[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 33 (Wednesday, March 22, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Pages S1582-S1583]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
CROP INSURANCE
Mr. GRAMS. Mr. President, I want to address the crop insurance reform
proposal. I thank you for the opportunity to address this legislation
that I think is so crucial to the economic health of farmers in
Minnesota and across the country. I have appreciated the hard work and
effort put into this bill, and I believe it is one of the key reform
issues the Congress must address this year to create an economic
climate that will enable America's farmers to thrive.
As a sponsor of crop insurance legislation in both the 105th and
106th Congress, I am certainly no stranger to this issue. Working with
producers, rural lenders, economists, and other stakeholders, I think
we have fashioned a bill that would encourage more participation in the
program, help encourage producers to buy higher levels of coverage, and
will also reduce the instances of ``moral hazard'' to keep everybody's
premiums lower, and also help maintain the integrity of the program.
Mr. President, I first introduced my crop insurance bill in the 105th
Congress, and I am pleased that much of my own legislation has now been
incorporated into the Roberts-Kerrey measure, including pilot programs
that would offer farmers premium discounts for using whole farm units
or one crop units of insurance, and allowing producers to cross State
and county boundaries to form insurable units, plus a pilot program
permitting producers to ensure their crops are based upon a future
price. Also, I am pleased that this bill will now also include an
expansion of the dairy options pilot program. I think this is also a
very important tool for producers who are attempting to weather the ups
and downs in the dairy market. So I think it is great that we have
included this provision that is going to help dairy farmers in the
Midwest and across the country as well.
Participation in the Federal Crop Insurance Program has increased
from 10 percent of the eligible acres in 1980 to about 70 percent of
eligible acres last year, 1999. I think that is encouraging, but we
still need higher levels of participation if our farm is to
successfully manage its risk in the face of ever-changing global
markets. Like almost no other form of employment, producers are subject
to a host of variables that impact their bottom line, including
weather, disease, production levels in other countries, foreign trade,
increasing production costs, and changing consumer demand. All are out
of the control of the producer.
As most of you know, America's farmers are fiercely independent and
ever optimistic and were glad to get the freedom to make their own
production decisions that came with the 1996 farm bill. However, part
of the promise of Freedom to Farm was that there would be accompanying
efforts to bring about trade negotiations to reduce barriers,
regulatory reform, and improvements to the Crop Insurance Program to
help producers manage the risk in open markets. Unfortunately, the
administration has not eased the regulatory burden on farmers, and we
have not initiated new WTO talks or negotiations. I am confident this
crop insurance reform legislation remains one of the most important
pieces of the farm prosperity puzzle. Tax relief and tax reform for our
farmers across the board is also very important because it directly
impacts the bottom line, the net income of our farmers and the ability
of our farmers to pass farms from one generation to another.
Again, I am proud to be one of the early advocates for reform and
that the basic concepts of my proposal again were carried into this
reform bill.
[[Page S1583]]
I strongly urge my colleagues to speedily approve this bill so it can
be reconciled with the House bill and be completed as soon as possible.
Thank you very much, Mr. President.
I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Idaho.
____________________