[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 45 (Tuesday, April 11, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Page S2521]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
``EXXON VALDEZ'' OIL SPILL
Mr. BINGAMAN. Mr. President, the Senate passed S. 711, calendar No.
235, a bill to allow for the investment of joint Federal and State
funds from the civil settlement of damages from the Exxon Valdez oil
spill, on November 19 last year, in the last hours of the First
Session.
The bill states that moneys in the settlement fund are eligible for
the new investment authority so long as they are allocated in a manner
identified in the bill. Specifically, S. 711 provides that $55 million
of the funds remaining on October 1, 2002 shall be allocated for
habitat protection programs.
The accompanying report, S. Rept. 106-124, contains a provision in
the section-by-section analysis, subsection 1(e), stating that, with
respect to the $55 million for habitat protection programs,
``[a]dditionally, any funds needed for the administration of the Trust
will also be deducted from these monies.'' I was surprised to see this
provision in the report because I do not believe that it reflects the
committee's intent with respect to the bill.
Mr. MURKOWSKI. I think the committee did speak clearly in the actual
legislative language of the bill, which requires that the new
investment authority be allocated ``consistent with the resolution of
the Trustees adopted March 1, 1999 concerning the Restoration
Reserve.'' Among other things, this resolution separates the remaining
funds into two distinct ``pots'' of money: a $55 million pot which can
be used for habitat acquisition; and a $115 million ``pot'' that will
be used for research and monitoring activities.
As the Trustees have explained the resolution to me, the cost of
administration for habitat acquisition will come from the $55 million
and the cost of administration for the monitoring and research will
come from the $115 million. Therefore, I am confident that the actual
legislative language of the bill is clear and that this was the
committee's intent. This provision was very important to me in drafting
this bill because I have always been concerned about the tens-of-
millions of dollars the Trustees have spent on administration of the
funds.
We prepared a statement to clarify this matter last November. It
should have appeared in the Record at the point where the bill was
passed (S15162-S15163). Regrettably, the statement was mislaid and did
not appear where it should have.
____________________