[Congressional Record Volume 146, Number 11 (Wednesday, February 9, 2000)]
[Senate]
[Page S555]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
GUN SAFETY
Mr. LAUTENBERG. Mr. President, on April 20, we are going to mark a 1-
year anniversary of the terrible tragedy that occurred at Columbine
High School in Colorado. That was the day when two teenagers, Eric
Harris and Dylan Klebold, walked into the school and sprayed the
library and cafeteria with gunfire, killing 12 classmates and a teacher
and wounding many others. A few who were aware of what took place that
day will never forget that horrible scene of a young man jumping out a
window, people running, weeping, the whole place in disarray, students
lying on the ground wounded, some fatally.
You would have thought by now, 9 months after that massacre, that
Congress would have been able to get together to pass commonsense gun
safety measures. Some of my colleagues will say there is not much we
can do about it.
No, we cannot go back and undo that tragedy, but we sure can do
something that maybe will prevent something similar from happening in
the future. It is preposterous to say we can't do anything better. We
can do a lot about it. Reasonable gun safety legislation can make a
difference.
For proof, I ask that we take a look at testimony of the young woman,
Robyn Anderson, before the Judiciary Committee of the Colorado House of
Representatives. In case the name isn't familiar, Robyn Anderson is the
young woman who went with Harris and Klebold to the Tanner gun show in
Adams County, CO. It was in late 1998. She wanted to help them buy
guns.
Harris and Klebold were too young to buy guns because they had an 18-
year age limit, but Robyn Anderson was 18. She bought three guns at
that gun show, two shotguns, and a rifle, and immediately handed them
over to Harris and Klebold. Four months later, Harris and Klebold used
all three of those guns in their murderous rampage.
This is what Ms. Anderson said during her testimony:
Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold had gone to the Tanner gun
show on Saturday and they took me back with them on Sunday. .
. . While we were walking around, Eric and Dylan kept asking
sellers if they were private or licensed. They wanted to buy
their guns from someone who was private--and not licensed--
because there would be no paperwork or background check.
That was her statement to the committee in the Colorado House. As all
can see, they had one mission: to avoid a background check.
I am the author of a piece of legislation we tried to get through the
Senate that said we ought to have everybody available for a background
check. We know those unlicensed dealers who were able to sell at these
gun shows--and there are over 4,000 gun shows a year--unless a State
law says no, can sell guns to anybody who has the money. They can put
them in the back of their car. They can carry them on their shoulder.
Even someone who is listed on the 10 Most Wanted--criminals--could
qualify to buy a gun from one of these dealers.
Tragically, these three young people found three gun dealers, and
they bought their deadly weapons. This is what she had to say about gun
sales at gun shows:
It was too easy. I wish it had been more difficult. I
wouldn't have helped them buy the guns if I had faced a
background check.
Robyn Anderson said that in front of the Colorado legislature. This
shows clearly that background checks for gun sales can make a
difference. They can keep guns out of the wrong hands.
When the National Rifle Association says that our gun laws are
sufficient, it is wrong. They are simply out of line. There is a
glaring loophole--the gun show loophole--which Congress must close.
There is no more time for delay. The American people are requesting
action, demanding it, if you look at surveys. I hope my colleagues will
complete action on the juvenile justice bill because it did contain a
prohibition on gun sales that are done at gun shows without a
background check. Now, that was knocked out of the House bill as it
came over to the Senate for conference. But the fact is that it was in
the Senate bill, and we ought to include it in any bill that finally
passes. Let's do it before we mark the anniversary of that terrible day
at Columbine High School, showing that we are serious and that we care
about what happened.
In the nine months since April 20, we have seen more terrible
shootings and bloodshed. In May of last year, a teenager in Conyers,
GA, shot and injured six of his classmates. In July, a gunman in Ohio
shot three teenage girls and the teacher of a Bible study group. In
August, a white supremacist stormed into a Jewish community center near
Los Angeles and shot two children and a senior citizen. Later that day,
before this culprit was apprehended, he shot and killed a postal
worker. In September, more gun violence--a gunman in Fort Worth, TX,
walked into a Baptist church and killed seven young people who were
there for a prayer meeting before shooting himself. In November, the
worst mass shooting in Hawaii's history--a Xerox employee killed seven
coworkers. Yet another school shooting in December--a seventh grader in
Fort Gibson, OK, takes his father's gun to school and wounds four
classmates.
That is what we see. It doesn't matter what the heritage is of the
individuals; race or religion doesn't matter. Everybody is subject to
this kind of violence if they are in the wrong place at the wrong time.
These are just the shootings that got the most attention. Month after
month, the death toll from gun violence continues to mount. From
Colorado to Georgia, from Ohio to California, from Texas to Hawaii,
families across this country continue to mourn.
What do we do here in Congress about it? Nothing. It is a disgrace.
Of course, the Senate did pass several reasonable measures as part of
the Juvenile Justice bill, including the amendment I mentioned before,
which would prevent criminals from being able to buy guns at gun shows.
Technically, this legislation is stuck in a conference committee. For
those who are not part of the structure here, the conference committee
is where legislation is finally resolved when the House committee and
the Senate committee, with similar jurisdiction, meet together and
argue out the differences, if any, in a bill. But it would be more
accurate to say that it is being held hostage by the extremists at the
NRA and the politicians who march lockstep to their commands.
We have to free this legislation, and we dare not let the gun lobby
prevail over the vast majority and the will of the American people who
simply want to make their families a little safer.
I urge my colleagues to join with me in pushing the congressional
leadership to finish work on the juvenile justice bill. We want to do
it before there is another episode of gun violence, another loss of
life that could be avoided. We have to do more to stop the gun
violence, the epidemic that lies within our country. I hope we will be
able to do it soon.
With that, I yield the floor.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Missouri is recognized.
____________________