the Senate to work to ensure that all
nominees are given fair treatment, including a fair vote for the many
minority and women candidates who remain pending.
The bipartisan Task Force on Judicial Selection of Citizens for
Independent Courts has recommended that the Senate complete its
consideration of judicial nominations within 60 days.
Governor Bush of Texas recently also proposed that presidential
nominations be acted upon by the Senate within 60 days.
Of the 34 judicial nominations currently pending, 26 have already
been pending for more than 60 days without Senate action. Already this
Congress 83 nominees, including 56 eventually confirmed, have had to
wait longer than 60 days for Senate action. I urge the Senate to do
better.
The Senate should be moving forward to consider the nominations of
Judge James Wynn, Jr. and Roger Gregory to the Fourth Circuit. When
confirmed, Judge Wynn and Mr. Gregory will be the first African-
Americans to serve on the Fourth Circuit and will each fill a judicial
emergency vacancy. Fifty years has passed since the confirmation of
Judge Hastie to the Third Circuit and still there has never been an
African-American on the Fourth Circuit. The nomination of Judge James
A. Beaty, Jr., was previously sent to us by President Clinton in 1995.
That nomination was never considered by the Senate Judiciary Committee
or the Senate and was returned to President Clinton without action at
the end of 1998. It is time for the Senate to act on a qualified
African-American nominee to the Fourth Circuit. President Clinton spoke
powerfully about these matters last week. We should respond not be
misunderstanding or mischaracterizing what he said, but by taking
action on this well-qualified nominees.
In addition, the Senate should act favorably on the nominations of
Judge Helene White and Kathleen McCree Lewis to the Sixth Circuit,
Bonnie Campbell to the Eighth Circuit, and Enrique Moreno to the Fifth
Circuit. Mr. Moreno succeeded to the nomination of Jorge Rangel on
which the Senate refused to act last Congress. These are well-qualified
nominees who will add to the capabilities and diversity of those
courts. In fact, the Chief Judge of the Fifth Circuit declared that a
judicial emergency exists on that court, caused by the number of
judicial vacancies, the lack of Senate action on pending nominations,
and the overwhelming workload.
I am sorely disappointed that the Committee has not reported the
nomination of Bonnie Campbell to the Eighth Circuit. She completed the
[[Page S7437]]
nomination and hearing process two months ago and is strongly supported
by Senator Grassley and Senator Harkin from her home state. She will
make an outstanding judge.
Filling these vacancies with qualified nominees is the concern of all
Americans. The Senate should treat minority and women and all nominees
fairly and proceed to consider them.
To reiterate, I commend and congratulate Judge Johnnie Rawlinson from
Nevada who was confirmed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. She is
going to do an outstanding job on that circuit. Senator Harry Reid of
Nevada, who worked so hard, deserves special mention as, of course,
does Senator Dick Bryan for joining in support of her nomination.
I hope this is a mark that maybe we will do better in the Senate and
start moving judges, similar to what a Democratic-controlled Senate did
in the last year of President George Bush's term in office when we
moved judicial nominations right through to practically the last day we
were in session.
There has been a lot of talk about what should be done or should not
be done, what is being held up or should not be held up. Whether it is
an accident or otherwise, it is a fact that women and minorities take a
disproportionate amount of time to go through the system. That does not
look well for the Senate.
If I could make a recommendation, I would join an unusual ally in
that. Gov. George W. Bush of Texas Presidential nominations should be
acted upon by the Senate within 60 days. He said:
The Constitution empowers the President to nominate
officers of the United States, with the advice and consent of
the Senate. That is clear-cut, straightforward language. It
does not empower anyone to turn the process into a protracted
ordeal of unreasonable delay and unrelenting investigation.
Yet somewhere along the way, that is what Senate
confirmations became --lengthy, partisan, and unpleasant. It
has done enough harm, injured too many good people, and it
must not happen again.
Governor Bush is right. President Clinton has said virtually the same
thing. I have said the same thing. The fact is, if you do not want
somebody to be a judge, then vote them down, but do not do this limbo
thing where sometimes they wait for years and years. Marsha Berzon
waited 2\1/2\ years just to get a vote. They were not going to vote on
this woman. When she finally came to a vote, she was confirmed
overwhelmingly.
Richard Paez is a distinguished jurist, an outstanding Hispanic
American. He waited not 1 year, not 2 years, not 3 years, but he waited
4 years for a vote, and then when his nomination was voted on, it was
overwhelming.
Let us do better. Let's move on some of the names that are here, such
as Kathleen McCree Lewis, Helene White, Bonnie Campbell, Enrique
Moreno, and others who have been held up so long. Let's move on them.
It can be done.
Mr. President, I thank my good friend from Kansas for his
forbearance. He has now done enough penance for 1 day.
I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The assistant legislative clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. BENNETT. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________