[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 95 (Wednesday, June 30, 1999)]
[House]
[Pages H5134-H5135]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
RURAL NEVADA AGAIN UNDER SIEGE BY U.S. FOREST SERVICE
(Mr. GIBBONS asked and was given permission to address the House for
1 minute and to revise and extend his remarks and include extraneous
material.)
Mr. GIBBONS. Mr. Speaker, once again, the absolute greed of the
Federal bureaucracy is pushing aside the common sense of local people
on an issue in my district.
I would like to share with my colleagues what can only be termed as
an insensitive approach to a very personal and private situation of the
Federal Agency Forest Service in my home State of Nevada.
In its seemingly endless battle over public lands in rural Nevada,
once again we are under siege by the Forest Service. But it is not
commercial real estate or high market value land interests that we are
after, it is about a mere two-acre cemetery.
The Forest Service wants to sell the small town of Jarbidge, Nevada,
two acres to buy its own cemetery where the parents and grandparents of
this small rural town have been laid to rest since the beginning of
this century.
The Federal Government already owns nearly 90,000 square miles of
Nevada's lands. Nevadans are not asking for much, a mere two acres to
be exact, a two-acre cemetery already occupied for nearly a century by
parents and grandparents of many Nevadans.
On behalf of the families of Jarbidge, I urge my colleagues to join
me in supporting H.R. 1231 to convey these two acres out of the
millions they own.
Where I Stand--Mike O'Callaghan: USFS Picks New Fight
(Mike O'Callaghan is the Las Vegas Sun executive editor)
About the time it appears there is some justice and common
sense ruling northeastern Nevada, along comes another goofy
act.
A couple of weeks ago this column praised the Nevada
Supreme Court for settling a dispute started three years ago
by a few Elko County residents who saw a conspiracy under
every rock in that huge area. After using and abusing the
power of a local grand jury the district judge was slapped
and four state employees were given back their lives by the
Supreme Court.
[[Page H5135]]
That whole mess was started by a businessman who believed
the state and federal conservation agencies were conspiring
to destroy the county when acting to protect the environment.
He wrote a letter to the county commissioners calling for a
grand jury because the conservation agencies, especially the
Nevada Division of Wildlife and the U.S. Forest Service, and
environmental groups were ruining almost everything held dear
by the people of that area. Those suffering economically,
according to the writer, were the ranching, mining, and
business communities and all of the taxpayers.
The grand jury was called and it acted as wild as the
charges made in the letter. While all of this was going on,
the U.S. Forest Service sat on its hands and took no action
to replace a road damaged by a flood in 1995. This resulted
in the county going to fix the road running alongside the
West Fork of the Jarbidge River. Immediately another federal
agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, came unglued
because it said the roadwork was hurting the bull trout
habitat. Eventually this mess was calmed down and on the
surface appears straightened out because the state also had a
role to play.
So now everything is hunky-dory between the federal
conservation agencies and Elko County? Not really. There's
the small issue over cemetery land at Jarbidge. Yes, a very
small two acres that Rep. Jim Gibbons wants turned over to
the county. Here are Gibbon's words before a subcommittee in
Washington last week:
``As you may know Jarbidge is a small, rural community in
Elko County, Nevada. Known historically for its contribution
to Nevada's mining industry, this community is surrounded by
national forest lands and the Jarbidge Wilderness Area.
``Within this area is a small cemetery, under
administration of the Forest Service, where generations of
residents of this historic community have been laid to rest.
``The earliest tombstones are dated in the very early
1900s, and some members of the Jarbidge community claim that
this land has been used as a cemetery long before its
designation as Forest Service land.
``Since 1915 the Jarbidge Cemetery has been operated under
a permit to Elko County by a Special Use authorization which
runs periodically for 10 and occasionally 20 years.
``In an effort to remove the uncertainty about the
continued existence of this cemetery and to resolve the
operational responsibility, the residents of Jarbidge have
long expressed an interest in having two acres, containing
the cemetery, conveyed to the county so they might have a
permanent, private cemetery.
``Madame Chairman, that is why I have introduced HR 1231, a
bill that would direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey
approximately two acres of National Forest lands to Elko
County, Nevada, or continued use as a cemetery.''
No problem for this small request coming from a state with
thousands of square miles controlled by the federal
government. Guess again. USFS Deputy Chief Ron Stewart
testified against HR 1231 because his agency expects to be
paid fair market price of those two acres. His testimony
doesn't describe how you put a price on a cemetery that's
just a bit less than 100 years old. What it does reveal is a
petty attitude by a large federal agency that continues to
result in even its rational decisions being questioned by the
people in and around little Jarbidge.
Gibbons could hardly believe Forest Service officials were
making the demand but it they were, he added, they ``should
hang their heads. These people are asking for a cemetery, not
for land to build commercial or residential enterprises. . .
. ''
Because of the actions of Elko's runaway grand jury I began
to wonder what was in the water the jurors were drinking.
This most recent action by the Forest Service in Washington
has convinced me that its decision makers are drinking
straight from the polluted Potomac River.
SPECIAL ORDERS
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of
January 6, 1999, and under a previous order of the House, the following
Members will be recognized for 5 minutes each.
____________________