[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 71 (Friday, June 9, 2000)]
[House]
[Pages H4168-H4169]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
PRESCRIPTION DRUGS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from Michigan (Ms. Stabenow) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. STABENOW. Mr. Speaker, on April 12, I led an hour of debate on
the topic of prescription drug coverage for senior citizens. I read
three letters from around the state from seniors who shared their
personal stories. On the 12th, I made a commitment to continue to read
a different letter every week until the House enacts reform. This week
I will read a letter from Julia Kanopsky of Livonia Michigan.
In conjunction with Mother's Day, the Older Women's League (OWL)
published a report entitled, ``Prescription for Change: Why women need
a Medicare Drug Benefit.'' The report describes the special problems
older women face in obtaining prescriptions.
More than one in three women on Medicare lack prescription drug
coverage.
In 1997, 2.6 million women on Medicare spent more than $1200 a year
on their medications and another 2.4 million women spent between $612
and $1200 a year on pharmaceuticals therapies.
The high costs of prescription drugs are especially hard on older
women, most of whom live on fixed incomes. More than half of women age
65 and over have personal annual incomes of less than $10,000 a year
and three out of four have incomes under $15,000.
On average, women's overall out-of-pocket spending for prescription
drugs is higher than
[[Page H4169]]
their male counterparts. In 1999, women on Medicare were projected to
spend $430 a year on medications, compared to $380 for men.
Women are expected to make up a greater share (58 percent) of
beneficiaries with high ($500-$999) or very high ($1,000) annual out-
of-pocket drug costs in 1999.
Women make up more than six in ten (61.4 percent) Medicare
beneficiaries with hypertension and women with hypertension have higher
overall out-of-pocket spending for prescription drugs ($800) than men
do ($694).
OWL shares the disturbing fact that Medicare beneficiaries without
drug coverage are less likely to receive drug therapies compared to
those with coverage. In 1996, women without coverage used 24 percent
fewer prescriptions than did women with coverage.
I agree with the conclusions in the OWL report that these numbers cry
out for the inclusion of a prescription drug benefit in Medicare.
I will now read the letter from Julia Kanopsky:
I was so thrilled to find your address I was allowed to
express myself on [the] high price of prescriptions. I am one
of the least fortunate ones who does not have any . . .
health care . . . [I have a] pension [and] when I pay for my
three prescriptions for heart and blood pressure, and 2 for
pain, pay for my Blue Cross, half of my check is used up and
every time you get a refill on prescription drugs, the price
differs. Blue Cross [also] goes up. I [have] talked to so
many seniors like myself and it has us worried to death. I
just wish the government would take an interest in different
problems like this, to curb like prices. I eat two meals a
day . . . any more hike in health cost, I'll have to go to
one meal. [I get] a little Social Security raise, and then .
. . property tax and utilities go up. I just can't win. Voice
your opinion, Debbie! Maybe someone will listen. Thank you,
Julia Kanopsky. P.S. I'm too old to get a job if I were
younger, maybe [I would]. I could pick up a job to at least
pay for prescriptions for Healthcare. I'm trying to maintain
my home and being independent, these prices are scaring me.
The time is now to enact legislation that will reduce the price for
prescription drugs for seniors and that will include a prescription
drug benefit in the Medicare program.
____________________