[Congressional Record Volume 145, Number 62 (Monday, May 3, 1999)]
[Senate]
[Pages S4511-S4512]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
MORNING BUSINESS
______
McCAIN RESOLUTION REGARDING KOSOVO
Mr. VOINOVICH. Mr. President. I rise today to oppose the McCain
Resolution.
First, I congratulate Reverend Jesse Jackson, Congressman Rod
Blagojevich, Joan Brown Campbell and religious leaders for the release
of our three servicemen. I am particularly proud that Joan Campbell,
the Secretary General of the National Council of Churches and the
mother of County Commissioner Jane Campbell, and Father Irinej
Dobrijevic, a Serbian-American Priest from St. Sava Orthodox Cathedral
in Cleveland, were major participants in the release.
I pray that the letter from Jesse Jackson to President Clinton and
other diplomatic moves this weekend with President Yeltsin of Russia
will bring all parties to the table so we can end the bombing, death
and destruction that is going on in Serbia and Kosovo.
Mr. President, I am astonished at the negative reaction. In fact,
Elizabeth Sullivan in today's Cleveland Plain Dealer pointed out that
``the alliance sneers at Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic's latest
offer, to accept a lightly armed U.N. peace force, refusing to treat it
as the basis for further talks.''
In my opinion, our State Department, President and NATO are allowing
their egos to get in the way of their common sense and good judgment.
It was this hubris--which is defined as ``excessive pride or self-
confidence; arrogance''--and their miscalculation of the importance of
Kosovo to the Serbian people and Milosevic that got us into this mess.
It appears that they are ``hell bent'' to get us into a major war
that will have catastrophic impact on our domestic and international
responsibilities for years to come and may well ignite destabilization
of southeast Europe, a new cold war with Russia and the creation of new
alliances by this country's adversaries who we have been working to
bring into the international community.
I believe it is time to stop the bombing, reduce hostilities on both
sides and resume negotiations to bring about peace and restore
stability to the region.
I agree with the sentiments expressed yesterday by Majority Leader
Trent Lott who said ``let's see if we can't find a way to get the
bombing stopped, get Milosevic to pull back his troops, find a way to
get the Kosovars to go back in a secure way. Short of that, I see a
quagmire that is going to go on. It's going to get bloodier.''
So, before we vote on this resolution and continue down the path to a
further escalation and a greater involvement, there are three things
that we
[[Page S4512]]
have to ask ourselves: (1) What is the price? (2) What is the risk? (3)
What is the prize?
The main price that will be paid will be done so in human lives.
There will be casualties--American and NATO troops, Kosovar civilians
and refugees, Serb civilians as well as civilians in neighboring
countries where we've already mistakenly dropped bombs.
We have to remember the experience of World War II, where 700,000
German troops were held-off by 150,000 Serb guerrillas. Are we willing
to make such a commitment?
We also have to consider the financial impact of this war so far.
Thus far, it is being paid for by Social Security. If the war escalates
to include ground forces and if we're totally honest with the American
people, we have to tell them that one of three things will happen to
pay for this war--
(1) we'll continue to use Social Security to pay for it and the
deficit will go up; (2) we'll reduce spending for domestic programs; or
(3) we'll increase taxes.
In addition, each passing day further diminishes the readiness of our
armed forces. We already have a terrible readiness problem--this
campaign is only making it worse.
Indeed, comments made by General Richard Hawley, head of the U.S. Air
Combat Command indicate that we could run out of the state-of-the-art
satellite-guided Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) for our B-2
Stealth bombers sometime this month.
He is quoted as saying ``it's going to be really touch-and-go as to
whether we'll go Winchester on JDAM's.'' That's pilot jargon for
``running out of bullets.'' He also indicated that because more crews
are being called up for this campaign, fewer crews are available should
another crisis appear elsewhere in the world (North Korea, Iraq, etc.)
Our main military goal should be to ensure our readiness to the
extent that our adversaries know we are prepared.
There are projections indicate that it will take at least $30 billion
to address readiness effectively.
The longer we continue our current efforts, the greater the
opportunity that one or more of our NATO allies may decide enough is
enough. This could leave the U.S. holding the bag! We could also stir
regional resentment among Serbia's neighbors, leading to further
political instability and the possibility of a wider war. There are
already groups promoting a greater Albania that would include parts of
Montenegro, Macedonia, and Greece.
This war could also undermine U.S. and NATO credibility and erode our
ability to deter aggression globally.
If we suffer significant casualties, equipment failures, morale loss,
etc. potential adversaries in North Korea, China, Iran and Iraq will
take note and could react;
Our experience in the Persian Gulf bolstered our credibility but this
situation is very different--different terrain, there was an
international consensus that Iraqi aggression against a sovereign
nation must be reversed, threat of weapons of mass destruction.
And finally--the Prize
When we win--and I am confident we would win--what do we get?
First there is the need to put in a long-term occupation force to
oversee the peace. I am concerned that such a force could be subject to
continual guerrilla attacks which would incur casualties.
Then we would have to rebuild the infrastructure and economy of
Kosovo and Serbia and that could cost as much as $100 billion.
We would also have to build a new, Western-oriented and democratic
state with whatever existing civic institutions there are available.
This could lead to a period of ``growing pains'' where there is
considerable political uncertainty for a number of years.
Mr. President, as our colleague from Kansas, Senator Roberts, has
pointed out, there would be a precedent for U.S. to intervene
militarily when there are widespread humanitarian abuses.
We have a lot of questions to answer before we find ourselves in a
war from which we cannot extricate ourselves.
Fundamentally, what Senator McCain's resolution does is give our
President carte blanche, and when you look at the price and the risk
and the prize, you can understand why I am opposed to this resolution.
We should not give the President blanket authority to get us into
another Viet Nam that could very well have much greater negative impact
nationally and internationally than Viet Nam.
Two weekends ago I visited Arlington Cemetery, the Vietnam and Korean
memorials and I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure that
we do not have a Kosovo Memorial here in Washington.
If the Senate passes anything, it ought to be what the House did this
last weekend when they had the courage to stand up and be counted.
Congress must exert its Constitutional authority in foreign policy
matters and demand that the President seek a declaration of war or
formal authorization before he deploys ground troops.
Again, should the Senate decide to offer alternative legislation to
the McCain measure, it should include such considerations.
The way we have conducted ourselves with NATO in regard to Kosovo has
created an environment that has allowed Slobodan Milosevic and the
Serbs to do exactly what those responsible for bombing did not want to
happen regarding human rights and ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.
It has resulted in the destruction of the infrastructure in Kosovo to
the extent that thousands of Kosavars will never return to their
destroyed homeland.
The decision also has resulted in death and destruction in Serbia
that is also unconscionable when one realizes that the alleged purpose
is to force Slobodan Milosevic to sign an agreement which is tantamount
to the Serbs and giving up their sovereignty.
Think about it, Mr. President. If we had not engaged in ``sign-or-
bomb'' diplomacy, we could still be at the negotiating table with 1,600
observers in Kosovo.
The time has come, Mr. President, where NATO needs to get off its
high horse, restrain its ego and instead of trying to save face over a
major foreign policy blunder and start thinking about saving lives.
It's time to stop the bombing and put everyone's efforts into finding
a diplomatic solution that will quickly result in the removal of
Serbian troops from Kosovo, end the ethnic cleansing, return the
Kosavars to Kosovo and commit to rebuilding both physical and political
infrastructure of Kosovo.
We need to fully protect all minority rights including the Serbs and
other minorities who live in Kosovo and full participation of all in
the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia including the Serbian Parliament.
Last but not least an international force to guarantee in the
beginning that the agreement provisions are fully implemented and
abided by all parties.
Mr. President, let's get to the peace table. Let's all of us get down
on our knees and pray that the Holy Spirit will inspire us to remember
Jesus' exultation to us--``Bless are the peacemakers for they shall be
called the children of God.''
This nightmare has to end now.
Mr. President, I suggest the absence of a quorum.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will call the roll.
The legislative assistant proceeded to call the roll.
Mr. DeWINE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for
the quorum call be rescinded.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
Mr. DeWINE. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to proceed for the
next 12 minutes as in morning business.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.
____________________