[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 12 (Thursday, February 10, 2000)]
[House]
[Page H335]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
H.R. 2777, THE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CAPITAL ENHANCEMENT ACT
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the
gentleman from Washington (Mr. Metcalf) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. METCALF. Mr. Speaker, my top priority when I was elected to
Congress was to balance the budget and rein in the skyrocketing
national debt. These two goals are vital to the economic well-being of
the United States.
Today's budget outlook is considerably more optimistic than when the
phrase ``deficits as far as the eye can see'' was commonly used in
conjunction with budget projections.
The Congressional Budget Office is forecasting enormous budget
surpluses which provides Congress an immense opportunity to begin to
pay down the $3.3 trillion of marketable debt. Today, the Treasury
auctioned $10 billion worth of 30-year bonds, and they are expecting an
additional small auction in August. After that, the Treasury is not
expected to auction any additional bonds until February 2001. In fact,
yesterday's Bloomberg article states that, ``Wall Street bond dealers
have decided that probably this will be the last bond ever: a
collector's item to be displayed on the shelf along with golf trophies
in the recreation room.''
This poses an interesting dilemma for the Federal Reserve Board.
Their job is to accommodate a substantial rate of economic growth by
assuring needed increases in the money supply which has been
accomplished in the past by buying United States Government securities
at an average annual rate of about $20 billion. When the Treasury stops
buying U.S. securities, the Federal Reserve will be losing a vital
lever to accommodate the needed increases in the money supply.
My bill, H.R. 2777, the Transportation Infrastructure and Local
Government Capital Enhancement Act, would provide the Federal Reserve
Board a replacement mechanism to accommodate the needed increase in the
money supply without buying U.S. Government securities, that is,
without going into debt. The Federal Reserve or its surrogate would buy
zero interest mortgages on State and local infrastructure improvements.
These mortgages would be amortized over periods of up to 30 years
depending on the nature of the improvement, and in almost every case
where the State or local government incurs a debt to finance investment
in infrastructure, the voters have to approve the loan and pay
interest. That taxpayers do not lightly assume such obligations is
testified by the nearly zero rate of defaults on municipal bonds.
The scheduled repayments of the zero interest mortgages would provide
a constantly renewed source of funds for public projects without
requiring the Treasury to pay interest on these loans. Unlike now, when
Federal borrowing means virtually permanent increases in the public
debt, the proposed mortgage loans would be regularly repaid by local
governments.
Evidence of failures to maintain and improve infrastructure is seen
every day in such problems as unsafe bridges, urban decay, dilapidated
and overcrowded schools, inadequate airports. A General Accounting
Office study finds that education is seriously handicapped by
deteriorating school buildings, and that an investment of $110 billion
is needed to bring them up to minimally accepted standards.
I am particularly concerned about our crisis in critical
transportation bottlenecks that are in trade corridors, and maritime
vulnerabilities. We also need to make immediate investments to address
our Nation's vulnerability in the end-to-end movement of forces,
equipment and material necessary to support a rapid military
deployment.
This plan is fiscally sound. It is a means of providing the Federal
Reserve Board with a needed lever to increase the money supply and
provide public infrastructure necessary to meet the challenges of the
21st century.
____________________