[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 38 (Thursday, March 30, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1947-S1948]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MEDICARE REFORM
Mr. WYDEN. Mr. President, over the last 3 months I have come to the
floor of the Senate on more than 20 occasions to talk about the need to
assist the Nation's senior citizens and families under Medicare with
help with the extraordinary costs so many of them are experiencing for
prescription medicine. I am very pleased to report some very exciting,
positive developments that have taken place in the last few hours on
this issue as a result of the bipartisan effort in the Budget
Committee.
I particularly want to commend my colleagues Senators Snowe and
Smith. Senators Snowe and Smith have teamed up with me on a bipartisan
basis for more than 15 months to address this enormous need of the
Nation's older people.
Today in the Budget Committee we took a concrete, tangible step to
set in place the kind of program that really will provide meaningful
relief for the Nation's older people. We did it in a way that will be
consistent with long-term Medicare reform, a view that is a view shared
by Members on both sides of the aisle. It allows for universal coverage
and a program that is voluntary. That is to ensure that older people
can make the choices that are good for them.
Specifically, what the Budget Committee did is provide legislation
that would allocate $20 billion during the next 3 years to put in place
a prescription drug program, and then make it possible to add another
$20 billion in the next fiscal year, which would be fiscal year 2004-
2005, as part of an effort to ensure solvency, long-term Medicare
reform, and to do it in a way that would not cause an on-budget deficit
in those later years.
I have believed for a long time that at a time when more than 20
percent of our Nation's older people are spending over $1,000 a year
out of pocket on their prescription medicine, when we have millions of
seniors with an average of 18 prescriptions a year, that it is
important we put in place, on a bipartisan basis, meaningful relief for
the Nation's older people.
Today, on a bipartisan basis, the Budget Committee said the Finance
Committee should report a plan on or before September 1 of this year to
help older people with their prescription drug medicine to ensure that
$20 billion would be available for fiscal years 2001, 2002, and 2003,
and, accompanied by real reform of the Medicare Program, there could be
$20 billion for fiscal years 2004 and 2005.
This required, frankly, compromise on both sides. For example, one of
the stipulations in what was done by the Budget Committee today was a
stipulation that there could not be transfers of new subsidies from the
general fund to extend solvency. Frankly, some of my colleagues on the
Democratic side of the aisle had supported those kinds of transfers in
the past.
I think after many months of debate, and certainly a lot of
prognosticators saying it was not possible in this session of Congress
to make real headway on the prescription drug issue, and, in fact, to
get the job done, what the Senate Budget Committee showed this morning
in a very significant breakthrough is that we are now on our way to
address the needs of older people. In fact, this language would be
binding. The language adopted by the Budget Committee, setting out the
parameters for the adoption of a prescription drug program for the
Nation's elderly under Medicare, would be binding.
In addition to my two colleagues Senators Snowe and Smith, I would
like to single out a number of others on a bipartisan basis who helped
us. Chairman Domenici, for example, was one who, in many conversations
with me on this issue, talked about the need to make this program
consistent with long-term Medicare reform and to make Medicare more
solvent in the future. That is an issue that has been highlighted by
Senators Daschle, Lautenberg, and Conrad as well. But the fact that
Senator Domenici emphasized that in the last couple of days helped us
find common ground this morning.
This is a vast improvement on what the House has thus far been able
to accomplish on this issue of prescription drugs. Specifically, the
Senate made it clear we could launch a prescription drug program that
would offer $40 billion of assistance to the Nation's older people, a
program that would assist all senior citizens. So the Senate was able,
this morning, in the Budget Committee, on a bipartisan basis, to add a
significant amount of additional relief. That was important.
The House did not address the solvency issue and that is what, in
fact, the Senate did. In that sense it is a dramatic improvement. What
we did, in terms of the dollars on a bipartisan basis, is today we
raised the amount the Senate would make available for the program to
$40 billion. Originally that amount was $20 billion.
The fundamental point remains. We addressed this issue by adding more
money than was originally envisaged in the mark that came out from the
Senate. We were able to do it in a way that addressed the Medicare
solvency question. The House did not really touch the Medicare solvency
question, and we think, on a bipartisan basis in the Senate this
morning, that was important.
Finally, we know the revolution in American health care has
essentially bypassed the Medicare Program. A lot of these medicines
today help older people to stay well. They help to lower blood
pressure. They help to lower cholesterol. They are medicines that
promote wellness. They do not just take care of folks when they are
sick. As a result of the work done today, we made a major step forward
in modernizing this program and bringing it in line with the rest of
the American health care system.
I reported on the floor of the Senate recently a case of an older
person in Hillsboro, OR, who had to be hospitalized for 6 weeks because
Part A of Medicare would pay his prescription drug bill and he could
not afford his medicine on an outpatient basis. Today, as a result of
what the Senate Budget Committee did, that person will be in a position
to get his medicine on an outpatient basis.
They will be able to get help because the Senate improved on what the
House has been talking about by putting more of a focus on solvency,
and
[[Page S1948]]
we were able to take the amount of the program up to $40 billion beyond
what the original discussion had been in the Senate, just $20 billion.
Finally, we need to understand there is a long way to go from here.
We are going to have to defend what was done by the Senate Budget
Committee this morning on the floor of the Senate. Then we will have a
conference with the House. I hope we will come out of that discussion
with the House ensuring there is $40 billion for the prescription drug
program, that it is possible to have universal coverage, that it is
voluntary, that it is consistent with Medicare reform, and that it
gives older people bargaining power in the private sector to get more
affordable medicine.
There is a long way to go in the process. This morning's breakthrough
was just one step in the process. It was a chance to go forward in a
way that is fiscally responsible--$20 billion for the first 3 years to
as the first downpayment, as Senator Snowe has characterized it, on
prescription drug relief, but then also to say there will be another
$20 billion available in 2004 and 2005 when it is accompanied by
reform.
We also work to ensure solvency, and for the first time, we put real
time constraints on getting a prescription drug benefit done .
As was pointed out yesterday in the Senate Finance Committee by
Senator Breaux, there have been 14 hearings on the issue of Medicare
reform and prescription drug coverage for older people. Senator Breaux,
along with Senator Frist, has a bipartisan bill supported by a number
of Members of the Senate.
What we said this morning in the Budget Committee is that we want the
Finance Committee, on or before September 1 of this year, to bring us
legislation in line with the binding language offered in the Senate
Budget Committee under the Snowe-Wyden-Smith amendment.
Having come to the floor of the Senate on more than 20 occasions, as
I related those stories about older people who had been put in
hospitals because they could not afford their medicine on an outpatient
basis, older people who were taking two pills a day when they should
have been taking three, or breaking their Lipitor capsules--which deals
with cholesterol and heart problems--in half, I often thought as I left
the floor that we might not be able to make the kind of progress we
made today in the Budget Committee.
Today, the Budget Committee came together on a bipartisan basis to
ensure there would be sufficient funds to jump-start Medicare reform,
provide meaningful relief for the Nation's older people and their
families, while addressing the solvency question and the need for an
approach to be consistent with long-term Medicare reform.
We have improved on what is being discussed in the House because they
do not have the same focus on solvency. I am very much looking
forward--as we bring that legislation to the floor of the Senate and it
goes to conference and the work in the Finance Committee--to continue
the progress we saw this morning.
Suffice it to say, there were a number of moments today when it was
likely that it was all going to break down. Had the Budget Committee
reported a significantly smaller sum than was finally agreed on, had we
not made the kind of changes in the Snowe-Wyden-Smith amendment, we
might not have been able to reach a bipartisan agreement on
prescription drugs this year in the Congress. As a result of what
happened today in the Budget Committee and the important work that was
done on a bipartisan basis, we have laid the foundation for making sure
that before this Congress adjourns and goes home for the year, we have
acted to help the Nation's older people.
For all of those seniors and for all the families who are walking an
economic tightrope, balancing their food costs against their fuel bills
and their fuel bills against their medical bills, my admonition this
afternoon is that we have a long way to go, but today we really made
progress.
Today, as a result of bipartisan work, we have an opportunity to
ensure that by fall, on or before September 1, as the amendment adopted
in the Budget Committee requires, we have a proposal that is
bipartisan, that is one which provides meaningful relief for older
people, that is voluntary, offers universal coverage, and is consistent
with long-term Medicare reform. We can have that kind of proposal on
the floor of the Senate this fall.
For the millions of seniors and families who are watching the
Congress and looking to see if we can deliver on this issue, progress
was made today. I particularly commend Senator Snowe and Senator Smith.
Senator Smith made a very constructive suggestion towards the end of
the markup when we had a debate about when the Budget Committee was
seeking a product from the Finance Committee. Senator Smith offered a
very constructive suggestion. If we can continue to build on that
bipartisan progress, we can get this job done.
I believe--and I will wrap up with this--this country can no longer
afford to deny coverage for senior citizens' prescription needs under
Medicare. I use those words deliberately. People ask if we can afford
to offer the coverage. I am of the view that we cannot afford not to
offer this coverage because the revolution in American health care is
about these new medicines that help people stay well.
I have pointed out repeatedly that one can spend $1,000 or $1,500 on
anticoagulant medicines that help prevent strokes and can stop a stroke
that costs more than $100,000.
Today, we made very significant progress in ensuring that no longer
does the revolution in American health care bypass the Medicare
program. I look forward to defending what was done in the Budget
Committee on prescription drugs on the floor of the Senate when we get
to the budget and working with the Finance Committee. Senators Moynihan
and Roth have been very gracious in assuring there will be an
opportunity for colleagues in both parties to contribute and offer
their ideas and suggestions.
If we can continue to build on the progress that was made today in
the Budget Committee, we will get this done, and we will get it done
before the end of this session. In my view, this will revolutionize
American health care and provide meaningful relief to older people and
their families.
Mr. President, I yield the floor and suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr. Bennett). The clerk will call the roll.
The bill clerk proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. STEVENS. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order
for the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________