[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 32 (Tuesday, March 21, 2000)]
[House]
[Pages H1140-H1141]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
IN OPPOSITION TO S. 1287, THE NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY AMENDMENTS ACT OF
2000
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentlewoman from Nevada (Ms. Berkley) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Ms. BERKLEY. Mr. Speaker, in 1983, President Reagan signed into law
the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. The new law began with a reasonable
scientific approach. The country would search all over the Nation
looking for geological formations which were capable of burying high-
level nuclear waste. The new law would also consider three sites so as
to provide some regional equity to the burden of storing the waste. One
site would be in the northeastern part of the country, one site would
be in the southeastern United States, and one site would be in the
West. These three sites would be studied and then presented to the
President of the United States for a decision.
[[Page H1141]]
Since then, politics has had more to say to the siting of high-level
nuclear waste than the science. After Members of Congress from the
Northeast began to openly oppose placing the dump in the Northeast, the
Department of Energy unilaterally decided to take them off the list.
When placing the dump in the southeastern part of the country came up
as a campaign issue in 1984, President Reagan unilaterally decided to
take the southeastern part of the country off the list.
These decisions were not based on science, Mr. Speaker. They were
based on politics. Then in 1987, the so-called ``screw Nevada'' bill
was passed into law. This bill made the most political of decisions, to
designate one site, Yucca Mountain, as the only site, excluding any
other consideration from any other region in the country. So if I begin
to question the claims of science from the supporters of dumping
nuclear waste in Nevada, it is because I have learned to question from
the history of this issue.
Fast forward to the mid 1990s. Nearly a decade has gone by since the
``screw Nevada'' bill and the scientific evidence against Yucca
Mountain is growing. It has become scandalously obvious that Yucca
Mountain was the wrong mountain to bet on. It is in an earthquake zone,
it is in an underground flooding zone, it is in a volcanic eruption
zone, for crying out loud.
On top of that we find out that the rocks at Yucca Mountain cannot
contain radiation like the politicians had hoped. So back to the
drawing boards to find another way to screw Nevada.
By 1995, illogical legislation took a new direction, something called
a temporary storage site in Nevada. The nuclear industry figured they
could build a temporary site because it would not have to meet the
strict standards of a permanent dump, and once the waste was in Nevada,
it would never leave.
But a funny thing happened on the way to a temporary dump. President
Clinton promised to veto it and that threat, coupled with the hard work
of some Members of the House and the Senate, has frozen the temporary
concept for half of a decade.
But now, given that the temporary dump will not fly, we see S. 1287.
This is nothing but a transparent effort to throw out radiation
standards and sneak the date several years closer for shipping nuclear
waste to Nevada. This is nothing but a temporary dump proposal in
disguise. The President recognizes that and will veto S. 1287, and the
Senate vote already proves the veto will be sustained.
Can we get off this act of futility and move on to worrying about the
important issues that confront this Congress, that confront this
country, education, health care, Social Security, and campaign finance
reform? This is what our constituents want.
{time} 1945
That is what the people of Nevada want. We will not stand for 1287,
and I ask my colleagues to join with me to stand up and oppose this
onerous, ridiculous piece of legislation.
____________________