[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 81 (Friday, June 23, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Page S5732]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
HATE CRIMES AMENDMENT
Mr. GRAMS. Mr. President, as hate-crimes legislation was recently
debated and voted on by the United States Senate, I would like to
briefly explain my vote on this issue. I believe that all victims of
crime, and most certainly victims of violent crime, are deserving of
special status. After due process has been afforded and guilt
determined, perpetrators of crimes should be punished speedily for the
peace of the community and to bring some measure of resolution for the
victim. However, creating different classifications of victims, and
rendering punishment based upon such classifications threatens the
notion of ``Equal Justice Under Law,'' the principle that adorns the
United States Supreme Court building and should suffuse our entire
legal system.
Violence itself, whether motivated by hate, revenge, greed, lust,
envy, or some other evil motivation, threatens the peace of our
communities and our citizens' sense of security. The Kennedy amendment
would include minor crimes against property within the definition of
hate crimes, but would not have included such heinous acts as the
Oklahoma City federal building bombing, or the school shooting at
Columbine High School, both of which left lasting, painful memories for
the local communities in Oklahoma and Colorado, and even the Nation as
a whole.
Rather than focusing on the particular motivation of the criminal,
Congress and the states should provide law enforcement officials the
resources necessary to fully prosecute all crimes. The diligent
enforcement of existing laws will serve as an effective deterrent
against criminal acts motivated by bigotry and hate, or any other
distasteful compulsion. A more comprehensive strategy than what is
embodied in the Kennedy amendment is warranted in light of the fact
that in 1998 there were 16,914 murders committed in the United States
(an average of 46 every day), and of the 16,914, only thirteen were
deemed to be hate crimes.
I supported the Hatch amendment, which studies how extensive the hate
crimes problem is and whether these heinous crimes are being fairly and
aggressively prosecuted in the same manner as other similar crimes. I
also welcome the Justice Department technical and financial assistance
to states which need help in pursuing and identifying hate crimes. This
is a far better role for the federal government than moving to
federalize all state actions against hate crimes.
The Kennedy amendment also raised concerns by experts about
constitutionality. Ultimately, it threatened to create more problems in
the criminal justice system than it purported to solve, and I
consequently voted ``no'' on the amendment and yes on the more
reasonable Hatch amendment. I pledge to my constituents that I will
support aggressive state prosecution of hate crimes, and I will
continue to work to maintain safe communities, including actively
supporting legislation that furthers that end.
____________________