[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 79 (Monday, June 7, 1999)]
[House]
[Pages H3744-H3745]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
{time} 1915
A POSITIVE SPIN ON AN UGLY WAR
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Green of Wisconsin). Under a previous
order of the House, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Paul) is recognized
for 5 minutes.
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, the Yugoslavian civil war, now going on for
years, was near ending until NATO chose to enter on the side of the KLA
seeking independence. Aggressively entering the fray by invading a
foreign nation, in direct opposition to its charter, NATO has expanded
the war and multiplied the casualties. The impasse now reached,
although predictable, prompts only more NATO bombing and killing of
innocent civilians on both sides. It is difficult to see how any good
can come from this continuous march of folly, but I am going to try.
Number one, the U.N. has suffered a justified setback in its effort
to be the world's governing body of the new world order, and that is
good. By NATO refusing to seek a U.N. resolution of support for its war
effort, it makes the U.N. look irrelevant. Now NATO is using the U.N.
to seek a peace settlement by including the Russians, who agree to play
the game as long as additional American tax dollars flow to them
through the IMF. The U.N. looks weak, irrelevant, ignored, and used.
The truth is winning out.
Number two, NATO is on the verge of self-destruction. Since the
purpose of NATO to defend against a ruthless Soviet system no longer
exists, that is good, NATO, in choosing to break its own rules looks
totally ineffective and has lost credibility. The U.S. can get out of
NATO, come home, save some money and let Europe tend to its own
affairs, and we can then contribute to peace, not war.
Number three, Tony Blair's true character has now become known to the
world. He has not only annoyed many Americans, but many Germans,
French, Italians and Greeks as well. By Blair demanding more American
bombs, money and the introduction of ground troops, many have become
skeptical of his judgment. It is much easier now to challenge his
influence over Bill Clinton and NATO, and that is not only good, but
necessary.
Number four, more Americans every day are discovering that military
spending is not equivalent to defense spending. This is a good start.
It is
[[Page H3745]]
clearly evident that when useless immoral wars are pursued, money is
wasted, weapons are consumed, and national security is endangered,
opposite to everything that is supposed to be achieved through defense
spending. A foolish policy of foreign interventionism, no matter how
much money is spent on the military, can never substitute for a
sensible, pro-American policy of friendship and trade with all those
countries willing to engage.
Number five, the ill-gotten war has shown once again that air power
alone, and especially when pursued without a declaration of war and a
determination to win, serves no useful purpose. Although most military
experts have stated this for years, it is now readily apparent to
anyone willing to study the issue. Many more Americans now agree that
war not fought for the defense of one's country and for the
preservation of liberty is immoral and rarely brings about victory. If
we remember that in the future, that would be good.
Number six, NATO's war against Yugoslovia has made it clearly
apparent that world leaders place relative value on human life. This is
valuable information that should be helped to restore U.S. national
sovereignty. According to NATO's policy, the lives of the Kosovars are
of greater value than the Serbs, Rwandans, Kurds, Tibetans, or East
Timorans. Likewise, oil and European markets command more bloodshed in
support of powerful financial interests than the suffering of millions
in Asia and Africa. This knowledge of NATO's hypocrisy should some day
lead to a fair and more peaceful world.
Number seven, the issue of whether or not a President can initiate
and wage an unconstitutional war without declaration and in violation
of the War Powers Resolution has prompted a positive and beneficial
debate in the Congress and throughout the Nation. This is a necessary
first step to get Congress to regain its prerogatives over the issue of
war.
Number eight, interventionism in the affairs of other nations when
our national security is not threatened serves no benefit and causes
great harm. Our involvement with NATO and Yugoslovia has once again
forcefully shown this. Although our Founders knew this and advised
against it, and American Presidents for over 100 years acted
accordingly, this rediscovery of a vital truth can serve us well in
future years.
Number nine, NATO's arrogance has once again restated another truth
worth remembering: Might does not make right.
Number ten, the 19 nations' military actions against a tiny state
shows that alliances to promote aggression do not work. The moral high
ground is not achieved because despite the pronouncements of concerns
for the suffering of the innocent, when survival is not at stake and
when the defense against an aggressor is not an issue, war by committee
is doomed to fail. This is a lesson that needs restating.
Number 11: NATO's blundering policy ironically will leave a legacy
that will allow rebuilding after the new world order disintegrates.
To the bewilderment of their own leaders NATO has forcefully
supported the notion of autonomy and independence for ethnic states.
Instead of huge governments demanding ethnic diversity, the goal of
establishing Kosovo's independence provides the moral foundation for an
independent Kashmir Kurdistan, Palestine, Tibet, East Timor, Quebec,
and North Ireland and anyone else that believes their rights as
citizens would be better protected by small local government. This is
in contrast to huge nation states and international governments that
care only about controlling wealth, while forgetting about the needs
and desires of average citizens.
12. Another lesson that will be learned from this misadventure, but
unfortunately not soon enough, is that empires self-destruct out of
their own weighty arrogance and blindness to the truth. Inevitably
powerful empires--and it is said we are the only super power left and
have great world-wide responsibilities--pursue a march of folly, a
course upon which we inextricably find ourselves.
If these lessons are remembered, we will have a much better chance of
achieving peace and prosperity throughout the world.
____________________