[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 94 (Tuesday, June 29, 1999)]
[House]
[Pages H5079-H5084]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]




           ILLEGAL NARCOTICS AND THEIR IMPACT ON OUR SOCIETY

  The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under the Speaker's announced policy of 
January 6, 1999, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mica) is recognized 
for 60 minutes.
  Mr. MICA. Mr. Speaker, I have come to the floor again to talk about 
the subject of illegal narcotics and its impact on our society, and 
tonight I would like to start with a small tribute, first of all, to 
our Drug Enforcement Administration administrator Tom Constantine who 
will be feted tomorrow upon his retirement, and I would like to first 
pay tribute to his tremendous service. Next month, in just a few days, 
Tom Constantine, the administrator of the Drug Enforcement 
Administration, will retire and return to Schenectady in New York where 
he lived prior to moving to Washington, D.C. and serving this 
administration.
  Tom Constantine has been the administrator for DEA for the past 5 
years, and he had a very long and distinguished career before he came 
to our Nation's capital. Mr. Constantine began his career as a deputy 
sheriff in Erie County in New York in 1960 and became a State trooper 
in 1962. In 1986, he was named superintendent of the New York State 
Police, and he served in that position with great honor and 
recognition. Since Tom Constantine has taken over the DEA in 1994, the 
agency has added 1,200 new agents, and

[[Page H5080]]

he is overseeing the revamping and the modernization of the agency's 
intelligence operations.
  During his tenure, he has initiated new programs to foster closer 
cooperation which is so important with our State and local law 
enforcement agencies and to enhance their ability to fight violent 
crime caused by drugs. Recently Tom Constantine opened a $29 million 
training academy for the agents of DEA and also for our foreign, State 
and local police that they participate in with training. The facility 
which can house 250 trainees is located in Quantico, VA.
  Mr. Constantine also was one of only 19 people ever to be named as an 
honorary FBI Agent, and for anyone aware of the longstanding rivalry 
between DEA and FBI, they really can know and appreciate the 
significance of this award and recognition. Over the past few years, 
Administrator Constantine and the FBI Director, Mr. Louis Freeh, 
bridged the gap between those two Department of Justice law enforcement 
agencies, and I believe they increased the effectiveness of our law 
enforcement efforts against major drug trafficking organizations.

                              {time}  2215

  Mr. Constantine believed that if Mexican authorities wanted to hurt 
the drug trade, then they could hunt down and arrest their country's 
top smugglers and major drug lords and send them to the United States 
for trial, and we know how many of them have been requested for 
extradition from that country.
  As he stated in testimony before our subcommittee, the one I chair, 
which is the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human 
Resources, there are 15 to 25 key drug traffickers who are primarily 
responsible for the drug trade. Cases have been prepared against them. 
They have been indicted in the United States, and arrest warrants have 
been issued, but they still have not been extradited.
  Tom Constantine, I believe, is one of the finest examples of law 
enforcement professionals to ever serve at any level in our law 
enforcement agencies, whether it be local, State or national. His 
service to the safety and the well-being of our Nation should be noted, 
and I know that I join many other of my colleagues tonight on the eve 
of his being recognized on his retirement in saluting his fine work to 
both the Drug Enforcement Administration and to every citizen in our 
Nation.
  Mr. Speaker, tonight, in addition to that small tribute to a great 
leader in the war on drugs, Mr. Tom Constantine, I would like to 
provide, Mr. Speaker, my colleagues and the American people with an 
update since my last speech last week on the floor on the topic of 
illegal narcotics and talk about the impact, some of the happenings and 
some of the tragedies that have faced our Nation and even our Nation's 
capital in the last week since I last talked on this subject.
  Then I would also like to talk about a Geraldo Rivera report which 
was aired, a very lengthy report, some of it accurate, some of it 
inaccurate, but since we have raised the question of legalization, 
since we have raised the question of decriminalization, since this 
topic is now very much in vogue in talk shows and special programs and 
in news reports, I think that it is important that we deal with the 
facts, and I would like to talk about those facts tonight.
  The first thing, in the update of some of the news, the news relating 
to the war on drugs and the situation relating to crime that emanates 
from illegal narcotics continues to be bad.
  Just in today's Washington Post, I would like to read from an 
editorial that said, and I will quote, the headline is, Shot, 5 months 
old. The latest stray gunfire victim may be the most innocent of all, a 
5-month-old baby boy. He was seated with his mother and a man on an 
apartment stoop in southeast Washington on Friday, this past Friday, 
when they were shot in an attack by two masked gunmen. The man, 
apparently the intended victim, is dead. The mother is hospitalized. 
The baby, guiltless as a lamb, is in critical condition. As with 
hundreds of other children caught in the city's violence, the wounded 
baby did not elect to enter this world. Neither did he choose to live 
in a neighborhood where drugs, gangs or gun battles flourish.
  I think if we look at our Nation's capital as an example, and what a 
tragic example, the last week with death and mayhem in the streets of 
our Nation's capital, even critically wounding a 5-month-old, we see 
the roots of some of the problem in drug trafficking and illegal 
narcotics.
  Last week, the Nation's capital, Congress, anyone with any 
sensibility, was absolutely distraught by what took place with the 
death and killing of a 55-year-old grandmother in the District of 
Columbia. We saw, those of us who serve in Washington, our Nation's 
capital and the local residents in this area, saw the funeral and the 
tragedy of, again, this slaying. I thought I would read a little bit, 
this is from the Washington Times, about that tragedy and the root of 
that problem.
  Tuesday night, police charged Derek Terrell Jackson, age 19, with 
first degree murder while armed in the shooting death of Mrs. Foster-
El, 55, a grandmother who was shot in the back while shielding children 
from gunfire. D.C. police said the cause of the southeast shooting is 
unusual. In drug-ravaged areas of the city, rival gangs normally shoot 
each other in turf wars. An open air drug market has operated for years 
only a block away from Ms. Foster-El's backyard in the 100 block of 
56th Place, Southeast. Again, headline, a tragedy and a neighborhood 
filled with drugs, crime, violence.
  Today's Washington Post gives us a story under the crime and justice 
heading of Maryland, and if they are not killing each other, they are 
killing innocent folks with guns. This is an account from Maryland in 
today's paper. A 16-year-old Gaithersburg youth pleaded guilty 
yesterday to first degree murder in the slaying of a 15-year-old who 
was beaten and stabbed to death after being blamed for a bad drug deal, 
prosecutors said.
  This goes on to say that the individual charged struck the teenager 
in the head with a large rock and stabbed him repeatedly after he 
begged for his life, prosecutors said. Another tragedy in the area of 
our Nation's capital, a 16-year-old first bludgeoning a 15-year-old and 
then stabbing him to death.
  Another report, on the Tuinei death, this is from an Associated Press 
story in McKinney, Texas. Former Dallas Cowboy offensive tackle, Mark 
Tuinei died of a lethal combination of heroin and a form of drug called 
ecstasy, according to autopsy results released Tuesday.
  I spoke in a previous special order about the tragedy possibly being 
linked to illegal narcotics, and here we see that deadly combination of 
heroin and ecstasy. We find high purity heroin coming in from Colombia 
and also from Mexico, and young people and even strong athletes do not 
realize the deadly potential of heroin just by itself, and then to mix 
it with some other drug proves to be fatal, not only in Texas but as I 
cited in my own central Florida area where we now have the number of 
drug overdose deaths in central Florida exceeding the number of 
homicides.
  Further update on the news, I spoke last week of an article relating 
to Plano, Texas, which has also been ravaged by drug deaths. Tonight 
there is a story that was published, I believe, over the weekend, 6-27-
99, by Tracy Eaton in the Dallas Morning News, a rather large story 
about the region's heroin supply and this would be the Texas region, 
linked to deaths in Plano. The headline says, Mexican production 
driving economy in the Mexican area.
  The story goes on and talks about the fields now of poppies. Again, 
part of this administration's policy did not serve us well in 
certifying Mexico, and Congress must also take the blame for certifying 
Mexico with fully cooperating while it is increasing dramatically the 
production of illegal narcotics, particularly black tar deadly heroin.
  Let me read a little bit from this story in the Dallas Morning News. 
Over the past 3 years, and I think I cited this last week, 18 young 
people from Plano or with ties to the city have died of heroin 
overdoses. Plano, with its wholesome reputation and all-American city 
status, is not the only spot that has been hit. Oklahoma City, 
Cleveland, Milwaukee, Seattle, Boston and Atlanta have all seen tragic 
strings of heroin-related deaths as part of what United States 
officials call a national epidemic.

[[Page H5081]]

  Let me quote, and this is a quote, the world is awash in heroin. It 
is really a nightmare, said retired Army General Barry McCaffrey. He is 
director of the White House Policy on Drug Control and our Nation's 
drug czar. He goes on to say, and let me quote Barry McCaffrey, he 
says, ask our eighth graders are they fearful of using heroin, and 
around 50 percent say no. It is crazy, that is what Barry McCaffrey 
said, our drug czar.

  The article goes on to cite an interesting report this news reporter 
had obtained, and let me read a little bit further. It says, a 
confidential U.S. intelligent report obtained by the Dallas Morning 
News calls heroin, and again this is a confidential report that the 
news folks have that we do not have it, but it calls heroin, and this 
is in quotes, a growing national threat. An increased supply of heroin 
is causing prices to drop and encouraging traffickers to develop new 
markets. This, in turn, leads to a new generation of consumers.
  That is the end of this confidential report. Maybe the administration 
does not want this to get out.
  Many of these new customers are in small towns and communities, the 
report read, and let me read again a quote from the report. Suburban 
consumers age 12--now listen to this. Suburban consumers age 12 to 25 
have been one of the fastest-growing user groups, the report read. Then 
it goes on to another quote, heroin use among women of all ages has 
increased significantly.
  So the most vulnerable in our society, our young people, age 12 to 
25, are becoming our leading consumers. They go on to cite how heroin 
deaths nationwide have nearly doubled since this administration took 
office, according to the latest government statistics.
  I always quote the absolutely startling statistic since 1992/1993, 
again with the institution of this administration's drug policy, heroin 
use among our teenage population has soared 875 percent.
  This is a story today in the Dallas Morning News that I thought would 
be of interest and provide, Mr. Speaker, my colleagues with a little 
update.
  Let me talk a little bit more about the impact of illegal narcotics 
and drug deaths and what is happening. Again, a sampling, just a recent 
case. Just in the past few months there has been a distressing number 
of drug-related deaths. This is in New York. For example, heroin users 
in the East Village of New York City have been overdosing at an 
alarming pace this year, according to a report. One local expert 
estimates that more than 30 people have died from heroin overdoses 
since mid-May. It is suspected that the high purity levels are 
poisoning people who are not prepared for its strength. And I spoke 
about the Tuinei case, a very strong athlete who died from a heroin 
ecstasy overdose.
  In Orlando last March, a heroin overdose victim was left to die as 
his friends watched him turn blue from suffocation. The victim was left 
sitting on a toilet for 8 hours after he was found semi-conscious in 
his bathroom.

                              {time}  2230

  He was then moved to a bedroom where he stayed for 4 hours before 
someone called 911. At least one of his friends played video games 
while his friend died in the next room.
  Two roommates in San Francisco died of a so-called flesh-eating 
bacteria, this is recently, after injecting themselves with Mexican 
black tar heroin. This should be good news for the heroin users out 
there, that this flesh-eating bacteria is now a special surprise from 
the Mexican heroin producers. Two others were hospitalized with the 
infection. The bacteria suspected in the deaths produces toxin that 
degrade human tissue. It is suspected that the bacteria may be in the 
dirt that adheres to the drug in the processing facilities in Mexico.
  Another report, and this is also from my area in Sanford, Florida, 
central Florida, a gentleman there plowed into a car driven by a 
pregnant woman, which caused the premature delivery and death of her 
twin sons. He had cocaine, Valium, and methadone in his system. The 
concentrations found in his blood indicated that he had probably taken 
one dose of each of the three drugs within 24 hours of the crash.
  The pregnant woman was 7 months pregnant at the time. The crash 
pinned her in the car. Once freed she was flown to the hospital, where 
doctors delivered the boys 13 weeks premature. One of the boys died the 
day of the crash and the other the next day.
  This is an example, again, that I cite time and time again of drug-
related deaths. These two premature babies may not be counted in the 
14,000-plus that were killed last year because of drug-related deaths. 
Those who were on our highways and in highway fatalities may or may not 
be counted. Those who were suicides may or may not be counted. Those 
who again have died in some other fashion may or may not be counted.
  Here is an example of several more lives snuffed out by illegal 
narcotics in probably the biggest social problem that we have facing 
our Nation.
  This month a former nurse accused of holding 2 women hostage for 
nearly 3 days in a hospital, then killing one and critically injuring 
another, had struggled with a heroin problem for more than 15 years. 
How will those deaths be recorded? How will those injuries be recorded?
  In Texas last week, a man convicted of beating his girlfriend's 4-
year-old daughter to death because babysitting kept him from buying 
drugs was sentenced to death by lethal injection.
  In a murder that shocked Mexico early this month, and I think I cited 
this death before, and it takes quite an incident to shock Mexico, but 
early this month a prominent TV and radio celebrity, Francisco Stanley, 
was gunned down in broad daylight by two men who sprayed the victim's 
car with automatic fire. Mr. Stanley was carrying credentials provided 
by the Ministry of Interior identifying him as a Federal agent.
  Additionally, autopsy results indicate that he was a cocaine user. 
Mexican media reports have stated that he may have dealt cocaine in the 
show business world. The way the killing occurred has led investigators 
to suspect that in fact, this, too, was the work of drug traffickers.
  That is a little bit on some of the recent news and an update on some 
of the cases I have cited before. This past week our Subcommittee on 
Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources conducted a hearing 
on the topic of the del Toro case, in particular, and the subject that 
we posed and the title of the hearing was ``Getting Away With Murder: 
Is Mexico a Safe Haven for Killers or Drug Dealers,'' and in 
particular, the del Toro case.
  The del Toro case is an absolutely heinous crime that was committed 
by a United States citizen. Even though his name is del Toro, he was 
born in the United States. He was not a Mexican national. He was born 
to U.S. citizens.
  There is no question from the testimony we had or from what law 
enforcement has made public that on November 7, 1997, Sheila Belush was 
found murdered in her home in Sarasota, Florida. She was murdered while 
her young children, some of them just babies, were left with her, with 
the body. This is a particularly heinous crime, as I said. She was 
shot, then she was finished off with a kitchen knife, stabbed in her 
own home in Sarasota. Her husband testified before our subcommittee 
asking for justice.
  Jose Luis del Toro fled to Mexico, and has used the Mexican corrupt 
judicial system to flee from justice from the United States. We have 
asked for his extradition and it has been refused. Again, the system 
which is so corrupt which we heard about in this hearing denied justice 
to Mr. Belush and the children that she left behind.
  This is not the only case of an extradition request being ignored by 
the Mexican government. It is one of dozens and dozens. In fact, in the 
last 10 years there have been 275 requests of extradition, and in 
particular, relating to murders and illegal drug dealers, drug lords. 
We have some 30 or 40 requests of these major traffickers and murderers 
that have been ignored.
  To date, not one Mexican national has been extradited to the United 
States. Only after complete disruption caused by Members of Congress 
and by others have we received one American. A Mr. Martin was returned 
several weeks ago. But this committee or this subcommittee showed that 
justice is not being done in the del Toro case, that the Mexican 
judicial system is becoming a haven for murderers and drug

[[Page H5082]]

dealers, and that that country is not complying with simple requests 
for extradition.
  Anyone who heard the testimony of this father, this husband, and the 
details of how this crime was committed against his family, and to hear 
the pain he has suffered and they have suffered in losing the wife and 
mother of these children, would cry out also for justice.
  Again, this is not the only case. Tonight I might cite a couple of 
cases just for information of the Congress, Mr. Speaker.
  First of all, first of all, I often refer to Mexico as a haven for 
drug dealers. Certainly one of our major wanted individuals is Rafael 
Caro-Quintero. He is a drug lord who is wanted for the kidnapping and 
killing of our United States DEA agent, Special Agent Enrique Camarena, 
14 years ago. Unfortunately, justice has not prevailed in the del Toro 
case, in the murder of Sheila Belush. Justice has not prevailed in the 
just incredible, again, heinous torture death of Enrique Camareno, who 
was tortured to death, and Rafael Caro-Quintero has been convicted of 
kidnapping and killing our United States agent.
  Special Agent Camareno was kidnapped and tortured by this individual 
and his cohorts. His cohorts, I might say, included, and we have 
evidence of this, scores of Mexican police and Mexican government 
accomplices who participated in, again, the murder and torture of our 
drug enforcement agent some 14 years ago. Caro-Quintero ordered the 
killing because raids organized by Camareno, our agent, were disrupting 
his drug operations.
  The United States would like this individual extradited so that 
justice can be served in the United States in the Camareno death. 
Again, at least this individual was responsible for organizing the 
death and mayhem committed against our DEA agent. This is 
one individual.

  Tonight we also have with us an individual, another individual who is 
a drug dealer. This is Agustin Vasquez-Mendoza. Mr. Vasquez-Mendoza is 
believed to be responsible for the 1994 murder of another United States 
DEA agent, and that is DEA Special Agent Richard Fahs. Vasquez-Mendoza 
is not believed to have been the actual trigger man, but he was the 
criminal mastermind behind the murder of Special Agent Fahs.
  Our special agent, DEA agent, was fatally wounded by Vasquez-
Mendoza's henchmen during an undercover drug buy in Glendale, Arizona. 
After the murder, Vasquez-Mendoza fled to Mexico, where he is still 
believed to be hiding. We have indicted this individual. We have also 
requested the Mexican government to extradite that individual so that 
he also can meet justice in the United States and under our system, 
where we know he would be tried fairly and where we have the evidence 
to convict that individual.
  I might say, Mr. Speaker, there is a $2.2 million award for 
information leading to the arrest or conviction of this fugitive. 
Again, his name is Agustin Vasquez-Mendoza, and the date of birth is 
March 23, 1974, and he is suspected of being in Mexico. There will be 
$2.2 million for return of this individual, and also having this 
individual, Agustin Vasquez-Mendoza, brought to justice.
  Those are a couple of points I wanted to make, and bring folks up to 
date relating to news in the drug war and also the hearing that we 
conducted in our subcommittee on the question of extradition, and two 
of our unfortunately numerous cast of individuals who have been 
indicted and we have requests that have been ignored by the Mexican 
government for extradition to see justice in the United States.
  Additionally, tonight I wanted to spend some time, as I said earlier, 
talking about a report that aired on television. I saw it over the 
weekend. Geraldo Rivera had over the weekend at least a 1-hour story. 
There was a series of stories. He called it ``Drug Bust, the Longest 
War,'' and he had some information that was correct and he had some 
information in it that was way off base.
  I thought it would be important to set the record straight, 
particularly since so many Members of Congress and the general public 
watch some of these shows and obtain information about what is going on 
in the war on drugs from these reports.

                              {time}  2245

  I think it is critical, again, to correct information that came out.
  First of all, I think Geraldo Rivera did a fairly accurate job 
describing the situation in Mexico, the corruption that exists, the 
drug lords running rampant, the problem with no extradition, the 
interviews relating to, again, corrupt activities and drug activities 
in Mexico being conducted in a routine manner and very few people being 
brought to justice.
  I think also the report did summarize that part of the problem was 
that the Congress, and also the administration, we must say, did not 
bring Mexico to task, and that has been a difficulty in trying to get 
Members of Congress to pay attention to this problem. The major source 
of illegal narcotics, some 60 to 70 percent of the hard drugs coming 
into the United States, heroin, cocaine, methamphetamines, come from 
and through Mexico. As I cited, Mexico is now a major producer, 
producing 14 percent of all the heroin coming into the United States.
  I think the report was on target about some of the problems. Also on 
target that this Congress has not responded, and this administration 
has not responded, in appropriately decertifying Mexico for trade and 
for financial benefits because the dollar has reigned supreme here, and 
both Members of Congress and the administration are afraid in any way 
to impact that trade, that business, that finance.
  That is unfortunate, that we have allowed our neighbors to the south 
to become close to a narco-trafficking state. It is not at the stage of 
a Colombia, but, if it continues, the whole system of justice, the 
entire governmental process, could be lost, and it could become a 
narco-terrorist state. That is not that far-fetched.
  Mr. Rivera had in his report some statements that I believe need 
correction. He went on to talk about waging the war on drugs and said 
that the war on drugs is basically a failure. In fact, I have a 
transcript of his report. Let me read a little bit of it. It says, ``We 
have always made waging the war the top priority. If only we could get 
more boats, more planes, more soldiers, we could win this fight.''
  Then his second sentence here is, ``Drug treatment has always been a 
distant second place.''
  Now, first of all, we have to deal with the facts. Now, I know Mr. 
Geraldo Rivera is not noted for always dealing with the facts, but I 
thought it would be an interesting approach to try to bring some of the 
facts out tonight that he spoke about. First of all, he thinks that the 
emphasis during this administration has been on getting more boats, 
more planes and more soldiers.
  Well, Mr. Rivera is wrong. In fact, I had our staff pull up, 
subcommittee staff, pull up drug spending for interdiction, and this 
would be the account under which we would get more planes, more boats, 
more soldiers, the military spending.
  If we could trace this chart before 1991, maybe we could focus on 
this chart here, but you would see from early 1980 when President 
Reagan took office a steady increase in expenditures for interdiction. 
This would be using the military and other sources, getting to drugs 
just as they came out of their source, interdicting them before they 
come to our borders. That certainly has to be a Federal responsibility. 
You would see that all the way up to 1992 with President Bush, and that 
was his policy.
  In 1993, and, again, you have to remember the Democrats controlled 
the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives by 
overwhelming majorities in the legislative bodies, and, of course, the 
executive agency, the presidency. They began a steady decline, and it 
went right to 1995, in expenditures. In fact, there are some absolutely 
incredible figures, and let me see if I can dig those up here, about 
the cuts that were made.
  Well, you can see right here, for example, just in military spending 
on the war on drugs there was a 50 percent cut during that period. Then 
the other part of this would be what about what is going on now?
  Well, I put this little cover on here to show that with the 
Republicans taking over Congress, we have restarted the war on drugs. 
The war on drugs basically ended in January of 1993 when

[[Page H5083]]

this President took office. We restarted the war on drugs, and you can 
see from this period in here where the new majority took over to here, 
we have just begun to get back to the point where we were, and we still 
are not there. Even this shows a projection for 1999 to get beyond 
where we were. But, again, this chart shows the actual spending on 
boats, planes and soldiers.
  Now, of course, this is also shown in 1999 dollars, and we began in 
1991 dollars, so we actually have a net decrease in spending.
  The war on drugs was closed down by this administration in the area 
of international programs. Now, international programs, in this 
category, again, if we looked at what this does, this is stopping drugs 
at their source.
  While this program dealing with the military was in the several 
billion dollar range, again, the military is still operating, they are 
operating in the Caribbean, they are operating around the world, they 
have been operating in Panama, they have been operating from our bases, 
and they have a military mission, so it is slightly different. I would 
have to even argue about that being a total cost. It is something that 
they are given as an additional mission.
  This budget deals with Federal drug spending for the international 
work. That would be at the source country. This is in the millions of 
dollars. Back with President Reagan and President Bush, we would have 
seen the same curve from the early eighties to 1992 with President Bush 
in office.
  Then we saw basically again a close-down in the war on drugs. This 
chart shows exactly what took place. On January 1, 1993, this President 
took office, closed down the war on drugs. This is particularly 
significant because this is stopping drugs at their source.
  Now, if you took cocaine, for example, 100 percent of the cocaine was 
grown with coca in Peru and Bolivia. This is the 1992-1993 era. We knew 
exactly where the cocaine was, and it can only grow at certain 
altitudes in the coca bush, et cetera. They closed this down. We saw 
huge increases in production.
  What happens here is when we stop spending money closest to where the 
drugs are produced, you have greater production, and we will talk about 
that in just a second. But this is the most effective way. If you could 
stop drugs, for example, we have been able, if you look when the 
Republicans took over here, working with Speaker Hastert, who was then 
chairman of the National Security International Affairs Criminal 
Justice Subcommittee which had oversight over drug policy in the prior 
Congress, this is where we restarted this program, and this is where we 
achieved in two countries that we would operate with that we had 
permission from the administration to operate with, Peru and Bolivia, 
we have now cut their production by 50 percent of cocaine.
  Actually, where the administration had a terrible policy in Colombia, 
Colombia has now become in the last six years the major producer of 
cocaine. They are actually growing it and producing it, processing it, 
the largest producer in the world. So our program in these two areas 
has been significant in cutting 50 percent of the supply.

  The administration stopped military assistance, helicopters, 
supplies, equipment, on sort of a human rights basis, and I could spend 
the rest of the evening talking about that bogus position, which has 
now turned Colombia into the major cocaine and heroine producing 
country.
  In 1993 there was no heroin produced really to speak of in Columbia. 
Now Colombia is, again, through the policy of this administration, not 
getting the guns, boats and ammunition to that country, the direct 
policy of this administration, and is now becoming the major producer.
  I also put a little cover on this to show what we have done in the 
last year to try to get us back up to the levels, because stopping 
illegal narcotics is far less costly, and, again, this is only in the 
millions of dollars as opposed to the billions of dollars on the other 
charts. If we can stop the supply, we can, at its source, eliminate a 
lot of the interdiction costs and the law enforcement costs.
  What is absolutely fascinating is staff produced this little graph, 
and this graph is very interesting, because it shows that 12th grade 
drug use among our young people actually mirrored the spending patterns 
of this administration. When they decreased the amount for 
international programs and interdiction, what happened is the supply 
increased, the price went down, it was available, and when heroin can 
be bought for the price of marijuana or cocaine you have developed a 
nice market and a young audience and consumer group that we have heard 
about that, again, begins using this hard stuff coming in. This is an 
incredible graph, because it absolutely mirrors the pattern of failure 
that this administration adopted.
  Now, again, Mr. Rivera said here, ``Drug treatment has always been a 
distant second place.'' This is not something I made up. I am quoting 
from the text which we obtained of his program.
  Another myth, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Rivera made, and that is borne out by 
this chart. This chart shows at the bottom the actual amount of dollars 
expended on drug treatment. If we go back to 1991 and we compare it 
with 1999, we see that in fact drug treatment expenditures have gone up 
almost every single year. There is one year in here, 1996, where it did 
not go up, but we have actually doubled the amount of money-plus on 
drug treatment. So it is not taking ``a distant second place.'' And 
this is the policy also adopted in 1993 by this administration, to 
spend more money on treatment, cut the interdiction, the source country 
programs, and put emphasis here.
  So this policy and liberalization policy which we have pointed out 
not only gives us more spending for treatment, but more people to 
treat, and we use Baltimore as a great example. It has now risen to 
39,900 heroin addicts in the City of Baltimore through a liberal 
policy. Again, this debunks some of the statements that were made by 
Mr. Rivera in his recent account.
  It is interesting too that in today's Washington Post, and possibly 
in other publications across the country, our drug czar, Barry 
McCaffrey, made an opinion editorial piece that was published, and let 
me read from that and what he says.

                              {time}  2300

  First of all, let me pick up on the part about the effectiveness of 
some of these programs. Drug use in this country has declined by half 
since 1979. The number of users dropped from 25 million in 1979 to 13 
million in 1996. Again, this does not coincide with what the report of 
Mr. Rivera said.
  And again this is according to our drug czar. ``You would think that 
under the Republican administration there might be less spent on drug 
treatment.'' And again I'm quoting from Barry McCaffrey, the head of 
our Office of Drug Policy under the Clinton administration, and this is 
his quote in this op-ed today, ``In the past 4 years the administration 
increased spending.'' I have to beg to differ with him, but the 
Republican majority increased spending on prevention by 55 percent, 
while spending on treatment rose 25 percent.
  So treatment and prevention, in fact, have risen dramatically under 
this Republican-controlled Congress, contrary to Mr. Rivera's statement 
that drug treatment has always been a distant second place.
  Additionally, the liberal policies we found actually create a bigger 
dependent population. I thought it was interesting what Mr. McCaffrey 
said about who commits crime and who is responsible for the 
disproportionate share of our Nation's violence that we hear about, and 
these are his words: ``Drug dependent individuals are responsible for a 
disproportionate percentage of our Nation's violent and income-
generating crimes, such as robbery, burglary or theft. The National 
Institute of Justice surveys consistently find that between one-half 
and three-quarters of all arrestees have drugs in their system at the 
time of the arrest. In 1997, a third of State prisoners and about one 
in five Federal prisoners said they had committed the crimes that led 
to incarceration while under the influence of drugs.'' This is, again, 
part of the op-ed of General McCaffrey.
  Then the myth about liberalization and that we should allow more 
folks to become addicts and hooked on hard drugs and that this is 
harmless, and this is what Barry McCaffrey says in

[[Page H5084]]

today's op-ed. ``Injection drug users place themselves at great risk. A 
University of Pennsylvania study of Philadelphia injection drug users 
found that four times as many addicts died from overdose, homicide, 
heart disease, renal failure and liver disease as did from causes 
associated with HIV disease.''
  Dr. James Curtis, Director of Addiction Services at Harlem Hospital 
Center, explains, and this is a quote from him, ``It is false, 
misleading and unethical to give addicts the idea that they can be 
intervenous drug abusers without suffering serious injury.
  So, in fact, the myth that we have folks behind bars, and again I 
appreciate the sensationalism that Mr. Geraldo Rivera tries to provide, 
and some of it is entertaining, but we must deal with facts, 
particularly on such a serious subject as what is happening in our 
society as a result of illegal narcotics trafficking.
  Mr. Rivera in his piece cited, and again from his transcripts, two 
women, and one with tears in her eyes testified that she had only been 
arrested this one time on drug trafficking and, in fact, I think she 
said whe was duped, she claimed, into carrying a package of cocaine for 
a drug dealer. That was one case. The second lady, who had received a 
mandatory sentence, was there because she was dealing with four ounces 
of cocaine.
  He also cited that most of the people in Federal prison were 
nonviolent offenders. Well, the facts are a little bit different, and I 
have cited this study, but a study just out from the New York State 
Commissioner of Criminal Justice reports that, in 1996, 87 percent of 
the 22,000 people in jail in New York for drug crimes were in for 
selling drugs or intent to sell. Of the 13 percent doing time for 
possession, 76 percent were arrested for selling drugs and pleading 
down to possession. The study further shows that the most convicted 
first-time drug offenders end up on probation or in treatment, again 
contrary to what this national report by Geraldo Rivera tried to 
portray. It just does not hold water.
  In fact, at a recent hearing we held in the Subcommittee on Criminal 
Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, the drug czar from Florida, 
Mr. Jim McDonough, testified that in a thousand cases they looked at, 
only 14 out of the total were there for possession and, in fact, some 
of that may have been also watered down for other offenses.
  The facts are that, in fact, virtually all convicted criminals who go 
to prison are violent offenders, repeat offenders or violent repeat 
offenders. It is simply a myth that our prison cells are filled with 
people who do not belong there or that we would somehow be safer if 
fewer people were in prison. A scientific survey of State prisoners 
conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice found that 62 percent of 
the prison population had a history of violence and that 94 percent of 
the State prisoners had committed one or more violent crimes or served 
a previous sentence of incarceration or probation.
  The New York study that we cited last week and again tonight was 
interesting. It was a rather in-depth study, and it showed that in New 
York, for example, one really had to work at it to be incarcerated in 
prison, and that no one was there just for a minor offense or for even 
for a first-time felony.
  In California, the 1994 prison population rose to 125,000 inmates. 
Numberous experts and journalists insisted the State's prisons were 
overflowing with first-time offenders and harmless parole violators. 
The results of another study, this California Department of Corrections 
analysis of randomly selected felony offenders admitted to the state's 
prison and classified as nonviolent, reveals that 88.5 percent of these 
offenders had one or more prior adult convictions. The average number 
of prior convictions was 4.7. A fifth of these so-called nonviolent 
felons had been committed to prison once or twice before.
  There is study after study to refute what Geraldo Rivera would try to 
lead the American people and the Congress to believe. A 1996 study of 
individuals in prison in Wisconsin found that about 91 percent of the 
prisoners had a current or prior adult juvenile conviction for a 
violent crime. About 7 percent of the prisoners were in for drug 
trafficking. None were sentenced solely for possession or as a drug 
user, and fewer than 2 percent were first-time drug or property 
offenders. Prisoners served less than half their sentence time behind 
bars, and 82 percent were eligible for discretionary parole within a 
few years.
  So the facts are not as presented, again sensationally, by Geraldo 
Rivera. They do show a different picture, if we just take a few minutes 
to look at them.
  According to a study published in the Journal of American Medical 
Association last year, nondrug users who live in households where 
drugs, including marijuana, are used, are 11 times as likely to be 
killed as those living in drug-free households. Drug abuse in a home 
increased a woman's risk of being killed by a close relative some 28 
times.
  So, again, the myths that were portrayed in this presentation tried 
to make us feel warm and fuzzy about releasing folks into the 
population.

                              {time}  2310

  I do not want to say that we do not need to treat folks in prison and 
I think a very good case could be made for that, but we must have 
effective treatment programs, not only in prison but also for other 
individuals, such as those portrayed, those individuals such as the 
young woman who was on drugs, as a young man who went back to drugs. We 
must work together to find solutions to this incredible problem facing 
our society but we must also not just listen to the Geraldo Riveras but 
to the facts about drugs and illegal narcotics and their impact on our 
society.

                          ____________________