[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 87 (Monday, July 10, 2000)]
[House]
[Page H5725]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MISSILE DEFENSE
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Weldon) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. WELDON. Mr. Speaker, this past weekend we had one in a series of
tests of our national missile defense program, which is currently under
development, and supported both by the White House and by overwhelming
support in both the House and the Senate. Unfortunately, this test was
not a success, and there are those who are using this test to criticize
the overall program and to say that technologically we are not prepared
to move forward with missile defense.
I want to take a few moments to clarify what did happen and to
clarify for the record what occurred in that test, and am offering to
Members this week to have a full briefing, both classified and
unclassified, on the details of the test that occurred this past
weekend.
First of all, Mr. Speaker, the hit-to-kill technology that is
fundamental to missile defense was not tested. It was not tested
because we could not get the separation stage away from the main
rocket.
Now, that is not new technology. That is not missile defense
technology. In fact, Wernher von Braun and other scientists solved this
problem 40 years ago. It is a technology necessary to launch every
communications satellite into outer space. It is a technology utilized
for every space mission that we get involved with. It is not a
technology specific to missile defense. However, it failed. No one
expected it to fail, just as when we launch communications satellites,
we do not expect the separation technology to fail to allow that
communications satellite to be put into an orbit.
Unfortunately, there are those who are misinformed; and there are
those who are informed but want to mischaracterize what occurred as to
say that this test was an indication that we are not ready to move
forward with missile defense. Nothing could be further from the truth.
In fact, Mr. Speaker, I have come out and strongly criticized the
corporation who was responsible for the separation stage technology and
have put them on notice that if we do not solve this quality-control
issue, there will be legislation to punitively punish them for other
failures that may occur in the future.
But make no mistake about it, this test was not a failure of missile
defense capability. We never got to that stage. The kill vehicle never
had the opportunity to go after the target. It never had the
opportunity to employ the sensors that are needed in missile defense to
kill the incoming missile on its way into an American city.
We will do a full analysis and the Ballistic Missile Defense
Organization and the Department of Defense will provide the full
reports to us. But this week I will arrange, as the chairman of the
Committee on Armed Services Subcommittee on Research and Development,
for any colleague in this Chamber that wants, a full briefing on the
test, exactly what occurred and why the test failed.
But, again, I would repeat, it was not a failure of missile defense,
any more than a rocket trying to launch a satellite into space and
failing would cause us to stop all future communication satellite
launches. It is simply a problem that we need to get corrected, and we
will get corrected.
As Jack Gantzler, our Deputy Secretary of Defense, and General
Kadish, our three-star general in charge of missile defense, stated in
Congressional hearings 2 and 3 weeks ago, they are totally confident in
our technology; and we will move forward. But there are those who want
to distort the facts. The Union of Unconcerned Scientists is one of
them. Those members of the Flat Earth Society that would like to
mischaracterize what occurred are not going to be allowed to get away
with that, and I would encourage our colleagues to make sure they avail
themselves of all the factual information surrounding that test.
____________________